Understanding the constraints to find a $2times 2$ non-zero matrix $A$ such that $A^2=0$ Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Planned maintenance scheduled April 17/18, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern)Row-wise non zero product in matrix notationProve that an upper triangular matrix is invertible if and only if every diagonal entry is non-zero.Prove that det($A$) is non-zero iff $A$ is row equivalent to the $ntimes n$ identity matrixConvert from sparse to full matrixMatrix as a Multiplication of Non-Zero VectorsFor $n times n$ matrix, is zero row able to be interpreted as $n$-leading zeros?We have matrix $Ain M_n-1times n(mathbb Z)$ so that the sum of entries in each row is zero. Prove that $det(AA^T)=nk^2.$Prove that the rank of a matrix is the number of non-zero rows of its row-reduced formGiven Matrix A and AB find the matrix BHow do I find the diagonal matrix of this general matrix

How to rotate it perfectly?

Does the STL have a way to apply a function before calling less than?

Can I throw a sword that doesn't have the Thrown property at someone?

Writing Thesis: Copying from published papers

What's the point in a preamp?

How do I automatically answer y in bash script?

Problem when applying foreach loop

Are my PIs rude or am I just being too sensitive?

Autumning in love

When is phishing education going too far?

Why is there no army of Iron-Mans in the MCU?

What to do with post with dry rot?

Passing functions in C++

What computer would be fastest for Mathematica Home Edition?

How did the aliens keep their waters separated?

Working around an AWS network ACL rule limit

Can smartphones with the same camera sensor have different image quality?

How many spell slots should a Fighter 11/Ranger 9 have?

Two different pronunciation of "понял"

Simulating Exploding Dice

How to market an anarchic city as a tourism spot to people living in civilized areas?

How to colour the US map with Yellow, Green, Red and Blue to minimize the number of states with the colour of Green

Is there folklore associating late breastfeeding with low intelligence and/or gullibility?

Communication vs. Technical skills ,which is more relevant for today's QA engineer positions?



Understanding the constraints to find a $2times 2$ non-zero matrix $A$ such that $A^2=0$



Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara
Planned maintenance scheduled April 17/18, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern)Row-wise non zero product in matrix notationProve that an upper triangular matrix is invertible if and only if every diagonal entry is non-zero.Prove that det($A$) is non-zero iff $A$ is row equivalent to the $ntimes n$ identity matrixConvert from sparse to full matrixMatrix as a Multiplication of Non-Zero VectorsFor $n times n$ matrix, is zero row able to be interpreted as $n$-leading zeros?We have matrix $Ain M_n-1times n(mathbb Z)$ so that the sum of entries in each row is zero. Prove that $det(AA^T)=nk^2.$Prove that the rank of a matrix is the number of non-zero rows of its row-reduced formGiven Matrix A and AB find the matrix BHow do I find the diagonal matrix of this general matrix










3












$begingroup$


Using the rules for matrix multiplication, I have found four algebraic equations as "constraints" for getting every element in the resulting matrix to be zero. Assuming that the elements in the resulting matrix are $a, b, c$ and $d$ ($a, b$ are the elements in the first row and $c, d$ are the elements in the second). The equations are therefore;



  1. $a^2 + bc = 0$

  2. $ab + bd = 0$

  3. $ac + cd = 0$

  4. $d^2 + bc = 0$

I have found from the four equations that $a=-d$ and that $bc=-a^2$ hence $bc$ must be a negative quantity thus $b$ and $c$ have opposite signs but that does not seem to be enough to guarantee that the resulting matrix is always zero. Now, I do not know how to think about this problem;



How do I find more constraints from these equations?



And how do I know that I have found all possible constraints?



Why is that when I square one equation, some how I get a new constraint?



Shouldn't the four equations be enough to determine the exact conditions for $a, b, c$ and $d$?










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$
















    3












    $begingroup$


    Using the rules for matrix multiplication, I have found four algebraic equations as "constraints" for getting every element in the resulting matrix to be zero. Assuming that the elements in the resulting matrix are $a, b, c$ and $d$ ($a, b$ are the elements in the first row and $c, d$ are the elements in the second). The equations are therefore;



    1. $a^2 + bc = 0$

    2. $ab + bd = 0$

    3. $ac + cd = 0$

    4. $d^2 + bc = 0$

    I have found from the four equations that $a=-d$ and that $bc=-a^2$ hence $bc$ must be a negative quantity thus $b$ and $c$ have opposite signs but that does not seem to be enough to guarantee that the resulting matrix is always zero. Now, I do not know how to think about this problem;



    How do I find more constraints from these equations?



    And how do I know that I have found all possible constraints?



    Why is that when I square one equation, some how I get a new constraint?



    Shouldn't the four equations be enough to determine the exact conditions for $a, b, c$ and $d$?










    share|cite|improve this question











    $endgroup$














      3












      3








      3


      1



      $begingroup$


      Using the rules for matrix multiplication, I have found four algebraic equations as "constraints" for getting every element in the resulting matrix to be zero. Assuming that the elements in the resulting matrix are $a, b, c$ and $d$ ($a, b$ are the elements in the first row and $c, d$ are the elements in the second). The equations are therefore;



      1. $a^2 + bc = 0$

      2. $ab + bd = 0$

      3. $ac + cd = 0$

      4. $d^2 + bc = 0$

      I have found from the four equations that $a=-d$ and that $bc=-a^2$ hence $bc$ must be a negative quantity thus $b$ and $c$ have opposite signs but that does not seem to be enough to guarantee that the resulting matrix is always zero. Now, I do not know how to think about this problem;



      How do I find more constraints from these equations?



      And how do I know that I have found all possible constraints?



      Why is that when I square one equation, some how I get a new constraint?



      Shouldn't the four equations be enough to determine the exact conditions for $a, b, c$ and $d$?










      share|cite|improve this question











      $endgroup$




      Using the rules for matrix multiplication, I have found four algebraic equations as "constraints" for getting every element in the resulting matrix to be zero. Assuming that the elements in the resulting matrix are $a, b, c$ and $d$ ($a, b$ are the elements in the first row and $c, d$ are the elements in the second). The equations are therefore;



      1. $a^2 + bc = 0$

      2. $ab + bd = 0$

      3. $ac + cd = 0$

      4. $d^2 + bc = 0$

      I have found from the four equations that $a=-d$ and that $bc=-a^2$ hence $bc$ must be a negative quantity thus $b$ and $c$ have opposite signs but that does not seem to be enough to guarantee that the resulting matrix is always zero. Now, I do not know how to think about this problem;



      How do I find more constraints from these equations?



      And how do I know that I have found all possible constraints?



      Why is that when I square one equation, some how I get a new constraint?



      Shouldn't the four equations be enough to determine the exact conditions for $a, b, c$ and $d$?







      linear-algebra matrices analysis






      share|cite|improve this question















      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question








      edited Apr 8 at 20:05









      Arnaud D.

      16.2k52445




      16.2k52445










      asked Apr 8 at 19:08









      Khalid T. SalemKhalid T. Salem

      151111




      151111




















          3 Answers
          3






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          3












          $begingroup$

          With



          $A = beginbmatrix a & b \ c & d endbmatrix, tag 1$



          we have



          $A^2 = beginbmatrix a & b \ c & d endbmatrixbeginbmatrix a & b \ c & d endbmatrix = beginbmatrix a^2 + bc & (a + d)b \ (a +d)c & d^2 + bc endbmatrix = 0, tag 2$



          whence



          $a^2 + bc = 0, tag 3$



          $d^2 + bc = 0, tag 4$



          $(a + d)b = 0, tag 5$



          $(a + d)c = 0; tag 6$



          suppose



          $a + d ne 0; tag 7$



          then via (5) and (6),



          $b = c = 0; tag 8$



          then via (3) and (4),



          $a^2 = d^2 = 0 Longrightarrow a = d = 0 Longrightarrow a + d = 0 Rightarrow Leftarrow a + d ne 0; tag 9$



          this contradiction rules out the case (7), so



          $a + d = 0 Longrightarrow d = -a; tag10$



          now if



          $a = d = 0, tag11$



          then (3)-(4) imply, assuming $A ne 0$, exactly one of



          $b = 0, ; c ne 0, tag12$



          $b ne 0, ; c = 0, tag13$



          holds. Thus the solutions in the event that (11) binds are one of the forms



          $A = beginbmatrix 0 & b \ 0 & 0 endbmatrix, ; beginbmatrix 0 & 0 \ c & 0 endbmatrix; tag14$



          when



          $d = -a ne 0, tag15$



          we find that (3)-(4) imply



          $b, c ne 0 tag16$



          and



          $c = -dfraca^2b; tag16$



          therefore



          $A = beginbmatrix a & b \ -dfraca^2b & -a endbmatrix. tag17$



          We see that (2) implies $A$ takes one of the three forms (14), (17); the former being comprised of two one-parameter families of matrices, and the latter comprised of one two-parameter family.






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$




















            2












            $begingroup$

            There's an easier way to do it. A $2times2$ matrix $A$ such that $A^2=0$ must have the single eigenvalue $0$, so its trace and determinant must be zero, because the characteristic polynomial is $X^2-operatornametr(A)X+det(A)$.



            This yields, with your notation, $a+d=0$ and $ad-bc=0$, so $d=-a$ and $a^2+bc=0$.



            Note that these conditions are sufficient, because the minimal polynomial is a divisor of the characteristic polynomial, so it is either $X$ (null matrix) or $X^2$ (nonzero nilpotent matrix).



            Now you can classify the nonzero nilpotent matrices as those of the form
            beginalign
            &beginbmatrix 0 & b \ 0 & 0 endbmatrix
            &&(bne0) \[6px]
            &beginbmatrix 0 & 0 \ c & 0 endbmatrix
            &&(cne0) \[6px]
            &beginbmatrix a & b \ -a^2/b & -a endbmatrix
            &&(ane0,bne0)
            endalign






            share|cite|improve this answer











            $endgroup$




















              0












              $begingroup$

              If $b=c=0$ then you get the matrIx of the form $$beginpmatrix a & 0 \ 0 & -a \ endpmatrix.$$



              Now suppose that both of them are not simultaneously $0.$ WLOG let us assume that $b neq 0.$ Then the matrix is of the form $$beginpmatrix a & b \ -frac a^2 b & -a \ endpmatrix.$$



              So this kind of matrices have at most $2$ degrees of freedom.






              share|cite|improve this answer









              $endgroup$













                Your Answer








                StackExchange.ready(function()
                var channelOptions =
                tags: "".split(" "),
                id: "69"
                ;
                initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

                StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
                // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
                if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
                StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
                createEditor();
                );

                else
                createEditor();

                );

                function createEditor()
                StackExchange.prepareEditor(
                heartbeatType: 'answer',
                autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
                convertImagesToLinks: true,
                noModals: true,
                showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
                reputationToPostImages: 10,
                bindNavPrevention: true,
                postfix: "",
                imageUploader:
                brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
                contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
                allowUrls: true
                ,
                noCode: true, onDemand: true,
                discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
                ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
                );



                );













                draft saved

                draft discarded


















                StackExchange.ready(
                function ()
                StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3180064%2funderstanding-the-constraints-to-find-a-2-times-2-non-zero-matrix-a-such-tha%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                );

                Post as a guest















                Required, but never shown

























                3 Answers
                3






                active

                oldest

                votes








                3 Answers
                3






                active

                oldest

                votes









                active

                oldest

                votes






                active

                oldest

                votes









                3












                $begingroup$

                With



                $A = beginbmatrix a & b \ c & d endbmatrix, tag 1$



                we have



                $A^2 = beginbmatrix a & b \ c & d endbmatrixbeginbmatrix a & b \ c & d endbmatrix = beginbmatrix a^2 + bc & (a + d)b \ (a +d)c & d^2 + bc endbmatrix = 0, tag 2$



                whence



                $a^2 + bc = 0, tag 3$



                $d^2 + bc = 0, tag 4$



                $(a + d)b = 0, tag 5$



                $(a + d)c = 0; tag 6$



                suppose



                $a + d ne 0; tag 7$



                then via (5) and (6),



                $b = c = 0; tag 8$



                then via (3) and (4),



                $a^2 = d^2 = 0 Longrightarrow a = d = 0 Longrightarrow a + d = 0 Rightarrow Leftarrow a + d ne 0; tag 9$



                this contradiction rules out the case (7), so



                $a + d = 0 Longrightarrow d = -a; tag10$



                now if



                $a = d = 0, tag11$



                then (3)-(4) imply, assuming $A ne 0$, exactly one of



                $b = 0, ; c ne 0, tag12$



                $b ne 0, ; c = 0, tag13$



                holds. Thus the solutions in the event that (11) binds are one of the forms



                $A = beginbmatrix 0 & b \ 0 & 0 endbmatrix, ; beginbmatrix 0 & 0 \ c & 0 endbmatrix; tag14$



                when



                $d = -a ne 0, tag15$



                we find that (3)-(4) imply



                $b, c ne 0 tag16$



                and



                $c = -dfraca^2b; tag16$



                therefore



                $A = beginbmatrix a & b \ -dfraca^2b & -a endbmatrix. tag17$



                We see that (2) implies $A$ takes one of the three forms (14), (17); the former being comprised of two one-parameter families of matrices, and the latter comprised of one two-parameter family.






                share|cite|improve this answer









                $endgroup$

















                  3












                  $begingroup$

                  With



                  $A = beginbmatrix a & b \ c & d endbmatrix, tag 1$



                  we have



                  $A^2 = beginbmatrix a & b \ c & d endbmatrixbeginbmatrix a & b \ c & d endbmatrix = beginbmatrix a^2 + bc & (a + d)b \ (a +d)c & d^2 + bc endbmatrix = 0, tag 2$



                  whence



                  $a^2 + bc = 0, tag 3$



                  $d^2 + bc = 0, tag 4$



                  $(a + d)b = 0, tag 5$



                  $(a + d)c = 0; tag 6$



                  suppose



                  $a + d ne 0; tag 7$



                  then via (5) and (6),



                  $b = c = 0; tag 8$



                  then via (3) and (4),



                  $a^2 = d^2 = 0 Longrightarrow a = d = 0 Longrightarrow a + d = 0 Rightarrow Leftarrow a + d ne 0; tag 9$



                  this contradiction rules out the case (7), so



                  $a + d = 0 Longrightarrow d = -a; tag10$



                  now if



                  $a = d = 0, tag11$



                  then (3)-(4) imply, assuming $A ne 0$, exactly one of



                  $b = 0, ; c ne 0, tag12$



                  $b ne 0, ; c = 0, tag13$



                  holds. Thus the solutions in the event that (11) binds are one of the forms



                  $A = beginbmatrix 0 & b \ 0 & 0 endbmatrix, ; beginbmatrix 0 & 0 \ c & 0 endbmatrix; tag14$



                  when



                  $d = -a ne 0, tag15$



                  we find that (3)-(4) imply



                  $b, c ne 0 tag16$



                  and



                  $c = -dfraca^2b; tag16$



                  therefore



                  $A = beginbmatrix a & b \ -dfraca^2b & -a endbmatrix. tag17$



                  We see that (2) implies $A$ takes one of the three forms (14), (17); the former being comprised of two one-parameter families of matrices, and the latter comprised of one two-parameter family.






                  share|cite|improve this answer









                  $endgroup$















                    3












                    3








                    3





                    $begingroup$

                    With



                    $A = beginbmatrix a & b \ c & d endbmatrix, tag 1$



                    we have



                    $A^2 = beginbmatrix a & b \ c & d endbmatrixbeginbmatrix a & b \ c & d endbmatrix = beginbmatrix a^2 + bc & (a + d)b \ (a +d)c & d^2 + bc endbmatrix = 0, tag 2$



                    whence



                    $a^2 + bc = 0, tag 3$



                    $d^2 + bc = 0, tag 4$



                    $(a + d)b = 0, tag 5$



                    $(a + d)c = 0; tag 6$



                    suppose



                    $a + d ne 0; tag 7$



                    then via (5) and (6),



                    $b = c = 0; tag 8$



                    then via (3) and (4),



                    $a^2 = d^2 = 0 Longrightarrow a = d = 0 Longrightarrow a + d = 0 Rightarrow Leftarrow a + d ne 0; tag 9$



                    this contradiction rules out the case (7), so



                    $a + d = 0 Longrightarrow d = -a; tag10$



                    now if



                    $a = d = 0, tag11$



                    then (3)-(4) imply, assuming $A ne 0$, exactly one of



                    $b = 0, ; c ne 0, tag12$



                    $b ne 0, ; c = 0, tag13$



                    holds. Thus the solutions in the event that (11) binds are one of the forms



                    $A = beginbmatrix 0 & b \ 0 & 0 endbmatrix, ; beginbmatrix 0 & 0 \ c & 0 endbmatrix; tag14$



                    when



                    $d = -a ne 0, tag15$



                    we find that (3)-(4) imply



                    $b, c ne 0 tag16$



                    and



                    $c = -dfraca^2b; tag16$



                    therefore



                    $A = beginbmatrix a & b \ -dfraca^2b & -a endbmatrix. tag17$



                    We see that (2) implies $A$ takes one of the three forms (14), (17); the former being comprised of two one-parameter families of matrices, and the latter comprised of one two-parameter family.






                    share|cite|improve this answer









                    $endgroup$



                    With



                    $A = beginbmatrix a & b \ c & d endbmatrix, tag 1$



                    we have



                    $A^2 = beginbmatrix a & b \ c & d endbmatrixbeginbmatrix a & b \ c & d endbmatrix = beginbmatrix a^2 + bc & (a + d)b \ (a +d)c & d^2 + bc endbmatrix = 0, tag 2$



                    whence



                    $a^2 + bc = 0, tag 3$



                    $d^2 + bc = 0, tag 4$



                    $(a + d)b = 0, tag 5$



                    $(a + d)c = 0; tag 6$



                    suppose



                    $a + d ne 0; tag 7$



                    then via (5) and (6),



                    $b = c = 0; tag 8$



                    then via (3) and (4),



                    $a^2 = d^2 = 0 Longrightarrow a = d = 0 Longrightarrow a + d = 0 Rightarrow Leftarrow a + d ne 0; tag 9$



                    this contradiction rules out the case (7), so



                    $a + d = 0 Longrightarrow d = -a; tag10$



                    now if



                    $a = d = 0, tag11$



                    then (3)-(4) imply, assuming $A ne 0$, exactly one of



                    $b = 0, ; c ne 0, tag12$



                    $b ne 0, ; c = 0, tag13$



                    holds. Thus the solutions in the event that (11) binds are one of the forms



                    $A = beginbmatrix 0 & b \ 0 & 0 endbmatrix, ; beginbmatrix 0 & 0 \ c & 0 endbmatrix; tag14$



                    when



                    $d = -a ne 0, tag15$



                    we find that (3)-(4) imply



                    $b, c ne 0 tag16$



                    and



                    $c = -dfraca^2b; tag16$



                    therefore



                    $A = beginbmatrix a & b \ -dfraca^2b & -a endbmatrix. tag17$



                    We see that (2) implies $A$ takes one of the three forms (14), (17); the former being comprised of two one-parameter families of matrices, and the latter comprised of one two-parameter family.







                    share|cite|improve this answer












                    share|cite|improve this answer



                    share|cite|improve this answer










                    answered Apr 8 at 20:21









                    Robert LewisRobert Lewis

                    49k23168




                    49k23168





















                        2












                        $begingroup$

                        There's an easier way to do it. A $2times2$ matrix $A$ such that $A^2=0$ must have the single eigenvalue $0$, so its trace and determinant must be zero, because the characteristic polynomial is $X^2-operatornametr(A)X+det(A)$.



                        This yields, with your notation, $a+d=0$ and $ad-bc=0$, so $d=-a$ and $a^2+bc=0$.



                        Note that these conditions are sufficient, because the minimal polynomial is a divisor of the characteristic polynomial, so it is either $X$ (null matrix) or $X^2$ (nonzero nilpotent matrix).



                        Now you can classify the nonzero nilpotent matrices as those of the form
                        beginalign
                        &beginbmatrix 0 & b \ 0 & 0 endbmatrix
                        &&(bne0) \[6px]
                        &beginbmatrix 0 & 0 \ c & 0 endbmatrix
                        &&(cne0) \[6px]
                        &beginbmatrix a & b \ -a^2/b & -a endbmatrix
                        &&(ane0,bne0)
                        endalign






                        share|cite|improve this answer











                        $endgroup$

















                          2












                          $begingroup$

                          There's an easier way to do it. A $2times2$ matrix $A$ such that $A^2=0$ must have the single eigenvalue $0$, so its trace and determinant must be zero, because the characteristic polynomial is $X^2-operatornametr(A)X+det(A)$.



                          This yields, with your notation, $a+d=0$ and $ad-bc=0$, so $d=-a$ and $a^2+bc=0$.



                          Note that these conditions are sufficient, because the minimal polynomial is a divisor of the characteristic polynomial, so it is either $X$ (null matrix) or $X^2$ (nonzero nilpotent matrix).



                          Now you can classify the nonzero nilpotent matrices as those of the form
                          beginalign
                          &beginbmatrix 0 & b \ 0 & 0 endbmatrix
                          &&(bne0) \[6px]
                          &beginbmatrix 0 & 0 \ c & 0 endbmatrix
                          &&(cne0) \[6px]
                          &beginbmatrix a & b \ -a^2/b & -a endbmatrix
                          &&(ane0,bne0)
                          endalign






                          share|cite|improve this answer











                          $endgroup$















                            2












                            2








                            2





                            $begingroup$

                            There's an easier way to do it. A $2times2$ matrix $A$ such that $A^2=0$ must have the single eigenvalue $0$, so its trace and determinant must be zero, because the characteristic polynomial is $X^2-operatornametr(A)X+det(A)$.



                            This yields, with your notation, $a+d=0$ and $ad-bc=0$, so $d=-a$ and $a^2+bc=0$.



                            Note that these conditions are sufficient, because the minimal polynomial is a divisor of the characteristic polynomial, so it is either $X$ (null matrix) or $X^2$ (nonzero nilpotent matrix).



                            Now you can classify the nonzero nilpotent matrices as those of the form
                            beginalign
                            &beginbmatrix 0 & b \ 0 & 0 endbmatrix
                            &&(bne0) \[6px]
                            &beginbmatrix 0 & 0 \ c & 0 endbmatrix
                            &&(cne0) \[6px]
                            &beginbmatrix a & b \ -a^2/b & -a endbmatrix
                            &&(ane0,bne0)
                            endalign






                            share|cite|improve this answer











                            $endgroup$



                            There's an easier way to do it. A $2times2$ matrix $A$ such that $A^2=0$ must have the single eigenvalue $0$, so its trace and determinant must be zero, because the characteristic polynomial is $X^2-operatornametr(A)X+det(A)$.



                            This yields, with your notation, $a+d=0$ and $ad-bc=0$, so $d=-a$ and $a^2+bc=0$.



                            Note that these conditions are sufficient, because the minimal polynomial is a divisor of the characteristic polynomial, so it is either $X$ (null matrix) or $X^2$ (nonzero nilpotent matrix).



                            Now you can classify the nonzero nilpotent matrices as those of the form
                            beginalign
                            &beginbmatrix 0 & b \ 0 & 0 endbmatrix
                            &&(bne0) \[6px]
                            &beginbmatrix 0 & 0 \ c & 0 endbmatrix
                            &&(cne0) \[6px]
                            &beginbmatrix a & b \ -a^2/b & -a endbmatrix
                            &&(ane0,bne0)
                            endalign







                            share|cite|improve this answer














                            share|cite|improve this answer



                            share|cite|improve this answer








                            edited Apr 8 at 20:39

























                            answered Apr 8 at 20:33









                            egregegreg

                            186k1486208




                            186k1486208





















                                0












                                $begingroup$

                                If $b=c=0$ then you get the matrIx of the form $$beginpmatrix a & 0 \ 0 & -a \ endpmatrix.$$



                                Now suppose that both of them are not simultaneously $0.$ WLOG let us assume that $b neq 0.$ Then the matrix is of the form $$beginpmatrix a & b \ -frac a^2 b & -a \ endpmatrix.$$



                                So this kind of matrices have at most $2$ degrees of freedom.






                                share|cite|improve this answer









                                $endgroup$

















                                  0












                                  $begingroup$

                                  If $b=c=0$ then you get the matrIx of the form $$beginpmatrix a & 0 \ 0 & -a \ endpmatrix.$$



                                  Now suppose that both of them are not simultaneously $0.$ WLOG let us assume that $b neq 0.$ Then the matrix is of the form $$beginpmatrix a & b \ -frac a^2 b & -a \ endpmatrix.$$



                                  So this kind of matrices have at most $2$ degrees of freedom.






                                  share|cite|improve this answer









                                  $endgroup$















                                    0












                                    0








                                    0





                                    $begingroup$

                                    If $b=c=0$ then you get the matrIx of the form $$beginpmatrix a & 0 \ 0 & -a \ endpmatrix.$$



                                    Now suppose that both of them are not simultaneously $0.$ WLOG let us assume that $b neq 0.$ Then the matrix is of the form $$beginpmatrix a & b \ -frac a^2 b & -a \ endpmatrix.$$



                                    So this kind of matrices have at most $2$ degrees of freedom.






                                    share|cite|improve this answer









                                    $endgroup$



                                    If $b=c=0$ then you get the matrIx of the form $$beginpmatrix a & 0 \ 0 & -a \ endpmatrix.$$



                                    Now suppose that both of them are not simultaneously $0.$ WLOG let us assume that $b neq 0.$ Then the matrix is of the form $$beginpmatrix a & b \ -frac a^2 b & -a \ endpmatrix.$$



                                    So this kind of matrices have at most $2$ degrees of freedom.







                                    share|cite|improve this answer












                                    share|cite|improve this answer



                                    share|cite|improve this answer










                                    answered Apr 8 at 19:20









                                    Dbchatto67Dbchatto67

                                    3,052623




                                    3,052623



























                                        draft saved

                                        draft discarded
















































                                        Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


                                        • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                                        But avoid


                                        • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                                        • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

                                        Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                                        To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                                        draft saved


                                        draft discarded














                                        StackExchange.ready(
                                        function ()
                                        StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3180064%2funderstanding-the-constraints-to-find-a-2-times-2-non-zero-matrix-a-such-tha%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                                        );

                                        Post as a guest















                                        Required, but never shown





















































                                        Required, but never shown














                                        Required, but never shown












                                        Required, but never shown







                                        Required, but never shown

































                                        Required, but never shown














                                        Required, but never shown












                                        Required, but never shown







                                        Required, but never shown







                                        Popular posts from this blog

                                        A recreational problem The 2019 Stack Overflow Developer Survey Results Are In Unicorn Meta Zoo #1: Why another podcast? Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manaraprime factors of numbers formed by primorialsAll the small primes close together yet againSimple quadratic, crazy question part 2Can every odd prime $pne 11$ be the smallest prime factor of a carmichael-number with $3$ prime factors?Is the product of consecutive primes in $(a, b)[n]$ $=$ $1$ $pmod ab$?Pythagorean triples that “survive” Euler's totient functionA question about a certain type of primesPrimes of the form $p^2+p+41$

                                        369. pr. Kr. Događaji Rođenja Smrti

                                        A weird inequality regarding integrals, limits, as well as sequence of functions. The 2019 Stack Overflow Developer Survey Results Are InA question regarding limits and integrable functionsChanging the order of $lim$ and $inf$ for point-wise converging monotonic sequence of functionsSequence of Distribution FunctionsBasic question on interchanging limits and integralsA sequence of functions $f_n$ that converges non-uniformly to $f$ but the limit of the integrals equals the integral of the limits?Is this (exotic) integral well defined and convergent (always)? and the bound correct?Sequence of differentiable,equicontinuous functionsProb. 10 (d), Chap. 6, in Baby Rudin: Holder Inequality for Improper Integrals With Infinite LimitsSuppose $f_n : [0,1]rightarrowmathbbR$ is a sequence of $C^1$ functions that converges pointwise to $f$.Suppose $f$ is a continuous function on $[a,b]$ and let $M=sup_ a leq x leq b |f(x)|$