Dimension of image of one parameter subgroup. [closed] Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Planned maintenance scheduled April 17/18, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern)Is a basis for the Lie algebra of a Lie group also a set of infinitesimal generators for the Lie group?One parameter subgroupReconstructing Lie group globally from the exponential mapAm I correct in saying that there are no non-commuting connected one-parameter Lie groups?1 parameter subgroups and Lie groupsOne parameter subgroups of group of isometries of planeClosures of one-parameter subgroups of lie groupsOne parameter subgroups of a Lie subgroupFinding all one-parameter subgroups of a matrix Lie groupUnique Lie subgroup structure

New Order #5: where Fibonacci and Beatty meet at Wythoff

Cold is to Refrigerator as warm is to?

What was Bilhah and Zilpah's ancestry?

If I can make up priors, why can't I make up posteriors?

What's the difference between (size_t)-1 and ~0?

Strange behaviour of Check

Is there folklore associating late breastfeeding with low intelligence and/or gullibility?

Keep going mode for require-package

Losing the Initialization Vector in Cipher Block Chaining

What are the performance impacts of 'functional' Rust?

When communicating altitude with a '9' in it, should it be pronounced "nine hundred" or "niner hundred"?

3 doors, three guards, one stone

How is simplicity better than precision and clarity in prose?

Replacing HDD with SSD; what about non-APFS/APFS?

How to market an anarchic city as a tourism spot to people living in civilized areas?

How did passengers keep warm on sail ships?

What to do with post with dry rot?

How to dynamically generate the hash value of a file while it gets downloaded from any website?

Does the STL have a way to apply a function before calling less than?

Mortgage adviser recommends a longer term than necessary combined with overpayments

Writing Thesis: Copying from published papers

How does modal jazz use chord progressions?

How can I make names more distinctive without making them longer?

Statistical model of ligand substitution



Dimension of image of one parameter subgroup. [closed]



Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara
Planned maintenance scheduled April 17/18, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern)Is a basis for the Lie algebra of a Lie group also a set of infinitesimal generators for the Lie group?One parameter subgroupReconstructing Lie group globally from the exponential mapAm I correct in saying that there are no non-commuting connected one-parameter Lie groups?1 parameter subgroups and Lie groupsOne parameter subgroups of group of isometries of planeClosures of one-parameter subgroups of lie groupsOne parameter subgroups of a Lie subgroupFinding all one-parameter subgroups of a matrix Lie groupUnique Lie subgroup structure










0












$begingroup$


If $G$ is a Lie group then $eta : mathbbRto G$ is called one parameter subgroup if it is a continuous group homomorphism.



I need to show that the images of one-parameter subgroups in a Lie group $G$ are precisely the connected Lie subgroups of dimension less than or equal to $1$.



I am not getting any idea how to start. Any hints are appreciated.



Thank you.










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$



closed as off-topic by Moishe Kohan, Saad, Alexander Gruber Apr 9 at 16:17


This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:


  • "This question is missing context or other details: Please provide additional context, which ideally explains why the question is relevant to you and our community. Some forms of context include: background and motivation, relevant definitions, source, possible strategies, your current progress, why the question is interesting or important, etc." – Moishe Kohan, Saad, Alexander Gruber
If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.











  • 1




    $begingroup$
    The place to start would be to write carefully the definition of a Lie subgroup that you have. Then compare it with the setting of the problem.
    $endgroup$
    – Moishe Kohan
    Apr 8 at 21:41















0












$begingroup$


If $G$ is a Lie group then $eta : mathbbRto G$ is called one parameter subgroup if it is a continuous group homomorphism.



I need to show that the images of one-parameter subgroups in a Lie group $G$ are precisely the connected Lie subgroups of dimension less than or equal to $1$.



I am not getting any idea how to start. Any hints are appreciated.



Thank you.










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$



closed as off-topic by Moishe Kohan, Saad, Alexander Gruber Apr 9 at 16:17


This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:


  • "This question is missing context or other details: Please provide additional context, which ideally explains why the question is relevant to you and our community. Some forms of context include: background and motivation, relevant definitions, source, possible strategies, your current progress, why the question is interesting or important, etc." – Moishe Kohan, Saad, Alexander Gruber
If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.











  • 1




    $begingroup$
    The place to start would be to write carefully the definition of a Lie subgroup that you have. Then compare it with the setting of the problem.
    $endgroup$
    – Moishe Kohan
    Apr 8 at 21:41













0












0








0


1



$begingroup$


If $G$ is a Lie group then $eta : mathbbRto G$ is called one parameter subgroup if it is a continuous group homomorphism.



I need to show that the images of one-parameter subgroups in a Lie group $G$ are precisely the connected Lie subgroups of dimension less than or equal to $1$.



I am not getting any idea how to start. Any hints are appreciated.



Thank you.










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$




If $G$ is a Lie group then $eta : mathbbRto G$ is called one parameter subgroup if it is a continuous group homomorphism.



I need to show that the images of one-parameter subgroups in a Lie group $G$ are precisely the connected Lie subgroups of dimension less than or equal to $1$.



I am not getting any idea how to start. Any hints are appreciated.



Thank you.







differential-geometry lie-groups lie-algebras






share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question











share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question










asked Apr 8 at 18:58









SaikatSaikat

369216




369216




closed as off-topic by Moishe Kohan, Saad, Alexander Gruber Apr 9 at 16:17


This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:


  • "This question is missing context or other details: Please provide additional context, which ideally explains why the question is relevant to you and our community. Some forms of context include: background and motivation, relevant definitions, source, possible strategies, your current progress, why the question is interesting or important, etc." – Moishe Kohan, Saad, Alexander Gruber
If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.







closed as off-topic by Moishe Kohan, Saad, Alexander Gruber Apr 9 at 16:17


This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:


  • "This question is missing context or other details: Please provide additional context, which ideally explains why the question is relevant to you and our community. Some forms of context include: background and motivation, relevant definitions, source, possible strategies, your current progress, why the question is interesting or important, etc." – Moishe Kohan, Saad, Alexander Gruber
If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.







  • 1




    $begingroup$
    The place to start would be to write carefully the definition of a Lie subgroup that you have. Then compare it with the setting of the problem.
    $endgroup$
    – Moishe Kohan
    Apr 8 at 21:41












  • 1




    $begingroup$
    The place to start would be to write carefully the definition of a Lie subgroup that you have. Then compare it with the setting of the problem.
    $endgroup$
    – Moishe Kohan
    Apr 8 at 21:41







1




1




$begingroup$
The place to start would be to write carefully the definition of a Lie subgroup that you have. Then compare it with the setting of the problem.
$endgroup$
– Moishe Kohan
Apr 8 at 21:41




$begingroup$
The place to start would be to write carefully the definition of a Lie subgroup that you have. Then compare it with the setting of the problem.
$endgroup$
– Moishe Kohan
Apr 8 at 21:41










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















1












$begingroup$

This is not true, consider the 2-dimensional torus $T^2$, there exists morphisms $mathbbRrightarrow T^2$ whose image are dense, such an image is not a subgroup since it is not closed.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    As far as I know, they are not group homomorphisms, however.
    $endgroup$
    – Randall
    Apr 8 at 19:01






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    If they were, the image would be a subgroup.
    $endgroup$
    – Randall
    Apr 8 at 19:02






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    Frequently, Lie subgroups are not required to be closed, see en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lie_group#Lie_subgroup
    $endgroup$
    – Moishe Kohan
    Apr 8 at 19:11






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @Saikat, the dimension $0$ case should not be hard for you. Now for dimension 1, Proposition 5.2, page 34 of Bump's Lie Groups is a very good start. You just need to know via Whitney's Embedding theorem that every Lie group as a manifold, sits inside some $mathbbR^n^2=Gl(n, mathbbR)$. Now use the matrix exponential.
    $endgroup$
    – Laz
    Apr 8 at 22:06






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @TsemoAristide is right about his counterexample. Just precompose the homomorphism $mathbbS^1rightarrow mathbbT^2$ give here (math.uchicago.edu/~womp/2007/lie2007.pdf) with $exp:mathbbRrightarrow mathbbS^1$. We need to require closedness, which is also used in the lemma of Bump's book I cited.
    $endgroup$
    – Laz
    Apr 8 at 23:55


















1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









1












$begingroup$

This is not true, consider the 2-dimensional torus $T^2$, there exists morphisms $mathbbRrightarrow T^2$ whose image are dense, such an image is not a subgroup since it is not closed.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    As far as I know, they are not group homomorphisms, however.
    $endgroup$
    – Randall
    Apr 8 at 19:01






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    If they were, the image would be a subgroup.
    $endgroup$
    – Randall
    Apr 8 at 19:02






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    Frequently, Lie subgroups are not required to be closed, see en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lie_group#Lie_subgroup
    $endgroup$
    – Moishe Kohan
    Apr 8 at 19:11






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @Saikat, the dimension $0$ case should not be hard for you. Now for dimension 1, Proposition 5.2, page 34 of Bump's Lie Groups is a very good start. You just need to know via Whitney's Embedding theorem that every Lie group as a manifold, sits inside some $mathbbR^n^2=Gl(n, mathbbR)$. Now use the matrix exponential.
    $endgroup$
    – Laz
    Apr 8 at 22:06






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @TsemoAristide is right about his counterexample. Just precompose the homomorphism $mathbbS^1rightarrow mathbbT^2$ give here (math.uchicago.edu/~womp/2007/lie2007.pdf) with $exp:mathbbRrightarrow mathbbS^1$. We need to require closedness, which is also used in the lemma of Bump's book I cited.
    $endgroup$
    – Laz
    Apr 8 at 23:55
















1












$begingroup$

This is not true, consider the 2-dimensional torus $T^2$, there exists morphisms $mathbbRrightarrow T^2$ whose image are dense, such an image is not a subgroup since it is not closed.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    As far as I know, they are not group homomorphisms, however.
    $endgroup$
    – Randall
    Apr 8 at 19:01






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    If they were, the image would be a subgroup.
    $endgroup$
    – Randall
    Apr 8 at 19:02






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    Frequently, Lie subgroups are not required to be closed, see en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lie_group#Lie_subgroup
    $endgroup$
    – Moishe Kohan
    Apr 8 at 19:11






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @Saikat, the dimension $0$ case should not be hard for you. Now for dimension 1, Proposition 5.2, page 34 of Bump's Lie Groups is a very good start. You just need to know via Whitney's Embedding theorem that every Lie group as a manifold, sits inside some $mathbbR^n^2=Gl(n, mathbbR)$. Now use the matrix exponential.
    $endgroup$
    – Laz
    Apr 8 at 22:06






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @TsemoAristide is right about his counterexample. Just precompose the homomorphism $mathbbS^1rightarrow mathbbT^2$ give here (math.uchicago.edu/~womp/2007/lie2007.pdf) with $exp:mathbbRrightarrow mathbbS^1$. We need to require closedness, which is also used in the lemma of Bump's book I cited.
    $endgroup$
    – Laz
    Apr 8 at 23:55














1












1








1





$begingroup$

This is not true, consider the 2-dimensional torus $T^2$, there exists morphisms $mathbbRrightarrow T^2$ whose image are dense, such an image is not a subgroup since it is not closed.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$



This is not true, consider the 2-dimensional torus $T^2$, there exists morphisms $mathbbRrightarrow T^2$ whose image are dense, such an image is not a subgroup since it is not closed.







share|cite|improve this answer












share|cite|improve this answer



share|cite|improve this answer










answered Apr 8 at 19:00









Tsemo AristideTsemo Aristide

60.7k11446




60.7k11446







  • 1




    $begingroup$
    As far as I know, they are not group homomorphisms, however.
    $endgroup$
    – Randall
    Apr 8 at 19:01






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    If they were, the image would be a subgroup.
    $endgroup$
    – Randall
    Apr 8 at 19:02






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    Frequently, Lie subgroups are not required to be closed, see en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lie_group#Lie_subgroup
    $endgroup$
    – Moishe Kohan
    Apr 8 at 19:11






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @Saikat, the dimension $0$ case should not be hard for you. Now for dimension 1, Proposition 5.2, page 34 of Bump's Lie Groups is a very good start. You just need to know via Whitney's Embedding theorem that every Lie group as a manifold, sits inside some $mathbbR^n^2=Gl(n, mathbbR)$. Now use the matrix exponential.
    $endgroup$
    – Laz
    Apr 8 at 22:06






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @TsemoAristide is right about his counterexample. Just precompose the homomorphism $mathbbS^1rightarrow mathbbT^2$ give here (math.uchicago.edu/~womp/2007/lie2007.pdf) with $exp:mathbbRrightarrow mathbbS^1$. We need to require closedness, which is also used in the lemma of Bump's book I cited.
    $endgroup$
    – Laz
    Apr 8 at 23:55













  • 1




    $begingroup$
    As far as I know, they are not group homomorphisms, however.
    $endgroup$
    – Randall
    Apr 8 at 19:01






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    If they were, the image would be a subgroup.
    $endgroup$
    – Randall
    Apr 8 at 19:02






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    Frequently, Lie subgroups are not required to be closed, see en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lie_group#Lie_subgroup
    $endgroup$
    – Moishe Kohan
    Apr 8 at 19:11






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @Saikat, the dimension $0$ case should not be hard for you. Now for dimension 1, Proposition 5.2, page 34 of Bump's Lie Groups is a very good start. You just need to know via Whitney's Embedding theorem that every Lie group as a manifold, sits inside some $mathbbR^n^2=Gl(n, mathbbR)$. Now use the matrix exponential.
    $endgroup$
    – Laz
    Apr 8 at 22:06






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @TsemoAristide is right about his counterexample. Just precompose the homomorphism $mathbbS^1rightarrow mathbbT^2$ give here (math.uchicago.edu/~womp/2007/lie2007.pdf) with $exp:mathbbRrightarrow mathbbS^1$. We need to require closedness, which is also used in the lemma of Bump's book I cited.
    $endgroup$
    – Laz
    Apr 8 at 23:55








1




1




$begingroup$
As far as I know, they are not group homomorphisms, however.
$endgroup$
– Randall
Apr 8 at 19:01




$begingroup$
As far as I know, they are not group homomorphisms, however.
$endgroup$
– Randall
Apr 8 at 19:01




1




1




$begingroup$
If they were, the image would be a subgroup.
$endgroup$
– Randall
Apr 8 at 19:02




$begingroup$
If they were, the image would be a subgroup.
$endgroup$
– Randall
Apr 8 at 19:02




2




2




$begingroup$
Frequently, Lie subgroups are not required to be closed, see en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lie_group#Lie_subgroup
$endgroup$
– Moishe Kohan
Apr 8 at 19:11




$begingroup$
Frequently, Lie subgroups are not required to be closed, see en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lie_group#Lie_subgroup
$endgroup$
– Moishe Kohan
Apr 8 at 19:11




1




1




$begingroup$
@Saikat, the dimension $0$ case should not be hard for you. Now for dimension 1, Proposition 5.2, page 34 of Bump's Lie Groups is a very good start. You just need to know via Whitney's Embedding theorem that every Lie group as a manifold, sits inside some $mathbbR^n^2=Gl(n, mathbbR)$. Now use the matrix exponential.
$endgroup$
– Laz
Apr 8 at 22:06




$begingroup$
@Saikat, the dimension $0$ case should not be hard for you. Now for dimension 1, Proposition 5.2, page 34 of Bump's Lie Groups is a very good start. You just need to know via Whitney's Embedding theorem that every Lie group as a manifold, sits inside some $mathbbR^n^2=Gl(n, mathbbR)$. Now use the matrix exponential.
$endgroup$
– Laz
Apr 8 at 22:06




1




1




$begingroup$
@TsemoAristide is right about his counterexample. Just precompose the homomorphism $mathbbS^1rightarrow mathbbT^2$ give here (math.uchicago.edu/~womp/2007/lie2007.pdf) with $exp:mathbbRrightarrow mathbbS^1$. We need to require closedness, which is also used in the lemma of Bump's book I cited.
$endgroup$
– Laz
Apr 8 at 23:55





$begingroup$
@TsemoAristide is right about his counterexample. Just precompose the homomorphism $mathbbS^1rightarrow mathbbT^2$ give here (math.uchicago.edu/~womp/2007/lie2007.pdf) with $exp:mathbbRrightarrow mathbbS^1$. We need to require closedness, which is also used in the lemma of Bump's book I cited.
$endgroup$
– Laz
Apr 8 at 23:55




Popular posts from this blog

What does it mean to find percent difference when two values are equivalent? The 2019 Stack Overflow Developer Survey Results Are InWhat does “percent of change” mean?Find what percent X is between two numbers?Unable to determine 'original amount' in simple percentage problemsWhat is the correct percent difference formula?How does proportionality hold when quantities are high? And the percentage increase formulaprofit and loss GRE questionProfitability calculationWhat is the difference between $xtimes 0.8$ and $x div 1.2 ? $Finding the percent probability of completing BUDs trainingCalculating Percent Difference with zero and near zero values

Why did some early computer designers eschew integers?What register size did early computers use?What other computers used this floating-point format?Why did so many early microcomputers use the MOS 6502 and variants?Why were early computers named “Mark”?Why did expert systems fall?Why were early personal computer monitors not green?When did “Zen” in computer programming become a thing?History of advanced hardwareWere there any working computers using residue number systems?Why did some CPUs use two Read/Write lines, and others just one?

How to avoid repetitive long generic constraints in Rust The 2019 Stack Overflow Developer Survey Results Are In Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Planned maintenance scheduled April 17/18, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern) The Ask Question Wizard is Live! Data science time! April 2019 and salary with experienceIs it possible to automatically implement a trait for any tuple that is made up of types that all implement the trait?Is there a constraint that restricts my generic method to numeric types?How can foreign key constraints be temporarily disabled using T-SQL?How do I use reflection to call a generic method?How to create a generic array in Java?How to get a class instance of generics type THow is `last` allowed to be called for an Args value?How to implement a trait for a parameterized traitAvoiding PhantomData in a struct to enforce type constraintsIs it possible to return part of a struct by reference?Associated References types as Value Types