A convergent regrouping of a series which tends to 0 implies convergence Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Planned maintenance scheduled April 17/18, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern)Absolute convergence of a real seriesConvergence of “alternating” harmonic series where sign is +, --, +++, ----, etc.Leibniz series convergence citeria valid for monotonic increasing zero-sequence?Uniform convergence of the given series of function.If I can't use Alt. Series Conv. test, how do I determine if it converges or diverges?Verifying if series is convergentQuestions about Divergence and Convergence in Seriesexample of a convergent series whose alternating series diverges?Necessary and sufficient conditions for the convergence of a seriesSeries convergence for even and odd terms
What is the electric potential inside a point charge?
What computer would be fastest for Mathematica Home Edition?
Aligning matrix of nodes with grid
Can the prologue be the backstory of your main character?
How do you clear the ApexPages.getMessages() collection in a test?
Complexity of many constant time steps with occasional logarithmic steps
Why don't the Weasley twins use magic outside of school if the Trace can only find the location of spells cast?
Why use gamma over alpha radiation?
What would be Julian Assange's expected punishment, on the current English criminal law?
What was the last x86 CPU that did not have the x87 floating-point unit built in?
Notation for two qubit composite product state
How do I automatically answer y in bash script?
Statistical model of ligand substitution
What are the performance impacts of 'functional' Rust?
How did the aliens keep their waters separated?
Did the new image of black hole confirm the general theory of relativity?
Mortgage adviser recommends a longer term than necessary combined with overpayments
The following signatures were invalid: EXPKEYSIG 1397BC53640DB551
When communicating altitude with a '9' in it, should it be pronounced "nine hundred" or "niner hundred"?
Are my PIs rude or am I just being too sensitive?
Is above average number of years spent on PhD considered a red flag in future academia or industry positions?
Classification of bundles, Postnikov towers, obstruction theory, local coefficients
Can't figure this one out.. What is the missing box?
Strange behaviour of Check
A convergent regrouping of a series which tends to 0 implies convergence
Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara
Planned maintenance scheduled April 17/18, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern)Absolute convergence of a real seriesConvergence of “alternating” harmonic series where sign is +, --, +++, ----, etc.Leibniz series convergence citeria valid for monotonic increasing zero-sequence?Uniform convergence of the given series of function.If I can't use Alt. Series Conv. test, how do I determine if it converges or diverges?Verifying if series is convergentQuestions about Divergence and Convergence in Seriesexample of a convergent series whose alternating series diverges?Necessary and sufficient conditions for the convergence of a seriesSeries convergence for even and odd terms
$begingroup$
A while ago I was trying to solve the problem of whether the following series converges:
$ 1 -1/2 -1/3 +1/4+1/5-1/6-1/7+1/8+1/9...$
My solution was to repeat a similar argument to the common proof od the Alternating series test where I show that the sequence of partial sums of positive terms converges and the sequence of partial sums of the negative terms converges, then using that show that the partial sums converge.
However, the above series can easily be grouped into an alternating series. My question is, is the convergence of a single regrouping, combined with the fact that the terms of the original series individually go to 0 enough to imply convergence?
real-analysis sequences-and-series alternative-proof
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
A while ago I was trying to solve the problem of whether the following series converges:
$ 1 -1/2 -1/3 +1/4+1/5-1/6-1/7+1/8+1/9...$
My solution was to repeat a similar argument to the common proof od the Alternating series test where I show that the sequence of partial sums of positive terms converges and the sequence of partial sums of the negative terms converges, then using that show that the partial sums converge.
However, the above series can easily be grouped into an alternating series. My question is, is the convergence of a single regrouping, combined with the fact that the terms of the original series individually go to 0 enough to imply convergence?
real-analysis sequences-and-series alternative-proof
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
If I understand your question correctly, the answer is no. I think you can rephrase the question: does the convergence of a series imply the convergence of every rearrangement of the series? You can easily construct counterexamples for this latter statement, though, so it isn’t true.
$endgroup$
– Clayton
Apr 8 at 19:58
add a comment |
$begingroup$
A while ago I was trying to solve the problem of whether the following series converges:
$ 1 -1/2 -1/3 +1/4+1/5-1/6-1/7+1/8+1/9...$
My solution was to repeat a similar argument to the common proof od the Alternating series test where I show that the sequence of partial sums of positive terms converges and the sequence of partial sums of the negative terms converges, then using that show that the partial sums converge.
However, the above series can easily be grouped into an alternating series. My question is, is the convergence of a single regrouping, combined with the fact that the terms of the original series individually go to 0 enough to imply convergence?
real-analysis sequences-and-series alternative-proof
$endgroup$
A while ago I was trying to solve the problem of whether the following series converges:
$ 1 -1/2 -1/3 +1/4+1/5-1/6-1/7+1/8+1/9...$
My solution was to repeat a similar argument to the common proof od the Alternating series test where I show that the sequence of partial sums of positive terms converges and the sequence of partial sums of the negative terms converges, then using that show that the partial sums converge.
However, the above series can easily be grouped into an alternating series. My question is, is the convergence of a single regrouping, combined with the fact that the terms of the original series individually go to 0 enough to imply convergence?
real-analysis sequences-and-series alternative-proof
real-analysis sequences-and-series alternative-proof
asked Apr 8 at 19:42
mmmmommmmo
1347
1347
$begingroup$
If I understand your question correctly, the answer is no. I think you can rephrase the question: does the convergence of a series imply the convergence of every rearrangement of the series? You can easily construct counterexamples for this latter statement, though, so it isn’t true.
$endgroup$
– Clayton
Apr 8 at 19:58
add a comment |
$begingroup$
If I understand your question correctly, the answer is no. I think you can rephrase the question: does the convergence of a series imply the convergence of every rearrangement of the series? You can easily construct counterexamples for this latter statement, though, so it isn’t true.
$endgroup$
– Clayton
Apr 8 at 19:58
$begingroup$
If I understand your question correctly, the answer is no. I think you can rephrase the question: does the convergence of a series imply the convergence of every rearrangement of the series? You can easily construct counterexamples for this latter statement, though, so it isn’t true.
$endgroup$
– Clayton
Apr 8 at 19:58
$begingroup$
If I understand your question correctly, the answer is no. I think you can rephrase the question: does the convergence of a series imply the convergence of every rearrangement of the series? You can easily construct counterexamples for this latter statement, though, so it isn’t true.
$endgroup$
– Clayton
Apr 8 at 19:58
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
It is as long as there is some $k$ such that each group is of size at most $k$. Lets say the $k$-th group starts at position $a_k$.
Then partial sum of the original series is $sumlimits_i=1^n x_i = sumlimits_k = 1^m sumlimits_i = a_k^a_k + 1 - 1 x_i + sumlimits_i=a_m + 1^n x_i$, where $m$ is such that $a_m + 1 < n leqslant a_m + 2$.
The first sum is a partial sum of regrouped series, and the second goes to zero, as it has at most $k$ addends and $x_i to 0$.
New contributor
mihaild is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3180106%2fa-convergent-regrouping-of-a-series-which-tends-to-0-implies-convergence%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
It is as long as there is some $k$ such that each group is of size at most $k$. Lets say the $k$-th group starts at position $a_k$.
Then partial sum of the original series is $sumlimits_i=1^n x_i = sumlimits_k = 1^m sumlimits_i = a_k^a_k + 1 - 1 x_i + sumlimits_i=a_m + 1^n x_i$, where $m$ is such that $a_m + 1 < n leqslant a_m + 2$.
The first sum is a partial sum of regrouped series, and the second goes to zero, as it has at most $k$ addends and $x_i to 0$.
New contributor
mihaild is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
It is as long as there is some $k$ such that each group is of size at most $k$. Lets say the $k$-th group starts at position $a_k$.
Then partial sum of the original series is $sumlimits_i=1^n x_i = sumlimits_k = 1^m sumlimits_i = a_k^a_k + 1 - 1 x_i + sumlimits_i=a_m + 1^n x_i$, where $m$ is such that $a_m + 1 < n leqslant a_m + 2$.
The first sum is a partial sum of regrouped series, and the second goes to zero, as it has at most $k$ addends and $x_i to 0$.
New contributor
mihaild is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
It is as long as there is some $k$ such that each group is of size at most $k$. Lets say the $k$-th group starts at position $a_k$.
Then partial sum of the original series is $sumlimits_i=1^n x_i = sumlimits_k = 1^m sumlimits_i = a_k^a_k + 1 - 1 x_i + sumlimits_i=a_m + 1^n x_i$, where $m$ is such that $a_m + 1 < n leqslant a_m + 2$.
The first sum is a partial sum of regrouped series, and the second goes to zero, as it has at most $k$ addends and $x_i to 0$.
New contributor
mihaild is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
$endgroup$
It is as long as there is some $k$ such that each group is of size at most $k$. Lets say the $k$-th group starts at position $a_k$.
Then partial sum of the original series is $sumlimits_i=1^n x_i = sumlimits_k = 1^m sumlimits_i = a_k^a_k + 1 - 1 x_i + sumlimits_i=a_m + 1^n x_i$, where $m$ is such that $a_m + 1 < n leqslant a_m + 2$.
The first sum is a partial sum of regrouped series, and the second goes to zero, as it has at most $k$ addends and $x_i to 0$.
New contributor
mihaild is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
New contributor
mihaild is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
answered Apr 8 at 19:59
mihaildmihaild
85210
85210
New contributor
mihaild is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
New contributor
mihaild is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
mihaild is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3180106%2fa-convergent-regrouping-of-a-series-which-tends-to-0-implies-convergence%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
$begingroup$
If I understand your question correctly, the answer is no. I think you can rephrase the question: does the convergence of a series imply the convergence of every rearrangement of the series? You can easily construct counterexamples for this latter statement, though, so it isn’t true.
$endgroup$
– Clayton
Apr 8 at 19:58