Are the real numbers a lattice? Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Planned maintenance scheduled April 17/18, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern)understanding lattice in detailedDrawing a lattice for a set partially ordered by divisibilityLattice DefinitionHow is a complete lattice defined solely by a least-upper bound?Lattice of a POSET RelationLattice orders and number of elements in a setA Lattice that is not a Complete LatticeComplete LatticeHow to prove that Dn, a set of all positive divisors of n under the relation of divisibility, is a lattice?Formal Definition of a Lattice

Stop battery usage [Ubuntu 18]

3 doors, three guards, one stone

Cauchy Sequence Characterized only By Directly Neighbouring Sequence Members

What to do with post with dry rot?

Estimate capacitor parameters

Mortgage adviser recommends a longer term than necessary combined with overpayments

Was credit for the black hole image misattributed?

Unexpected result with right shift after bitwise negation

What did Darwin mean by 'squib' here?

Biased dice probability question

How should I respond to a player wanting to catch a sword between their hands?

What do you call the holes in a flute?

Why is there no army of Iron-Mans in the MCU?

How to market an anarchic city as a tourism spot to people living in civilized areas?

How can you insert a "times/divide" symbol similar to the "plus/minus" (±) one?

Is 1 ppb equal to 1 μg/kg?

How can players take actions together that are impossible otherwise?

Single author papers against my advisor's will?

Complexity of many constant time steps with occasional logarithmic steps

Can a non-EU citizen traveling with me come with me through the EU passport line?

How to politely respond to generic emails requesting a PhD/job in my lab? Without wasting too much time

Why does tar appear to skip file contents when output file is /dev/null?

The following signatures were invalid: EXPKEYSIG 1397BC53640DB551

Antler Helmet: Can it work?



Are the real numbers a lattice?



Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara
Planned maintenance scheduled April 17/18, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern)understanding lattice in detailedDrawing a lattice for a set partially ordered by divisibilityLattice DefinitionHow is a complete lattice defined solely by a least-upper bound?Lattice of a POSET RelationLattice orders and number of elements in a setA Lattice that is not a Complete LatticeComplete LatticeHow to prove that Dn, a set of all positive divisors of n under the relation of divisibility, is a lattice?Formal Definition of a Lattice










2












$begingroup$


A lattice is a set with a partial order, where every pair has a unique upper and lower bound.



As far as I can tell, there is nothing in the definition that forces the set to be discrete. In particular, the real numbers with their usual partial order and upper/lower bounds seems to fit the definition. But all the examples I've come across are discrete, which makes me wonder if I've missed something. (e.g. Wikipedia)










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$







  • 4




    $begingroup$
    You're not missing anything. Every totally ordered set is a lattice.
    $endgroup$
    – Wojowu
    Apr 8 at 20:23






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    You didn't miss anything, the real numbers form a lattice.
    $endgroup$
    – Javi
    Apr 8 at 20:24















2












$begingroup$


A lattice is a set with a partial order, where every pair has a unique upper and lower bound.



As far as I can tell, there is nothing in the definition that forces the set to be discrete. In particular, the real numbers with their usual partial order and upper/lower bounds seems to fit the definition. But all the examples I've come across are discrete, which makes me wonder if I've missed something. (e.g. Wikipedia)










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$







  • 4




    $begingroup$
    You're not missing anything. Every totally ordered set is a lattice.
    $endgroup$
    – Wojowu
    Apr 8 at 20:23






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    You didn't miss anything, the real numbers form a lattice.
    $endgroup$
    – Javi
    Apr 8 at 20:24













2












2








2





$begingroup$


A lattice is a set with a partial order, where every pair has a unique upper and lower bound.



As far as I can tell, there is nothing in the definition that forces the set to be discrete. In particular, the real numbers with their usual partial order and upper/lower bounds seems to fit the definition. But all the examples I've come across are discrete, which makes me wonder if I've missed something. (e.g. Wikipedia)










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$




A lattice is a set with a partial order, where every pair has a unique upper and lower bound.



As far as I can tell, there is nothing in the definition that forces the set to be discrete. In particular, the real numbers with their usual partial order and upper/lower bounds seems to fit the definition. But all the examples I've come across are discrete, which makes me wonder if I've missed something. (e.g. Wikipedia)







lattice-orders






share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question











share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question










asked Apr 8 at 20:20









prdnrprdnr

956




956







  • 4




    $begingroup$
    You're not missing anything. Every totally ordered set is a lattice.
    $endgroup$
    – Wojowu
    Apr 8 at 20:23






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    You didn't miss anything, the real numbers form a lattice.
    $endgroup$
    – Javi
    Apr 8 at 20:24












  • 4




    $begingroup$
    You're not missing anything. Every totally ordered set is a lattice.
    $endgroup$
    – Wojowu
    Apr 8 at 20:23






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    You didn't miss anything, the real numbers form a lattice.
    $endgroup$
    – Javi
    Apr 8 at 20:24







4




4




$begingroup$
You're not missing anything. Every totally ordered set is a lattice.
$endgroup$
– Wojowu
Apr 8 at 20:23




$begingroup$
You're not missing anything. Every totally ordered set is a lattice.
$endgroup$
– Wojowu
Apr 8 at 20:23




1




1




$begingroup$
You didn't miss anything, the real numbers form a lattice.
$endgroup$
– Javi
Apr 8 at 20:24




$begingroup$
You didn't miss anything, the real numbers form a lattice.
$endgroup$
– Javi
Apr 8 at 20:24










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















3












$begingroup$

In a lattice, every pair must have a least upper bound (called join) and greatest lower bound (called meet), that is different from it being unique. There can be many upper bounds or lower bounds. The join or meet of a pair however, is unique.



The reals are in fact a particularly nice kind of lattice:



  • They are totally ordered, which means that any two elements $a, b in mathbbR$ can be compared and therefore the join and meet can be computed very easily by using $max(a, b)$ and $min(a, b)$ respectively.

  • When we take a closed interval (e.g. $[0,1]$), then that interval is complete. This means that every subset $A subseteq [0,1]$ has a least upper bound, in this case given by its supremum $sup A$. Similarly for a greatest lower bound and the infimum.





share|cite|improve this answer








New contributor




Mark Kamsma is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.






$endgroup$













    Your Answer








    StackExchange.ready(function()
    var channelOptions =
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "69"
    ;
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
    createEditor();
    );

    else
    createEditor();

    );

    function createEditor()
    StackExchange.prepareEditor(
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader:
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    ,
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    );



    );













    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function ()
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3180155%2fare-the-real-numbers-a-lattice%23new-answer', 'question_page');

    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes








    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    3












    $begingroup$

    In a lattice, every pair must have a least upper bound (called join) and greatest lower bound (called meet), that is different from it being unique. There can be many upper bounds or lower bounds. The join or meet of a pair however, is unique.



    The reals are in fact a particularly nice kind of lattice:



    • They are totally ordered, which means that any two elements $a, b in mathbbR$ can be compared and therefore the join and meet can be computed very easily by using $max(a, b)$ and $min(a, b)$ respectively.

    • When we take a closed interval (e.g. $[0,1]$), then that interval is complete. This means that every subset $A subseteq [0,1]$ has a least upper bound, in this case given by its supremum $sup A$. Similarly for a greatest lower bound and the infimum.





    share|cite|improve this answer








    New contributor




    Mark Kamsma is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
    Check out our Code of Conduct.






    $endgroup$

















      3












      $begingroup$

      In a lattice, every pair must have a least upper bound (called join) and greatest lower bound (called meet), that is different from it being unique. There can be many upper bounds or lower bounds. The join or meet of a pair however, is unique.



      The reals are in fact a particularly nice kind of lattice:



      • They are totally ordered, which means that any two elements $a, b in mathbbR$ can be compared and therefore the join and meet can be computed very easily by using $max(a, b)$ and $min(a, b)$ respectively.

      • When we take a closed interval (e.g. $[0,1]$), then that interval is complete. This means that every subset $A subseteq [0,1]$ has a least upper bound, in this case given by its supremum $sup A$. Similarly for a greatest lower bound and the infimum.





      share|cite|improve this answer








      New contributor




      Mark Kamsma is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.






      $endgroup$















        3












        3








        3





        $begingroup$

        In a lattice, every pair must have a least upper bound (called join) and greatest lower bound (called meet), that is different from it being unique. There can be many upper bounds or lower bounds. The join or meet of a pair however, is unique.



        The reals are in fact a particularly nice kind of lattice:



        • They are totally ordered, which means that any two elements $a, b in mathbbR$ can be compared and therefore the join and meet can be computed very easily by using $max(a, b)$ and $min(a, b)$ respectively.

        • When we take a closed interval (e.g. $[0,1]$), then that interval is complete. This means that every subset $A subseteq [0,1]$ has a least upper bound, in this case given by its supremum $sup A$. Similarly for a greatest lower bound and the infimum.





        share|cite|improve this answer








        New contributor




        Mark Kamsma is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
        Check out our Code of Conduct.






        $endgroup$



        In a lattice, every pair must have a least upper bound (called join) and greatest lower bound (called meet), that is different from it being unique. There can be many upper bounds or lower bounds. The join or meet of a pair however, is unique.



        The reals are in fact a particularly nice kind of lattice:



        • They are totally ordered, which means that any two elements $a, b in mathbbR$ can be compared and therefore the join and meet can be computed very easily by using $max(a, b)$ and $min(a, b)$ respectively.

        • When we take a closed interval (e.g. $[0,1]$), then that interval is complete. This means that every subset $A subseteq [0,1]$ has a least upper bound, in this case given by its supremum $sup A$. Similarly for a greatest lower bound and the infimum.






        share|cite|improve this answer








        New contributor




        Mark Kamsma is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
        Check out our Code of Conduct.









        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer






        New contributor




        Mark Kamsma is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
        Check out our Code of Conduct.









        answered Apr 8 at 20:33









        Mark KamsmaMark Kamsma

        3617




        3617




        New contributor




        Mark Kamsma is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
        Check out our Code of Conduct.





        New contributor





        Mark Kamsma is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
        Check out our Code of Conduct.






        Mark Kamsma is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
        Check out our Code of Conduct.



























            draft saved

            draft discarded
















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid


            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

            Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3180155%2fare-the-real-numbers-a-lattice%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            Hidroelektrana Sadržaj Povijest | Podjela hidroelektrana | Snaga dobivena u hidroelektranama | Dijelovi hidroelektrane | Uloga hidroelektrana u suvremenom svijetu | Prednosti hidroelektrana | Nedostaci hidroelektrana | Države s najvećom proizvodnjom hidro-električne energije | Deset najvećih hidroelektrana u svijetu | Hidroelektrane u Hrvatskoj | Izvori | Poveznice | Vanjske poveznice | Navigacijski izbornikTechnical Report, Version 2Zajedničkom poslužiteljuHidroelektranaHEP Proizvodnja d.o.o. - Hidroelektrane u Hrvatskoj

            Oconto (Nebraska) Índice Demografia | Geografia | Localidades na vizinhança | Referências Ligações externas | Menu de navegação41° 8' 29" N 99° 45' 41" O41° 8' 29" N 99° 45' 41" OU.S. Census Bureau. Census 2000 Summary File 1U.S. Census Bureau. Estimativa da população (julho de 2006)U.S. Board on Geographic Names. Topical Gazetteers Populated Places. Gráficos do banco de dados de altitudes dos Estados Unidos da AméricaEstatísticas, mapas e outras informações sobre Oconto em city-data.com

            WordPress Information needed