Randomly choose $n+1$ points on a $S^n-1$, probability of $n$-simplex containing center Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Planned maintenance scheduled April 17/18, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern)How to simplify complex integration?probabilty of random points on perimeter containing centerSimpson's rule error rate for N-dimensionProbability that one of a set of four points lies within the triangle formed by the other threeInformation matrix for a Student's T distributionProbability of center enclosed by polygon of random pointsProbability that convex hull of $2n$ random points contains the $n-$sphere's centerProbability that a random triangle with vertices on a circle contains an arbitrary point inside said circleProbability that a stick randomly broken in three places can form a triangleProbability that the distance between two random points inside a circle is less than some value
What is the electric potential inside a point charge?
How do I keep my slimes from escaping their pens?
Can smartphones with the same camera sensor have different image quality?
Using "nakedly" instead of "with nothing on"
What's the point in a preamp?
Area of a 2D convex hull
What computer would be fastest for Mathematica Home Edition?
Unexpected result with right shift after bitwise negation
How do you clear the ApexPages.getMessages() collection in a test?
If I can make up priors, why can't I make up posteriors?
Can I throw a sword that doesn't have the Thrown property at someone?
Losing the Initialization Vector in Cipher Block Chaining
When is phishing education going too far?
How to say that you spent the night with someone, you were only sleeping and nothing else?
Array/tabular for long multiplication
Mortgage adviser recommends a longer term than necessary combined with overpayments
How are presidential pardons supposed to be used?
How to market an anarchic city as a tourism spot to people living in civilized areas?
Single author papers against my advisor's will?
Fishing simulator
Two different pronunciation of "понял"
What would be Julian Assange's expected punishment, on the current English criminal law?
Should you tell Jews they are breaking a commandment?
Why use gamma over alpha radiation?
Randomly choose $n+1$ points on a $S^n-1$, probability of $n$-simplex containing center
Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara
Planned maintenance scheduled April 17/18, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern)How to simplify complex integration?probabilty of random points on perimeter containing centerSimpson's rule error rate for N-dimensionProbability that one of a set of four points lies within the triangle formed by the other threeInformation matrix for a Student's T distributionProbability of center enclosed by polygon of random pointsProbability that convex hull of $2n$ random points contains the $n-$sphere's centerProbability that a random triangle with vertices on a circle contains an arbitrary point inside said circleProbability that a stick randomly broken in three places can form a triangleProbability that the distance between two random points inside a circle is less than some value
$begingroup$
Randomly choose $n+1$ points on a $S^n-1$(surface of ball in $n$-dim space). What's the probability that the $n$-simplex formed by these $n+1$ points contain the center of the sphere?
I conjecture that the result is $frac12^n$.
For $n=2$, it's easy:
$$int_0^2pi frac12pi fracpi-theta2pidtheta = frac14$$
For $n=3$, I compute and the result is $1/8$ :
By the same method, but need to use spherical triangle area formula and spherical triangle cosine rule
The detailed computation is following:
Very complicated function integration, I can hardly imagine that such a numerical integration has analytical solution $1/8$. And this complicated method is hard to be generalized to higher dimension. There should be some simple explanation and can be generalized to higher dimension case.
calculus probability-theory geometric-probability
$endgroup$
|
show 2 more comments
$begingroup$
Randomly choose $n+1$ points on a $S^n-1$(surface of ball in $n$-dim space). What's the probability that the $n$-simplex formed by these $n+1$ points contain the center of the sphere?
I conjecture that the result is $frac12^n$.
For $n=2$, it's easy:
$$int_0^2pi frac12pi fracpi-theta2pidtheta = frac14$$
For $n=3$, I compute and the result is $1/8$ :
By the same method, but need to use spherical triangle area formula and spherical triangle cosine rule
The detailed computation is following:
Very complicated function integration, I can hardly imagine that such a numerical integration has analytical solution $1/8$. And this complicated method is hard to be generalized to higher dimension. There should be some simple explanation and can be generalized to higher dimension case.
calculus probability-theory geometric-probability
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Any reason you have that conjecture?
$endgroup$
– Arctic Char
Apr 8 at 19:49
1
$begingroup$
This is the problem considered in this 3blue1brown video. It is only solved for $n=2$ and $3$, but the method generalizes easily.
$endgroup$
– Arthur
Apr 8 at 19:53
$begingroup$
@ArcticChar I compute by brute force the case of $n=2$ the result is $1/4$ and the case $n=3$ the result is $1/8$
$endgroup$
– maplemaple
Apr 8 at 19:53
$begingroup$
@Arthur Yes, I compute above the case of $n=2, 3$. In $n=3$, by numerical integral is $0.125 = 1/8$. But I can hardly imagine this method can get analytical solution. And this method can hardly to generalize to higher dimension case.
$endgroup$
– maplemaple
Apr 8 at 19:58
1
$begingroup$
Check out Wendel's Theorem for a generalization.
$endgroup$
– Mike Earnest
Apr 9 at 0:20
|
show 2 more comments
$begingroup$
Randomly choose $n+1$ points on a $S^n-1$(surface of ball in $n$-dim space). What's the probability that the $n$-simplex formed by these $n+1$ points contain the center of the sphere?
I conjecture that the result is $frac12^n$.
For $n=2$, it's easy:
$$int_0^2pi frac12pi fracpi-theta2pidtheta = frac14$$
For $n=3$, I compute and the result is $1/8$ :
By the same method, but need to use spherical triangle area formula and spherical triangle cosine rule
The detailed computation is following:
Very complicated function integration, I can hardly imagine that such a numerical integration has analytical solution $1/8$. And this complicated method is hard to be generalized to higher dimension. There should be some simple explanation and can be generalized to higher dimension case.
calculus probability-theory geometric-probability
$endgroup$
Randomly choose $n+1$ points on a $S^n-1$(surface of ball in $n$-dim space). What's the probability that the $n$-simplex formed by these $n+1$ points contain the center of the sphere?
I conjecture that the result is $frac12^n$.
For $n=2$, it's easy:
$$int_0^2pi frac12pi fracpi-theta2pidtheta = frac14$$
For $n=3$, I compute and the result is $1/8$ :
By the same method, but need to use spherical triangle area formula and spherical triangle cosine rule
The detailed computation is following:
Very complicated function integration, I can hardly imagine that such a numerical integration has analytical solution $1/8$. And this complicated method is hard to be generalized to higher dimension. There should be some simple explanation and can be generalized to higher dimension case.
calculus probability-theory geometric-probability
calculus probability-theory geometric-probability
edited Apr 8 at 20:06
maplemaple
asked Apr 8 at 19:46
maplemaplemaplemaple
35419
35419
$begingroup$
Any reason you have that conjecture?
$endgroup$
– Arctic Char
Apr 8 at 19:49
1
$begingroup$
This is the problem considered in this 3blue1brown video. It is only solved for $n=2$ and $3$, but the method generalizes easily.
$endgroup$
– Arthur
Apr 8 at 19:53
$begingroup$
@ArcticChar I compute by brute force the case of $n=2$ the result is $1/4$ and the case $n=3$ the result is $1/8$
$endgroup$
– maplemaple
Apr 8 at 19:53
$begingroup$
@Arthur Yes, I compute above the case of $n=2, 3$. In $n=3$, by numerical integral is $0.125 = 1/8$. But I can hardly imagine this method can get analytical solution. And this method can hardly to generalize to higher dimension case.
$endgroup$
– maplemaple
Apr 8 at 19:58
1
$begingroup$
Check out Wendel's Theorem for a generalization.
$endgroup$
– Mike Earnest
Apr 9 at 0:20
|
show 2 more comments
$begingroup$
Any reason you have that conjecture?
$endgroup$
– Arctic Char
Apr 8 at 19:49
1
$begingroup$
This is the problem considered in this 3blue1brown video. It is only solved for $n=2$ and $3$, but the method generalizes easily.
$endgroup$
– Arthur
Apr 8 at 19:53
$begingroup$
@ArcticChar I compute by brute force the case of $n=2$ the result is $1/4$ and the case $n=3$ the result is $1/8$
$endgroup$
– maplemaple
Apr 8 at 19:53
$begingroup$
@Arthur Yes, I compute above the case of $n=2, 3$. In $n=3$, by numerical integral is $0.125 = 1/8$. But I can hardly imagine this method can get analytical solution. And this method can hardly to generalize to higher dimension case.
$endgroup$
– maplemaple
Apr 8 at 19:58
1
$begingroup$
Check out Wendel's Theorem for a generalization.
$endgroup$
– Mike Earnest
Apr 9 at 0:20
$begingroup$
Any reason you have that conjecture?
$endgroup$
– Arctic Char
Apr 8 at 19:49
$begingroup$
Any reason you have that conjecture?
$endgroup$
– Arctic Char
Apr 8 at 19:49
1
1
$begingroup$
This is the problem considered in this 3blue1brown video. It is only solved for $n=2$ and $3$, but the method generalizes easily.
$endgroup$
– Arthur
Apr 8 at 19:53
$begingroup$
This is the problem considered in this 3blue1brown video. It is only solved for $n=2$ and $3$, but the method generalizes easily.
$endgroup$
– Arthur
Apr 8 at 19:53
$begingroup$
@ArcticChar I compute by brute force the case of $n=2$ the result is $1/4$ and the case $n=3$ the result is $1/8$
$endgroup$
– maplemaple
Apr 8 at 19:53
$begingroup$
@ArcticChar I compute by brute force the case of $n=2$ the result is $1/4$ and the case $n=3$ the result is $1/8$
$endgroup$
– maplemaple
Apr 8 at 19:53
$begingroup$
@Arthur Yes, I compute above the case of $n=2, 3$. In $n=3$, by numerical integral is $0.125 = 1/8$. But I can hardly imagine this method can get analytical solution. And this method can hardly to generalize to higher dimension case.
$endgroup$
– maplemaple
Apr 8 at 19:58
$begingroup$
@Arthur Yes, I compute above the case of $n=2, 3$. In $n=3$, by numerical integral is $0.125 = 1/8$. But I can hardly imagine this method can get analytical solution. And this method can hardly to generalize to higher dimension case.
$endgroup$
– maplemaple
Apr 8 at 19:58
1
1
$begingroup$
Check out Wendel's Theorem for a generalization.
$endgroup$
– Mike Earnest
Apr 9 at 0:20
$begingroup$
Check out Wendel's Theorem for a generalization.
$endgroup$
– Mike Earnest
Apr 9 at 0:20
|
show 2 more comments
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
In your picture, you've first chosen two points on the circle, then drawn the diagonals, then found the probability that the third point is on the correct cord. This will get difficult to generalize.
Instead, first choose the two diagonals, then choose the third point, then find the probability that the first two points are on the "correct ends" of the two diagonals. The probability is immediately seen to be $frac14$.
This method generalizes without much issue to higher dimensions: pick $n$ diagonals and the $(n+1)$th point at random, then place the first $n$ points on the ends of their respective diagonals. This gives you the answer $frac12^n$ that you conjectured.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3180115%2frandomly-choose-n1-points-on-a-sn-1-probability-of-n-simplex-containi%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
In your picture, you've first chosen two points on the circle, then drawn the diagonals, then found the probability that the third point is on the correct cord. This will get difficult to generalize.
Instead, first choose the two diagonals, then choose the third point, then find the probability that the first two points are on the "correct ends" of the two diagonals. The probability is immediately seen to be $frac14$.
This method generalizes without much issue to higher dimensions: pick $n$ diagonals and the $(n+1)$th point at random, then place the first $n$ points on the ends of their respective diagonals. This gives you the answer $frac12^n$ that you conjectured.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
In your picture, you've first chosen two points on the circle, then drawn the diagonals, then found the probability that the third point is on the correct cord. This will get difficult to generalize.
Instead, first choose the two diagonals, then choose the third point, then find the probability that the first two points are on the "correct ends" of the two diagonals. The probability is immediately seen to be $frac14$.
This method generalizes without much issue to higher dimensions: pick $n$ diagonals and the $(n+1)$th point at random, then place the first $n$ points on the ends of their respective diagonals. This gives you the answer $frac12^n$ that you conjectured.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
In your picture, you've first chosen two points on the circle, then drawn the diagonals, then found the probability that the third point is on the correct cord. This will get difficult to generalize.
Instead, first choose the two diagonals, then choose the third point, then find the probability that the first two points are on the "correct ends" of the two diagonals. The probability is immediately seen to be $frac14$.
This method generalizes without much issue to higher dimensions: pick $n$ diagonals and the $(n+1)$th point at random, then place the first $n$ points on the ends of their respective diagonals. This gives you the answer $frac12^n$ that you conjectured.
$endgroup$
In your picture, you've first chosen two points on the circle, then drawn the diagonals, then found the probability that the third point is on the correct cord. This will get difficult to generalize.
Instead, first choose the two diagonals, then choose the third point, then find the probability that the first two points are on the "correct ends" of the two diagonals. The probability is immediately seen to be $frac14$.
This method generalizes without much issue to higher dimensions: pick $n$ diagonals and the $(n+1)$th point at random, then place the first $n$ points on the ends of their respective diagonals. This gives you the answer $frac12^n$ that you conjectured.
answered Apr 8 at 20:03
ArthurArthur
123k7122211
123k7122211
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3180115%2frandomly-choose-n1-points-on-a-sn-1-probability-of-n-simplex-containi%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
$begingroup$
Any reason you have that conjecture?
$endgroup$
– Arctic Char
Apr 8 at 19:49
1
$begingroup$
This is the problem considered in this 3blue1brown video. It is only solved for $n=2$ and $3$, but the method generalizes easily.
$endgroup$
– Arthur
Apr 8 at 19:53
$begingroup$
@ArcticChar I compute by brute force the case of $n=2$ the result is $1/4$ and the case $n=3$ the result is $1/8$
$endgroup$
– maplemaple
Apr 8 at 19:53
$begingroup$
@Arthur Yes, I compute above the case of $n=2, 3$. In $n=3$, by numerical integral is $0.125 = 1/8$. But I can hardly imagine this method can get analytical solution. And this method can hardly to generalize to higher dimension case.
$endgroup$
– maplemaple
Apr 8 at 19:58
1
$begingroup$
Check out Wendel's Theorem for a generalization.
$endgroup$
– Mike Earnest
Apr 9 at 0:20