Randomly choose $n+1$ points on a $S^n-1$, probability of $n$-simplex containing center Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Planned maintenance scheduled April 17/18, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern)How to simplify complex integration?probabilty of random points on perimeter containing centerSimpson's rule error rate for N-dimensionProbability that one of a set of four points lies within the triangle formed by the other threeInformation matrix for a Student's T distributionProbability of center enclosed by polygon of random pointsProbability that convex hull of $2n$ random points contains the $n-$sphere's centerProbability that a random triangle with vertices on a circle contains an arbitrary point inside said circleProbability that a stick randomly broken in three places can form a triangleProbability that the distance between two random points inside a circle is less than some value

What is the electric potential inside a point charge?

How do I keep my slimes from escaping their pens?

Can smartphones with the same camera sensor have different image quality?

Using "nakedly" instead of "with nothing on"

What's the point in a preamp?

Area of a 2D convex hull

What computer would be fastest for Mathematica Home Edition?

Unexpected result with right shift after bitwise negation

How do you clear the ApexPages.getMessages() collection in a test?

If I can make up priors, why can't I make up posteriors?

Can I throw a sword that doesn't have the Thrown property at someone?

Losing the Initialization Vector in Cipher Block Chaining

When is phishing education going too far?

How to say that you spent the night with someone, you were only sleeping and nothing else?

Array/tabular for long multiplication

Mortgage adviser recommends a longer term than necessary combined with overpayments

How are presidential pardons supposed to be used?

How to market an anarchic city as a tourism spot to people living in civilized areas?

Single author papers against my advisor's will?

Fishing simulator

Two different pronunciation of "понял"

What would be Julian Assange's expected punishment, on the current English criminal law?

Should you tell Jews they are breaking a commandment?

Why use gamma over alpha radiation?



Randomly choose $n+1$ points on a $S^n-1$, probability of $n$-simplex containing center



Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara
Planned maintenance scheduled April 17/18, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern)How to simplify complex integration?probabilty of random points on perimeter containing centerSimpson's rule error rate for N-dimensionProbability that one of a set of four points lies within the triangle formed by the other threeInformation matrix for a Student's T distributionProbability of center enclosed by polygon of random pointsProbability that convex hull of $2n$ random points contains the $n-$sphere's centerProbability that a random triangle with vertices on a circle contains an arbitrary point inside said circleProbability that a stick randomly broken in three places can form a triangleProbability that the distance between two random points inside a circle is less than some value










2












$begingroup$


Randomly choose $n+1$ points on a $S^n-1$(surface of ball in $n$-dim space). What's the probability that the $n$-simplex formed by these $n+1$ points contain the center of the sphere?



I conjecture that the result is $frac12^n$.



For $n=2$, it's easy:



enter image description here



$$int_0^2pi frac12pi fracpi-theta2pidtheta = frac14$$



For $n=3$, I compute and the result is $1/8$ :



By the same method, but need to use spherical triangle area formula and spherical triangle cosine rule



The detailed computation is following:



enter image description here



Very complicated function integration, I can hardly imagine that such a numerical integration has analytical solution $1/8$. And this complicated method is hard to be generalized to higher dimension. There should be some simple explanation and can be generalized to higher dimension case.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$











  • $begingroup$
    Any reason you have that conjecture?
    $endgroup$
    – Arctic Char
    Apr 8 at 19:49






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    This is the problem considered in this 3blue1brown video. It is only solved for $n=2$ and $3$, but the method generalizes easily.
    $endgroup$
    – Arthur
    Apr 8 at 19:53











  • $begingroup$
    @ArcticChar I compute by brute force the case of $n=2$ the result is $1/4$ and the case $n=3$ the result is $1/8$
    $endgroup$
    – maplemaple
    Apr 8 at 19:53










  • $begingroup$
    @Arthur Yes, I compute above the case of $n=2, 3$. In $n=3$, by numerical integral is $0.125 = 1/8$. But I can hardly imagine this method can get analytical solution. And this method can hardly to generalize to higher dimension case.
    $endgroup$
    – maplemaple
    Apr 8 at 19:58






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Check out Wendel's Theorem for a generalization.
    $endgroup$
    – Mike Earnest
    Apr 9 at 0:20















2












$begingroup$


Randomly choose $n+1$ points on a $S^n-1$(surface of ball in $n$-dim space). What's the probability that the $n$-simplex formed by these $n+1$ points contain the center of the sphere?



I conjecture that the result is $frac12^n$.



For $n=2$, it's easy:



enter image description here



$$int_0^2pi frac12pi fracpi-theta2pidtheta = frac14$$



For $n=3$, I compute and the result is $1/8$ :



By the same method, but need to use spherical triangle area formula and spherical triangle cosine rule



The detailed computation is following:



enter image description here



Very complicated function integration, I can hardly imagine that such a numerical integration has analytical solution $1/8$. And this complicated method is hard to be generalized to higher dimension. There should be some simple explanation and can be generalized to higher dimension case.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$











  • $begingroup$
    Any reason you have that conjecture?
    $endgroup$
    – Arctic Char
    Apr 8 at 19:49






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    This is the problem considered in this 3blue1brown video. It is only solved for $n=2$ and $3$, but the method generalizes easily.
    $endgroup$
    – Arthur
    Apr 8 at 19:53











  • $begingroup$
    @ArcticChar I compute by brute force the case of $n=2$ the result is $1/4$ and the case $n=3$ the result is $1/8$
    $endgroup$
    – maplemaple
    Apr 8 at 19:53










  • $begingroup$
    @Arthur Yes, I compute above the case of $n=2, 3$. In $n=3$, by numerical integral is $0.125 = 1/8$. But I can hardly imagine this method can get analytical solution. And this method can hardly to generalize to higher dimension case.
    $endgroup$
    – maplemaple
    Apr 8 at 19:58






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Check out Wendel's Theorem for a generalization.
    $endgroup$
    – Mike Earnest
    Apr 9 at 0:20













2












2








2


2



$begingroup$


Randomly choose $n+1$ points on a $S^n-1$(surface of ball in $n$-dim space). What's the probability that the $n$-simplex formed by these $n+1$ points contain the center of the sphere?



I conjecture that the result is $frac12^n$.



For $n=2$, it's easy:



enter image description here



$$int_0^2pi frac12pi fracpi-theta2pidtheta = frac14$$



For $n=3$, I compute and the result is $1/8$ :



By the same method, but need to use spherical triangle area formula and spherical triangle cosine rule



The detailed computation is following:



enter image description here



Very complicated function integration, I can hardly imagine that such a numerical integration has analytical solution $1/8$. And this complicated method is hard to be generalized to higher dimension. There should be some simple explanation and can be generalized to higher dimension case.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$




Randomly choose $n+1$ points on a $S^n-1$(surface of ball in $n$-dim space). What's the probability that the $n$-simplex formed by these $n+1$ points contain the center of the sphere?



I conjecture that the result is $frac12^n$.



For $n=2$, it's easy:



enter image description here



$$int_0^2pi frac12pi fracpi-theta2pidtheta = frac14$$



For $n=3$, I compute and the result is $1/8$ :



By the same method, but need to use spherical triangle area formula and spherical triangle cosine rule



The detailed computation is following:



enter image description here



Very complicated function integration, I can hardly imagine that such a numerical integration has analytical solution $1/8$. And this complicated method is hard to be generalized to higher dimension. There should be some simple explanation and can be generalized to higher dimension case.







calculus probability-theory geometric-probability






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Apr 8 at 20:06







maplemaple

















asked Apr 8 at 19:46









maplemaplemaplemaple

35419




35419











  • $begingroup$
    Any reason you have that conjecture?
    $endgroup$
    – Arctic Char
    Apr 8 at 19:49






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    This is the problem considered in this 3blue1brown video. It is only solved for $n=2$ and $3$, but the method generalizes easily.
    $endgroup$
    – Arthur
    Apr 8 at 19:53











  • $begingroup$
    @ArcticChar I compute by brute force the case of $n=2$ the result is $1/4$ and the case $n=3$ the result is $1/8$
    $endgroup$
    – maplemaple
    Apr 8 at 19:53










  • $begingroup$
    @Arthur Yes, I compute above the case of $n=2, 3$. In $n=3$, by numerical integral is $0.125 = 1/8$. But I can hardly imagine this method can get analytical solution. And this method can hardly to generalize to higher dimension case.
    $endgroup$
    – maplemaple
    Apr 8 at 19:58






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Check out Wendel's Theorem for a generalization.
    $endgroup$
    – Mike Earnest
    Apr 9 at 0:20
















  • $begingroup$
    Any reason you have that conjecture?
    $endgroup$
    – Arctic Char
    Apr 8 at 19:49






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    This is the problem considered in this 3blue1brown video. It is only solved for $n=2$ and $3$, but the method generalizes easily.
    $endgroup$
    – Arthur
    Apr 8 at 19:53











  • $begingroup$
    @ArcticChar I compute by brute force the case of $n=2$ the result is $1/4$ and the case $n=3$ the result is $1/8$
    $endgroup$
    – maplemaple
    Apr 8 at 19:53










  • $begingroup$
    @Arthur Yes, I compute above the case of $n=2, 3$. In $n=3$, by numerical integral is $0.125 = 1/8$. But I can hardly imagine this method can get analytical solution. And this method can hardly to generalize to higher dimension case.
    $endgroup$
    – maplemaple
    Apr 8 at 19:58






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Check out Wendel's Theorem for a generalization.
    $endgroup$
    – Mike Earnest
    Apr 9 at 0:20















$begingroup$
Any reason you have that conjecture?
$endgroup$
– Arctic Char
Apr 8 at 19:49




$begingroup$
Any reason you have that conjecture?
$endgroup$
– Arctic Char
Apr 8 at 19:49




1




1




$begingroup$
This is the problem considered in this 3blue1brown video. It is only solved for $n=2$ and $3$, but the method generalizes easily.
$endgroup$
– Arthur
Apr 8 at 19:53





$begingroup$
This is the problem considered in this 3blue1brown video. It is only solved for $n=2$ and $3$, but the method generalizes easily.
$endgroup$
– Arthur
Apr 8 at 19:53













$begingroup$
@ArcticChar I compute by brute force the case of $n=2$ the result is $1/4$ and the case $n=3$ the result is $1/8$
$endgroup$
– maplemaple
Apr 8 at 19:53




$begingroup$
@ArcticChar I compute by brute force the case of $n=2$ the result is $1/4$ and the case $n=3$ the result is $1/8$
$endgroup$
– maplemaple
Apr 8 at 19:53












$begingroup$
@Arthur Yes, I compute above the case of $n=2, 3$. In $n=3$, by numerical integral is $0.125 = 1/8$. But I can hardly imagine this method can get analytical solution. And this method can hardly to generalize to higher dimension case.
$endgroup$
– maplemaple
Apr 8 at 19:58




$begingroup$
@Arthur Yes, I compute above the case of $n=2, 3$. In $n=3$, by numerical integral is $0.125 = 1/8$. But I can hardly imagine this method can get analytical solution. And this method can hardly to generalize to higher dimension case.
$endgroup$
– maplemaple
Apr 8 at 19:58




1




1




$begingroup$
Check out Wendel's Theorem for a generalization.
$endgroup$
– Mike Earnest
Apr 9 at 0:20




$begingroup$
Check out Wendel's Theorem for a generalization.
$endgroup$
– Mike Earnest
Apr 9 at 0:20










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















2












$begingroup$

In your picture, you've first chosen two points on the circle, then drawn the diagonals, then found the probability that the third point is on the correct cord. This will get difficult to generalize.



Instead, first choose the two diagonals, then choose the third point, then find the probability that the first two points are on the "correct ends" of the two diagonals. The probability is immediately seen to be $frac14$.



This method generalizes without much issue to higher dimensions: pick $n$ diagonals and the $(n+1)$th point at random, then place the first $n$ points on the ends of their respective diagonals. This gives you the answer $frac12^n$ that you conjectured.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$













    Your Answer








    StackExchange.ready(function()
    var channelOptions =
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "69"
    ;
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
    createEditor();
    );

    else
    createEditor();

    );

    function createEditor()
    StackExchange.prepareEditor(
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader:
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    ,
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    );



    );













    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function ()
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3180115%2frandomly-choose-n1-points-on-a-sn-1-probability-of-n-simplex-containi%23new-answer', 'question_page');

    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes








    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    2












    $begingroup$

    In your picture, you've first chosen two points on the circle, then drawn the diagonals, then found the probability that the third point is on the correct cord. This will get difficult to generalize.



    Instead, first choose the two diagonals, then choose the third point, then find the probability that the first two points are on the "correct ends" of the two diagonals. The probability is immediately seen to be $frac14$.



    This method generalizes without much issue to higher dimensions: pick $n$ diagonals and the $(n+1)$th point at random, then place the first $n$ points on the ends of their respective diagonals. This gives you the answer $frac12^n$ that you conjectured.






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$

















      2












      $begingroup$

      In your picture, you've first chosen two points on the circle, then drawn the diagonals, then found the probability that the third point is on the correct cord. This will get difficult to generalize.



      Instead, first choose the two diagonals, then choose the third point, then find the probability that the first two points are on the "correct ends" of the two diagonals. The probability is immediately seen to be $frac14$.



      This method generalizes without much issue to higher dimensions: pick $n$ diagonals and the $(n+1)$th point at random, then place the first $n$ points on the ends of their respective diagonals. This gives you the answer $frac12^n$ that you conjectured.






      share|cite|improve this answer









      $endgroup$















        2












        2








        2





        $begingroup$

        In your picture, you've first chosen two points on the circle, then drawn the diagonals, then found the probability that the third point is on the correct cord. This will get difficult to generalize.



        Instead, first choose the two diagonals, then choose the third point, then find the probability that the first two points are on the "correct ends" of the two diagonals. The probability is immediately seen to be $frac14$.



        This method generalizes without much issue to higher dimensions: pick $n$ diagonals and the $(n+1)$th point at random, then place the first $n$ points on the ends of their respective diagonals. This gives you the answer $frac12^n$ that you conjectured.






        share|cite|improve this answer









        $endgroup$



        In your picture, you've first chosen two points on the circle, then drawn the diagonals, then found the probability that the third point is on the correct cord. This will get difficult to generalize.



        Instead, first choose the two diagonals, then choose the third point, then find the probability that the first two points are on the "correct ends" of the two diagonals. The probability is immediately seen to be $frac14$.



        This method generalizes without much issue to higher dimensions: pick $n$ diagonals and the $(n+1)$th point at random, then place the first $n$ points on the ends of their respective diagonals. This gives you the answer $frac12^n$ that you conjectured.







        share|cite|improve this answer












        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer










        answered Apr 8 at 20:03









        ArthurArthur

        123k7122211




        123k7122211



























            draft saved

            draft discarded
















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid


            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

            Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3180115%2frandomly-choose-n1-points-on-a-sn-1-probability-of-n-simplex-containi%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            Hidroelektrana Sadržaj Povijest | Podjela hidroelektrana | Snaga dobivena u hidroelektranama | Dijelovi hidroelektrane | Uloga hidroelektrana u suvremenom svijetu | Prednosti hidroelektrana | Nedostaci hidroelektrana | Države s najvećom proizvodnjom hidro-električne energije | Deset najvećih hidroelektrana u svijetu | Hidroelektrane u Hrvatskoj | Izvori | Poveznice | Vanjske poveznice | Navigacijski izbornikTechnical Report, Version 2Zajedničkom poslužiteljuHidroelektranaHEP Proizvodnja d.o.o. - Hidroelektrane u Hrvatskoj

            Oconto (Nebraska) Índice Demografia | Geografia | Localidades na vizinhança | Referências Ligações externas | Menu de navegação41° 8' 29" N 99° 45' 41" O41° 8' 29" N 99° 45' 41" OU.S. Census Bureau. Census 2000 Summary File 1U.S. Census Bureau. Estimativa da população (julho de 2006)U.S. Board on Geographic Names. Topical Gazetteers Populated Places. Gráficos do banco de dados de altitudes dos Estados Unidos da AméricaEstatísticas, mapas e outras informações sobre Oconto em city-data.com

            WordPress Information needed