Reference request for knot's signature via skein relation Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Planned maintenance scheduled April 17/18, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern)What is smoothness needed for?On the HOMFLY polynomial of a split linkFinding the Alexander polynomial of the following braid closureMinimizer and invariance of normal projection energy of a knotWhen does $pi_1(Sigma)$ inject into $pi_1(S^3 setminus Sigma)$?Morse theory of knot complementsFundamental group of torus knot with a specific definitionReferences for the Linking number in terms of the cup product.Properties and conjectures about alternating knotsFundamental group of torus knot without thickening

Losing the Initialization Vector in Cipher Block Chaining

How does modal jazz use chord progressions?

I'm thinking of a number

Mortgage adviser recommends a longer term than necessary combined with overpayments

Cold is to Refrigerator as warm is to?

Estimate capacitor parameters

How do I keep my slimes from escaping their pens?

Simulating Exploding Dice

What was the last x86 CPU that did not have the x87 floating-point unit built in?

Keep going mode for require-package

How to rotate it perfectly?

Writing Thesis: Copying from published papers

Why is "Captain Marvel" translated as male in Portugal?

Is there a documented rationale why the House Ways and Means chairman can demand tax info?

Why is there no army of Iron-Mans in the MCU?

If I can make up priors, why can't I make up posteriors?

What computer would be fastest for Mathematica Home Edition?

Are my PIs rude or am I just being too sensitive?

What LEGO pieces have "real-world" functionality?

How to market an anarchic city as a tourism spot to people living in civilized areas?

Can smartphones with the same camera sensor have different image quality?

New Order #5: where Fibonacci and Beatty meet at Wythoff

Why does tar appear to skip file contents when output file is /dev/null?

Am I ethically obligated to go into work on an off day if the reason is sudden?



Reference request for knot's signature via skein relation



Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara
Planned maintenance scheduled April 17/18, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern)What is smoothness needed for?On the HOMFLY polynomial of a split linkFinding the Alexander polynomial of the following braid closureMinimizer and invariance of normal projection energy of a knotWhen does $pi_1(Sigma)$ inject into $pi_1(S^3 setminus Sigma)$?Morse theory of knot complementsFundamental group of torus knot with a specific definitionReferences for the Linking number in terms of the cup product.Properties and conjectures about alternating knotsFundamental group of torus knot without thickening










2












$begingroup$


Mathworld's article on knot signature [1] defines it as a function that satisfies two conditions: $s(K_+) - s(K_-) in 0, 2$ and $4 mid s(K) iff nabla (K)(2i) > 0$. Where can I find proof that this is in fact equivalent to classical definition as signature of matrix $M + M^T$, where $M$ is a Seifert matrix?



[1] http://mathworld.wolfram.com/KnotSignature.html










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$
















    2












    $begingroup$


    Mathworld's article on knot signature [1] defines it as a function that satisfies two conditions: $s(K_+) - s(K_-) in 0, 2$ and $4 mid s(K) iff nabla (K)(2i) > 0$. Where can I find proof that this is in fact equivalent to classical definition as signature of matrix $M + M^T$, where $M$ is a Seifert matrix?



    [1] http://mathworld.wolfram.com/KnotSignature.html










    share|cite|improve this question









    $endgroup$














      2












      2








      2


      1



      $begingroup$


      Mathworld's article on knot signature [1] defines it as a function that satisfies two conditions: $s(K_+) - s(K_-) in 0, 2$ and $4 mid s(K) iff nabla (K)(2i) > 0$. Where can I find proof that this is in fact equivalent to classical definition as signature of matrix $M + M^T$, where $M$ is a Seifert matrix?



      [1] http://mathworld.wolfram.com/KnotSignature.html










      share|cite|improve this question









      $endgroup$




      Mathworld's article on knot signature [1] defines it as a function that satisfies two conditions: $s(K_+) - s(K_-) in 0, 2$ and $4 mid s(K) iff nabla (K)(2i) > 0$. Where can I find proof that this is in fact equivalent to classical definition as signature of matrix $M + M^T$, where $M$ is a Seifert matrix?



      [1] http://mathworld.wolfram.com/KnotSignature.html







      knot-theory






      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question











      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question










      asked Apr 8 at 19:49









      SantiagoSantiago

      1,059619




      1,059619




















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          2












          $begingroup$

          The idea is to prove that the standard definition
          $$sigma(K)=sgn(M+M^T)$$
          implies the two properties:



          beginalign
          sigma(K_+)−sigma(K_-)in0,2tagalabelprop-a\
          4|sigma(𝐾)⟺∇_K(2𝑖)>0
          tagblabelprop-b
          endalign



          and then to observe that eqrefprop-a and eqrefprop-b together uniquely determine the number $sigma(K)$.



          Namely, pick a sequence of crossing changes $K=K_varepsilon_0rightarrow K_varepsilon_0varepsilon_1 rightarrow K_varepsilon_0varepsilon_1varepsilon_2rightarrow dotsrightarrow K_varepsilon_0varepsilon_1dotsvarepsilon_N=U$ to the unknot. Use eqrefprop-b to calculate $sigma(K_varepsilon_1dotsvarepsilon_m)pmod 4$ for each $mgeq 0$. This will allow you to determine if after each crossing change the signature stays the same or changes by 2. Since $sigma(U)=0$, you can recover $sigma(K)$ by adding up all the 2's that occurred.



          This is explained in the Remark 3 (p. 97) in:



          Giller, C. (1982). A Family of Links and the Conway Calculus. Transactions of the American Mathematical Society, 270(1), 75-109.



          relying on the Theorem 5.6 (p. 399) in:



          Murasugi, K. (1965). On a certain numerical invariant of link types. Transactions of the American Mathematical Society, 117, 387-422.



          where the property eqrefprop-b of the knot signature is proven.






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$













            Your Answer








            StackExchange.ready(function()
            var channelOptions =
            tags: "".split(" "),
            id: "69"
            ;
            initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
            // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
            if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
            createEditor();
            );

            else
            createEditor();

            );

            function createEditor()
            StackExchange.prepareEditor(
            heartbeatType: 'answer',
            autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
            convertImagesToLinks: true,
            noModals: true,
            showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
            reputationToPostImages: 10,
            bindNavPrevention: true,
            postfix: "",
            imageUploader:
            brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
            contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
            allowUrls: true
            ,
            noCode: true, onDemand: true,
            discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
            ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
            );



            );













            draft saved

            draft discarded


















            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3180121%2freference-request-for-knots-signature-via-skein-relation%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown

























            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes








            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes









            active

            oldest

            votes






            active

            oldest

            votes









            2












            $begingroup$

            The idea is to prove that the standard definition
            $$sigma(K)=sgn(M+M^T)$$
            implies the two properties:



            beginalign
            sigma(K_+)−sigma(K_-)in0,2tagalabelprop-a\
            4|sigma(𝐾)⟺∇_K(2𝑖)>0
            tagblabelprop-b
            endalign



            and then to observe that eqrefprop-a and eqrefprop-b together uniquely determine the number $sigma(K)$.



            Namely, pick a sequence of crossing changes $K=K_varepsilon_0rightarrow K_varepsilon_0varepsilon_1 rightarrow K_varepsilon_0varepsilon_1varepsilon_2rightarrow dotsrightarrow K_varepsilon_0varepsilon_1dotsvarepsilon_N=U$ to the unknot. Use eqrefprop-b to calculate $sigma(K_varepsilon_1dotsvarepsilon_m)pmod 4$ for each $mgeq 0$. This will allow you to determine if after each crossing change the signature stays the same or changes by 2. Since $sigma(U)=0$, you can recover $sigma(K)$ by adding up all the 2's that occurred.



            This is explained in the Remark 3 (p. 97) in:



            Giller, C. (1982). A Family of Links and the Conway Calculus. Transactions of the American Mathematical Society, 270(1), 75-109.



            relying on the Theorem 5.6 (p. 399) in:



            Murasugi, K. (1965). On a certain numerical invariant of link types. Transactions of the American Mathematical Society, 117, 387-422.



            where the property eqrefprop-b of the knot signature is proven.






            share|cite|improve this answer











            $endgroup$

















              2












              $begingroup$

              The idea is to prove that the standard definition
              $$sigma(K)=sgn(M+M^T)$$
              implies the two properties:



              beginalign
              sigma(K_+)−sigma(K_-)in0,2tagalabelprop-a\
              4|sigma(𝐾)⟺∇_K(2𝑖)>0
              tagblabelprop-b
              endalign



              and then to observe that eqrefprop-a and eqrefprop-b together uniquely determine the number $sigma(K)$.



              Namely, pick a sequence of crossing changes $K=K_varepsilon_0rightarrow K_varepsilon_0varepsilon_1 rightarrow K_varepsilon_0varepsilon_1varepsilon_2rightarrow dotsrightarrow K_varepsilon_0varepsilon_1dotsvarepsilon_N=U$ to the unknot. Use eqrefprop-b to calculate $sigma(K_varepsilon_1dotsvarepsilon_m)pmod 4$ for each $mgeq 0$. This will allow you to determine if after each crossing change the signature stays the same or changes by 2. Since $sigma(U)=0$, you can recover $sigma(K)$ by adding up all the 2's that occurred.



              This is explained in the Remark 3 (p. 97) in:



              Giller, C. (1982). A Family of Links and the Conway Calculus. Transactions of the American Mathematical Society, 270(1), 75-109.



              relying on the Theorem 5.6 (p. 399) in:



              Murasugi, K. (1965). On a certain numerical invariant of link types. Transactions of the American Mathematical Society, 117, 387-422.



              where the property eqrefprop-b of the knot signature is proven.






              share|cite|improve this answer











              $endgroup$















                2












                2








                2





                $begingroup$

                The idea is to prove that the standard definition
                $$sigma(K)=sgn(M+M^T)$$
                implies the two properties:



                beginalign
                sigma(K_+)−sigma(K_-)in0,2tagalabelprop-a\
                4|sigma(𝐾)⟺∇_K(2𝑖)>0
                tagblabelprop-b
                endalign



                and then to observe that eqrefprop-a and eqrefprop-b together uniquely determine the number $sigma(K)$.



                Namely, pick a sequence of crossing changes $K=K_varepsilon_0rightarrow K_varepsilon_0varepsilon_1 rightarrow K_varepsilon_0varepsilon_1varepsilon_2rightarrow dotsrightarrow K_varepsilon_0varepsilon_1dotsvarepsilon_N=U$ to the unknot. Use eqrefprop-b to calculate $sigma(K_varepsilon_1dotsvarepsilon_m)pmod 4$ for each $mgeq 0$. This will allow you to determine if after each crossing change the signature stays the same or changes by 2. Since $sigma(U)=0$, you can recover $sigma(K)$ by adding up all the 2's that occurred.



                This is explained in the Remark 3 (p. 97) in:



                Giller, C. (1982). A Family of Links and the Conway Calculus. Transactions of the American Mathematical Society, 270(1), 75-109.



                relying on the Theorem 5.6 (p. 399) in:



                Murasugi, K. (1965). On a certain numerical invariant of link types. Transactions of the American Mathematical Society, 117, 387-422.



                where the property eqrefprop-b of the knot signature is proven.






                share|cite|improve this answer











                $endgroup$



                The idea is to prove that the standard definition
                $$sigma(K)=sgn(M+M^T)$$
                implies the two properties:



                beginalign
                sigma(K_+)−sigma(K_-)in0,2tagalabelprop-a\
                4|sigma(𝐾)⟺∇_K(2𝑖)>0
                tagblabelprop-b
                endalign



                and then to observe that eqrefprop-a and eqrefprop-b together uniquely determine the number $sigma(K)$.



                Namely, pick a sequence of crossing changes $K=K_varepsilon_0rightarrow K_varepsilon_0varepsilon_1 rightarrow K_varepsilon_0varepsilon_1varepsilon_2rightarrow dotsrightarrow K_varepsilon_0varepsilon_1dotsvarepsilon_N=U$ to the unknot. Use eqrefprop-b to calculate $sigma(K_varepsilon_1dotsvarepsilon_m)pmod 4$ for each $mgeq 0$. This will allow you to determine if after each crossing change the signature stays the same or changes by 2. Since $sigma(U)=0$, you can recover $sigma(K)$ by adding up all the 2's that occurred.



                This is explained in the Remark 3 (p. 97) in:



                Giller, C. (1982). A Family of Links and the Conway Calculus. Transactions of the American Mathematical Society, 270(1), 75-109.



                relying on the Theorem 5.6 (p. 399) in:



                Murasugi, K. (1965). On a certain numerical invariant of link types. Transactions of the American Mathematical Society, 117, 387-422.



                where the property eqrefprop-b of the knot signature is proven.







                share|cite|improve this answer














                share|cite|improve this answer



                share|cite|improve this answer








                edited Apr 9 at 17:26

























                answered Apr 9 at 12:20









                DanicaDanica

                665




                665



























                    draft saved

                    draft discarded
















































                    Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


                    • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                    But avoid


                    • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                    • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

                    Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                    To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                    draft saved


                    draft discarded














                    StackExchange.ready(
                    function ()
                    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3180121%2freference-request-for-knots-signature-via-skein-relation%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                    );

                    Post as a guest















                    Required, but never shown





















































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown

































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown







                    Popular posts from this blog

                    Hidroelektrana Sadržaj Povijest | Podjela hidroelektrana | Snaga dobivena u hidroelektranama | Dijelovi hidroelektrane | Uloga hidroelektrana u suvremenom svijetu | Prednosti hidroelektrana | Nedostaci hidroelektrana | Države s najvećom proizvodnjom hidro-električne energije | Deset najvećih hidroelektrana u svijetu | Hidroelektrane u Hrvatskoj | Izvori | Poveznice | Vanjske poveznice | Navigacijski izbornikTechnical Report, Version 2Zajedničkom poslužiteljuHidroelektranaHEP Proizvodnja d.o.o. - Hidroelektrane u Hrvatskoj

                    Oconto (Nebraska) Índice Demografia | Geografia | Localidades na vizinhança | Referências Ligações externas | Menu de navegação41° 8' 29" N 99° 45' 41" O41° 8' 29" N 99° 45' 41" OU.S. Census Bureau. Census 2000 Summary File 1U.S. Census Bureau. Estimativa da população (julho de 2006)U.S. Board on Geographic Names. Topical Gazetteers Populated Places. Gráficos do banco de dados de altitudes dos Estados Unidos da AméricaEstatísticas, mapas e outras informações sobre Oconto em city-data.com

                    WordPress Information needed