Some basic questions on halt and move in Turing machines Planned maintenance scheduled April 17/18, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern) Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Unicorn Meta Zoo #1: Why another podcast?“Print 'em all game” for Turing machinesPower of variants of Turing machinesThe control in the Turing MachineThe halting problem of Turing machines in view of enumeration of initial tape configurationsDifficulty in the halting problem for a simple Turing machine with standard enumerations of programs and of initial tape configurationsTuring machine that computes w#w when the input is w?Construct a Turing Machine that recognizes the set $0^2n1^n$For multi-tape Turing machines, can we assume that each tape can be in its own state independently of the other tapes?How would you create a Turing machine that copies a string and prints it to the tape?Turing machine - Transition between two states by more than one condition allowed?

Complexity of many constant time steps with occasional logarithmic steps

How to rotate it perfectly?

Are my PIs rude or am I just being too sensitive?

Array/tabular for long multiplication

What is the largest species of polychaete?

Using "nakedly" instead of "with nothing on"

Who can trigger ship-wide alerts in Star Trek?

Statistical model of ligand substitution

When communicating altitude with a '9' in it, should it be pronounced "nine hundred" or "niner hundred"?

Would an alien lifeform be able to achieve space travel if lacking in vision?

How many spell slots should a Fighter 11/Ranger 9 have?

Cold is to Refrigerator as warm is to?

Can a 1st-level character have an ability score above 18?

I'm thinking of a number

Why use gamma over alpha radiation?

Simulating Exploding Dice

How can I protect witches in combat who wear limited clothing?

I'm having difficulty getting my players to do stuff in a sandbox campaign

3 doors, three guards, one stone

What are the performance impacts of 'functional' Rust?

Was credit for the black hole image misattributed?

Two different pronunciation of "понял"

What was the last x86 CPU that did not have the x87 floating-point unit built in?

Am I ethically obligated to go into work on an off day if the reason is sudden?



Some basic questions on halt and move in Turing machines



Planned maintenance scheduled April 17/18, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern)
Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara
Unicorn Meta Zoo #1: Why another podcast?“Print 'em all game” for Turing machinesPower of variants of Turing machinesThe control in the Turing MachineThe halting problem of Turing machines in view of enumeration of initial tape configurationsDifficulty in the halting problem for a simple Turing machine with standard enumerations of programs and of initial tape configurationsTuring machine that computes w#w when the input is w?Construct a Turing Machine that recognizes the set $0^2n1^n$For multi-tape Turing machines, can we assume that each tape can be in its own state independently of the other tapes?How would you create a Turing machine that copies a string and prints it to the tape?Turing machine - Transition between two states by more than one condition allowed?










2












$begingroup$


Im trying to learn about and set up Turing Machines (TMs) the simplest ways using the simplest definite rules. I am using my previous knowledge on simple Cellular Automata to do this. I want to write the computer code, but first I have to get some understanding of the restrictions and possibilities of TMs.



Firstly i define an operation as follows:



Operation (Op)



Do operation based on current color ($C$) and its state ($S$) i.e. $Op(c, s)$:



  1. replace color $C$ with $0$ or $1$. (at current position of tape head) move

  2. tape-head (change its position).

  3. change state $S$ with $0$ or $1$ (at new position).

For each operation:



  • In general does a TM only have only one halting-operation?
    (i.e. can only one operation promote the halting or can more than one operation do that?).


  • Can the tape-head also stop at a fixed position? (i.e. not move its head).
    Instead of the rules $0$ (move left) and $1$ (move right), it can also $2$ (not move anywhere) or even jump two units to the left or right?


My last question is basically the same as the last question..



  • Can the tape-head move more than one unit to the left or right?

The reason I ask this, is because if there is only one halting state in no more than one operation, the number of rules (in my setup) can be reduced. And if the tape-head can move more than one unit either to the left or right or both my guess is that it can produce more complex outputs. But my questions are concerning what is the limitations of a Turing Machine.



Example



If something was unclear I can try this example:



 inp: outp:
Op(0,0) => 110
Op(0,1) => 101
Op(1,0) => 111
Op(1,1) => 001*


Of the output ($b_2b_1b_0$), where the first bit ($b_0$) represent the tapehead-move direction, $b_1$ represents the new state, and $b_0$ represents the changed color.
The asterisk shows that a halting operation should be performed.



The first question I asked wether there was possible to have more than one halting operation in a TM. Basically I ask wether I can have two or more asterisks like this, or if its not allowed:



 inp: outp:
Op(0,0) => 110
Op(0,1) => 101
Op(1,0) => 111*
Op(1,1) => 001*


Recap



So can more than one operation perform the halting operation?



Can we move the tape head more than one unit to the left or right, or can it stand still?










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$











  • $begingroup$
    You can define your Turing machine model in whichever reasonable way you want, as long as the resulting model is equal in power to a standard Turing machine.
    $endgroup$
    – Yuval Filmus
    Apr 8 at 10:55






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    If you are interested in a specific model of Turing machines, then you'll have to specify your model, and then you'll likely be able to answer these questions on your own.
    $endgroup$
    – Yuval Filmus
    Apr 8 at 10:55










  • $begingroup$
    Thanks, but where can I find info on a standard Turing machine? Was my above descriptions close?
    $endgroup$
    – Natural Number Guy
    Apr 8 at 11:03






  • 3




    $begingroup$
    There is no single standard model of a Turing machine. You can find (similar but not identical) definitions on Wikipedia and in any number of textbooks.
    $endgroup$
    – Yuval Filmus
    Apr 8 at 11:04















2












$begingroup$


Im trying to learn about and set up Turing Machines (TMs) the simplest ways using the simplest definite rules. I am using my previous knowledge on simple Cellular Automata to do this. I want to write the computer code, but first I have to get some understanding of the restrictions and possibilities of TMs.



Firstly i define an operation as follows:



Operation (Op)



Do operation based on current color ($C$) and its state ($S$) i.e. $Op(c, s)$:



  1. replace color $C$ with $0$ or $1$. (at current position of tape head) move

  2. tape-head (change its position).

  3. change state $S$ with $0$ or $1$ (at new position).

For each operation:



  • In general does a TM only have only one halting-operation?
    (i.e. can only one operation promote the halting or can more than one operation do that?).


  • Can the tape-head also stop at a fixed position? (i.e. not move its head).
    Instead of the rules $0$ (move left) and $1$ (move right), it can also $2$ (not move anywhere) or even jump two units to the left or right?


My last question is basically the same as the last question..



  • Can the tape-head move more than one unit to the left or right?

The reason I ask this, is because if there is only one halting state in no more than one operation, the number of rules (in my setup) can be reduced. And if the tape-head can move more than one unit either to the left or right or both my guess is that it can produce more complex outputs. But my questions are concerning what is the limitations of a Turing Machine.



Example



If something was unclear I can try this example:



 inp: outp:
Op(0,0) => 110
Op(0,1) => 101
Op(1,0) => 111
Op(1,1) => 001*


Of the output ($b_2b_1b_0$), where the first bit ($b_0$) represent the tapehead-move direction, $b_1$ represents the new state, and $b_0$ represents the changed color.
The asterisk shows that a halting operation should be performed.



The first question I asked wether there was possible to have more than one halting operation in a TM. Basically I ask wether I can have two or more asterisks like this, or if its not allowed:



 inp: outp:
Op(0,0) => 110
Op(0,1) => 101
Op(1,0) => 111*
Op(1,1) => 001*


Recap



So can more than one operation perform the halting operation?



Can we move the tape head more than one unit to the left or right, or can it stand still?










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$











  • $begingroup$
    You can define your Turing machine model in whichever reasonable way you want, as long as the resulting model is equal in power to a standard Turing machine.
    $endgroup$
    – Yuval Filmus
    Apr 8 at 10:55






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    If you are interested in a specific model of Turing machines, then you'll have to specify your model, and then you'll likely be able to answer these questions on your own.
    $endgroup$
    – Yuval Filmus
    Apr 8 at 10:55










  • $begingroup$
    Thanks, but where can I find info on a standard Turing machine? Was my above descriptions close?
    $endgroup$
    – Natural Number Guy
    Apr 8 at 11:03






  • 3




    $begingroup$
    There is no single standard model of a Turing machine. You can find (similar but not identical) definitions on Wikipedia and in any number of textbooks.
    $endgroup$
    – Yuval Filmus
    Apr 8 at 11:04













2












2








2





$begingroup$


Im trying to learn about and set up Turing Machines (TMs) the simplest ways using the simplest definite rules. I am using my previous knowledge on simple Cellular Automata to do this. I want to write the computer code, but first I have to get some understanding of the restrictions and possibilities of TMs.



Firstly i define an operation as follows:



Operation (Op)



Do operation based on current color ($C$) and its state ($S$) i.e. $Op(c, s)$:



  1. replace color $C$ with $0$ or $1$. (at current position of tape head) move

  2. tape-head (change its position).

  3. change state $S$ with $0$ or $1$ (at new position).

For each operation:



  • In general does a TM only have only one halting-operation?
    (i.e. can only one operation promote the halting or can more than one operation do that?).


  • Can the tape-head also stop at a fixed position? (i.e. not move its head).
    Instead of the rules $0$ (move left) and $1$ (move right), it can also $2$ (not move anywhere) or even jump two units to the left or right?


My last question is basically the same as the last question..



  • Can the tape-head move more than one unit to the left or right?

The reason I ask this, is because if there is only one halting state in no more than one operation, the number of rules (in my setup) can be reduced. And if the tape-head can move more than one unit either to the left or right or both my guess is that it can produce more complex outputs. But my questions are concerning what is the limitations of a Turing Machine.



Example



If something was unclear I can try this example:



 inp: outp:
Op(0,0) => 110
Op(0,1) => 101
Op(1,0) => 111
Op(1,1) => 001*


Of the output ($b_2b_1b_0$), where the first bit ($b_0$) represent the tapehead-move direction, $b_1$ represents the new state, and $b_0$ represents the changed color.
The asterisk shows that a halting operation should be performed.



The first question I asked wether there was possible to have more than one halting operation in a TM. Basically I ask wether I can have two or more asterisks like this, or if its not allowed:



 inp: outp:
Op(0,0) => 110
Op(0,1) => 101
Op(1,0) => 111*
Op(1,1) => 001*


Recap



So can more than one operation perform the halting operation?



Can we move the tape head more than one unit to the left or right, or can it stand still?










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$




Im trying to learn about and set up Turing Machines (TMs) the simplest ways using the simplest definite rules. I am using my previous knowledge on simple Cellular Automata to do this. I want to write the computer code, but first I have to get some understanding of the restrictions and possibilities of TMs.



Firstly i define an operation as follows:



Operation (Op)



Do operation based on current color ($C$) and its state ($S$) i.e. $Op(c, s)$:



  1. replace color $C$ with $0$ or $1$. (at current position of tape head) move

  2. tape-head (change its position).

  3. change state $S$ with $0$ or $1$ (at new position).

For each operation:



  • In general does a TM only have only one halting-operation?
    (i.e. can only one operation promote the halting or can more than one operation do that?).


  • Can the tape-head also stop at a fixed position? (i.e. not move its head).
    Instead of the rules $0$ (move left) and $1$ (move right), it can also $2$ (not move anywhere) or even jump two units to the left or right?


My last question is basically the same as the last question..



  • Can the tape-head move more than one unit to the left or right?

The reason I ask this, is because if there is only one halting state in no more than one operation, the number of rules (in my setup) can be reduced. And if the tape-head can move more than one unit either to the left or right or both my guess is that it can produce more complex outputs. But my questions are concerning what is the limitations of a Turing Machine.



Example



If something was unclear I can try this example:



 inp: outp:
Op(0,0) => 110
Op(0,1) => 101
Op(1,0) => 111
Op(1,1) => 001*


Of the output ($b_2b_1b_0$), where the first bit ($b_0$) represent the tapehead-move direction, $b_1$ represents the new state, and $b_0$ represents the changed color.
The asterisk shows that a halting operation should be performed.



The first question I asked wether there was possible to have more than one halting operation in a TM. Basically I ask wether I can have two or more asterisks like this, or if its not allowed:



 inp: outp:
Op(0,0) => 110
Op(0,1) => 101
Op(1,0) => 111*
Op(1,1) => 001*


Recap



So can more than one operation perform the halting operation?



Can we move the tape head more than one unit to the left or right, or can it stand still?







turing-machines automata






share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question











share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question










asked Apr 8 at 10:39









Natural Number GuyNatural Number Guy

1154




1154











  • $begingroup$
    You can define your Turing machine model in whichever reasonable way you want, as long as the resulting model is equal in power to a standard Turing machine.
    $endgroup$
    – Yuval Filmus
    Apr 8 at 10:55






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    If you are interested in a specific model of Turing machines, then you'll have to specify your model, and then you'll likely be able to answer these questions on your own.
    $endgroup$
    – Yuval Filmus
    Apr 8 at 10:55










  • $begingroup$
    Thanks, but where can I find info on a standard Turing machine? Was my above descriptions close?
    $endgroup$
    – Natural Number Guy
    Apr 8 at 11:03






  • 3




    $begingroup$
    There is no single standard model of a Turing machine. You can find (similar but not identical) definitions on Wikipedia and in any number of textbooks.
    $endgroup$
    – Yuval Filmus
    Apr 8 at 11:04
















  • $begingroup$
    You can define your Turing machine model in whichever reasonable way you want, as long as the resulting model is equal in power to a standard Turing machine.
    $endgroup$
    – Yuval Filmus
    Apr 8 at 10:55






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    If you are interested in a specific model of Turing machines, then you'll have to specify your model, and then you'll likely be able to answer these questions on your own.
    $endgroup$
    – Yuval Filmus
    Apr 8 at 10:55










  • $begingroup$
    Thanks, but where can I find info on a standard Turing machine? Was my above descriptions close?
    $endgroup$
    – Natural Number Guy
    Apr 8 at 11:03






  • 3




    $begingroup$
    There is no single standard model of a Turing machine. You can find (similar but not identical) definitions on Wikipedia and in any number of textbooks.
    $endgroup$
    – Yuval Filmus
    Apr 8 at 11:04















$begingroup$
You can define your Turing machine model in whichever reasonable way you want, as long as the resulting model is equal in power to a standard Turing machine.
$endgroup$
– Yuval Filmus
Apr 8 at 10:55




$begingroup$
You can define your Turing machine model in whichever reasonable way you want, as long as the resulting model is equal in power to a standard Turing machine.
$endgroup$
– Yuval Filmus
Apr 8 at 10:55




1




1




$begingroup$
If you are interested in a specific model of Turing machines, then you'll have to specify your model, and then you'll likely be able to answer these questions on your own.
$endgroup$
– Yuval Filmus
Apr 8 at 10:55




$begingroup$
If you are interested in a specific model of Turing machines, then you'll have to specify your model, and then you'll likely be able to answer these questions on your own.
$endgroup$
– Yuval Filmus
Apr 8 at 10:55












$begingroup$
Thanks, but where can I find info on a standard Turing machine? Was my above descriptions close?
$endgroup$
– Natural Number Guy
Apr 8 at 11:03




$begingroup$
Thanks, but where can I find info on a standard Turing machine? Was my above descriptions close?
$endgroup$
– Natural Number Guy
Apr 8 at 11:03




3




3




$begingroup$
There is no single standard model of a Turing machine. You can find (similar but not identical) definitions on Wikipedia and in any number of textbooks.
$endgroup$
– Yuval Filmus
Apr 8 at 11:04




$begingroup$
There is no single standard model of a Turing machine. You can find (similar but not identical) definitions on Wikipedia and in any number of textbooks.
$endgroup$
– Yuval Filmus
Apr 8 at 11:04










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















8












$begingroup$

To answer any kind of question like this, you need to choose one of the standard definitions of Turing machines (there are several but they're all essentially the same) and prove that adding the feature you want doesn't increase the computational power. You do that by showing how to simulate the feature using the standard machine.




  • In general does a TM only have only one halting-operation? (i.e. can only one operation promote the halting or can more than one operation do that?).



It doesn't matter. If you want three halting states and I insist that there can be only one, then have three states called $h_1$, $h_2$ and $h_3$ and design the transition function so that, if the machine ever enters one of those, its next transition is to $mathrmHALT$.




  • Can the tape-head also stop at a fixed position? (i.e. not move its head). Instead of the rules 0 (move left) and 1 (move right), it can also 2 (not move anywhere) or even jump two units to the left or right?



Again, it doesn't matter. If I insist you must move left or right, you can move one step left and then move back to the right; you can move two steps to the right by moving one step, twice.




  • Can the tape-head move more than one unit to the left or right?



Even that doesn't affect things: random-access Turing machines have an "address tape" onto which you can write a number and a special state that causes the head to move straight to the tape cell indexed by that number. Again, same power.



Multiple tapes, inserting and deleting characters, two-dimensional (or more!) tapes. Almost anything you can imagine makes no difference, and proving these things are standard exercises in computation theory textbooks.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    One more question: What about the Buzzy Beaver TM, does the same rules apply there? Or do they have restricted rules on the movements and halting ops.
    $endgroup$
    – Natural Number Guy
    Apr 8 at 19:06










  • $begingroup$
    You can ask the busy beaver question for any specific definition of Turing machines. It probably doesn't make a lot of difference to the answer -- it's uncomputable regardless, and the answer to any busy beaver question is "some huge number".
    $endgroup$
    – David Richerby
    Apr 8 at 19:56











Your Answer








StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "419"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);

else
createEditor();

);

function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);



);













draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fcs.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f106651%2fsome-basic-questions-on-halt-and-move-in-turing-machines%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









8












$begingroup$

To answer any kind of question like this, you need to choose one of the standard definitions of Turing machines (there are several but they're all essentially the same) and prove that adding the feature you want doesn't increase the computational power. You do that by showing how to simulate the feature using the standard machine.




  • In general does a TM only have only one halting-operation? (i.e. can only one operation promote the halting or can more than one operation do that?).



It doesn't matter. If you want three halting states and I insist that there can be only one, then have three states called $h_1$, $h_2$ and $h_3$ and design the transition function so that, if the machine ever enters one of those, its next transition is to $mathrmHALT$.




  • Can the tape-head also stop at a fixed position? (i.e. not move its head). Instead of the rules 0 (move left) and 1 (move right), it can also 2 (not move anywhere) or even jump two units to the left or right?



Again, it doesn't matter. If I insist you must move left or right, you can move one step left and then move back to the right; you can move two steps to the right by moving one step, twice.




  • Can the tape-head move more than one unit to the left or right?



Even that doesn't affect things: random-access Turing machines have an "address tape" onto which you can write a number and a special state that causes the head to move straight to the tape cell indexed by that number. Again, same power.



Multiple tapes, inserting and deleting characters, two-dimensional (or more!) tapes. Almost anything you can imagine makes no difference, and proving these things are standard exercises in computation theory textbooks.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    One more question: What about the Buzzy Beaver TM, does the same rules apply there? Or do they have restricted rules on the movements and halting ops.
    $endgroup$
    – Natural Number Guy
    Apr 8 at 19:06










  • $begingroup$
    You can ask the busy beaver question for any specific definition of Turing machines. It probably doesn't make a lot of difference to the answer -- it's uncomputable regardless, and the answer to any busy beaver question is "some huge number".
    $endgroup$
    – David Richerby
    Apr 8 at 19:56















8












$begingroup$

To answer any kind of question like this, you need to choose one of the standard definitions of Turing machines (there are several but they're all essentially the same) and prove that adding the feature you want doesn't increase the computational power. You do that by showing how to simulate the feature using the standard machine.




  • In general does a TM only have only one halting-operation? (i.e. can only one operation promote the halting or can more than one operation do that?).



It doesn't matter. If you want three halting states and I insist that there can be only one, then have three states called $h_1$, $h_2$ and $h_3$ and design the transition function so that, if the machine ever enters one of those, its next transition is to $mathrmHALT$.




  • Can the tape-head also stop at a fixed position? (i.e. not move its head). Instead of the rules 0 (move left) and 1 (move right), it can also 2 (not move anywhere) or even jump two units to the left or right?



Again, it doesn't matter. If I insist you must move left or right, you can move one step left and then move back to the right; you can move two steps to the right by moving one step, twice.




  • Can the tape-head move more than one unit to the left or right?



Even that doesn't affect things: random-access Turing machines have an "address tape" onto which you can write a number and a special state that causes the head to move straight to the tape cell indexed by that number. Again, same power.



Multiple tapes, inserting and deleting characters, two-dimensional (or more!) tapes. Almost anything you can imagine makes no difference, and proving these things are standard exercises in computation theory textbooks.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    One more question: What about the Buzzy Beaver TM, does the same rules apply there? Or do they have restricted rules on the movements and halting ops.
    $endgroup$
    – Natural Number Guy
    Apr 8 at 19:06










  • $begingroup$
    You can ask the busy beaver question for any specific definition of Turing machines. It probably doesn't make a lot of difference to the answer -- it's uncomputable regardless, and the answer to any busy beaver question is "some huge number".
    $endgroup$
    – David Richerby
    Apr 8 at 19:56













8












8








8





$begingroup$

To answer any kind of question like this, you need to choose one of the standard definitions of Turing machines (there are several but they're all essentially the same) and prove that adding the feature you want doesn't increase the computational power. You do that by showing how to simulate the feature using the standard machine.




  • In general does a TM only have only one halting-operation? (i.e. can only one operation promote the halting or can more than one operation do that?).



It doesn't matter. If you want three halting states and I insist that there can be only one, then have three states called $h_1$, $h_2$ and $h_3$ and design the transition function so that, if the machine ever enters one of those, its next transition is to $mathrmHALT$.




  • Can the tape-head also stop at a fixed position? (i.e. not move its head). Instead of the rules 0 (move left) and 1 (move right), it can also 2 (not move anywhere) or even jump two units to the left or right?



Again, it doesn't matter. If I insist you must move left or right, you can move one step left and then move back to the right; you can move two steps to the right by moving one step, twice.




  • Can the tape-head move more than one unit to the left or right?



Even that doesn't affect things: random-access Turing machines have an "address tape" onto which you can write a number and a special state that causes the head to move straight to the tape cell indexed by that number. Again, same power.



Multiple tapes, inserting and deleting characters, two-dimensional (or more!) tapes. Almost anything you can imagine makes no difference, and proving these things are standard exercises in computation theory textbooks.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$



To answer any kind of question like this, you need to choose one of the standard definitions of Turing machines (there are several but they're all essentially the same) and prove that adding the feature you want doesn't increase the computational power. You do that by showing how to simulate the feature using the standard machine.




  • In general does a TM only have only one halting-operation? (i.e. can only one operation promote the halting or can more than one operation do that?).



It doesn't matter. If you want three halting states and I insist that there can be only one, then have three states called $h_1$, $h_2$ and $h_3$ and design the transition function so that, if the machine ever enters one of those, its next transition is to $mathrmHALT$.




  • Can the tape-head also stop at a fixed position? (i.e. not move its head). Instead of the rules 0 (move left) and 1 (move right), it can also 2 (not move anywhere) or even jump two units to the left or right?



Again, it doesn't matter. If I insist you must move left or right, you can move one step left and then move back to the right; you can move two steps to the right by moving one step, twice.




  • Can the tape-head move more than one unit to the left or right?



Even that doesn't affect things: random-access Turing machines have an "address tape" onto which you can write a number and a special state that causes the head to move straight to the tape cell indexed by that number. Again, same power.



Multiple tapes, inserting and deleting characters, two-dimensional (or more!) tapes. Almost anything you can imagine makes no difference, and proving these things are standard exercises in computation theory textbooks.







share|cite|improve this answer












share|cite|improve this answer



share|cite|improve this answer










answered Apr 8 at 12:09









David RicherbyDavid Richerby

70.4k16107196




70.4k16107196











  • $begingroup$
    One more question: What about the Buzzy Beaver TM, does the same rules apply there? Or do they have restricted rules on the movements and halting ops.
    $endgroup$
    – Natural Number Guy
    Apr 8 at 19:06










  • $begingroup$
    You can ask the busy beaver question for any specific definition of Turing machines. It probably doesn't make a lot of difference to the answer -- it's uncomputable regardless, and the answer to any busy beaver question is "some huge number".
    $endgroup$
    – David Richerby
    Apr 8 at 19:56
















  • $begingroup$
    One more question: What about the Buzzy Beaver TM, does the same rules apply there? Or do they have restricted rules on the movements and halting ops.
    $endgroup$
    – Natural Number Guy
    Apr 8 at 19:06










  • $begingroup$
    You can ask the busy beaver question for any specific definition of Turing machines. It probably doesn't make a lot of difference to the answer -- it's uncomputable regardless, and the answer to any busy beaver question is "some huge number".
    $endgroup$
    – David Richerby
    Apr 8 at 19:56















$begingroup$
One more question: What about the Buzzy Beaver TM, does the same rules apply there? Or do they have restricted rules on the movements and halting ops.
$endgroup$
– Natural Number Guy
Apr 8 at 19:06




$begingroup$
One more question: What about the Buzzy Beaver TM, does the same rules apply there? Or do they have restricted rules on the movements and halting ops.
$endgroup$
– Natural Number Guy
Apr 8 at 19:06












$begingroup$
You can ask the busy beaver question for any specific definition of Turing machines. It probably doesn't make a lot of difference to the answer -- it's uncomputable regardless, and the answer to any busy beaver question is "some huge number".
$endgroup$
– David Richerby
Apr 8 at 19:56




$begingroup$
You can ask the busy beaver question for any specific definition of Turing machines. It probably doesn't make a lot of difference to the answer -- it's uncomputable regardless, and the answer to any busy beaver question is "some huge number".
$endgroup$
– David Richerby
Apr 8 at 19:56

















draft saved

draft discarded
















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Computer Science Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid


  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fcs.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f106651%2fsome-basic-questions-on-halt-and-move-in-turing-machines%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

What does it mean to find percent difference when two values are equivalent? The 2019 Stack Overflow Developer Survey Results Are InWhat does “percent of change” mean?Find what percent X is between two numbers?Unable to determine 'original amount' in simple percentage problemsWhat is the correct percent difference formula?How does proportionality hold when quantities are high? And the percentage increase formulaprofit and loss GRE questionProfitability calculationWhat is the difference between $xtimes 0.8$ and $x div 1.2 ? $Finding the percent probability of completing BUDs trainingCalculating Percent Difference with zero and near zero values

Why did some early computer designers eschew integers?What register size did early computers use?What other computers used this floating-point format?Why did so many early microcomputers use the MOS 6502 and variants?Why were early computers named “Mark”?Why did expert systems fall?Why were early personal computer monitors not green?When did “Zen” in computer programming become a thing?History of advanced hardwareWere there any working computers using residue number systems?Why did some CPUs use two Read/Write lines, and others just one?

How to avoid repetitive long generic constraints in Rust The 2019 Stack Overflow Developer Survey Results Are In Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Planned maintenance scheduled April 17/18, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern) The Ask Question Wizard is Live! Data science time! April 2019 and salary with experienceIs it possible to automatically implement a trait for any tuple that is made up of types that all implement the trait?Is there a constraint that restricts my generic method to numeric types?How can foreign key constraints be temporarily disabled using T-SQL?How do I use reflection to call a generic method?How to create a generic array in Java?How to get a class instance of generics type THow is `last` allowed to be called for an Args value?How to implement a trait for a parameterized traitAvoiding PhantomData in a struct to enforce type constraintsIs it possible to return part of a struct by reference?Associated References types as Value Types