Partition?! On a step function Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Planned maintenance scheduled April 17/18, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern)Is the space of uniformly left continuous functions on [0,1] complete?Partial derivative of a summation.Am I on the right track? Any hints on what to do next?Is there alternate definitions of an integral based on values of function on open or closed interval ?Taylor series and integrationUnderstanding the role of Partitioning in Riemann SumsRiemann and Darboux Integral of a product of two functionsProve a function is not Darboux-integrableEquivalent definition of the variation of the function on $[a,b]$How to prove that the limit of an upper sum equals the integral of a function with these limited definitions?

Why use gamma over alpha radiation?

The following signatures were invalid: EXPKEYSIG 1397BC53640DB551

What's the point in a preamp?

Can I add database to AWS RDS MySQL without creating new instance?

Unexpected result with right shift after bitwise negation

Antler Helmet: Can it work?

Fishing simulator

Stopping real property loss from eroding embankment

How do you clear the ApexPages.getMessages() collection in a test?

Can I throw a longsword at someone?

Cold is to Refrigerator as warm is to?

Unable to start mainnet node docker container

Jazz greats knew nothing of modes. Why are they used to improvise on standards?

Can a zero nonce be safely used with AES-GCM if the key is random and never used again?

Direct Experience of Meditation

What was the last x86 CPU that did not have the x87 floating-point unit built in?

Complexity of many constant time steps with occasional logarithmic steps

Estimate capacitor parameters

Passing functions in C++

What items from the Roman-age tech-level could be used to deter all creatures from entering a small area?

Why does tar appear to skip file contents when output file is /dev/null?

Can smartphones with the same camera sensor have different image quality?

How do I automatically answer y in bash script?

What LEGO pieces have "real-world" functionality?



Partition?! On a step function



Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara
Planned maintenance scheduled April 17/18, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern)Is the space of uniformly left continuous functions on [0,1] complete?Partial derivative of a summation.Am I on the right track? Any hints on what to do next?Is there alternate definitions of an integral based on values of function on open or closed interval ?Taylor series and integrationUnderstanding the role of Partitioning in Riemann SumsRiemann and Darboux Integral of a product of two functionsProve a function is not Darboux-integrableEquivalent definition of the variation of the function on $[a,b]$How to prove that the limit of an upper sum equals the integral of a function with these limited definitions?










0












$begingroup$


Let $s,r:[a,b]to mathbb R$ be step functions. Prove that there exists a partition $a=t_0<t_1<ldots<t_N=b$ such that $s$ and $r$ are both constant on $(t_i-1,t_i)$ for each $iin1,ldots,N$.



Yeah I have no idea could use a mini lesson explaining.










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$







  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Do some drawing.
    $endgroup$
    – Phicar
    Apr 8 at 20:25















0












$begingroup$


Let $s,r:[a,b]to mathbb R$ be step functions. Prove that there exists a partition $a=t_0<t_1<ldots<t_N=b$ such that $s$ and $r$ are both constant on $(t_i-1,t_i)$ for each $iin1,ldots,N$.



Yeah I have no idea could use a mini lesson explaining.










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$







  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Do some drawing.
    $endgroup$
    – Phicar
    Apr 8 at 20:25













0












0








0





$begingroup$


Let $s,r:[a,b]to mathbb R$ be step functions. Prove that there exists a partition $a=t_0<t_1<ldots<t_N=b$ such that $s$ and $r$ are both constant on $(t_i-1,t_i)$ for each $iin1,ldots,N$.



Yeah I have no idea could use a mini lesson explaining.










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$




Let $s,r:[a,b]to mathbb R$ be step functions. Prove that there exists a partition $a=t_0<t_1<ldots<t_N=b$ such that $s$ and $r$ are both constant on $(t_i-1,t_i)$ for each $iin1,ldots,N$.



Yeah I have no idea could use a mini lesson explaining.







calculus






share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question











share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question










asked Apr 8 at 20:24









DoubleliftDoublelift

305




305







  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Do some drawing.
    $endgroup$
    – Phicar
    Apr 8 at 20:25












  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Do some drawing.
    $endgroup$
    – Phicar
    Apr 8 at 20:25







1




1




$begingroup$
Do some drawing.
$endgroup$
– Phicar
Apr 8 at 20:25




$begingroup$
Do some drawing.
$endgroup$
– Phicar
Apr 8 at 20:25










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















0












$begingroup$

Let's note 2 things about step functions:



(1) By definition the step function is peicewise constant. So each step function already has a "natural" partition $a=x_0 < x_1 < ... < x_N = b$ for which it is constant on $(x_i , x_i+1)$



(2) If we add any points to the natural partition of a step function, say we added the point $y$ to the above partition: $a = x_0 < ... < x_i < y < x_i+1 < ... < x_M = b $. Then the step function is still constant on every $(x_i , x_i+1)$. Namely it is constant on $(x_i , y)$ and $(y, x_i+1)$.



So now to answer your question. Take the natural partition on which $s$ is defined, and add to it all points of the natural partition on which $r$ is defined. Denote the combined partition by $t_0 , ... , t_N$. Then $s$ is still constant on $(t_i , t_i+1)$ by point (2).



Similarly, take the natural partition on which $r$ is defined, and add to it all points of the natural partition on which $s$ is defined. Denote the combined partition by $t_0 , ... , t_N$ (it is the same one as the previous paragraph). Then $r$ is still constant on $(t_i , t_i+1)$ by point (2).



This proves the result, since $t_0 , ... , t_N$ works for both $s$ and $r$






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$













    Your Answer








    StackExchange.ready(function()
    var channelOptions =
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "69"
    ;
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
    createEditor();
    );

    else
    createEditor();

    );

    function createEditor()
    StackExchange.prepareEditor(
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader:
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    ,
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    );



    );













    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function ()
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3180160%2fpartition-on-a-step-function%23new-answer', 'question_page');

    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes








    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    0












    $begingroup$

    Let's note 2 things about step functions:



    (1) By definition the step function is peicewise constant. So each step function already has a "natural" partition $a=x_0 < x_1 < ... < x_N = b$ for which it is constant on $(x_i , x_i+1)$



    (2) If we add any points to the natural partition of a step function, say we added the point $y$ to the above partition: $a = x_0 < ... < x_i < y < x_i+1 < ... < x_M = b $. Then the step function is still constant on every $(x_i , x_i+1)$. Namely it is constant on $(x_i , y)$ and $(y, x_i+1)$.



    So now to answer your question. Take the natural partition on which $s$ is defined, and add to it all points of the natural partition on which $r$ is defined. Denote the combined partition by $t_0 , ... , t_N$. Then $s$ is still constant on $(t_i , t_i+1)$ by point (2).



    Similarly, take the natural partition on which $r$ is defined, and add to it all points of the natural partition on which $s$ is defined. Denote the combined partition by $t_0 , ... , t_N$ (it is the same one as the previous paragraph). Then $r$ is still constant on $(t_i , t_i+1)$ by point (2).



    This proves the result, since $t_0 , ... , t_N$ works for both $s$ and $r$






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$

















      0












      $begingroup$

      Let's note 2 things about step functions:



      (1) By definition the step function is peicewise constant. So each step function already has a "natural" partition $a=x_0 < x_1 < ... < x_N = b$ for which it is constant on $(x_i , x_i+1)$



      (2) If we add any points to the natural partition of a step function, say we added the point $y$ to the above partition: $a = x_0 < ... < x_i < y < x_i+1 < ... < x_M = b $. Then the step function is still constant on every $(x_i , x_i+1)$. Namely it is constant on $(x_i , y)$ and $(y, x_i+1)$.



      So now to answer your question. Take the natural partition on which $s$ is defined, and add to it all points of the natural partition on which $r$ is defined. Denote the combined partition by $t_0 , ... , t_N$. Then $s$ is still constant on $(t_i , t_i+1)$ by point (2).



      Similarly, take the natural partition on which $r$ is defined, and add to it all points of the natural partition on which $s$ is defined. Denote the combined partition by $t_0 , ... , t_N$ (it is the same one as the previous paragraph). Then $r$ is still constant on $(t_i , t_i+1)$ by point (2).



      This proves the result, since $t_0 , ... , t_N$ works for both $s$ and $r$






      share|cite|improve this answer









      $endgroup$















        0












        0








        0





        $begingroup$

        Let's note 2 things about step functions:



        (1) By definition the step function is peicewise constant. So each step function already has a "natural" partition $a=x_0 < x_1 < ... < x_N = b$ for which it is constant on $(x_i , x_i+1)$



        (2) If we add any points to the natural partition of a step function, say we added the point $y$ to the above partition: $a = x_0 < ... < x_i < y < x_i+1 < ... < x_M = b $. Then the step function is still constant on every $(x_i , x_i+1)$. Namely it is constant on $(x_i , y)$ and $(y, x_i+1)$.



        So now to answer your question. Take the natural partition on which $s$ is defined, and add to it all points of the natural partition on which $r$ is defined. Denote the combined partition by $t_0 , ... , t_N$. Then $s$ is still constant on $(t_i , t_i+1)$ by point (2).



        Similarly, take the natural partition on which $r$ is defined, and add to it all points of the natural partition on which $s$ is defined. Denote the combined partition by $t_0 , ... , t_N$ (it is the same one as the previous paragraph). Then $r$ is still constant on $(t_i , t_i+1)$ by point (2).



        This proves the result, since $t_0 , ... , t_N$ works for both $s$ and $r$






        share|cite|improve this answer









        $endgroup$



        Let's note 2 things about step functions:



        (1) By definition the step function is peicewise constant. So each step function already has a "natural" partition $a=x_0 < x_1 < ... < x_N = b$ for which it is constant on $(x_i , x_i+1)$



        (2) If we add any points to the natural partition of a step function, say we added the point $y$ to the above partition: $a = x_0 < ... < x_i < y < x_i+1 < ... < x_M = b $. Then the step function is still constant on every $(x_i , x_i+1)$. Namely it is constant on $(x_i , y)$ and $(y, x_i+1)$.



        So now to answer your question. Take the natural partition on which $s$ is defined, and add to it all points of the natural partition on which $r$ is defined. Denote the combined partition by $t_0 , ... , t_N$. Then $s$ is still constant on $(t_i , t_i+1)$ by point (2).



        Similarly, take the natural partition on which $r$ is defined, and add to it all points of the natural partition on which $s$ is defined. Denote the combined partition by $t_0 , ... , t_N$ (it is the same one as the previous paragraph). Then $r$ is still constant on $(t_i , t_i+1)$ by point (2).



        This proves the result, since $t_0 , ... , t_N$ works for both $s$ and $r$







        share|cite|improve this answer












        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer










        answered Apr 9 at 13:04









        NazimJNazimJ

        880110




        880110



























            draft saved

            draft discarded
















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid


            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

            Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3180160%2fpartition-on-a-step-function%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            Hidroelektrana Sadržaj Povijest | Podjela hidroelektrana | Snaga dobivena u hidroelektranama | Dijelovi hidroelektrane | Uloga hidroelektrana u suvremenom svijetu | Prednosti hidroelektrana | Nedostaci hidroelektrana | Države s najvećom proizvodnjom hidro-električne energije | Deset najvećih hidroelektrana u svijetu | Hidroelektrane u Hrvatskoj | Izvori | Poveznice | Vanjske poveznice | Navigacijski izbornikTechnical Report, Version 2Zajedničkom poslužiteljuHidroelektranaHEP Proizvodnja d.o.o. - Hidroelektrane u Hrvatskoj

            Oconto (Nebraska) Índice Demografia | Geografia | Localidades na vizinhança | Referências Ligações externas | Menu de navegação41° 8' 29" N 99° 45' 41" O41° 8' 29" N 99° 45' 41" OU.S. Census Bureau. Census 2000 Summary File 1U.S. Census Bureau. Estimativa da população (julho de 2006)U.S. Board on Geographic Names. Topical Gazetteers Populated Places. Gráficos do banco de dados de altitudes dos Estados Unidos da AméricaEstatísticas, mapas e outras informações sobre Oconto em city-data.com

            WordPress Information needed