Different shapes made from particular number of squares Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Planned maintenance scheduled April 17/18, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern)Given N blocks, find the number of unique shapes in a NxN blockDefinite shape of polyominosDistinct permutations of x items from n itemsLatin Squares of different sizesA starting lineup consists of 2 forwards, 2 guards and 1 center. How many different starting lineups..How many different groups of $4$ can be made from $142$?Number of ways of coloring projected faces of any hypercubeGiven N blocks, find the number of unique shapes in a NxN blockHow many different shapes that consist of five bordering squares can there be in a $3 times 3$ grid?How many $10$-letter sequences can be made from five different vowels and five different consonants?How many different words can be made?Squares sharing a side have different colors

Problem when applying foreach loop

Am I ethically obligated to go into work on an off day if the reason is sudden?

Need a suitable toxic chemical for a murder plot in my novel

Statistical model of ligand substitution

Can I throw a sword that doesn't have the Thrown property at someone?

What would be Julian Assange's expected punishment, on the current English criminal law?

Interesting examples of non-locally compact topological groups

How is simplicity better than precision and clarity in prose?

How are presidential pardons supposed to be used?

Windows 10: How to Lock (not sleep) laptop on lid close?

Slither Like a Snake

Why does this iterative way of solving of equation work?

Antler Helmet: Can it work?

What do you call a plan that's an alternative plan in case your initial plan fails?

How to market an anarchic city as a tourism spot to people living in civilized areas?

What's the point in a preamp?

Are my PIs rude or am I just being too sensitive?

Losing the Initialization Vector in Cipher Block Chaining

Array/tabular for long multiplication

Replacing HDD with SSD; what about non-APFS/APFS?

How to add zeros to reach same number of decimal places in tables?

What did Darwin mean by 'squib' here?

Estimate capacitor parameters

When communicating altitude with a '9' in it, should it be pronounced "nine hundred" or "niner hundred"?



Different shapes made from particular number of squares



Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara
Planned maintenance scheduled April 17/18, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern)Given N blocks, find the number of unique shapes in a NxN blockDefinite shape of polyominosDistinct permutations of x items from n itemsLatin Squares of different sizesA starting lineup consists of 2 forwards, 2 guards and 1 center. How many different starting lineups..How many different groups of $4$ can be made from $142$?Number of ways of coloring projected faces of any hypercubeGiven N blocks, find the number of unique shapes in a NxN blockHow many different shapes that consist of five bordering squares can there be in a $3 times 3$ grid?How many $10$-letter sequences can be made from five different vowels and five different consonants?How many different words can be made?Squares sharing a side have different colors










9












$begingroup$


Good day! I’m currently investigating how different shapes can be made from a particular number of squares.
I have two major concerns: (1) Will there be a formula predicting the number of shapes that can be made from a certain number of squares without the flipping and rotation of formed shapes; and (2) how about with flipping and rotation?
Researching and manually listing the possible shapes that can be formed, my observations are the following:



Without flip and rotation:



Number of squares -Number of shapes made



1- 1



2- 1



3- 2



4- 5



5- 12



6- 35



7- 108



8- 384 edit: should be 369



With flip and rotation:



Number of squares- Number of shapes made



1- 1



2- 2



3- 6



4- 19



5- 63



6- 208 edit: should be 216



Any help you might extend will be highly appreciated.



PS. Will really, really be grateful if you can provide an explanation why there is (or there is no) formula that can be derived from this.



Many thanks!



Edit: Added a picture because I don't think I was able to point my message clearly :D



enter image description here










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$







  • 2




    $begingroup$
    Look up polyominoes. I believe the 8th number in your first list should be 369, not 384.
    $endgroup$
    – Rory Daulton
    Sep 14 '15 at 9:57










  • $begingroup$
    What is your definition of a shape?
    $endgroup$
    – Aditya Agarwal
    Sep 14 '15 at 9:57










  • $begingroup$
    @AdityaAgarwal, posted the picture already. :)
    $endgroup$
    – wildberry tart
    Sep 14 '15 at 12:28















9












$begingroup$


Good day! I’m currently investigating how different shapes can be made from a particular number of squares.
I have two major concerns: (1) Will there be a formula predicting the number of shapes that can be made from a certain number of squares without the flipping and rotation of formed shapes; and (2) how about with flipping and rotation?
Researching and manually listing the possible shapes that can be formed, my observations are the following:



Without flip and rotation:



Number of squares -Number of shapes made



1- 1



2- 1



3- 2



4- 5



5- 12



6- 35



7- 108



8- 384 edit: should be 369



With flip and rotation:



Number of squares- Number of shapes made



1- 1



2- 2



3- 6



4- 19



5- 63



6- 208 edit: should be 216



Any help you might extend will be highly appreciated.



PS. Will really, really be grateful if you can provide an explanation why there is (or there is no) formula that can be derived from this.



Many thanks!



Edit: Added a picture because I don't think I was able to point my message clearly :D



enter image description here










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$







  • 2




    $begingroup$
    Look up polyominoes. I believe the 8th number in your first list should be 369, not 384.
    $endgroup$
    – Rory Daulton
    Sep 14 '15 at 9:57










  • $begingroup$
    What is your definition of a shape?
    $endgroup$
    – Aditya Agarwal
    Sep 14 '15 at 9:57










  • $begingroup$
    @AdityaAgarwal, posted the picture already. :)
    $endgroup$
    – wildberry tart
    Sep 14 '15 at 12:28













9












9








9


2



$begingroup$


Good day! I’m currently investigating how different shapes can be made from a particular number of squares.
I have two major concerns: (1) Will there be a formula predicting the number of shapes that can be made from a certain number of squares without the flipping and rotation of formed shapes; and (2) how about with flipping and rotation?
Researching and manually listing the possible shapes that can be formed, my observations are the following:



Without flip and rotation:



Number of squares -Number of shapes made



1- 1



2- 1



3- 2



4- 5



5- 12



6- 35



7- 108



8- 384 edit: should be 369



With flip and rotation:



Number of squares- Number of shapes made



1- 1



2- 2



3- 6



4- 19



5- 63



6- 208 edit: should be 216



Any help you might extend will be highly appreciated.



PS. Will really, really be grateful if you can provide an explanation why there is (or there is no) formula that can be derived from this.



Many thanks!



Edit: Added a picture because I don't think I was able to point my message clearly :D



enter image description here










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$




Good day! I’m currently investigating how different shapes can be made from a particular number of squares.
I have two major concerns: (1) Will there be a formula predicting the number of shapes that can be made from a certain number of squares without the flipping and rotation of formed shapes; and (2) how about with flipping and rotation?
Researching and manually listing the possible shapes that can be formed, my observations are the following:



Without flip and rotation:



Number of squares -Number of shapes made



1- 1



2- 1



3- 2



4- 5



5- 12



6- 35



7- 108



8- 384 edit: should be 369



With flip and rotation:



Number of squares- Number of shapes made



1- 1



2- 2



3- 6



4- 19



5- 63



6- 208 edit: should be 216



Any help you might extend will be highly appreciated.



PS. Will really, really be grateful if you can provide an explanation why there is (or there is no) formula that can be derived from this.



Many thanks!



Edit: Added a picture because I don't think I was able to point my message clearly :D



enter image description here







combinatorics






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Sep 14 '15 at 12:24







wildberry tart

















asked Sep 14 '15 at 9:46









wildberry tartwildberry tart

7927




7927







  • 2




    $begingroup$
    Look up polyominoes. I believe the 8th number in your first list should be 369, not 384.
    $endgroup$
    – Rory Daulton
    Sep 14 '15 at 9:57










  • $begingroup$
    What is your definition of a shape?
    $endgroup$
    – Aditya Agarwal
    Sep 14 '15 at 9:57










  • $begingroup$
    @AdityaAgarwal, posted the picture already. :)
    $endgroup$
    – wildberry tart
    Sep 14 '15 at 12:28












  • 2




    $begingroup$
    Look up polyominoes. I believe the 8th number in your first list should be 369, not 384.
    $endgroup$
    – Rory Daulton
    Sep 14 '15 at 9:57










  • $begingroup$
    What is your definition of a shape?
    $endgroup$
    – Aditya Agarwal
    Sep 14 '15 at 9:57










  • $begingroup$
    @AdityaAgarwal, posted the picture already. :)
    $endgroup$
    – wildberry tart
    Sep 14 '15 at 12:28







2




2




$begingroup$
Look up polyominoes. I believe the 8th number in your first list should be 369, not 384.
$endgroup$
– Rory Daulton
Sep 14 '15 at 9:57




$begingroup$
Look up polyominoes. I believe the 8th number in your first list should be 369, not 384.
$endgroup$
– Rory Daulton
Sep 14 '15 at 9:57












$begingroup$
What is your definition of a shape?
$endgroup$
– Aditya Agarwal
Sep 14 '15 at 9:57




$begingroup$
What is your definition of a shape?
$endgroup$
– Aditya Agarwal
Sep 14 '15 at 9:57












$begingroup$
@AdityaAgarwal, posted the picture already. :)
$endgroup$
– wildberry tart
Sep 14 '15 at 12:28




$begingroup$
@AdityaAgarwal, posted the picture already. :)
$endgroup$
– wildberry tart
Sep 14 '15 at 12:28










2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















4












$begingroup$

When you have such a list of integers, it's always worthwhile to search for it in the Online Encyclopedia of Integer Sequences. The two sequences you describe are OEIS sequence A000105 and OEIS sequence A001168, though it seems you got the last counts wrong and they should be $369$ and $216$, respectively.



See also MathWorld and Wikipedia on polyominoes. According to the MathWorld article, not even the growth rate is known, so no formula is known for these numbers. As to your question why this is so, that's rather hard to answer specifically. Many mathematical problems prove intractable.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    Hi! Thank you for pointing it out. I hadn't noticed that. I just manually listed the shapes so I might have been confused in the process. "no formula is known for these numbers" But might there be a pattern regarding this sequence? Or none at all? Thank you!
    $endgroup$
    – wildberry tart
    Sep 14 '15 at 12:51











  • $begingroup$
    @wildberrytart: I don't know of any patterns, but I wouldn't be surprised if there are some.
    $endgroup$
    – joriki
    Sep 14 '15 at 13:05


















-1












$begingroup$

I thought of this question from playing blokus, and I thought I came up with an equation that works, but it only works for 1-5 pieces. I thought it was right since blokus doesn’t have pieces any larger than that. Here it is anyway though! For y= the size and x= number of pieces, $y=2^(x-1)-x+1$






share|cite|improve this answer










New contributor




Patrick Ryan is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.






$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    MathJax hint: to get multicharacter exponents, put them in braces, so 2^(x-1) gives $2^(x-1)$.
    $endgroup$
    – Ross Millikan
    Apr 8 at 19:43










  • $begingroup$
    Yea I didn’t know that it would actually turn it into a superscript
    $endgroup$
    – Patrick Ryan
    Apr 8 at 21:04











Your Answer








StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);

else
createEditor();

);

function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);



);













draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f1434813%2fdifferent-shapes-made-from-particular-number-of-squares%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes








2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









4












$begingroup$

When you have such a list of integers, it's always worthwhile to search for it in the Online Encyclopedia of Integer Sequences. The two sequences you describe are OEIS sequence A000105 and OEIS sequence A001168, though it seems you got the last counts wrong and they should be $369$ and $216$, respectively.



See also MathWorld and Wikipedia on polyominoes. According to the MathWorld article, not even the growth rate is known, so no formula is known for these numbers. As to your question why this is so, that's rather hard to answer specifically. Many mathematical problems prove intractable.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    Hi! Thank you for pointing it out. I hadn't noticed that. I just manually listed the shapes so I might have been confused in the process. "no formula is known for these numbers" But might there be a pattern regarding this sequence? Or none at all? Thank you!
    $endgroup$
    – wildberry tart
    Sep 14 '15 at 12:51











  • $begingroup$
    @wildberrytart: I don't know of any patterns, but I wouldn't be surprised if there are some.
    $endgroup$
    – joriki
    Sep 14 '15 at 13:05















4












$begingroup$

When you have such a list of integers, it's always worthwhile to search for it in the Online Encyclopedia of Integer Sequences. The two sequences you describe are OEIS sequence A000105 and OEIS sequence A001168, though it seems you got the last counts wrong and they should be $369$ and $216$, respectively.



See also MathWorld and Wikipedia on polyominoes. According to the MathWorld article, not even the growth rate is known, so no formula is known for these numbers. As to your question why this is so, that's rather hard to answer specifically. Many mathematical problems prove intractable.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    Hi! Thank you for pointing it out. I hadn't noticed that. I just manually listed the shapes so I might have been confused in the process. "no formula is known for these numbers" But might there be a pattern regarding this sequence? Or none at all? Thank you!
    $endgroup$
    – wildberry tart
    Sep 14 '15 at 12:51











  • $begingroup$
    @wildberrytart: I don't know of any patterns, but I wouldn't be surprised if there are some.
    $endgroup$
    – joriki
    Sep 14 '15 at 13:05













4












4








4





$begingroup$

When you have such a list of integers, it's always worthwhile to search for it in the Online Encyclopedia of Integer Sequences. The two sequences you describe are OEIS sequence A000105 and OEIS sequence A001168, though it seems you got the last counts wrong and they should be $369$ and $216$, respectively.



See also MathWorld and Wikipedia on polyominoes. According to the MathWorld article, not even the growth rate is known, so no formula is known for these numbers. As to your question why this is so, that's rather hard to answer specifically. Many mathematical problems prove intractable.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$



When you have such a list of integers, it's always worthwhile to search for it in the Online Encyclopedia of Integer Sequences. The two sequences you describe are OEIS sequence A000105 and OEIS sequence A001168, though it seems you got the last counts wrong and they should be $369$ and $216$, respectively.



See also MathWorld and Wikipedia on polyominoes. According to the MathWorld article, not even the growth rate is known, so no formula is known for these numbers. As to your question why this is so, that's rather hard to answer specifically. Many mathematical problems prove intractable.







share|cite|improve this answer












share|cite|improve this answer



share|cite|improve this answer










answered Sep 14 '15 at 10:02









jorikijoriki

171k10190352




171k10190352











  • $begingroup$
    Hi! Thank you for pointing it out. I hadn't noticed that. I just manually listed the shapes so I might have been confused in the process. "no formula is known for these numbers" But might there be a pattern regarding this sequence? Or none at all? Thank you!
    $endgroup$
    – wildberry tart
    Sep 14 '15 at 12:51











  • $begingroup$
    @wildberrytart: I don't know of any patterns, but I wouldn't be surprised if there are some.
    $endgroup$
    – joriki
    Sep 14 '15 at 13:05
















  • $begingroup$
    Hi! Thank you for pointing it out. I hadn't noticed that. I just manually listed the shapes so I might have been confused in the process. "no formula is known for these numbers" But might there be a pattern regarding this sequence? Or none at all? Thank you!
    $endgroup$
    – wildberry tart
    Sep 14 '15 at 12:51











  • $begingroup$
    @wildberrytart: I don't know of any patterns, but I wouldn't be surprised if there are some.
    $endgroup$
    – joriki
    Sep 14 '15 at 13:05















$begingroup$
Hi! Thank you for pointing it out. I hadn't noticed that. I just manually listed the shapes so I might have been confused in the process. "no formula is known for these numbers" But might there be a pattern regarding this sequence? Or none at all? Thank you!
$endgroup$
– wildberry tart
Sep 14 '15 at 12:51





$begingroup$
Hi! Thank you for pointing it out. I hadn't noticed that. I just manually listed the shapes so I might have been confused in the process. "no formula is known for these numbers" But might there be a pattern regarding this sequence? Or none at all? Thank you!
$endgroup$
– wildberry tart
Sep 14 '15 at 12:51













$begingroup$
@wildberrytart: I don't know of any patterns, but I wouldn't be surprised if there are some.
$endgroup$
– joriki
Sep 14 '15 at 13:05




$begingroup$
@wildberrytart: I don't know of any patterns, but I wouldn't be surprised if there are some.
$endgroup$
– joriki
Sep 14 '15 at 13:05











-1












$begingroup$

I thought of this question from playing blokus, and I thought I came up with an equation that works, but it only works for 1-5 pieces. I thought it was right since blokus doesn’t have pieces any larger than that. Here it is anyway though! For y= the size and x= number of pieces, $y=2^(x-1)-x+1$






share|cite|improve this answer










New contributor




Patrick Ryan is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.






$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    MathJax hint: to get multicharacter exponents, put them in braces, so 2^(x-1) gives $2^(x-1)$.
    $endgroup$
    – Ross Millikan
    Apr 8 at 19:43










  • $begingroup$
    Yea I didn’t know that it would actually turn it into a superscript
    $endgroup$
    – Patrick Ryan
    Apr 8 at 21:04















-1












$begingroup$

I thought of this question from playing blokus, and I thought I came up with an equation that works, but it only works for 1-5 pieces. I thought it was right since blokus doesn’t have pieces any larger than that. Here it is anyway though! For y= the size and x= number of pieces, $y=2^(x-1)-x+1$






share|cite|improve this answer










New contributor




Patrick Ryan is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.






$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    MathJax hint: to get multicharacter exponents, put them in braces, so 2^(x-1) gives $2^(x-1)$.
    $endgroup$
    – Ross Millikan
    Apr 8 at 19:43










  • $begingroup$
    Yea I didn’t know that it would actually turn it into a superscript
    $endgroup$
    – Patrick Ryan
    Apr 8 at 21:04













-1












-1








-1





$begingroup$

I thought of this question from playing blokus, and I thought I came up with an equation that works, but it only works for 1-5 pieces. I thought it was right since blokus doesn’t have pieces any larger than that. Here it is anyway though! For y= the size and x= number of pieces, $y=2^(x-1)-x+1$






share|cite|improve this answer










New contributor




Patrick Ryan is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.






$endgroup$



I thought of this question from playing blokus, and I thought I came up with an equation that works, but it only works for 1-5 pieces. I thought it was right since blokus doesn’t have pieces any larger than that. Here it is anyway though! For y= the size and x= number of pieces, $y=2^(x-1)-x+1$







share|cite|improve this answer










New contributor




Patrick Ryan is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









share|cite|improve this answer



share|cite|improve this answer








edited Apr 8 at 21:05





















New contributor




Patrick Ryan is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









answered Apr 8 at 19:19









Patrick RyanPatrick Ryan

11




11




New contributor




Patrick Ryan is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.





New contributor





Patrick Ryan is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.






Patrick Ryan is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











  • $begingroup$
    MathJax hint: to get multicharacter exponents, put them in braces, so 2^(x-1) gives $2^(x-1)$.
    $endgroup$
    – Ross Millikan
    Apr 8 at 19:43










  • $begingroup$
    Yea I didn’t know that it would actually turn it into a superscript
    $endgroup$
    – Patrick Ryan
    Apr 8 at 21:04
















  • $begingroup$
    MathJax hint: to get multicharacter exponents, put them in braces, so 2^(x-1) gives $2^(x-1)$.
    $endgroup$
    – Ross Millikan
    Apr 8 at 19:43










  • $begingroup$
    Yea I didn’t know that it would actually turn it into a superscript
    $endgroup$
    – Patrick Ryan
    Apr 8 at 21:04















$begingroup$
MathJax hint: to get multicharacter exponents, put them in braces, so 2^(x-1) gives $2^(x-1)$.
$endgroup$
– Ross Millikan
Apr 8 at 19:43




$begingroup$
MathJax hint: to get multicharacter exponents, put them in braces, so 2^(x-1) gives $2^(x-1)$.
$endgroup$
– Ross Millikan
Apr 8 at 19:43












$begingroup$
Yea I didn’t know that it would actually turn it into a superscript
$endgroup$
– Patrick Ryan
Apr 8 at 21:04




$begingroup$
Yea I didn’t know that it would actually turn it into a superscript
$endgroup$
– Patrick Ryan
Apr 8 at 21:04

















draft saved

draft discarded
















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid


  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f1434813%2fdifferent-shapes-made-from-particular-number-of-squares%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

Hidroelektrana Sadržaj Povijest | Podjela hidroelektrana | Snaga dobivena u hidroelektranama | Dijelovi hidroelektrane | Uloga hidroelektrana u suvremenom svijetu | Prednosti hidroelektrana | Nedostaci hidroelektrana | Države s najvećom proizvodnjom hidro-električne energije | Deset najvećih hidroelektrana u svijetu | Hidroelektrane u Hrvatskoj | Izvori | Poveznice | Vanjske poveznice | Navigacijski izbornikTechnical Report, Version 2Zajedničkom poslužiteljuHidroelektranaHEP Proizvodnja d.o.o. - Hidroelektrane u Hrvatskoj

Oconto (Nebraska) Índice Demografia | Geografia | Localidades na vizinhança | Referências Ligações externas | Menu de navegação41° 8' 29" N 99° 45' 41" O41° 8' 29" N 99° 45' 41" OU.S. Census Bureau. Census 2000 Summary File 1U.S. Census Bureau. Estimativa da população (julho de 2006)U.S. Board on Geographic Names. Topical Gazetteers Populated Places. Gráficos do banco de dados de altitudes dos Estados Unidos da AméricaEstatísticas, mapas e outras informações sobre Oconto em city-data.com

WordPress Information needed