6D Fourier transform of Coulomb potential The 2019 Stack Overflow Developer Survey Results Are In Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Planned maintenance scheduled April 17/18, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern)Fourier transform of projection of spherical cap$k$-space tensor integral in statistical physicsHow to do this two complex integrals?Fourier Transform of Window FunctionCalculate Hankel Transform by Fast Fourier TransformSolving an ODE for the Green function using Fourier transform2-dim Fourier Transform of HeavisideDerivation of the Fourier Transform of a PDE$left( partial^2_xy + partial^2_xz + partial^2_yz right)u(x,y,z) = delta(x,y,z)$Integration with Dirac delta function of two-argument function
Derivation tree not rendering
Why does the Event Horizon Telescope (EHT) not include telescopes from Africa, Asia or Australia?
How did the audience guess the pentatonic scale in Bobby McFerrin's presentation?
Is this wall load bearing? Blueprints and photos attached
Are my PIs rude or am I just being too sensitive?
Was credit for the black hole image misattributed?
What do you call a plan that's an alternative plan in case your initial plan fails?
What information about me do stores get via my credit card?
Finding degree of a finite field extension
Problems with Ubuntu mount /tmp
Road tyres vs "Street" tyres for charity ride on MTB Tandem
Why not take a picture of a closer black hole?
Did the UK government pay "millions and millions of dollars" to try to snag Julian Assange?
Can a 1st-level character have an ability score above 18?
Match Roman Numerals
How to copy the contents of all files with a certain name into a new file?
Windows 10: How to Lock (not sleep) laptop on lid close?
How to prevent selfdestruct from another contract
Do warforged have souls?
Semisimplicity of the category of coherent sheaves?
Take groceries in checked luggage
Can a novice safely splice in wire to lengthen 5V charging cable?
Create an outline of font
What are these Gizmos at Izaña Atmospheric Research Center in Spain?
6D Fourier transform of Coulomb potential
The 2019 Stack Overflow Developer Survey Results Are In
Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara
Planned maintenance scheduled April 17/18, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern)Fourier transform of projection of spherical cap$k$-space tensor integral in statistical physicsHow to do this two complex integrals?Fourier Transform of Window FunctionCalculate Hankel Transform by Fast Fourier TransformSolving an ODE for the Green function using Fourier transform2-dim Fourier Transform of HeavisideDerivation of the Fourier Transform of a PDE$left( partial^2_xy + partial^2_xz + partial^2_yz right)u(x,y,z) = delta(x,y,z)$Integration with Dirac delta function of two-argument function
$begingroup$
I just wanted to check my result.
Let's define the Fourier transform as (the integral over whole real line):
$$g(k)=frac1sqrt2 pi int e^-i k x f(x) dx$$
We have the following function:
$$f(mathbfr_1,mathbfr_2)=frac1$$
I want to Fourier it in all the Cartesian coordinates, which should be:
$$g(mathbfk_1,mathbfk_2)=frac1(2 pi)^3 int int e^-i mathbfk_1 mathbfr_1-i mathbfk_2 mathbfr_2 fracdmathbfr_1 dmathbfr_2=$$
Substituting:
$$mathbfr_1=mathbfr+mathbfr_2$$
$$=frac1(2 pi)^3 int int e^-i (mathbfk_1+mathbfk_2) mathbfr_2-i mathbfk_1 mathbfr fracdmathbfr_2 dmathbfrmathbfr=delta(mathbfk_1+mathbfk_2) int e^-i mathbfk_1 mathbfr fracdmathbfrmathbfr=frac4 pi delta(mathbfk_1+mathbfk_2)mathbfk_1^2$$
The last integral is evaluated using spherical coordinates and the properties of Bessel functions.
What's confusing to me is that the transform should be symmetric in $1 leftrightarrow 2$, meaning that if we exchange the indices, the result should be the same. But it doesn't seem to be symmetric. Where's my mistake?
Appendix:
$$int e^-i mathbfk mathbfr fracdmathbfrmathbfr=int_0^2 pi int_0^pi int_0^infty e^-i rho ( k_x sin theta cos phi + k_y sin theta sin phi+k_z cos theta) rho sin theta d rho d theta d phi=$$
$$=2 pi int_0^pi int_0^infty e^-i rho k_z cos theta J_0 (sqrtk_x^2+k_y^2 rho sin theta ) rho sin theta d rho d theta=$$
$$=2 pi int_0^pi int_0^infty e^-i rho k_z cot theta J_0 (sqrtk_x^2+k_y^2 rho ) rho csc theta d rho d theta=$$
$$=4 pi int_0^infty K_0 (k_z rho) J_0 (sqrtk_x^2+k_y^2 rho ) rho d rho=frac4 pik_x^2+k_y^2+k_z^2$$
integration fourier-transform multiple-integral
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I just wanted to check my result.
Let's define the Fourier transform as (the integral over whole real line):
$$g(k)=frac1sqrt2 pi int e^-i k x f(x) dx$$
We have the following function:
$$f(mathbfr_1,mathbfr_2)=frac1$$
I want to Fourier it in all the Cartesian coordinates, which should be:
$$g(mathbfk_1,mathbfk_2)=frac1(2 pi)^3 int int e^-i mathbfk_1 mathbfr_1-i mathbfk_2 mathbfr_2 fracdmathbfr_1 dmathbfr_2=$$
Substituting:
$$mathbfr_1=mathbfr+mathbfr_2$$
$$=frac1(2 pi)^3 int int e^-i (mathbfk_1+mathbfk_2) mathbfr_2-i mathbfk_1 mathbfr fracdmathbfr_2 dmathbfrmathbfr=delta(mathbfk_1+mathbfk_2) int e^-i mathbfk_1 mathbfr fracdmathbfrmathbfr=frac4 pi delta(mathbfk_1+mathbfk_2)mathbfk_1^2$$
The last integral is evaluated using spherical coordinates and the properties of Bessel functions.
What's confusing to me is that the transform should be symmetric in $1 leftrightarrow 2$, meaning that if we exchange the indices, the result should be the same. But it doesn't seem to be symmetric. Where's my mistake?
Appendix:
$$int e^-i mathbfk mathbfr fracdmathbfrmathbfr=int_0^2 pi int_0^pi int_0^infty e^-i rho ( k_x sin theta cos phi + k_y sin theta sin phi+k_z cos theta) rho sin theta d rho d theta d phi=$$
$$=2 pi int_0^pi int_0^infty e^-i rho k_z cos theta J_0 (sqrtk_x^2+k_y^2 rho sin theta ) rho sin theta d rho d theta=$$
$$=2 pi int_0^pi int_0^infty e^-i rho k_z cot theta J_0 (sqrtk_x^2+k_y^2 rho ) rho csc theta d rho d theta=$$
$$=4 pi int_0^infty K_0 (k_z rho) J_0 (sqrtk_x^2+k_y^2 rho ) rho d rho=frac4 pik_x^2+k_y^2+k_z^2$$
integration fourier-transform multiple-integral
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I just wanted to check my result.
Let's define the Fourier transform as (the integral over whole real line):
$$g(k)=frac1sqrt2 pi int e^-i k x f(x) dx$$
We have the following function:
$$f(mathbfr_1,mathbfr_2)=frac1$$
I want to Fourier it in all the Cartesian coordinates, which should be:
$$g(mathbfk_1,mathbfk_2)=frac1(2 pi)^3 int int e^-i mathbfk_1 mathbfr_1-i mathbfk_2 mathbfr_2 fracdmathbfr_1 dmathbfr_2=$$
Substituting:
$$mathbfr_1=mathbfr+mathbfr_2$$
$$=frac1(2 pi)^3 int int e^-i (mathbfk_1+mathbfk_2) mathbfr_2-i mathbfk_1 mathbfr fracdmathbfr_2 dmathbfrmathbfr=delta(mathbfk_1+mathbfk_2) int e^-i mathbfk_1 mathbfr fracdmathbfrmathbfr=frac4 pi delta(mathbfk_1+mathbfk_2)mathbfk_1^2$$
The last integral is evaluated using spherical coordinates and the properties of Bessel functions.
What's confusing to me is that the transform should be symmetric in $1 leftrightarrow 2$, meaning that if we exchange the indices, the result should be the same. But it doesn't seem to be symmetric. Where's my mistake?
Appendix:
$$int e^-i mathbfk mathbfr fracdmathbfrmathbfr=int_0^2 pi int_0^pi int_0^infty e^-i rho ( k_x sin theta cos phi + k_y sin theta sin phi+k_z cos theta) rho sin theta d rho d theta d phi=$$
$$=2 pi int_0^pi int_0^infty e^-i rho k_z cos theta J_0 (sqrtk_x^2+k_y^2 rho sin theta ) rho sin theta d rho d theta=$$
$$=2 pi int_0^pi int_0^infty e^-i rho k_z cot theta J_0 (sqrtk_x^2+k_y^2 rho ) rho csc theta d rho d theta=$$
$$=4 pi int_0^infty K_0 (k_z rho) J_0 (sqrtk_x^2+k_y^2 rho ) rho d rho=frac4 pik_x^2+k_y^2+k_z^2$$
integration fourier-transform multiple-integral
$endgroup$
I just wanted to check my result.
Let's define the Fourier transform as (the integral over whole real line):
$$g(k)=frac1sqrt2 pi int e^-i k x f(x) dx$$
We have the following function:
$$f(mathbfr_1,mathbfr_2)=frac1$$
I want to Fourier it in all the Cartesian coordinates, which should be:
$$g(mathbfk_1,mathbfk_2)=frac1(2 pi)^3 int int e^-i mathbfk_1 mathbfr_1-i mathbfk_2 mathbfr_2 fracdmathbfr_1 dmathbfr_2=$$
Substituting:
$$mathbfr_1=mathbfr+mathbfr_2$$
$$=frac1(2 pi)^3 int int e^-i (mathbfk_1+mathbfk_2) mathbfr_2-i mathbfk_1 mathbfr fracdmathbfr_2 dmathbfrmathbfr=delta(mathbfk_1+mathbfk_2) int e^-i mathbfk_1 mathbfr fracdmathbfrmathbfr=frac4 pi delta(mathbfk_1+mathbfk_2)mathbfk_1^2$$
The last integral is evaluated using spherical coordinates and the properties of Bessel functions.
What's confusing to me is that the transform should be symmetric in $1 leftrightarrow 2$, meaning that if we exchange the indices, the result should be the same. But it doesn't seem to be symmetric. Where's my mistake?
Appendix:
$$int e^-i mathbfk mathbfr fracdmathbfrmathbfr=int_0^2 pi int_0^pi int_0^infty e^-i rho ( k_x sin theta cos phi + k_y sin theta sin phi+k_z cos theta) rho sin theta d rho d theta d phi=$$
$$=2 pi int_0^pi int_0^infty e^-i rho k_z cos theta J_0 (sqrtk_x^2+k_y^2 rho sin theta ) rho sin theta d rho d theta=$$
$$=2 pi int_0^pi int_0^infty e^-i rho k_z cot theta J_0 (sqrtk_x^2+k_y^2 rho ) rho csc theta d rho d theta=$$
$$=4 pi int_0^infty K_0 (k_z rho) J_0 (sqrtk_x^2+k_y^2 rho ) rho d rho=frac4 pik_x^2+k_y^2+k_z^2$$
integration fourier-transform multiple-integral
integration fourier-transform multiple-integral
asked Apr 8 at 12:00
Yuriy SYuriy S
15.9k433118
15.9k433118
add a comment |
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Since $deltane0impliesmathbfk_1=-mathbfk_2$, an equivalent way to write the result would be the manifestly symmetric $dfrac4pidelta(mathbfk_1+mathbfk_2)$.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Could you please elaborate? How is this equivalent? Can we show it from the definition?
$endgroup$
– Yuriy S
Apr 8 at 12:08
$begingroup$
Oh wait, the delta-function factor helps here, am I right? Since we can (and should) have $mathbfk_1=-mathbfk_2$
$endgroup$
– Yuriy S
Apr 8 at 12:13
$begingroup$
@YuriyS Exactly. This is a common thing that surprises people with Dirac deltas.
$endgroup$
– J.G.
Apr 8 at 12:18
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3179538%2f6d-fourier-transform-of-coulomb-potential%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Since $deltane0impliesmathbfk_1=-mathbfk_2$, an equivalent way to write the result would be the manifestly symmetric $dfrac4pidelta(mathbfk_1+mathbfk_2)$.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Could you please elaborate? How is this equivalent? Can we show it from the definition?
$endgroup$
– Yuriy S
Apr 8 at 12:08
$begingroup$
Oh wait, the delta-function factor helps here, am I right? Since we can (and should) have $mathbfk_1=-mathbfk_2$
$endgroup$
– Yuriy S
Apr 8 at 12:13
$begingroup$
@YuriyS Exactly. This is a common thing that surprises people with Dirac deltas.
$endgroup$
– J.G.
Apr 8 at 12:18
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Since $deltane0impliesmathbfk_1=-mathbfk_2$, an equivalent way to write the result would be the manifestly symmetric $dfrac4pidelta(mathbfk_1+mathbfk_2)$.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Could you please elaborate? How is this equivalent? Can we show it from the definition?
$endgroup$
– Yuriy S
Apr 8 at 12:08
$begingroup$
Oh wait, the delta-function factor helps here, am I right? Since we can (and should) have $mathbfk_1=-mathbfk_2$
$endgroup$
– Yuriy S
Apr 8 at 12:13
$begingroup$
@YuriyS Exactly. This is a common thing that surprises people with Dirac deltas.
$endgroup$
– J.G.
Apr 8 at 12:18
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Since $deltane0impliesmathbfk_1=-mathbfk_2$, an equivalent way to write the result would be the manifestly symmetric $dfrac4pidelta(mathbfk_1+mathbfk_2)$.
$endgroup$
Since $deltane0impliesmathbfk_1=-mathbfk_2$, an equivalent way to write the result would be the manifestly symmetric $dfrac4pidelta(mathbfk_1+mathbfk_2)$.
edited Apr 8 at 12:19
answered Apr 8 at 12:04
J.G.J.G.
33.4k23252
33.4k23252
$begingroup$
Could you please elaborate? How is this equivalent? Can we show it from the definition?
$endgroup$
– Yuriy S
Apr 8 at 12:08
$begingroup$
Oh wait, the delta-function factor helps here, am I right? Since we can (and should) have $mathbfk_1=-mathbfk_2$
$endgroup$
– Yuriy S
Apr 8 at 12:13
$begingroup$
@YuriyS Exactly. This is a common thing that surprises people with Dirac deltas.
$endgroup$
– J.G.
Apr 8 at 12:18
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Could you please elaborate? How is this equivalent? Can we show it from the definition?
$endgroup$
– Yuriy S
Apr 8 at 12:08
$begingroup$
Oh wait, the delta-function factor helps here, am I right? Since we can (and should) have $mathbfk_1=-mathbfk_2$
$endgroup$
– Yuriy S
Apr 8 at 12:13
$begingroup$
@YuriyS Exactly. This is a common thing that surprises people with Dirac deltas.
$endgroup$
– J.G.
Apr 8 at 12:18
$begingroup$
Could you please elaborate? How is this equivalent? Can we show it from the definition?
$endgroup$
– Yuriy S
Apr 8 at 12:08
$begingroup$
Could you please elaborate? How is this equivalent? Can we show it from the definition?
$endgroup$
– Yuriy S
Apr 8 at 12:08
$begingroup$
Oh wait, the delta-function factor helps here, am I right? Since we can (and should) have $mathbfk_1=-mathbfk_2$
$endgroup$
– Yuriy S
Apr 8 at 12:13
$begingroup$
Oh wait, the delta-function factor helps here, am I right? Since we can (and should) have $mathbfk_1=-mathbfk_2$
$endgroup$
– Yuriy S
Apr 8 at 12:13
$begingroup$
@YuriyS Exactly. This is a common thing that surprises people with Dirac deltas.
$endgroup$
– J.G.
Apr 8 at 12:18
$begingroup$
@YuriyS Exactly. This is a common thing that surprises people with Dirac deltas.
$endgroup$
– J.G.
Apr 8 at 12:18
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3179538%2f6d-fourier-transform-of-coulomb-potential%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown