Symbol for any number within a set for proofs The 2019 Stack Overflow Developer Survey Results Are In Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Planned maintenance scheduled April 17/18, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern)Mathematical symbol for “and”Symbol/notation/strategy for figuring out an unknown inequality?Solve for ? - undetermined inequality symbolIs there a symbol for plus and minus as opposed to plus or minus?Is there a symbol for ‘equal if defined’What is the difference between $implies$ and $or$?Anyone familiar with a mathematical symbol for “that is” / “to clarify” / “whereby”?Is there a standard symbol for a multiset version of the natural numbersSymbol for assignment of a truth-value?Notation in quotient rings

I could not break this equation. Please help me

What do you call a plan that's an alternative plan in case your initial plan fails?

Python - Fishing Simulator

Sort list of array linked objects by keys and values

How does this infinite series simplify to an integral?

Did the new image of black hole confirm the general theory of relativity?

How do I add random spotting to the same face in cycles?

Why does the Event Horizon Telescope (EHT) not include telescopes from Africa, Asia or Australia?

Why can't devices on different VLANs, but on the same subnet, communicate?

Can withdrawing asylum be illegal?

The variadic template constructor of my class cannot modify my class members, why is that so?

Create an outline of font

Hopping to infinity along a string of digits

ELI5: Why do they say that Israel would have been the fourth country to land a spacecraft on the Moon and why do they call it low cost?

Take groceries in checked luggage

Why did all the guest students take carriages to the Yule Ball?

Segmentation fault output is suppressed when piping stdin into a function. Why?

What are these Gizmos at Izaña Atmospheric Research Center in Spain?

What's the point in a preamp?

Semisimplicity of the category of coherent sheaves?

Can a 1st-level character have an ability score above 18?

Do warforged have souls?

Simulating Exploding Dice

How to grep and cut numbers from a file and sum them



Symbol for any number within a set for proofs



The 2019 Stack Overflow Developer Survey Results Are In
Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara
Planned maintenance scheduled April 17/18, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern)Mathematical symbol for “and”Symbol/notation/strategy for figuring out an unknown inequality?Solve for ? - undetermined inequality symbolIs there a symbol for plus and minus as opposed to plus or minus?Is there a symbol for ‘equal if defined’What is the difference between $implies$ and $or$?Anyone familiar with a mathematical symbol for “that is” / “to clarify” / “whereby”?Is there a standard symbol for a multiset version of the natural numbersSymbol for assignment of a truth-value?Notation in quotient rings










1












$begingroup$


I think it's simpler if I write down where I wanted to use this symbol, rather than trying to explain it in an abstract way. I'll give a simple example and then explain the actual problem I was working on.



Simple example: Let $a in mathbbN$ and $b in mathbbZ$, then $a * b in mathbbZ$. The symbol I'm looking for (let's say it's $cdot$) would be used like this: $mathbbN * mathbbZ = mathbbZ$



The example I was working on was to prove that the Hessian matrix, $H$, of a likelihood function for a normal distribution is negative definite at the solutions to the likelihood equations. Calculating $z^THz$ where $z = (a, b)^T$ gives:



$$z^THz = frac-a^2n^2S_xx+frac-b^2n^32S_xx^2$$



I know that




  • $a, b in mathbbR$ and $(a, b) ne (0, 0)$

  • $n in mathbbN^+$

  • $S_xx in mathbbR_ge 0$

Then it can be shown that from the two elements that are added together only one can be zero under these conditions and the other one must be negative, so the Hessian is negative definite. Is there a symbol that I could use to show something like $-mathbbR^2mathbbN^2 = mathbbR^-$, etc. deriving the result?



The question is not about how to calculate the definiteness but if there is a symbol that could be used here?



Thanks,



Norbert










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$
















    1












    $begingroup$


    I think it's simpler if I write down where I wanted to use this symbol, rather than trying to explain it in an abstract way. I'll give a simple example and then explain the actual problem I was working on.



    Simple example: Let $a in mathbbN$ and $b in mathbbZ$, then $a * b in mathbbZ$. The symbol I'm looking for (let's say it's $cdot$) would be used like this: $mathbbN * mathbbZ = mathbbZ$



    The example I was working on was to prove that the Hessian matrix, $H$, of a likelihood function for a normal distribution is negative definite at the solutions to the likelihood equations. Calculating $z^THz$ where $z = (a, b)^T$ gives:



    $$z^THz = frac-a^2n^2S_xx+frac-b^2n^32S_xx^2$$



    I know that




    • $a, b in mathbbR$ and $(a, b) ne (0, 0)$

    • $n in mathbbN^+$

    • $S_xx in mathbbR_ge 0$

    Then it can be shown that from the two elements that are added together only one can be zero under these conditions and the other one must be negative, so the Hessian is negative definite. Is there a symbol that I could use to show something like $-mathbbR^2mathbbN^2 = mathbbR^-$, etc. deriving the result?



    The question is not about how to calculate the definiteness but if there is a symbol that could be used here?



    Thanks,



    Norbert










    share|cite|improve this question











    $endgroup$














      1












      1








      1





      $begingroup$


      I think it's simpler if I write down where I wanted to use this symbol, rather than trying to explain it in an abstract way. I'll give a simple example and then explain the actual problem I was working on.



      Simple example: Let $a in mathbbN$ and $b in mathbbZ$, then $a * b in mathbbZ$. The symbol I'm looking for (let's say it's $cdot$) would be used like this: $mathbbN * mathbbZ = mathbbZ$



      The example I was working on was to prove that the Hessian matrix, $H$, of a likelihood function for a normal distribution is negative definite at the solutions to the likelihood equations. Calculating $z^THz$ where $z = (a, b)^T$ gives:



      $$z^THz = frac-a^2n^2S_xx+frac-b^2n^32S_xx^2$$



      I know that




      • $a, b in mathbbR$ and $(a, b) ne (0, 0)$

      • $n in mathbbN^+$

      • $S_xx in mathbbR_ge 0$

      Then it can be shown that from the two elements that are added together only one can be zero under these conditions and the other one must be negative, so the Hessian is negative definite. Is there a symbol that I could use to show something like $-mathbbR^2mathbbN^2 = mathbbR^-$, etc. deriving the result?



      The question is not about how to calculate the definiteness but if there is a symbol that could be used here?



      Thanks,



      Norbert










      share|cite|improve this question











      $endgroup$




      I think it's simpler if I write down where I wanted to use this symbol, rather than trying to explain it in an abstract way. I'll give a simple example and then explain the actual problem I was working on.



      Simple example: Let $a in mathbbN$ and $b in mathbbZ$, then $a * b in mathbbZ$. The symbol I'm looking for (let's say it's $cdot$) would be used like this: $mathbbN * mathbbZ = mathbbZ$



      The example I was working on was to prove that the Hessian matrix, $H$, of a likelihood function for a normal distribution is negative definite at the solutions to the likelihood equations. Calculating $z^THz$ where $z = (a, b)^T$ gives:



      $$z^THz = frac-a^2n^2S_xx+frac-b^2n^32S_xx^2$$



      I know that




      • $a, b in mathbbR$ and $(a, b) ne (0, 0)$

      • $n in mathbbN^+$

      • $S_xx in mathbbR_ge 0$

      Then it can be shown that from the two elements that are added together only one can be zero under these conditions and the other one must be negative, so the Hessian is negative definite. Is there a symbol that I could use to show something like $-mathbbR^2mathbbN^2 = mathbbR^-$, etc. deriving the result?



      The question is not about how to calculate the definiteness but if there is a symbol that could be used here?



      Thanks,



      Norbert







      notation






      share|cite|improve this question















      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question








      edited Apr 8 at 12:41









      Asaf Karagila

      308k33441775




      308k33441775










      asked Apr 8 at 12:19









      norbertknorbertk

      1183




      1183




















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          2












          $begingroup$

          The closest one would be applying an operand to a set:



          Let $M,N$ be two sets and $circ$ a mathematical operation on elements of $M$ and $N$ (e.g. addition, multiplication,...). Then
          $$M circ N := m circ n mid m in M, n in N.$$
          So for example, $-mathbbN = -n mid n in mathbbN$ or $mathbbN cdotmathbbZ = mathbbZ$ or maybe the most prominent example: $V + W = v + w mid v in V, w in W$ for two vector spaces $V,W$.



          In some cases, these operands on sets are commonly used, in other cases they are rather rare and it would be better to define or at least mention them first. You should also ask yourself if you really need this notation, so if a definition of it is really justified.






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$












          • $begingroup$
            Thanks Dirk. I don't really need this notation, I was just curious if one exists. I was thinking of just simply using the symbols for the sets, but it gets confusing when I raise a set to a power, e.g. $mathbbR^2$ is a set for vectors of dimension 2 and in my example, I would need to say something like squaring any number from $mathbbR$ gives a result in $mathbbR$, kind of like $f(x) = x^2, f: mathbbR to mathbbR$ without defining $f$
            $endgroup$
            – norbertk
            Apr 8 at 12:47










          • $begingroup$
            @norbertk the ambiguity of squaring is a pain. You could probably write $mathbb R*mathbb Rsubseteqmathbb R$ or similar, but definitely make sure you announce that you're using this sort of notation if it's not common in your context.
            $endgroup$
            – Mark S.
            Apr 9 at 11:48











          Your Answer








          StackExchange.ready(function()
          var channelOptions =
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "69"
          ;
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
          createEditor();
          );

          else
          createEditor();

          );

          function createEditor()
          StackExchange.prepareEditor(
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: true,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: 10,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader:
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          ,
          noCode: true, onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          );



          );













          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3179558%2fsymbol-for-any-number-within-a-set-for-proofs%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes








          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes









          2












          $begingroup$

          The closest one would be applying an operand to a set:



          Let $M,N$ be two sets and $circ$ a mathematical operation on elements of $M$ and $N$ (e.g. addition, multiplication,...). Then
          $$M circ N := m circ n mid m in M, n in N.$$
          So for example, $-mathbbN = -n mid n in mathbbN$ or $mathbbN cdotmathbbZ = mathbbZ$ or maybe the most prominent example: $V + W = v + w mid v in V, w in W$ for two vector spaces $V,W$.



          In some cases, these operands on sets are commonly used, in other cases they are rather rare and it would be better to define or at least mention them first. You should also ask yourself if you really need this notation, so if a definition of it is really justified.






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$












          • $begingroup$
            Thanks Dirk. I don't really need this notation, I was just curious if one exists. I was thinking of just simply using the symbols for the sets, but it gets confusing when I raise a set to a power, e.g. $mathbbR^2$ is a set for vectors of dimension 2 and in my example, I would need to say something like squaring any number from $mathbbR$ gives a result in $mathbbR$, kind of like $f(x) = x^2, f: mathbbR to mathbbR$ without defining $f$
            $endgroup$
            – norbertk
            Apr 8 at 12:47










          • $begingroup$
            @norbertk the ambiguity of squaring is a pain. You could probably write $mathbb R*mathbb Rsubseteqmathbb R$ or similar, but definitely make sure you announce that you're using this sort of notation if it's not common in your context.
            $endgroup$
            – Mark S.
            Apr 9 at 11:48















          2












          $begingroup$

          The closest one would be applying an operand to a set:



          Let $M,N$ be two sets and $circ$ a mathematical operation on elements of $M$ and $N$ (e.g. addition, multiplication,...). Then
          $$M circ N := m circ n mid m in M, n in N.$$
          So for example, $-mathbbN = -n mid n in mathbbN$ or $mathbbN cdotmathbbZ = mathbbZ$ or maybe the most prominent example: $V + W = v + w mid v in V, w in W$ for two vector spaces $V,W$.



          In some cases, these operands on sets are commonly used, in other cases they are rather rare and it would be better to define or at least mention them first. You should also ask yourself if you really need this notation, so if a definition of it is really justified.






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$












          • $begingroup$
            Thanks Dirk. I don't really need this notation, I was just curious if one exists. I was thinking of just simply using the symbols for the sets, but it gets confusing when I raise a set to a power, e.g. $mathbbR^2$ is a set for vectors of dimension 2 and in my example, I would need to say something like squaring any number from $mathbbR$ gives a result in $mathbbR$, kind of like $f(x) = x^2, f: mathbbR to mathbbR$ without defining $f$
            $endgroup$
            – norbertk
            Apr 8 at 12:47










          • $begingroup$
            @norbertk the ambiguity of squaring is a pain. You could probably write $mathbb R*mathbb Rsubseteqmathbb R$ or similar, but definitely make sure you announce that you're using this sort of notation if it's not common in your context.
            $endgroup$
            – Mark S.
            Apr 9 at 11:48













          2












          2








          2





          $begingroup$

          The closest one would be applying an operand to a set:



          Let $M,N$ be two sets and $circ$ a mathematical operation on elements of $M$ and $N$ (e.g. addition, multiplication,...). Then
          $$M circ N := m circ n mid m in M, n in N.$$
          So for example, $-mathbbN = -n mid n in mathbbN$ or $mathbbN cdotmathbbZ = mathbbZ$ or maybe the most prominent example: $V + W = v + w mid v in V, w in W$ for two vector spaces $V,W$.



          In some cases, these operands on sets are commonly used, in other cases they are rather rare and it would be better to define or at least mention them first. You should also ask yourself if you really need this notation, so if a definition of it is really justified.






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$



          The closest one would be applying an operand to a set:



          Let $M,N$ be two sets and $circ$ a mathematical operation on elements of $M$ and $N$ (e.g. addition, multiplication,...). Then
          $$M circ N := m circ n mid m in M, n in N.$$
          So for example, $-mathbbN = -n mid n in mathbbN$ or $mathbbN cdotmathbbZ = mathbbZ$ or maybe the most prominent example: $V + W = v + w mid v in V, w in W$ for two vector spaces $V,W$.



          In some cases, these operands on sets are commonly used, in other cases they are rather rare and it would be better to define or at least mention them first. You should also ask yourself if you really need this notation, so if a definition of it is really justified.







          share|cite|improve this answer












          share|cite|improve this answer



          share|cite|improve this answer










          answered Apr 8 at 12:33









          DirkDirk

          4,658219




          4,658219











          • $begingroup$
            Thanks Dirk. I don't really need this notation, I was just curious if one exists. I was thinking of just simply using the symbols for the sets, but it gets confusing when I raise a set to a power, e.g. $mathbbR^2$ is a set for vectors of dimension 2 and in my example, I would need to say something like squaring any number from $mathbbR$ gives a result in $mathbbR$, kind of like $f(x) = x^2, f: mathbbR to mathbbR$ without defining $f$
            $endgroup$
            – norbertk
            Apr 8 at 12:47










          • $begingroup$
            @norbertk the ambiguity of squaring is a pain. You could probably write $mathbb R*mathbb Rsubseteqmathbb R$ or similar, but definitely make sure you announce that you're using this sort of notation if it's not common in your context.
            $endgroup$
            – Mark S.
            Apr 9 at 11:48
















          • $begingroup$
            Thanks Dirk. I don't really need this notation, I was just curious if one exists. I was thinking of just simply using the symbols for the sets, but it gets confusing when I raise a set to a power, e.g. $mathbbR^2$ is a set for vectors of dimension 2 and in my example, I would need to say something like squaring any number from $mathbbR$ gives a result in $mathbbR$, kind of like $f(x) = x^2, f: mathbbR to mathbbR$ without defining $f$
            $endgroup$
            – norbertk
            Apr 8 at 12:47










          • $begingroup$
            @norbertk the ambiguity of squaring is a pain. You could probably write $mathbb R*mathbb Rsubseteqmathbb R$ or similar, but definitely make sure you announce that you're using this sort of notation if it's not common in your context.
            $endgroup$
            – Mark S.
            Apr 9 at 11:48















          $begingroup$
          Thanks Dirk. I don't really need this notation, I was just curious if one exists. I was thinking of just simply using the symbols for the sets, but it gets confusing when I raise a set to a power, e.g. $mathbbR^2$ is a set for vectors of dimension 2 and in my example, I would need to say something like squaring any number from $mathbbR$ gives a result in $mathbbR$, kind of like $f(x) = x^2, f: mathbbR to mathbbR$ without defining $f$
          $endgroup$
          – norbertk
          Apr 8 at 12:47




          $begingroup$
          Thanks Dirk. I don't really need this notation, I was just curious if one exists. I was thinking of just simply using the symbols for the sets, but it gets confusing when I raise a set to a power, e.g. $mathbbR^2$ is a set for vectors of dimension 2 and in my example, I would need to say something like squaring any number from $mathbbR$ gives a result in $mathbbR$, kind of like $f(x) = x^2, f: mathbbR to mathbbR$ without defining $f$
          $endgroup$
          – norbertk
          Apr 8 at 12:47












          $begingroup$
          @norbertk the ambiguity of squaring is a pain. You could probably write $mathbb R*mathbb Rsubseteqmathbb R$ or similar, but definitely make sure you announce that you're using this sort of notation if it's not common in your context.
          $endgroup$
          – Mark S.
          Apr 9 at 11:48




          $begingroup$
          @norbertk the ambiguity of squaring is a pain. You could probably write $mathbb R*mathbb Rsubseteqmathbb R$ or similar, but definitely make sure you announce that you're using this sort of notation if it's not common in your context.
          $endgroup$
          – Mark S.
          Apr 9 at 11:48

















          draft saved

          draft discarded
















































          Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid


          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

          Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3179558%2fsymbol-for-any-number-within-a-set-for-proofs%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          Hidroelektrana Sadržaj Povijest | Podjela hidroelektrana | Snaga dobivena u hidroelektranama | Dijelovi hidroelektrane | Uloga hidroelektrana u suvremenom svijetu | Prednosti hidroelektrana | Nedostaci hidroelektrana | Države s najvećom proizvodnjom hidro-električne energije | Deset najvećih hidroelektrana u svijetu | Hidroelektrane u Hrvatskoj | Izvori | Poveznice | Vanjske poveznice | Navigacijski izbornikTechnical Report, Version 2Zajedničkom poslužiteljuHidroelektranaHEP Proizvodnja d.o.o. - Hidroelektrane u Hrvatskoj

          WordPress Information needed

          Oconto (Nebraska) Índice Demografia | Geografia | Localidades na vizinhança | Referências Ligações externas | Menu de navegação41° 8' 29" N 99° 45' 41" O41° 8' 29" N 99° 45' 41" OU.S. Census Bureau. Census 2000 Summary File 1U.S. Census Bureau. Estimativa da população (julho de 2006)U.S. Board on Geographic Names. Topical Gazetteers Populated Places. Gráficos do banco de dados de altitudes dos Estados Unidos da AméricaEstatísticas, mapas e outras informações sobre Oconto em city-data.com