Is it hard to solve equations such as $sin x + sin(2x sin x) = sin 3x$? The 2019 Stack Overflow Developer Survey Results Are In Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Planned maintenance scheduled April 17/18, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern)Is $sin^3 x=frac34sin x - frac14sin 3x$? Is it possible to find radical solution of $sin(5beta)+sin(beta)=1$ and finding radical approximation of $pi$How to solve $3x+sin x = e^x$Using the Intermediate Value TheoremReference? filler: IRS, Rhind Papyrus, High-school algebraHow to solve simple trigonometry equation.Solving $sin x = 4sin10°sin40°sin(70°-x)$(Infinite) Nested radical equation, how to get the right solution?Finding number of solutions for a trigonometric equation.Is there a way to solve $sqrt a + sqrt b = sqrt n$ analytically?Is there a simple way to calculate $sin frac3pi10-sin fracpi10$?

Keeping a retro style to sci-fi spaceships?

How did the audience guess the pentatonic scale in Bobby McFerrin's presentation?

Make it rain characters

Relations between two reciprocal partial derivatives?

Road tyres vs "Street" tyres for charity ride on MTB Tandem

Is above average number of years spent on PhD considered a red flag in future academia or industry positions?

In horse breeding, what is the female equivalent of putting a horse out "to stud"?

How to test the equality of two Pearson correlation coefficients computed from the same sample?

I could not break this equation. Please help me

University's motivation for having tenure-track positions

Is there a writing software that you can sort scenes like slides in PowerPoint?

How did passengers keep warm on sail ships?

Am I ethically obligated to go into work on an off day if the reason is sudden?

What can I do if neighbor is blocking my solar panels intentionally?

How to politely respond to generic emails requesting a PhD/job in my lab? Without wasting too much time

The following signatures were invalid: EXPKEYSIG 1397BC53640DB551

What information about me do stores get via my credit card?

"... to apply for a visa" or "... and applied for a visa"?

What is this lever in Argentinian toilets?

Difference between "generating set" and free product?

Do warforged have souls?

Hiding Certain Lines on Table

How can I protect witches in combat who wear limited clothing?

does high air pressure throw off wheel balance?



Is it hard to solve equations such as $sin x + sin(2x sin x) = sin 3x$?



The 2019 Stack Overflow Developer Survey Results Are In
Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara
Planned maintenance scheduled April 17/18, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern)Is $sin^3 x=frac34sin x - frac14sin 3x$? Is it possible to find radical solution of $sin(5beta)+sin(beta)=1$ and finding radical approximation of $pi$How to solve $3x+sin x = e^x$Using the Intermediate Value TheoremReference? filler: IRS, Rhind Papyrus, High-school algebraHow to solve simple trigonometry equation.Solving $sin x = 4sin10°sin40°sin(70°-x)$(Infinite) Nested radical equation, how to get the right solution?Finding number of solutions for a trigonometric equation.Is there a way to solve $sqrt a + sqrt b = sqrt n$ analytically?Is there a simple way to calculate $sin frac3pi10-sin fracpi10$?










0












$begingroup$


I am talking about finding a simple, exact, non-trivial solution such as $x = pi/6$. Of course, $x=0$ or $x=pi$ are trivial solutions. I created this equation with its exact solution in mind beforehand, so that's how I know the solution, but if you don't know the solution to begin with, how easy is it to find it, other than using trial and error? Is it an exam question that you could ask to high school students? Another similar equation is $sin x + sin(2x sin x) = 1$ and it also has $x=pi/6$ as a solution. Interestingly, Wolfram Alpha can not find the exact solution, only an approximation (with as many correct digits as you want). See plot of $sin x + sin(2x sin x) - sin 3x$, below.



enter image description here










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$







  • 3




    $begingroup$
    Yes, it is! The problem is that you have "x" both inside and outside a transcendental function. If I really had to solve such a problem I would probably write sine and cosine in terms of exponentials and try to use "Lambert's w function".
    $endgroup$
    – user247327
    Apr 8 at 13:59










  • $begingroup$
    For high school students writing $sin(A)+sin(B)$ or $sin(A)-sin(B)$ as a product, followed by a factorization should be about right. That idea is not helpful here so I would say no, not suitable.
    $endgroup$
    – Paul
    Apr 8 at 14:01










  • $begingroup$
    It is not easy even if you know that: . $ sin(3x)=3cdot sin x -4cdot sin^3 x. $Source:math.stackexchange.com/questions/97654/…
    $endgroup$
    – NoChance
    Apr 8 at 14:41











  • $begingroup$
    You will have a hard time finding anything with physical meaning with the form $sin(ldots sin(x))$. Sine is a function that converts angles to ratios and chaining them like this makes no physical sense.
    $endgroup$
    – ja72
    Apr 8 at 15:13






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    " Is it an exam question that you could ask to high school students?" You should never ask a student a question that you yourself can't answer!
    $endgroup$
    – fleablood
    Apr 8 at 16:14















0












$begingroup$


I am talking about finding a simple, exact, non-trivial solution such as $x = pi/6$. Of course, $x=0$ or $x=pi$ are trivial solutions. I created this equation with its exact solution in mind beforehand, so that's how I know the solution, but if you don't know the solution to begin with, how easy is it to find it, other than using trial and error? Is it an exam question that you could ask to high school students? Another similar equation is $sin x + sin(2x sin x) = 1$ and it also has $x=pi/6$ as a solution. Interestingly, Wolfram Alpha can not find the exact solution, only an approximation (with as many correct digits as you want). See plot of $sin x + sin(2x sin x) - sin 3x$, below.



enter image description here










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$







  • 3




    $begingroup$
    Yes, it is! The problem is that you have "x" both inside and outside a transcendental function. If I really had to solve such a problem I would probably write sine and cosine in terms of exponentials and try to use "Lambert's w function".
    $endgroup$
    – user247327
    Apr 8 at 13:59










  • $begingroup$
    For high school students writing $sin(A)+sin(B)$ or $sin(A)-sin(B)$ as a product, followed by a factorization should be about right. That idea is not helpful here so I would say no, not suitable.
    $endgroup$
    – Paul
    Apr 8 at 14:01










  • $begingroup$
    It is not easy even if you know that: . $ sin(3x)=3cdot sin x -4cdot sin^3 x. $Source:math.stackexchange.com/questions/97654/…
    $endgroup$
    – NoChance
    Apr 8 at 14:41











  • $begingroup$
    You will have a hard time finding anything with physical meaning with the form $sin(ldots sin(x))$. Sine is a function that converts angles to ratios and chaining them like this makes no physical sense.
    $endgroup$
    – ja72
    Apr 8 at 15:13






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    " Is it an exam question that you could ask to high school students?" You should never ask a student a question that you yourself can't answer!
    $endgroup$
    – fleablood
    Apr 8 at 16:14













0












0








0





$begingroup$


I am talking about finding a simple, exact, non-trivial solution such as $x = pi/6$. Of course, $x=0$ or $x=pi$ are trivial solutions. I created this equation with its exact solution in mind beforehand, so that's how I know the solution, but if you don't know the solution to begin with, how easy is it to find it, other than using trial and error? Is it an exam question that you could ask to high school students? Another similar equation is $sin x + sin(2x sin x) = 1$ and it also has $x=pi/6$ as a solution. Interestingly, Wolfram Alpha can not find the exact solution, only an approximation (with as many correct digits as you want). See plot of $sin x + sin(2x sin x) - sin 3x$, below.



enter image description here










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$




I am talking about finding a simple, exact, non-trivial solution such as $x = pi/6$. Of course, $x=0$ or $x=pi$ are trivial solutions. I created this equation with its exact solution in mind beforehand, so that's how I know the solution, but if you don't know the solution to begin with, how easy is it to find it, other than using trial and error? Is it an exam question that you could ask to high school students? Another similar equation is $sin x + sin(2x sin x) = 1$ and it also has $x=pi/6$ as a solution. Interestingly, Wolfram Alpha can not find the exact solution, only an approximation (with as many correct digits as you want). See plot of $sin x + sin(2x sin x) - sin 3x$, below.



enter image description here







calculus algebra-precalculus trigonometry






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Apr 8 at 15:04







Vincent Granville

















asked Apr 8 at 13:50









Vincent GranvilleVincent Granville

697




697







  • 3




    $begingroup$
    Yes, it is! The problem is that you have "x" both inside and outside a transcendental function. If I really had to solve such a problem I would probably write sine and cosine in terms of exponentials and try to use "Lambert's w function".
    $endgroup$
    – user247327
    Apr 8 at 13:59










  • $begingroup$
    For high school students writing $sin(A)+sin(B)$ or $sin(A)-sin(B)$ as a product, followed by a factorization should be about right. That idea is not helpful here so I would say no, not suitable.
    $endgroup$
    – Paul
    Apr 8 at 14:01










  • $begingroup$
    It is not easy even if you know that: . $ sin(3x)=3cdot sin x -4cdot sin^3 x. $Source:math.stackexchange.com/questions/97654/…
    $endgroup$
    – NoChance
    Apr 8 at 14:41











  • $begingroup$
    You will have a hard time finding anything with physical meaning with the form $sin(ldots sin(x))$. Sine is a function that converts angles to ratios and chaining them like this makes no physical sense.
    $endgroup$
    – ja72
    Apr 8 at 15:13






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    " Is it an exam question that you could ask to high school students?" You should never ask a student a question that you yourself can't answer!
    $endgroup$
    – fleablood
    Apr 8 at 16:14












  • 3




    $begingroup$
    Yes, it is! The problem is that you have "x" both inside and outside a transcendental function. If I really had to solve such a problem I would probably write sine and cosine in terms of exponentials and try to use "Lambert's w function".
    $endgroup$
    – user247327
    Apr 8 at 13:59










  • $begingroup$
    For high school students writing $sin(A)+sin(B)$ or $sin(A)-sin(B)$ as a product, followed by a factorization should be about right. That idea is not helpful here so I would say no, not suitable.
    $endgroup$
    – Paul
    Apr 8 at 14:01










  • $begingroup$
    It is not easy even if you know that: . $ sin(3x)=3cdot sin x -4cdot sin^3 x. $Source:math.stackexchange.com/questions/97654/…
    $endgroup$
    – NoChance
    Apr 8 at 14:41











  • $begingroup$
    You will have a hard time finding anything with physical meaning with the form $sin(ldots sin(x))$. Sine is a function that converts angles to ratios and chaining them like this makes no physical sense.
    $endgroup$
    – ja72
    Apr 8 at 15:13






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    " Is it an exam question that you could ask to high school students?" You should never ask a student a question that you yourself can't answer!
    $endgroup$
    – fleablood
    Apr 8 at 16:14







3




3




$begingroup$
Yes, it is! The problem is that you have "x" both inside and outside a transcendental function. If I really had to solve such a problem I would probably write sine and cosine in terms of exponentials and try to use "Lambert's w function".
$endgroup$
– user247327
Apr 8 at 13:59




$begingroup$
Yes, it is! The problem is that you have "x" both inside and outside a transcendental function. If I really had to solve such a problem I would probably write sine and cosine in terms of exponentials and try to use "Lambert's w function".
$endgroup$
– user247327
Apr 8 at 13:59












$begingroup$
For high school students writing $sin(A)+sin(B)$ or $sin(A)-sin(B)$ as a product, followed by a factorization should be about right. That idea is not helpful here so I would say no, not suitable.
$endgroup$
– Paul
Apr 8 at 14:01




$begingroup$
For high school students writing $sin(A)+sin(B)$ or $sin(A)-sin(B)$ as a product, followed by a factorization should be about right. That idea is not helpful here so I would say no, not suitable.
$endgroup$
– Paul
Apr 8 at 14:01












$begingroup$
It is not easy even if you know that: . $ sin(3x)=3cdot sin x -4cdot sin^3 x. $Source:math.stackexchange.com/questions/97654/…
$endgroup$
– NoChance
Apr 8 at 14:41





$begingroup$
It is not easy even if you know that: . $ sin(3x)=3cdot sin x -4cdot sin^3 x. $Source:math.stackexchange.com/questions/97654/…
$endgroup$
– NoChance
Apr 8 at 14:41













$begingroup$
You will have a hard time finding anything with physical meaning with the form $sin(ldots sin(x))$. Sine is a function that converts angles to ratios and chaining them like this makes no physical sense.
$endgroup$
– ja72
Apr 8 at 15:13




$begingroup$
You will have a hard time finding anything with physical meaning with the form $sin(ldots sin(x))$. Sine is a function that converts angles to ratios and chaining them like this makes no physical sense.
$endgroup$
– ja72
Apr 8 at 15:13




1




1




$begingroup$
" Is it an exam question that you could ask to high school students?" You should never ask a student a question that you yourself can't answer!
$endgroup$
– fleablood
Apr 8 at 16:14




$begingroup$
" Is it an exam question that you could ask to high school students?" You should never ask a student a question that you yourself can't answer!
$endgroup$
– fleablood
Apr 8 at 16:14










2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















3












$begingroup$

Just kidding : if you expect analytical solutions for such monsters, stop dreaming !



Now, being serious : take into account that the simple $x=cos(x)$ does not shw analytical solutions and needs to be solved using numerical methods.



Consider that you look for the zero's of
$$f(x)=sin (x) + sin(2x sin (x)) -sin (3x)$$ Plot the function and, visually, locate where (more or less) is the root you want (there is an infinite number of solutions). Call this value $x_0$ and start using Newton method which will update the guess according to
$$x_k+1=x_k-fracf(x_k)f'(x_k)$$



For example, there is root "around" $x=2$. Let us try to get the following iterates
$$left(
beginarraycc
k & x_k \
0 & 2.0000000000000000000 \
1 & 2.2077878077914573503 \
2 & 2.2372992747296569378 \
3 & 2.2389331854770425722 \
4 & 2.2389386369537428867 \
5 & 2.2389386370146724403
endarray
right)$$
which is the solution for twenty significant figures.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    This equation has an infinite number of trivial solutions ($x = kpi$ where $k$ is any positive or negative integer), an infinite number of non-trivial solutions that can not be expressed analytically (for instance the one you found), and then one analytical, non-trivial solution, $x = pi/6$.
    $endgroup$
    – Vincent Granville
    Apr 8 at 15:00










  • $begingroup$
    Is the $pi/6$ solution really analytical? What analytical methods are used to identify it? Just guessing is not an analytical method.
    $endgroup$
    – Oscar Lanzi
    Apr 8 at 15:05










  • $begingroup$
    I did not use an analytical method to find the solution. It is part of a general type of equations, namely $f(x) + f(x f(x)) = 2 f(1)$ where one of the solutions must of course also be solution of $f(x) = 1$. In this case, $f(x) = 2sin x$.
    $endgroup$
    – Vincent Granville
    Apr 8 at 15:22






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @VincentGranville - there is more than one analytical solution. Check out $x=tfrac56pi$ as well as $x=-tfrac76pi$. These are generated by solving $$sin(x) = sin(2 x sin(x))$$
    $endgroup$
    – ja72
    Apr 8 at 20:44


















2












$begingroup$

The rule here is that anything that appears both inside and outside a transcendental function makes it impossible to solve analytically. Examples are



$$ x - 2 sin(x) = 0 $$
$$ x cos(x)+sin(x) = 1 $$



But you can convert any equation that has sines and cosines of $x$ into a polynomial using the tan-half-angle substitution $t = tan left( fracx2 right)$.



Example, solve:



$$ 3 sin(x)-cos(x) = sqrt6 $$



Use the substitution $x = 2 tan^-1(t)$ in the expression above which yields
$$ beginaligned
sin(x) & = frac2 t1+t^2 \
cos(x) & = frac1-t^21+t^2
endaligned $$



Now solve the expression below in terms of $t$



$$ 3 frac2 t1+t^2 -frac1-t^21+t^2 = sqrt6 $$



$$ t = begincases 1+sqrt6 & text1st solution \
tfrac1+sqrt65 & text2nd solution endcases $$



with the solution in terms of $x$



$$ x = begincases 2 tan^-1left(1+sqrt6right) = 2.57727... & text1st solution \
2 tan^-1left( frac1+sqrt65right) = 1.20783... & text2nd solution endcases $$



Confirmation:



$$ left. 3 sin(2.57727)-cos(2.57727) = sqrt6 phantommatrix\ \ right} 2.4494897...=2.4494897... $$



and



$$ left. 3 sin(1.20783)-cos(1.20783) = sqrt6 phantommatrix\ \ right} 2.4494897...=2.4494897... $$






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    "The rule here is that anything that appears both inside and outside a transcendental function makes it impossible to solve analytically." True in general, but this one is an exception.
    $endgroup$
    – Vincent Granville
    Apr 8 at 16:37










  • $begingroup$
    @VincentGranville - do tell. Don't leave us hanging. What is the exception?
    $endgroup$
    – ja72
    Apr 8 at 18:02










  • $begingroup$
    Solution is $pi/6$. I posted more details in one of my articles, at dsc.news/2LFF9xS
    $endgroup$
    – Vincent Granville
    Apr 8 at 18:58










  • $begingroup$
    @VincentGranville - I don't see how you go from $sin(3 x)$ to $2 f(1)$ for the RHS.
    $endgroup$
    – ja72
    Apr 8 at 20:34










  • $begingroup$
    Yes, there was one extra step. Since $2 = 2 cdot 1$, and since $sin 3x = sin(pi/2) = 1$, I replace $1$ by $sin 3x$.
    $endgroup$
    – Vincent Granville
    Apr 8 at 22:27











Your Answer








StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);

else
createEditor();

);

function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);



);













draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3179659%2fis-it-hard-to-solve-equations-such-as-sin-x-sin2x-sin-x-sin-3x%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes








2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









3












$begingroup$

Just kidding : if you expect analytical solutions for such monsters, stop dreaming !



Now, being serious : take into account that the simple $x=cos(x)$ does not shw analytical solutions and needs to be solved using numerical methods.



Consider that you look for the zero's of
$$f(x)=sin (x) + sin(2x sin (x)) -sin (3x)$$ Plot the function and, visually, locate where (more or less) is the root you want (there is an infinite number of solutions). Call this value $x_0$ and start using Newton method which will update the guess according to
$$x_k+1=x_k-fracf(x_k)f'(x_k)$$



For example, there is root "around" $x=2$. Let us try to get the following iterates
$$left(
beginarraycc
k & x_k \
0 & 2.0000000000000000000 \
1 & 2.2077878077914573503 \
2 & 2.2372992747296569378 \
3 & 2.2389331854770425722 \
4 & 2.2389386369537428867 \
5 & 2.2389386370146724403
endarray
right)$$
which is the solution for twenty significant figures.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    This equation has an infinite number of trivial solutions ($x = kpi$ where $k$ is any positive or negative integer), an infinite number of non-trivial solutions that can not be expressed analytically (for instance the one you found), and then one analytical, non-trivial solution, $x = pi/6$.
    $endgroup$
    – Vincent Granville
    Apr 8 at 15:00










  • $begingroup$
    Is the $pi/6$ solution really analytical? What analytical methods are used to identify it? Just guessing is not an analytical method.
    $endgroup$
    – Oscar Lanzi
    Apr 8 at 15:05










  • $begingroup$
    I did not use an analytical method to find the solution. It is part of a general type of equations, namely $f(x) + f(x f(x)) = 2 f(1)$ where one of the solutions must of course also be solution of $f(x) = 1$. In this case, $f(x) = 2sin x$.
    $endgroup$
    – Vincent Granville
    Apr 8 at 15:22






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @VincentGranville - there is more than one analytical solution. Check out $x=tfrac56pi$ as well as $x=-tfrac76pi$. These are generated by solving $$sin(x) = sin(2 x sin(x))$$
    $endgroup$
    – ja72
    Apr 8 at 20:44















3












$begingroup$

Just kidding : if you expect analytical solutions for such monsters, stop dreaming !



Now, being serious : take into account that the simple $x=cos(x)$ does not shw analytical solutions and needs to be solved using numerical methods.



Consider that you look for the zero's of
$$f(x)=sin (x) + sin(2x sin (x)) -sin (3x)$$ Plot the function and, visually, locate where (more or less) is the root you want (there is an infinite number of solutions). Call this value $x_0$ and start using Newton method which will update the guess according to
$$x_k+1=x_k-fracf(x_k)f'(x_k)$$



For example, there is root "around" $x=2$. Let us try to get the following iterates
$$left(
beginarraycc
k & x_k \
0 & 2.0000000000000000000 \
1 & 2.2077878077914573503 \
2 & 2.2372992747296569378 \
3 & 2.2389331854770425722 \
4 & 2.2389386369537428867 \
5 & 2.2389386370146724403
endarray
right)$$
which is the solution for twenty significant figures.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    This equation has an infinite number of trivial solutions ($x = kpi$ where $k$ is any positive or negative integer), an infinite number of non-trivial solutions that can not be expressed analytically (for instance the one you found), and then one analytical, non-trivial solution, $x = pi/6$.
    $endgroup$
    – Vincent Granville
    Apr 8 at 15:00










  • $begingroup$
    Is the $pi/6$ solution really analytical? What analytical methods are used to identify it? Just guessing is not an analytical method.
    $endgroup$
    – Oscar Lanzi
    Apr 8 at 15:05










  • $begingroup$
    I did not use an analytical method to find the solution. It is part of a general type of equations, namely $f(x) + f(x f(x)) = 2 f(1)$ where one of the solutions must of course also be solution of $f(x) = 1$. In this case, $f(x) = 2sin x$.
    $endgroup$
    – Vincent Granville
    Apr 8 at 15:22






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @VincentGranville - there is more than one analytical solution. Check out $x=tfrac56pi$ as well as $x=-tfrac76pi$. These are generated by solving $$sin(x) = sin(2 x sin(x))$$
    $endgroup$
    – ja72
    Apr 8 at 20:44













3












3








3





$begingroup$

Just kidding : if you expect analytical solutions for such monsters, stop dreaming !



Now, being serious : take into account that the simple $x=cos(x)$ does not shw analytical solutions and needs to be solved using numerical methods.



Consider that you look for the zero's of
$$f(x)=sin (x) + sin(2x sin (x)) -sin (3x)$$ Plot the function and, visually, locate where (more or less) is the root you want (there is an infinite number of solutions). Call this value $x_0$ and start using Newton method which will update the guess according to
$$x_k+1=x_k-fracf(x_k)f'(x_k)$$



For example, there is root "around" $x=2$. Let us try to get the following iterates
$$left(
beginarraycc
k & x_k \
0 & 2.0000000000000000000 \
1 & 2.2077878077914573503 \
2 & 2.2372992747296569378 \
3 & 2.2389331854770425722 \
4 & 2.2389386369537428867 \
5 & 2.2389386370146724403
endarray
right)$$
which is the solution for twenty significant figures.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$



Just kidding : if you expect analytical solutions for such monsters, stop dreaming !



Now, being serious : take into account that the simple $x=cos(x)$ does not shw analytical solutions and needs to be solved using numerical methods.



Consider that you look for the zero's of
$$f(x)=sin (x) + sin(2x sin (x)) -sin (3x)$$ Plot the function and, visually, locate where (more or less) is the root you want (there is an infinite number of solutions). Call this value $x_0$ and start using Newton method which will update the guess according to
$$x_k+1=x_k-fracf(x_k)f'(x_k)$$



For example, there is root "around" $x=2$. Let us try to get the following iterates
$$left(
beginarraycc
k & x_k \
0 & 2.0000000000000000000 \
1 & 2.2077878077914573503 \
2 & 2.2372992747296569378 \
3 & 2.2389331854770425722 \
4 & 2.2389386369537428867 \
5 & 2.2389386370146724403
endarray
right)$$
which is the solution for twenty significant figures.







share|cite|improve this answer












share|cite|improve this answer



share|cite|improve this answer










answered Apr 8 at 14:42









Claude LeiboviciClaude Leibovici

125k1158135




125k1158135











  • $begingroup$
    This equation has an infinite number of trivial solutions ($x = kpi$ where $k$ is any positive or negative integer), an infinite number of non-trivial solutions that can not be expressed analytically (for instance the one you found), and then one analytical, non-trivial solution, $x = pi/6$.
    $endgroup$
    – Vincent Granville
    Apr 8 at 15:00










  • $begingroup$
    Is the $pi/6$ solution really analytical? What analytical methods are used to identify it? Just guessing is not an analytical method.
    $endgroup$
    – Oscar Lanzi
    Apr 8 at 15:05










  • $begingroup$
    I did not use an analytical method to find the solution. It is part of a general type of equations, namely $f(x) + f(x f(x)) = 2 f(1)$ where one of the solutions must of course also be solution of $f(x) = 1$. In this case, $f(x) = 2sin x$.
    $endgroup$
    – Vincent Granville
    Apr 8 at 15:22






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @VincentGranville - there is more than one analytical solution. Check out $x=tfrac56pi$ as well as $x=-tfrac76pi$. These are generated by solving $$sin(x) = sin(2 x sin(x))$$
    $endgroup$
    – ja72
    Apr 8 at 20:44
















  • $begingroup$
    This equation has an infinite number of trivial solutions ($x = kpi$ where $k$ is any positive or negative integer), an infinite number of non-trivial solutions that can not be expressed analytically (for instance the one you found), and then one analytical, non-trivial solution, $x = pi/6$.
    $endgroup$
    – Vincent Granville
    Apr 8 at 15:00










  • $begingroup$
    Is the $pi/6$ solution really analytical? What analytical methods are used to identify it? Just guessing is not an analytical method.
    $endgroup$
    – Oscar Lanzi
    Apr 8 at 15:05










  • $begingroup$
    I did not use an analytical method to find the solution. It is part of a general type of equations, namely $f(x) + f(x f(x)) = 2 f(1)$ where one of the solutions must of course also be solution of $f(x) = 1$. In this case, $f(x) = 2sin x$.
    $endgroup$
    – Vincent Granville
    Apr 8 at 15:22






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @VincentGranville - there is more than one analytical solution. Check out $x=tfrac56pi$ as well as $x=-tfrac76pi$. These are generated by solving $$sin(x) = sin(2 x sin(x))$$
    $endgroup$
    – ja72
    Apr 8 at 20:44















$begingroup$
This equation has an infinite number of trivial solutions ($x = kpi$ where $k$ is any positive or negative integer), an infinite number of non-trivial solutions that can not be expressed analytically (for instance the one you found), and then one analytical, non-trivial solution, $x = pi/6$.
$endgroup$
– Vincent Granville
Apr 8 at 15:00




$begingroup$
This equation has an infinite number of trivial solutions ($x = kpi$ where $k$ is any positive or negative integer), an infinite number of non-trivial solutions that can not be expressed analytically (for instance the one you found), and then one analytical, non-trivial solution, $x = pi/6$.
$endgroup$
– Vincent Granville
Apr 8 at 15:00












$begingroup$
Is the $pi/6$ solution really analytical? What analytical methods are used to identify it? Just guessing is not an analytical method.
$endgroup$
– Oscar Lanzi
Apr 8 at 15:05




$begingroup$
Is the $pi/6$ solution really analytical? What analytical methods are used to identify it? Just guessing is not an analytical method.
$endgroup$
– Oscar Lanzi
Apr 8 at 15:05












$begingroup$
I did not use an analytical method to find the solution. It is part of a general type of equations, namely $f(x) + f(x f(x)) = 2 f(1)$ where one of the solutions must of course also be solution of $f(x) = 1$. In this case, $f(x) = 2sin x$.
$endgroup$
– Vincent Granville
Apr 8 at 15:22




$begingroup$
I did not use an analytical method to find the solution. It is part of a general type of equations, namely $f(x) + f(x f(x)) = 2 f(1)$ where one of the solutions must of course also be solution of $f(x) = 1$. In this case, $f(x) = 2sin x$.
$endgroup$
– Vincent Granville
Apr 8 at 15:22




1




1




$begingroup$
@VincentGranville - there is more than one analytical solution. Check out $x=tfrac56pi$ as well as $x=-tfrac76pi$. These are generated by solving $$sin(x) = sin(2 x sin(x))$$
$endgroup$
– ja72
Apr 8 at 20:44




$begingroup$
@VincentGranville - there is more than one analytical solution. Check out $x=tfrac56pi$ as well as $x=-tfrac76pi$. These are generated by solving $$sin(x) = sin(2 x sin(x))$$
$endgroup$
– ja72
Apr 8 at 20:44











2












$begingroup$

The rule here is that anything that appears both inside and outside a transcendental function makes it impossible to solve analytically. Examples are



$$ x - 2 sin(x) = 0 $$
$$ x cos(x)+sin(x) = 1 $$



But you can convert any equation that has sines and cosines of $x$ into a polynomial using the tan-half-angle substitution $t = tan left( fracx2 right)$.



Example, solve:



$$ 3 sin(x)-cos(x) = sqrt6 $$



Use the substitution $x = 2 tan^-1(t)$ in the expression above which yields
$$ beginaligned
sin(x) & = frac2 t1+t^2 \
cos(x) & = frac1-t^21+t^2
endaligned $$



Now solve the expression below in terms of $t$



$$ 3 frac2 t1+t^2 -frac1-t^21+t^2 = sqrt6 $$



$$ t = begincases 1+sqrt6 & text1st solution \
tfrac1+sqrt65 & text2nd solution endcases $$



with the solution in terms of $x$



$$ x = begincases 2 tan^-1left(1+sqrt6right) = 2.57727... & text1st solution \
2 tan^-1left( frac1+sqrt65right) = 1.20783... & text2nd solution endcases $$



Confirmation:



$$ left. 3 sin(2.57727)-cos(2.57727) = sqrt6 phantommatrix\ \ right} 2.4494897...=2.4494897... $$



and



$$ left. 3 sin(1.20783)-cos(1.20783) = sqrt6 phantommatrix\ \ right} 2.4494897...=2.4494897... $$






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    "The rule here is that anything that appears both inside and outside a transcendental function makes it impossible to solve analytically." True in general, but this one is an exception.
    $endgroup$
    – Vincent Granville
    Apr 8 at 16:37










  • $begingroup$
    @VincentGranville - do tell. Don't leave us hanging. What is the exception?
    $endgroup$
    – ja72
    Apr 8 at 18:02










  • $begingroup$
    Solution is $pi/6$. I posted more details in one of my articles, at dsc.news/2LFF9xS
    $endgroup$
    – Vincent Granville
    Apr 8 at 18:58










  • $begingroup$
    @VincentGranville - I don't see how you go from $sin(3 x)$ to $2 f(1)$ for the RHS.
    $endgroup$
    – ja72
    Apr 8 at 20:34










  • $begingroup$
    Yes, there was one extra step. Since $2 = 2 cdot 1$, and since $sin 3x = sin(pi/2) = 1$, I replace $1$ by $sin 3x$.
    $endgroup$
    – Vincent Granville
    Apr 8 at 22:27















2












$begingroup$

The rule here is that anything that appears both inside and outside a transcendental function makes it impossible to solve analytically. Examples are



$$ x - 2 sin(x) = 0 $$
$$ x cos(x)+sin(x) = 1 $$



But you can convert any equation that has sines and cosines of $x$ into a polynomial using the tan-half-angle substitution $t = tan left( fracx2 right)$.



Example, solve:



$$ 3 sin(x)-cos(x) = sqrt6 $$



Use the substitution $x = 2 tan^-1(t)$ in the expression above which yields
$$ beginaligned
sin(x) & = frac2 t1+t^2 \
cos(x) & = frac1-t^21+t^2
endaligned $$



Now solve the expression below in terms of $t$



$$ 3 frac2 t1+t^2 -frac1-t^21+t^2 = sqrt6 $$



$$ t = begincases 1+sqrt6 & text1st solution \
tfrac1+sqrt65 & text2nd solution endcases $$



with the solution in terms of $x$



$$ x = begincases 2 tan^-1left(1+sqrt6right) = 2.57727... & text1st solution \
2 tan^-1left( frac1+sqrt65right) = 1.20783... & text2nd solution endcases $$



Confirmation:



$$ left. 3 sin(2.57727)-cos(2.57727) = sqrt6 phantommatrix\ \ right} 2.4494897...=2.4494897... $$



and



$$ left. 3 sin(1.20783)-cos(1.20783) = sqrt6 phantommatrix\ \ right} 2.4494897...=2.4494897... $$






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    "The rule here is that anything that appears both inside and outside a transcendental function makes it impossible to solve analytically." True in general, but this one is an exception.
    $endgroup$
    – Vincent Granville
    Apr 8 at 16:37










  • $begingroup$
    @VincentGranville - do tell. Don't leave us hanging. What is the exception?
    $endgroup$
    – ja72
    Apr 8 at 18:02










  • $begingroup$
    Solution is $pi/6$. I posted more details in one of my articles, at dsc.news/2LFF9xS
    $endgroup$
    – Vincent Granville
    Apr 8 at 18:58










  • $begingroup$
    @VincentGranville - I don't see how you go from $sin(3 x)$ to $2 f(1)$ for the RHS.
    $endgroup$
    – ja72
    Apr 8 at 20:34










  • $begingroup$
    Yes, there was one extra step. Since $2 = 2 cdot 1$, and since $sin 3x = sin(pi/2) = 1$, I replace $1$ by $sin 3x$.
    $endgroup$
    – Vincent Granville
    Apr 8 at 22:27













2












2








2





$begingroup$

The rule here is that anything that appears both inside and outside a transcendental function makes it impossible to solve analytically. Examples are



$$ x - 2 sin(x) = 0 $$
$$ x cos(x)+sin(x) = 1 $$



But you can convert any equation that has sines and cosines of $x$ into a polynomial using the tan-half-angle substitution $t = tan left( fracx2 right)$.



Example, solve:



$$ 3 sin(x)-cos(x) = sqrt6 $$



Use the substitution $x = 2 tan^-1(t)$ in the expression above which yields
$$ beginaligned
sin(x) & = frac2 t1+t^2 \
cos(x) & = frac1-t^21+t^2
endaligned $$



Now solve the expression below in terms of $t$



$$ 3 frac2 t1+t^2 -frac1-t^21+t^2 = sqrt6 $$



$$ t = begincases 1+sqrt6 & text1st solution \
tfrac1+sqrt65 & text2nd solution endcases $$



with the solution in terms of $x$



$$ x = begincases 2 tan^-1left(1+sqrt6right) = 2.57727... & text1st solution \
2 tan^-1left( frac1+sqrt65right) = 1.20783... & text2nd solution endcases $$



Confirmation:



$$ left. 3 sin(2.57727)-cos(2.57727) = sqrt6 phantommatrix\ \ right} 2.4494897...=2.4494897... $$



and



$$ left. 3 sin(1.20783)-cos(1.20783) = sqrt6 phantommatrix\ \ right} 2.4494897...=2.4494897... $$






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$



The rule here is that anything that appears both inside and outside a transcendental function makes it impossible to solve analytically. Examples are



$$ x - 2 sin(x) = 0 $$
$$ x cos(x)+sin(x) = 1 $$



But you can convert any equation that has sines and cosines of $x$ into a polynomial using the tan-half-angle substitution $t = tan left( fracx2 right)$.



Example, solve:



$$ 3 sin(x)-cos(x) = sqrt6 $$



Use the substitution $x = 2 tan^-1(t)$ in the expression above which yields
$$ beginaligned
sin(x) & = frac2 t1+t^2 \
cos(x) & = frac1-t^21+t^2
endaligned $$



Now solve the expression below in terms of $t$



$$ 3 frac2 t1+t^2 -frac1-t^21+t^2 = sqrt6 $$



$$ t = begincases 1+sqrt6 & text1st solution \
tfrac1+sqrt65 & text2nd solution endcases $$



with the solution in terms of $x$



$$ x = begincases 2 tan^-1left(1+sqrt6right) = 2.57727... & text1st solution \
2 tan^-1left( frac1+sqrt65right) = 1.20783... & text2nd solution endcases $$



Confirmation:



$$ left. 3 sin(2.57727)-cos(2.57727) = sqrt6 phantommatrix\ \ right} 2.4494897...=2.4494897... $$



and



$$ left. 3 sin(1.20783)-cos(1.20783) = sqrt6 phantommatrix\ \ right} 2.4494897...=2.4494897... $$







share|cite|improve this answer












share|cite|improve this answer



share|cite|improve this answer










answered Apr 8 at 16:03









ja72ja72

7,58212044




7,58212044











  • $begingroup$
    "The rule here is that anything that appears both inside and outside a transcendental function makes it impossible to solve analytically." True in general, but this one is an exception.
    $endgroup$
    – Vincent Granville
    Apr 8 at 16:37










  • $begingroup$
    @VincentGranville - do tell. Don't leave us hanging. What is the exception?
    $endgroup$
    – ja72
    Apr 8 at 18:02










  • $begingroup$
    Solution is $pi/6$. I posted more details in one of my articles, at dsc.news/2LFF9xS
    $endgroup$
    – Vincent Granville
    Apr 8 at 18:58










  • $begingroup$
    @VincentGranville - I don't see how you go from $sin(3 x)$ to $2 f(1)$ for the RHS.
    $endgroup$
    – ja72
    Apr 8 at 20:34










  • $begingroup$
    Yes, there was one extra step. Since $2 = 2 cdot 1$, and since $sin 3x = sin(pi/2) = 1$, I replace $1$ by $sin 3x$.
    $endgroup$
    – Vincent Granville
    Apr 8 at 22:27
















  • $begingroup$
    "The rule here is that anything that appears both inside and outside a transcendental function makes it impossible to solve analytically." True in general, but this one is an exception.
    $endgroup$
    – Vincent Granville
    Apr 8 at 16:37










  • $begingroup$
    @VincentGranville - do tell. Don't leave us hanging. What is the exception?
    $endgroup$
    – ja72
    Apr 8 at 18:02










  • $begingroup$
    Solution is $pi/6$. I posted more details in one of my articles, at dsc.news/2LFF9xS
    $endgroup$
    – Vincent Granville
    Apr 8 at 18:58










  • $begingroup$
    @VincentGranville - I don't see how you go from $sin(3 x)$ to $2 f(1)$ for the RHS.
    $endgroup$
    – ja72
    Apr 8 at 20:34










  • $begingroup$
    Yes, there was one extra step. Since $2 = 2 cdot 1$, and since $sin 3x = sin(pi/2) = 1$, I replace $1$ by $sin 3x$.
    $endgroup$
    – Vincent Granville
    Apr 8 at 22:27















$begingroup$
"The rule here is that anything that appears both inside and outside a transcendental function makes it impossible to solve analytically." True in general, but this one is an exception.
$endgroup$
– Vincent Granville
Apr 8 at 16:37




$begingroup$
"The rule here is that anything that appears both inside and outside a transcendental function makes it impossible to solve analytically." True in general, but this one is an exception.
$endgroup$
– Vincent Granville
Apr 8 at 16:37












$begingroup$
@VincentGranville - do tell. Don't leave us hanging. What is the exception?
$endgroup$
– ja72
Apr 8 at 18:02




$begingroup$
@VincentGranville - do tell. Don't leave us hanging. What is the exception?
$endgroup$
– ja72
Apr 8 at 18:02












$begingroup$
Solution is $pi/6$. I posted more details in one of my articles, at dsc.news/2LFF9xS
$endgroup$
– Vincent Granville
Apr 8 at 18:58




$begingroup$
Solution is $pi/6$. I posted more details in one of my articles, at dsc.news/2LFF9xS
$endgroup$
– Vincent Granville
Apr 8 at 18:58












$begingroup$
@VincentGranville - I don't see how you go from $sin(3 x)$ to $2 f(1)$ for the RHS.
$endgroup$
– ja72
Apr 8 at 20:34




$begingroup$
@VincentGranville - I don't see how you go from $sin(3 x)$ to $2 f(1)$ for the RHS.
$endgroup$
– ja72
Apr 8 at 20:34












$begingroup$
Yes, there was one extra step. Since $2 = 2 cdot 1$, and since $sin 3x = sin(pi/2) = 1$, I replace $1$ by $sin 3x$.
$endgroup$
– Vincent Granville
Apr 8 at 22:27




$begingroup$
Yes, there was one extra step. Since $2 = 2 cdot 1$, and since $sin 3x = sin(pi/2) = 1$, I replace $1$ by $sin 3x$.
$endgroup$
– Vincent Granville
Apr 8 at 22:27

















draft saved

draft discarded
















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid


  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3179659%2fis-it-hard-to-solve-equations-such-as-sin-x-sin2x-sin-x-sin-3x%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

Bosc Connection Yimello Approaching Angry The produce zaps the market. 구성 기록되다 변경...

WordPress Information needed

Hidroelektrana Sadržaj Povijest | Podjela hidroelektrana | Snaga dobivena u hidroelektranama | Dijelovi hidroelektrane | Uloga hidroelektrana u suvremenom svijetu | Prednosti hidroelektrana | Nedostaci hidroelektrana | Države s najvećom proizvodnjom hidro-električne energije | Deset najvećih hidroelektrana u svijetu | Hidroelektrane u Hrvatskoj | Izvori | Poveznice | Vanjske poveznice | Navigacijski izbornikTechnical Report, Version 2Zajedničkom poslužiteljuHidroelektranaHEP Proizvodnja d.o.o. - Hidroelektrane u Hrvatskoj