Integral form of the conservation law $u_t+f(u)_x=0$ The 2019 Stack Overflow Developer Survey Results Are In Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Planned maintenance scheduled April 17/18, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern)Prove an identity for the continuous integral solution of the conservation lawreversibility scalar conservation lawEntropy solution to scalar conservation lawEvans PDE Conservation Law IntegralWeak solutions of initial value problem of conservation laws with $L^infty$ initial dataNonsmooth data in the conservation laws, their approximations and limitsProperties of the solution of conservation lawsFinite-difference vs finite-volume schemes for conservation lawsNumerical convergence of Godunov schemeDiscrete entropy inequality for hyperbolic system
Is there a writing software that you can sort scenes like slides in PowerPoint?
"... to apply for a visa" or "... and applied for a visa"?
Did the new image of black hole confirm the general theory of relativity?
Simulating Exploding Dice
What can I do if neighbor is blocking my solar panels intentionally?
Is every episode of "Where are my Pants?" identical?
Can smartphones with the same camera sensor have different image quality?
Was credit for the black hole image misattributed?
Python - Fishing Simulator
What is special about square numbers here?
Finding the path in a graph from A to B then back to A with a minimum of shared edges
How long does the line of fire that you can create as an action using the Investiture of Flame spell last?
How to test the equality of two Pearson correlation coefficients computed from the same sample?
Match Roman Numerals
Is it ethical to upload a automatically generated paper to a non peer-reviewed site as part of a larger research?
What's the point in a preamp?
How does ice melt when immersed in water?
University's motivation for having tenure-track positions
I could not break this equation. Please help me
How do you keep chess fun when your opponent constantly beats you?
In horse breeding, what is the female equivalent of putting a horse out "to stud"?
Derivation tree not rendering
What is this lever in Argentinian toilets?
Does Parliament hold absolute power in the UK?
Integral form of the conservation law $u_t+f(u)_x=0$
The 2019 Stack Overflow Developer Survey Results Are In
Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara
Planned maintenance scheduled April 17/18, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern)Prove an identity for the continuous integral solution of the conservation lawreversibility scalar conservation lawEntropy solution to scalar conservation lawEvans PDE Conservation Law IntegralWeak solutions of initial value problem of conservation laws with $L^infty$ initial dataNonsmooth data in the conservation laws, their approximations and limitsProperties of the solution of conservation lawsFinite-difference vs finite-volume schemes for conservation lawsNumerical convergence of Godunov schemeDiscrete entropy inequality for hyperbolic system
$begingroup$
Consider the conservation law given by
$$u_t+f(u)_x=0$$
We know that in general weak solutions are not smooth but are bounded in $L^infty$ norm (they do not belong to Sobolev spaces).
However while deriving the numerical schemes most of the books say, integrating the conservation law over $(a,b) times (t_1,t_2)$ and applying fundamental theorem of calculus we get
$$int_a^b u(x,t_1)dx - int_a^b u(x,t_2)dx= -int_t_1^t_2 f(u(b,t)dt+ int_t_1^t_2 f(u(a,t)dt$$
I have the following doubts:
How can we perform integration by parts as the solution does not possess any regularity?
If a function satisfies the above integral formulation, can we say that it is a weak solution? Conversely, if $u$ is a weak solution, will it satisfy the above integral formulation?
Thank you.
analysis pde numerical-methods hyperbolic-equations
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Consider the conservation law given by
$$u_t+f(u)_x=0$$
We know that in general weak solutions are not smooth but are bounded in $L^infty$ norm (they do not belong to Sobolev spaces).
However while deriving the numerical schemes most of the books say, integrating the conservation law over $(a,b) times (t_1,t_2)$ and applying fundamental theorem of calculus we get
$$int_a^b u(x,t_1)dx - int_a^b u(x,t_2)dx= -int_t_1^t_2 f(u(b,t)dt+ int_t_1^t_2 f(u(a,t)dt$$
I have the following doubts:
How can we perform integration by parts as the solution does not possess any regularity?
If a function satisfies the above integral formulation, can we say that it is a weak solution? Conversely, if $u$ is a weak solution, will it satisfy the above integral formulation?
Thank you.
analysis pde numerical-methods hyperbolic-equations
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Consider the conservation law given by
$$u_t+f(u)_x=0$$
We know that in general weak solutions are not smooth but are bounded in $L^infty$ norm (they do not belong to Sobolev spaces).
However while deriving the numerical schemes most of the books say, integrating the conservation law over $(a,b) times (t_1,t_2)$ and applying fundamental theorem of calculus we get
$$int_a^b u(x,t_1)dx - int_a^b u(x,t_2)dx= -int_t_1^t_2 f(u(b,t)dt+ int_t_1^t_2 f(u(a,t)dt$$
I have the following doubts:
How can we perform integration by parts as the solution does not possess any regularity?
If a function satisfies the above integral formulation, can we say that it is a weak solution? Conversely, if $u$ is a weak solution, will it satisfy the above integral formulation?
Thank you.
analysis pde numerical-methods hyperbolic-equations
$endgroup$
Consider the conservation law given by
$$u_t+f(u)_x=0$$
We know that in general weak solutions are not smooth but are bounded in $L^infty$ norm (they do not belong to Sobolev spaces).
However while deriving the numerical schemes most of the books say, integrating the conservation law over $(a,b) times (t_1,t_2)$ and applying fundamental theorem of calculus we get
$$int_a^b u(x,t_1)dx - int_a^b u(x,t_2)dx= -int_t_1^t_2 f(u(b,t)dt+ int_t_1^t_2 f(u(a,t)dt$$
I have the following doubts:
How can we perform integration by parts as the solution does not possess any regularity?
If a function satisfies the above integral formulation, can we say that it is a weak solution? Conversely, if $u$ is a weak solution, will it satisfy the above integral formulation?
Thank you.
analysis pde numerical-methods hyperbolic-equations
analysis pde numerical-methods hyperbolic-equations
edited Apr 8 at 13:43
Andrews
1,2962423
1,2962423
asked Apr 4 at 12:39
RosyRosy
1476
1476
add a comment |
add a comment |
0
active
oldest
votes
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3174583%2fintegral-form-of-the-conservation-law-u-tfu-x-0%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
0
active
oldest
votes
0
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3174583%2fintegral-form-of-the-conservation-law-u-tfu-x-0%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown