Transition matrix for a two state Markov Chain The 2019 Stack Overflow Developer Survey Results Are InMarkov chain transition matrixTwo different ways of constructing a continuous time Markov chain from discrete time oneEquivalence Classes of a Markov Chain with Transition MatrixChanges in the transition matrix of a Markov chainExpected payoff of a 2-State Markov ChainReduce the mixing time by switching a regular state to an absorbing state in a Markov chainHow to model a markov chain that randomly switches between two transition matrices?Markov Chain never reaches a statePeriodic markov chain - finding initial conditions causing convergence to steady state?Find probability of markov chain ended in state $0$.

Write faster on AT24C32

Am I thawing this London Broil safely?

How to type this arrow in math mode?

What does ひと匙 mean in this manga and has it been used colloquially?

What could be the right powersource for 15 seconds lifespan disposable giant chainsaw?

Why hard-Brexiteers don't insist on a hard border to prevent illegal immigration after Brexit?

How technical should a Scrum Master be to effectively remove impediments?

Is "plugging out" electronic devices an American expression?

Is a "Democratic" Oligarchy-Style System Possible?

Aging parents with no investments

STM32 programming and BOOT0 pin

Is flight data recorder erased after every flight?

Shouldn't "much" here be used instead of "more"?

Are there incongruent pythagorean triangles with the same perimeter and same area?

Do these rules for Critical Successes and Critical Failures seem Fair?

Return to UK after being refused entry years previously

Why was M87 targetted for the Event Horizon Telescope instead of Sagittarius A*?

Is there any way to tell whether the shot is going to hit you or not?

Does a dangling wire really electrocute me if I'm standing in water?

Why not us interferometry to take a picture of Pluto?

Multiply Two Integer Polynomials

Can we generate random numbers using irrational numbers like π and e?

Did 3000BC Egyptians use meteoric iron weapons?

How to notate time signature switching consistently every measure



Transition matrix for a two state Markov Chain



The 2019 Stack Overflow Developer Survey Results Are InMarkov chain transition matrixTwo different ways of constructing a continuous time Markov chain from discrete time oneEquivalence Classes of a Markov Chain with Transition MatrixChanges in the transition matrix of a Markov chainExpected payoff of a 2-State Markov ChainReduce the mixing time by switching a regular state to an absorbing state in a Markov chainHow to model a markov chain that randomly switches between two transition matrices?Markov Chain never reaches a statePeriodic markov chain - finding initial conditions causing convergence to steady state?Find probability of markov chain ended in state $0$.










3












$begingroup$


What is the most general transition matrix for a two state Markov Chain? (both Markov and homogeneous). And show that any such chain has an equilibrium vector.



Is it should be the following matrix? If it is, how could we show it alway exists an equilibrium vector? beginbmatrix
p & 1-p \
q & 1-q
endbmatrix










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$
















    3












    $begingroup$


    What is the most general transition matrix for a two state Markov Chain? (both Markov and homogeneous). And show that any such chain has an equilibrium vector.



    Is it should be the following matrix? If it is, how could we show it alway exists an equilibrium vector? beginbmatrix
    p & 1-p \
    q & 1-q
    endbmatrix










    share|cite|improve this question









    $endgroup$














      3












      3








      3





      $begingroup$


      What is the most general transition matrix for a two state Markov Chain? (both Markov and homogeneous). And show that any such chain has an equilibrium vector.



      Is it should be the following matrix? If it is, how could we show it alway exists an equilibrium vector? beginbmatrix
      p & 1-p \
      q & 1-q
      endbmatrix










      share|cite|improve this question









      $endgroup$




      What is the most general transition matrix for a two state Markov Chain? (both Markov and homogeneous). And show that any such chain has an equilibrium vector.



      Is it should be the following matrix? If it is, how could we show it alway exists an equilibrium vector? beginbmatrix
      p & 1-p \
      q & 1-q
      endbmatrix







      stochastic-processes






      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question











      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question










      asked Apr 6 at 20:11









      EricEric

      577




      577




















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          3












          $begingroup$

          You're right, that's the two-state transition matrix in full generality. To find an equilibrium vector, we solve:
          beginalign
          beginbmatrix
          x & y
          endbmatrix
          cdot
          beginbmatrix
          p & 1-p \ q & 1-q
          endbmatrix
          =
          beginbmatrix
          x & y
          endbmatrix,
          endalign

          which yields the system
          beginequation
          left{
          beginaligned
          px+qy&=x
          \(1-p)x+(1-q)y&=y
          endaligned
          right.
          .
          endequation

          The second equation is redundant,
          beginalign
          y
          &=(1-p)x+(1-q)y
          \&=x+y-(px+qy)
          \&=x+y-(x)
          \&=y,
          endalign

          so we only have to solve the first one. Now, pick any non-negative value of $x$, then
          beginequation
          y=frac(1-p)xq
          endequation

          is a non-negative number, and the pair $(x,y)$ solve the first equation (check). Finally, if $(x,y)$ solve the first equation, then $(sx,sy)$ for any $s$ also solve the first equation, because
          beginalign
          sx &=psx+qsy
          \&=s(px+qy)
          \&=s(x)
          endalign

          since $px+qy=x$. By letting $s=frac1x+y$ we ensure $sx+sy=1$, which means beginbmatrix
          sx & sy
          endbmatrix
          is the equilibrium vector we want.



          Hope this helps!






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$













            Your Answer





            StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
            return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
            StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
            StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
            );
            );
            , "mathjax-editing");

            StackExchange.ready(function()
            var channelOptions =
            tags: "".split(" "),
            id: "69"
            ;
            initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
            // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
            if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
            createEditor();
            );

            else
            createEditor();

            );

            function createEditor()
            StackExchange.prepareEditor(
            heartbeatType: 'answer',
            autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
            convertImagesToLinks: true,
            noModals: true,
            showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
            reputationToPostImages: 10,
            bindNavPrevention: true,
            postfix: "",
            imageUploader:
            brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
            contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
            allowUrls: true
            ,
            noCode: true, onDemand: true,
            discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
            ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
            );



            );













            draft saved

            draft discarded


















            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3177392%2ftransition-matrix-for-a-two-state-markov-chain%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown

























            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes








            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes









            active

            oldest

            votes






            active

            oldest

            votes









            3












            $begingroup$

            You're right, that's the two-state transition matrix in full generality. To find an equilibrium vector, we solve:
            beginalign
            beginbmatrix
            x & y
            endbmatrix
            cdot
            beginbmatrix
            p & 1-p \ q & 1-q
            endbmatrix
            =
            beginbmatrix
            x & y
            endbmatrix,
            endalign

            which yields the system
            beginequation
            left{
            beginaligned
            px+qy&=x
            \(1-p)x+(1-q)y&=y
            endaligned
            right.
            .
            endequation

            The second equation is redundant,
            beginalign
            y
            &=(1-p)x+(1-q)y
            \&=x+y-(px+qy)
            \&=x+y-(x)
            \&=y,
            endalign

            so we only have to solve the first one. Now, pick any non-negative value of $x$, then
            beginequation
            y=frac(1-p)xq
            endequation

            is a non-negative number, and the pair $(x,y)$ solve the first equation (check). Finally, if $(x,y)$ solve the first equation, then $(sx,sy)$ for any $s$ also solve the first equation, because
            beginalign
            sx &=psx+qsy
            \&=s(px+qy)
            \&=s(x)
            endalign

            since $px+qy=x$. By letting $s=frac1x+y$ we ensure $sx+sy=1$, which means beginbmatrix
            sx & sy
            endbmatrix
            is the equilibrium vector we want.



            Hope this helps!






            share|cite|improve this answer











            $endgroup$

















              3












              $begingroup$

              You're right, that's the two-state transition matrix in full generality. To find an equilibrium vector, we solve:
              beginalign
              beginbmatrix
              x & y
              endbmatrix
              cdot
              beginbmatrix
              p & 1-p \ q & 1-q
              endbmatrix
              =
              beginbmatrix
              x & y
              endbmatrix,
              endalign

              which yields the system
              beginequation
              left{
              beginaligned
              px+qy&=x
              \(1-p)x+(1-q)y&=y
              endaligned
              right.
              .
              endequation

              The second equation is redundant,
              beginalign
              y
              &=(1-p)x+(1-q)y
              \&=x+y-(px+qy)
              \&=x+y-(x)
              \&=y,
              endalign

              so we only have to solve the first one. Now, pick any non-negative value of $x$, then
              beginequation
              y=frac(1-p)xq
              endequation

              is a non-negative number, and the pair $(x,y)$ solve the first equation (check). Finally, if $(x,y)$ solve the first equation, then $(sx,sy)$ for any $s$ also solve the first equation, because
              beginalign
              sx &=psx+qsy
              \&=s(px+qy)
              \&=s(x)
              endalign

              since $px+qy=x$. By letting $s=frac1x+y$ we ensure $sx+sy=1$, which means beginbmatrix
              sx & sy
              endbmatrix
              is the equilibrium vector we want.



              Hope this helps!






              share|cite|improve this answer











              $endgroup$















                3












                3








                3





                $begingroup$

                You're right, that's the two-state transition matrix in full generality. To find an equilibrium vector, we solve:
                beginalign
                beginbmatrix
                x & y
                endbmatrix
                cdot
                beginbmatrix
                p & 1-p \ q & 1-q
                endbmatrix
                =
                beginbmatrix
                x & y
                endbmatrix,
                endalign

                which yields the system
                beginequation
                left{
                beginaligned
                px+qy&=x
                \(1-p)x+(1-q)y&=y
                endaligned
                right.
                .
                endequation

                The second equation is redundant,
                beginalign
                y
                &=(1-p)x+(1-q)y
                \&=x+y-(px+qy)
                \&=x+y-(x)
                \&=y,
                endalign

                so we only have to solve the first one. Now, pick any non-negative value of $x$, then
                beginequation
                y=frac(1-p)xq
                endequation

                is a non-negative number, and the pair $(x,y)$ solve the first equation (check). Finally, if $(x,y)$ solve the first equation, then $(sx,sy)$ for any $s$ also solve the first equation, because
                beginalign
                sx &=psx+qsy
                \&=s(px+qy)
                \&=s(x)
                endalign

                since $px+qy=x$. By letting $s=frac1x+y$ we ensure $sx+sy=1$, which means beginbmatrix
                sx & sy
                endbmatrix
                is the equilibrium vector we want.



                Hope this helps!






                share|cite|improve this answer











                $endgroup$



                You're right, that's the two-state transition matrix in full generality. To find an equilibrium vector, we solve:
                beginalign
                beginbmatrix
                x & y
                endbmatrix
                cdot
                beginbmatrix
                p & 1-p \ q & 1-q
                endbmatrix
                =
                beginbmatrix
                x & y
                endbmatrix,
                endalign

                which yields the system
                beginequation
                left{
                beginaligned
                px+qy&=x
                \(1-p)x+(1-q)y&=y
                endaligned
                right.
                .
                endequation

                The second equation is redundant,
                beginalign
                y
                &=(1-p)x+(1-q)y
                \&=x+y-(px+qy)
                \&=x+y-(x)
                \&=y,
                endalign

                so we only have to solve the first one. Now, pick any non-negative value of $x$, then
                beginequation
                y=frac(1-p)xq
                endequation

                is a non-negative number, and the pair $(x,y)$ solve the first equation (check). Finally, if $(x,y)$ solve the first equation, then $(sx,sy)$ for any $s$ also solve the first equation, because
                beginalign
                sx &=psx+qsy
                \&=s(px+qy)
                \&=s(x)
                endalign

                since $px+qy=x$. By letting $s=frac1x+y$ we ensure $sx+sy=1$, which means beginbmatrix
                sx & sy
                endbmatrix
                is the equilibrium vector we want.



                Hope this helps!







                share|cite|improve this answer














                share|cite|improve this answer



                share|cite|improve this answer








                edited Apr 7 at 12:37

























                answered Apr 6 at 20:41









                R_BR_B

                839111




                839111



























                    draft saved

                    draft discarded
















































                    Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


                    • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                    But avoid


                    • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                    • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

                    Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                    To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                    draft saved


                    draft discarded














                    StackExchange.ready(
                    function ()
                    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3177392%2ftransition-matrix-for-a-two-state-markov-chain%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                    );

                    Post as a guest















                    Required, but never shown





















































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown

































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown







                    Popular posts from this blog

                    A recreational problem The 2019 Stack Overflow Developer Survey Results Are In Unicorn Meta Zoo #1: Why another podcast? Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manaraprime factors of numbers formed by primorialsAll the small primes close together yet againSimple quadratic, crazy question part 2Can every odd prime $pne 11$ be the smallest prime factor of a carmichael-number with $3$ prime factors?Is the product of consecutive primes in $(a, b)[n]$ $=$ $1$ $pmod ab$?Pythagorean triples that “survive” Euler's totient functionA question about a certain type of primesPrimes of the form $p^2+p+41$

                    369. pr. Kr. Događaji Rođenja Smrti

                    A weird inequality regarding integrals, limits, as well as sequence of functions. The 2019 Stack Overflow Developer Survey Results Are InA question regarding limits and integrable functionsChanging the order of $lim$ and $inf$ for point-wise converging monotonic sequence of functionsSequence of Distribution FunctionsBasic question on interchanging limits and integralsA sequence of functions $f_n$ that converges non-uniformly to $f$ but the limit of the integrals equals the integral of the limits?Is this (exotic) integral well defined and convergent (always)? and the bound correct?Sequence of differentiable,equicontinuous functionsProb. 10 (d), Chap. 6, in Baby Rudin: Holder Inequality for Improper Integrals With Infinite LimitsSuppose $f_n : [0,1]rightarrowmathbbR$ is a sequence of $C^1$ functions that converges pointwise to $f$.Suppose $f$ is a continuous function on $[a,b]$ and let $M=sup_ a leq x leq b |f(x)|$