Complex Analysis: Evaluating an Integral over C. where C is the contour |z| = 1. The 2019 Stack Overflow Developer Survey Results Are InEvaluating a Complex Trigonometric IntegralComplex contour integral with residue theoryEvaluating series by contour integration, the residue theorem, and cotangentComplex Contour Integration - Complex AnalysisComplex Analysis- Finding Laurent SeriesIntegral along closed contourComplex Laurent Series and Contour IntegralComplex Analysis - Contour IntegralEvaluating contour integral along the boundary of the fundamental domain of $SL_2(mathbbZ)$ near polesContour Integral of Complex Power Function

What is the meaning of the verb "bear" in this context?

Can you compress metal and what would be the consequences?

Button changing it's text & action. Good or terrible?

Does the shape of a die affect the probability of a number being rolled?

What to do when moving next to a bird sanctuary with a loosely-domesticated cat?

Why isn't airport relocation done gradually?

What is the meaning of Triage in Cybersec world?

Can a rogue use sneak attack with weapons that have the thrown property even if they are not thrown?

Why isn't the circumferential light around the M87 black hole's event horizon symmetric?

Identify boardgame from Big movie

How technical should a Scrum Master be to effectively remove impediments?

A poker game description that does not feel gimmicky

How can I autofill dates in Excel excluding Sunday?

Shouldn't "much" here be used instead of "more"?

Can someone be penalized for an "unlawful" act if no penalty is specified?

How to support a colleague who finds meetings extremely tiring?

Why was M87 targetted for the Event Horizon Telescope instead of Sagittarius A*?

How to notate time signature switching consistently every measure

Deal with toxic manager when you can't quit

"as much details as you can remember"

Loose spokes after only a few rides

Did 3000BC Egyptians use meteoric iron weapons?

Earliest use of the term "Galois extension"?

Geography at the pixel level



Complex Analysis: Evaluating an Integral over C. where C is the contour |z| = 1.



The 2019 Stack Overflow Developer Survey Results Are InEvaluating a Complex Trigonometric IntegralComplex contour integral with residue theoryEvaluating series by contour integration, the residue theorem, and cotangentComplex Contour Integration - Complex AnalysisComplex Analysis- Finding Laurent SeriesIntegral along closed contourComplex Laurent Series and Contour IntegralComplex Analysis - Contour IntegralEvaluating contour integral along the boundary of the fundamental domain of $SL_2(mathbbZ)$ near polesContour Integral of Complex Power Function










2












$begingroup$


I've got a homework question that I believe requires me to use Laurent series/method of residues.



The question itself is:
Evaluate $int_C frac1z^2(z^2-16)dz$ where C is the contour $|z| = 1$.
I'm confused by this question because it doesn't say anything about the orientation of C.
I know that the function is not analytic at z = 0, 4, -4. However beyond that, i'm ashamed to say I don't even know how to approach this.



So far, I've tried breaking it into:
$int_C frac1z^2 frac1z+4i frac1z-4idz$. But I don't really know how to get the Taylor/Laurent series for these three pieces.



Am I approaching this in the right way?
Can somebody help me move forward?










share|cite|improve this question







New contributor




Qhef is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.







$endgroup$







  • 1




    $begingroup$
    The contour "|z|= 1" is the circle, of radius 1, centered at the origin. Both 4i and -4i lie outside that contour so, immediately, those two parts contribute nothing to the integral. You have reduced the problem to integrating $frac1z^2$ around that circle. One way to do that is to observe that, on that circle,$z= e^itheta$ with $theta$ going from 0 to $2pi$. $dz= ie^ithetadtheta$ so the integral becomes $int_0^2pi e^-2itheta ie^ithetadtheta= iint_0^2pi e^-ithetadtheta$.
    $endgroup$
    – user247327
    Apr 6 at 22:35











  • $begingroup$
    There is a very easy way to get the Taylor series for $f(z) = frac1z^2-16$; think about geometric series. Then you just have to divide it by $z^2$.
    $endgroup$
    – Nate Eldredge
    Apr 6 at 23:27











  • $begingroup$
    Note that $frac1z^2-16$ factors as $frac1(z+4)(z-4)$, not $4i$. Not that it makes a lot of difference for this problem.
    $endgroup$
    – Nate Eldredge
    Apr 6 at 23:28











  • $begingroup$
    The question probably should have specified an orientation for $C$. However you are going to find that the value of the integral is 0 so in fact it doesn't matter which way you orient it.
    $endgroup$
    – Nate Eldredge
    Apr 6 at 23:30















2












$begingroup$


I've got a homework question that I believe requires me to use Laurent series/method of residues.



The question itself is:
Evaluate $int_C frac1z^2(z^2-16)dz$ where C is the contour $|z| = 1$.
I'm confused by this question because it doesn't say anything about the orientation of C.
I know that the function is not analytic at z = 0, 4, -4. However beyond that, i'm ashamed to say I don't even know how to approach this.



So far, I've tried breaking it into:
$int_C frac1z^2 frac1z+4i frac1z-4idz$. But I don't really know how to get the Taylor/Laurent series for these three pieces.



Am I approaching this in the right way?
Can somebody help me move forward?










share|cite|improve this question







New contributor




Qhef is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.







$endgroup$







  • 1




    $begingroup$
    The contour "|z|= 1" is the circle, of radius 1, centered at the origin. Both 4i and -4i lie outside that contour so, immediately, those two parts contribute nothing to the integral. You have reduced the problem to integrating $frac1z^2$ around that circle. One way to do that is to observe that, on that circle,$z= e^itheta$ with $theta$ going from 0 to $2pi$. $dz= ie^ithetadtheta$ so the integral becomes $int_0^2pi e^-2itheta ie^ithetadtheta= iint_0^2pi e^-ithetadtheta$.
    $endgroup$
    – user247327
    Apr 6 at 22:35











  • $begingroup$
    There is a very easy way to get the Taylor series for $f(z) = frac1z^2-16$; think about geometric series. Then you just have to divide it by $z^2$.
    $endgroup$
    – Nate Eldredge
    Apr 6 at 23:27











  • $begingroup$
    Note that $frac1z^2-16$ factors as $frac1(z+4)(z-4)$, not $4i$. Not that it makes a lot of difference for this problem.
    $endgroup$
    – Nate Eldredge
    Apr 6 at 23:28











  • $begingroup$
    The question probably should have specified an orientation for $C$. However you are going to find that the value of the integral is 0 so in fact it doesn't matter which way you orient it.
    $endgroup$
    – Nate Eldredge
    Apr 6 at 23:30













2












2








2





$begingroup$


I've got a homework question that I believe requires me to use Laurent series/method of residues.



The question itself is:
Evaluate $int_C frac1z^2(z^2-16)dz$ where C is the contour $|z| = 1$.
I'm confused by this question because it doesn't say anything about the orientation of C.
I know that the function is not analytic at z = 0, 4, -4. However beyond that, i'm ashamed to say I don't even know how to approach this.



So far, I've tried breaking it into:
$int_C frac1z^2 frac1z+4i frac1z-4idz$. But I don't really know how to get the Taylor/Laurent series for these three pieces.



Am I approaching this in the right way?
Can somebody help me move forward?










share|cite|improve this question







New contributor




Qhef is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.







$endgroup$




I've got a homework question that I believe requires me to use Laurent series/method of residues.



The question itself is:
Evaluate $int_C frac1z^2(z^2-16)dz$ where C is the contour $|z| = 1$.
I'm confused by this question because it doesn't say anything about the orientation of C.
I know that the function is not analytic at z = 0, 4, -4. However beyond that, i'm ashamed to say I don't even know how to approach this.



So far, I've tried breaking it into:
$int_C frac1z^2 frac1z+4i frac1z-4idz$. But I don't really know how to get the Taylor/Laurent series for these three pieces.



Am I approaching this in the right way?
Can somebody help me move forward?







complex-analysis






share|cite|improve this question







New contributor




Qhef is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











share|cite|improve this question







New contributor




Qhef is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question






New contributor




Qhef is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









asked Apr 6 at 22:19









QhefQhef

111




111




New contributor




Qhef is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.





New contributor





Qhef is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.






Qhef is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.







  • 1




    $begingroup$
    The contour "|z|= 1" is the circle, of radius 1, centered at the origin. Both 4i and -4i lie outside that contour so, immediately, those two parts contribute nothing to the integral. You have reduced the problem to integrating $frac1z^2$ around that circle. One way to do that is to observe that, on that circle,$z= e^itheta$ with $theta$ going from 0 to $2pi$. $dz= ie^ithetadtheta$ so the integral becomes $int_0^2pi e^-2itheta ie^ithetadtheta= iint_0^2pi e^-ithetadtheta$.
    $endgroup$
    – user247327
    Apr 6 at 22:35











  • $begingroup$
    There is a very easy way to get the Taylor series for $f(z) = frac1z^2-16$; think about geometric series. Then you just have to divide it by $z^2$.
    $endgroup$
    – Nate Eldredge
    Apr 6 at 23:27











  • $begingroup$
    Note that $frac1z^2-16$ factors as $frac1(z+4)(z-4)$, not $4i$. Not that it makes a lot of difference for this problem.
    $endgroup$
    – Nate Eldredge
    Apr 6 at 23:28











  • $begingroup$
    The question probably should have specified an orientation for $C$. However you are going to find that the value of the integral is 0 so in fact it doesn't matter which way you orient it.
    $endgroup$
    – Nate Eldredge
    Apr 6 at 23:30












  • 1




    $begingroup$
    The contour "|z|= 1" is the circle, of radius 1, centered at the origin. Both 4i and -4i lie outside that contour so, immediately, those two parts contribute nothing to the integral. You have reduced the problem to integrating $frac1z^2$ around that circle. One way to do that is to observe that, on that circle,$z= e^itheta$ with $theta$ going from 0 to $2pi$. $dz= ie^ithetadtheta$ so the integral becomes $int_0^2pi e^-2itheta ie^ithetadtheta= iint_0^2pi e^-ithetadtheta$.
    $endgroup$
    – user247327
    Apr 6 at 22:35











  • $begingroup$
    There is a very easy way to get the Taylor series for $f(z) = frac1z^2-16$; think about geometric series. Then you just have to divide it by $z^2$.
    $endgroup$
    – Nate Eldredge
    Apr 6 at 23:27











  • $begingroup$
    Note that $frac1z^2-16$ factors as $frac1(z+4)(z-4)$, not $4i$. Not that it makes a lot of difference for this problem.
    $endgroup$
    – Nate Eldredge
    Apr 6 at 23:28











  • $begingroup$
    The question probably should have specified an orientation for $C$. However you are going to find that the value of the integral is 0 so in fact it doesn't matter which way you orient it.
    $endgroup$
    – Nate Eldredge
    Apr 6 at 23:30







1




1




$begingroup$
The contour "|z|= 1" is the circle, of radius 1, centered at the origin. Both 4i and -4i lie outside that contour so, immediately, those two parts contribute nothing to the integral. You have reduced the problem to integrating $frac1z^2$ around that circle. One way to do that is to observe that, on that circle,$z= e^itheta$ with $theta$ going from 0 to $2pi$. $dz= ie^ithetadtheta$ so the integral becomes $int_0^2pi e^-2itheta ie^ithetadtheta= iint_0^2pi e^-ithetadtheta$.
$endgroup$
– user247327
Apr 6 at 22:35





$begingroup$
The contour "|z|= 1" is the circle, of radius 1, centered at the origin. Both 4i and -4i lie outside that contour so, immediately, those two parts contribute nothing to the integral. You have reduced the problem to integrating $frac1z^2$ around that circle. One way to do that is to observe that, on that circle,$z= e^itheta$ with $theta$ going from 0 to $2pi$. $dz= ie^ithetadtheta$ so the integral becomes $int_0^2pi e^-2itheta ie^ithetadtheta= iint_0^2pi e^-ithetadtheta$.
$endgroup$
– user247327
Apr 6 at 22:35













$begingroup$
There is a very easy way to get the Taylor series for $f(z) = frac1z^2-16$; think about geometric series. Then you just have to divide it by $z^2$.
$endgroup$
– Nate Eldredge
Apr 6 at 23:27





$begingroup$
There is a very easy way to get the Taylor series for $f(z) = frac1z^2-16$; think about geometric series. Then you just have to divide it by $z^2$.
$endgroup$
– Nate Eldredge
Apr 6 at 23:27













$begingroup$
Note that $frac1z^2-16$ factors as $frac1(z+4)(z-4)$, not $4i$. Not that it makes a lot of difference for this problem.
$endgroup$
– Nate Eldredge
Apr 6 at 23:28





$begingroup$
Note that $frac1z^2-16$ factors as $frac1(z+4)(z-4)$, not $4i$. Not that it makes a lot of difference for this problem.
$endgroup$
– Nate Eldredge
Apr 6 at 23:28













$begingroup$
The question probably should have specified an orientation for $C$. However you are going to find that the value of the integral is 0 so in fact it doesn't matter which way you orient it.
$endgroup$
– Nate Eldredge
Apr 6 at 23:30




$begingroup$
The question probably should have specified an orientation for $C$. However you are going to find that the value of the integral is 0 so in fact it doesn't matter which way you orient it.
$endgroup$
– Nate Eldredge
Apr 6 at 23:30










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















1












$begingroup$

Orientation of $C$ does not matter here. The value of the integral is $0$ and you can prove it without any calculation! The only pole inside $C$ is $z=0$. Near $0$ the function $frac 1 z^2-16$ is analytic and when you divide the power series of this analytic function by $z^2$ the residue becomes $0$. [ Residue is the coefficient of $frac 1 z$. Note that the power series of this function has only even powers of $z$]. Hence the integral is $0$.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$













    Your Answer





    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
    return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
    StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
    StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
    );
    );
    , "mathjax-editing");

    StackExchange.ready(function()
    var channelOptions =
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "69"
    ;
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
    createEditor();
    );

    else
    createEditor();

    );

    function createEditor()
    StackExchange.prepareEditor(
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader:
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    ,
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    );



    );






    Qhef is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.









    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function ()
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3177511%2fcomplex-analysis-evaluating-an-integral-over-c-where-c-is-the-contour-z-1%23new-answer', 'question_page');

    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes








    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    1












    $begingroup$

    Orientation of $C$ does not matter here. The value of the integral is $0$ and you can prove it without any calculation! The only pole inside $C$ is $z=0$. Near $0$ the function $frac 1 z^2-16$ is analytic and when you divide the power series of this analytic function by $z^2$ the residue becomes $0$. [ Residue is the coefficient of $frac 1 z$. Note that the power series of this function has only even powers of $z$]. Hence the integral is $0$.






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$

















      1












      $begingroup$

      Orientation of $C$ does not matter here. The value of the integral is $0$ and you can prove it without any calculation! The only pole inside $C$ is $z=0$. Near $0$ the function $frac 1 z^2-16$ is analytic and when you divide the power series of this analytic function by $z^2$ the residue becomes $0$. [ Residue is the coefficient of $frac 1 z$. Note that the power series of this function has only even powers of $z$]. Hence the integral is $0$.






      share|cite|improve this answer









      $endgroup$















        1












        1








        1





        $begingroup$

        Orientation of $C$ does not matter here. The value of the integral is $0$ and you can prove it without any calculation! The only pole inside $C$ is $z=0$. Near $0$ the function $frac 1 z^2-16$ is analytic and when you divide the power series of this analytic function by $z^2$ the residue becomes $0$. [ Residue is the coefficient of $frac 1 z$. Note that the power series of this function has only even powers of $z$]. Hence the integral is $0$.






        share|cite|improve this answer









        $endgroup$



        Orientation of $C$ does not matter here. The value of the integral is $0$ and you can prove it without any calculation! The only pole inside $C$ is $z=0$. Near $0$ the function $frac 1 z^2-16$ is analytic and when you divide the power series of this analytic function by $z^2$ the residue becomes $0$. [ Residue is the coefficient of $frac 1 z$. Note that the power series of this function has only even powers of $z$]. Hence the integral is $0$.







        share|cite|improve this answer












        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer










        answered Apr 6 at 23:23









        Kavi Rama MurthyKavi Rama Murthy

        73.9k53170




        73.9k53170




















            Qhef is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.









            draft saved

            draft discarded


















            Qhef is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.












            Qhef is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.











            Qhef is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.














            Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid


            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

            Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3177511%2fcomplex-analysis-evaluating-an-integral-over-c-where-c-is-the-contour-z-1%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            Hidroelektrana Sadržaj Povijest | Podjela hidroelektrana | Snaga dobivena u hidroelektranama | Dijelovi hidroelektrane | Uloga hidroelektrana u suvremenom svijetu | Prednosti hidroelektrana | Nedostaci hidroelektrana | Države s najvećom proizvodnjom hidro-električne energije | Deset najvećih hidroelektrana u svijetu | Hidroelektrane u Hrvatskoj | Izvori | Poveznice | Vanjske poveznice | Navigacijski izbornikTechnical Report, Version 2Zajedničkom poslužiteljuHidroelektranaHEP Proizvodnja d.o.o. - Hidroelektrane u Hrvatskoj

            WordPress Information needed

            Oconto (Nebraska) Índice Demografia | Geografia | Localidades na vizinhança | Referências Ligações externas | Menu de navegação41° 8' 29" N 99° 45' 41" O41° 8' 29" N 99° 45' 41" OU.S. Census Bureau. Census 2000 Summary File 1U.S. Census Bureau. Estimativa da população (julho de 2006)U.S. Board on Geographic Names. Topical Gazetteers Populated Places. Gráficos do banco de dados de altitudes dos Estados Unidos da AméricaEstatísticas, mapas e outras informações sobre Oconto em city-data.com