Maximal value, linear programming problem The 2019 Stack Overflow Developer Survey Results Are InWhy maximum/minimum of linear programming occurs at a vertex?On the Proof of Fundamental Theorem of Linear Programming.Primal and dual solution to linear programmingLinear combination question in Linear Programming ProblemConverting linear programming problems into standard formMinimize the minimum - Linear programmingSingle nonzero value constraint formulation in linear programming problem statementEasier way of finding out whether a given linear programming problem has optimal solution or notSolving linear programming problem with given informationUtilizing theorems of duality to solve primal linear programming problemProof of 100 % rule in Linear ProgrammingLinear programming model for a retail online order

Is "plugging out" electronic devices an American expression?

Is an up-to-date browser secure on an out-of-date OS?

If I score a critical hit on an 18 or higher, what are my chances of getting a critical hit if I roll 3d20?

Write faster on AT24C32

What does Linus Torvalds mean when he says that Git "never ever" tracks a file?

Can we generate random numbers using irrational numbers like π and e?

How to notate time signature switching consistently every measure

Is there any way to tell whether the shot is going to hit you or not?

What are the motivations for publishing new editions of an existing textbook, beyond new discoveries in a field?

Does a dangling wire really electrocute me if I'm standing in water?

What do hard-Brexiteers want with respect to the Irish border?

How come people say “Would of”?

Who coined the term "madman theory"?

What is the meaning of the verb "bear" in this context?

Can you compress metal and what would be the consequences?

Identify boardgame from Big movie

Button changing it's text & action. Good or terrible?

Is a "Democratic" Oligarchy-Style System Possible?

One word riddle: Vowel in the middle

FPGA - DIY Programming

Falsification in Math vs Science

Loose spokes after only a few rides

Did Scotland spend $250,000 for the slogan "Welcome to Scotland"?

What does "fetching by region is not available for SAM files" means?



Maximal value, linear programming problem



The 2019 Stack Overflow Developer Survey Results Are InWhy maximum/minimum of linear programming occurs at a vertex?On the Proof of Fundamental Theorem of Linear Programming.Primal and dual solution to linear programmingLinear combination question in Linear Programming ProblemConverting linear programming problems into standard formMinimize the minimum - Linear programmingSingle nonzero value constraint formulation in linear programming problem statementEasier way of finding out whether a given linear programming problem has optimal solution or notSolving linear programming problem with given informationUtilizing theorems of duality to solve primal linear programming problemProof of 100 % rule in Linear ProgrammingLinear programming model for a retail online order










0












$begingroup$


I want to find the maximal $psi_1$ for the following linear programming problem:
beginalign
max frac23025(525+121psi_3 + 1089 psi_4), text s.t.
\
endalign

beginarray
text0 leq 1450 - 3267 psi_3 - 5203 psi_4 \
text0 leq psi_3\
text0 leq psi_4
endarray



Intuitively we want to make $psi_3$ and $psi_4$ as large as possible.
My textbook states that:




Since the constraints are linear, it follows that either all the
weight should be put on $psi_3$ or $psi_4$.




Why is that the case?



I have drawn the constraints, I see that the possible values should be inside a triangle. But why the optimal values should be one of the two corners of the triangle?










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$







  • 1




    $begingroup$
    In a linear program, it's always the case that if there is an optimal solution (the LP isn't unbounded), then there is an optimal solution that lies at a corner of the feasible region. There may be additional optimal solutions (with the same optimal objective value) along edges or higher dimensional faces of the feasible region.
    $endgroup$
    – Brian Borchers
    Apr 6 at 20:43










  • $begingroup$
    @BrianBorchers Do you have a proof or some kind of intuition of why this is the case?
    $endgroup$
    – Victor
    Apr 6 at 20:48






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    This is a standard theorem in linear programming that is usually proved in courses on that subject. Chvatal's Linear Programming has a nice constructive proof based on the simplex method.
    $endgroup$
    – Brian Borchers
    Apr 6 at 21:08










  • $begingroup$
    This topic (called the fundamental theorem of linear programming), is discussed here with some follow-up here.
    $endgroup$
    – David M.
    Apr 7 at 18:26















0












$begingroup$


I want to find the maximal $psi_1$ for the following linear programming problem:
beginalign
max frac23025(525+121psi_3 + 1089 psi_4), text s.t.
\
endalign

beginarray
text0 leq 1450 - 3267 psi_3 - 5203 psi_4 \
text0 leq psi_3\
text0 leq psi_4
endarray



Intuitively we want to make $psi_3$ and $psi_4$ as large as possible.
My textbook states that:




Since the constraints are linear, it follows that either all the
weight should be put on $psi_3$ or $psi_4$.




Why is that the case?



I have drawn the constraints, I see that the possible values should be inside a triangle. But why the optimal values should be one of the two corners of the triangle?










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$







  • 1




    $begingroup$
    In a linear program, it's always the case that if there is an optimal solution (the LP isn't unbounded), then there is an optimal solution that lies at a corner of the feasible region. There may be additional optimal solutions (with the same optimal objective value) along edges or higher dimensional faces of the feasible region.
    $endgroup$
    – Brian Borchers
    Apr 6 at 20:43










  • $begingroup$
    @BrianBorchers Do you have a proof or some kind of intuition of why this is the case?
    $endgroup$
    – Victor
    Apr 6 at 20:48






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    This is a standard theorem in linear programming that is usually proved in courses on that subject. Chvatal's Linear Programming has a nice constructive proof based on the simplex method.
    $endgroup$
    – Brian Borchers
    Apr 6 at 21:08










  • $begingroup$
    This topic (called the fundamental theorem of linear programming), is discussed here with some follow-up here.
    $endgroup$
    – David M.
    Apr 7 at 18:26













0












0








0





$begingroup$


I want to find the maximal $psi_1$ for the following linear programming problem:
beginalign
max frac23025(525+121psi_3 + 1089 psi_4), text s.t.
\
endalign

beginarray
text0 leq 1450 - 3267 psi_3 - 5203 psi_4 \
text0 leq psi_3\
text0 leq psi_4
endarray



Intuitively we want to make $psi_3$ and $psi_4$ as large as possible.
My textbook states that:




Since the constraints are linear, it follows that either all the
weight should be put on $psi_3$ or $psi_4$.




Why is that the case?



I have drawn the constraints, I see that the possible values should be inside a triangle. But why the optimal values should be one of the two corners of the triangle?










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$




I want to find the maximal $psi_1$ for the following linear programming problem:
beginalign
max frac23025(525+121psi_3 + 1089 psi_4), text s.t.
\
endalign

beginarray
text0 leq 1450 - 3267 psi_3 - 5203 psi_4 \
text0 leq psi_3\
text0 leq psi_4
endarray



Intuitively we want to make $psi_3$ and $psi_4$ as large as possible.
My textbook states that:




Since the constraints are linear, it follows that either all the
weight should be put on $psi_3$ or $psi_4$.




Why is that the case?



I have drawn the constraints, I see that the possible values should be inside a triangle. But why the optimal values should be one of the two corners of the triangle?







optimization linear-programming






share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question











share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question










asked Apr 6 at 20:38









VictorVictor

577




577







  • 1




    $begingroup$
    In a linear program, it's always the case that if there is an optimal solution (the LP isn't unbounded), then there is an optimal solution that lies at a corner of the feasible region. There may be additional optimal solutions (with the same optimal objective value) along edges or higher dimensional faces of the feasible region.
    $endgroup$
    – Brian Borchers
    Apr 6 at 20:43










  • $begingroup$
    @BrianBorchers Do you have a proof or some kind of intuition of why this is the case?
    $endgroup$
    – Victor
    Apr 6 at 20:48






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    This is a standard theorem in linear programming that is usually proved in courses on that subject. Chvatal's Linear Programming has a nice constructive proof based on the simplex method.
    $endgroup$
    – Brian Borchers
    Apr 6 at 21:08










  • $begingroup$
    This topic (called the fundamental theorem of linear programming), is discussed here with some follow-up here.
    $endgroup$
    – David M.
    Apr 7 at 18:26












  • 1




    $begingroup$
    In a linear program, it's always the case that if there is an optimal solution (the LP isn't unbounded), then there is an optimal solution that lies at a corner of the feasible region. There may be additional optimal solutions (with the same optimal objective value) along edges or higher dimensional faces of the feasible region.
    $endgroup$
    – Brian Borchers
    Apr 6 at 20:43










  • $begingroup$
    @BrianBorchers Do you have a proof or some kind of intuition of why this is the case?
    $endgroup$
    – Victor
    Apr 6 at 20:48






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    This is a standard theorem in linear programming that is usually proved in courses on that subject. Chvatal's Linear Programming has a nice constructive proof based on the simplex method.
    $endgroup$
    – Brian Borchers
    Apr 6 at 21:08










  • $begingroup$
    This topic (called the fundamental theorem of linear programming), is discussed here with some follow-up here.
    $endgroup$
    – David M.
    Apr 7 at 18:26







1




1




$begingroup$
In a linear program, it's always the case that if there is an optimal solution (the LP isn't unbounded), then there is an optimal solution that lies at a corner of the feasible region. There may be additional optimal solutions (with the same optimal objective value) along edges or higher dimensional faces of the feasible region.
$endgroup$
– Brian Borchers
Apr 6 at 20:43




$begingroup$
In a linear program, it's always the case that if there is an optimal solution (the LP isn't unbounded), then there is an optimal solution that lies at a corner of the feasible region. There may be additional optimal solutions (with the same optimal objective value) along edges or higher dimensional faces of the feasible region.
$endgroup$
– Brian Borchers
Apr 6 at 20:43












$begingroup$
@BrianBorchers Do you have a proof or some kind of intuition of why this is the case?
$endgroup$
– Victor
Apr 6 at 20:48




$begingroup$
@BrianBorchers Do you have a proof or some kind of intuition of why this is the case?
$endgroup$
– Victor
Apr 6 at 20:48




2




2




$begingroup$
This is a standard theorem in linear programming that is usually proved in courses on that subject. Chvatal's Linear Programming has a nice constructive proof based on the simplex method.
$endgroup$
– Brian Borchers
Apr 6 at 21:08




$begingroup$
This is a standard theorem in linear programming that is usually proved in courses on that subject. Chvatal's Linear Programming has a nice constructive proof based on the simplex method.
$endgroup$
– Brian Borchers
Apr 6 at 21:08












$begingroup$
This topic (called the fundamental theorem of linear programming), is discussed here with some follow-up here.
$endgroup$
– David M.
Apr 7 at 18:26




$begingroup$
This topic (called the fundamental theorem of linear programming), is discussed here with some follow-up here.
$endgroup$
– David M.
Apr 7 at 18:26










0






active

oldest

votes












Your Answer





StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
);
);
, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);

else
createEditor();

);

function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);



);













draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3177418%2fmaximal-value-linear-programming-problem%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























0






active

oldest

votes








0






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes















draft saved

draft discarded
















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid


  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3177418%2fmaximal-value-linear-programming-problem%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

A recreational problem The 2019 Stack Overflow Developer Survey Results Are In Unicorn Meta Zoo #1: Why another podcast? Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manaraprime factors of numbers formed by primorialsAll the small primes close together yet againSimple quadratic, crazy question part 2Can every odd prime $pne 11$ be the smallest prime factor of a carmichael-number with $3$ prime factors?Is the product of consecutive primes in $(a, b)[n]$ $=$ $1$ $pmod ab$?Pythagorean triples that “survive” Euler's totient functionA question about a certain type of primesPrimes of the form $p^2+p+41$

369. pr. Kr. Događaji Rođenja Smrti

A weird inequality regarding integrals, limits, as well as sequence of functions. The 2019 Stack Overflow Developer Survey Results Are InA question regarding limits and integrable functionsChanging the order of $lim$ and $inf$ for point-wise converging monotonic sequence of functionsSequence of Distribution FunctionsBasic question on interchanging limits and integralsA sequence of functions $f_n$ that converges non-uniformly to $f$ but the limit of the integrals equals the integral of the limits?Is this (exotic) integral well defined and convergent (always)? and the bound correct?Sequence of differentiable,equicontinuous functionsProb. 10 (d), Chap. 6, in Baby Rudin: Holder Inequality for Improper Integrals With Infinite LimitsSuppose $f_n : [0,1]rightarrowmathbbR$ is a sequence of $C^1$ functions that converges pointwise to $f$.Suppose $f$ is a continuous function on $[a,b]$ and let $M=sup_ a leq x leq b |f(x)|$