$K$-Theory of operators I, Higson notes The 2019 Stack Overflow Developer Survey Results Are InSpecial elements in the $C^*$ algebra $A otimes mathcalK$.K-theory for non-separable C*-algebrasK-theory, $K_0$ of algebra of compact operatorsWhat is the motivation of studying $P[A]$ in operator K-theory?K-theory of $C_0(X)$Periodicity of Fredholm operators for proving Bott periodicityIn what way is $sigma(L) in K(T^*X)$ in the $K$-theoretic formulation of the Atiyah-Singer index theorem?Operator K-theory and Topological K-theoryInduced $K$-theory maps between $C^*$ algebras.Understanding the map from $K_0(A)$ to homotopy class of maps,Special elements in the $C^*$ algebra $A otimes mathcalK$.

If I can cast sorceries at instant speed, can I use sorcery-speed activated abilities at instant speed?

APIPA and LAN Broadcast Domain

Mathematics of imaging the black hole

Correct punctuation for showing a character's confusion

Are spiders unable to hurt humans, especially very small spiders?

Why doesn't UInt have a toDouble()?

Why didn't the Event Horizon Telescope team mention Sagittarius A*?

Why can't devices on different VLANs, but on the same subnet, communicate?

Can withdrawing asylum be illegal?

Why was M87 targeted for the Event Horizon Telescope instead of Sagittarius A*?

How can I add encounters in the Lost Mine of Phandelver campaign without giving PCs too much XP?

Falsification in Math vs Science

What to do when moving next to a bird sanctuary with a loosely-domesticated cat?

What's the name of these plastic connectors

Star Trek - X-shaped Item on Regula/Orbital Office Starbases

ODD NUMBER in Cognitive Linguistics of WILLIAM CROFT and D. ALAN CRUSE

Dropping list elements from nested list after evaluation

Is Cinnamon a desktop environment or a window manager? (Or both?)

Why don't hard Brexiteers insist on a hard border to prevent illegal immigration after Brexit?

Deal with toxic manager when you can't quit

Kerning for subscripts of sigma?

How to type a long/em dash `—`

What does Linus Torvalds mean when he says that Git "never ever" tracks a file?

Straighten subgroup lattice



$K$-Theory of operators I, Higson notes



The 2019 Stack Overflow Developer Survey Results Are InSpecial elements in the $C^*$ algebra $A otimes mathcalK$.K-theory for non-separable C*-algebrasK-theory, $K_0$ of algebra of compact operatorsWhat is the motivation of studying $P[A]$ in operator K-theory?K-theory of $C_0(X)$Periodicity of Fredholm operators for proving Bott periodicityIn what way is $sigma(L) in K(T^*X)$ in the $K$-theoretic formulation of the Atiyah-Singer index theorem?Operator K-theory and Topological K-theoryInduced $K$-theory maps between $C^*$ algebras.Understanding the map from $K_0(A)$ to homotopy class of maps,Special elements in the $C^*$ algebra $A otimes mathcalK$.










3












$begingroup$


I am having trouble understanding the following statement:




3.20 Proposition, pg44: Let $D$ be a symmetric, odd graded elliptic operator on a graded vector bundle $S$ over a compact manifold. The element $[phi_D] in K(Bbb C) cong Bbb Z$ is the Fredholm index of the operator $D$.





What exactly are used in making sense of this statement:



  1. Def 2.10, page 19. A Graded $*$-homomoprhism $phi_D:mathcalS rightarrow mathcalK(H)$ from spectral theorem.


  2. Prop 3.17. There is an isomoprhism $$Phi:K(A) rightarrow [mathcalS, A otimes mathcalK(H)]$$


What the above two means is explain in my other post.




The proof goes as follows:




We have a homotopy of $*$-homomoprhisms $phi_s^-1D(f) = f(s^-1D)$. At $s=1$ we have $phi_D$ at $s=0$ we have the homomorphism of $f mapsto f(0)P$ where $P$ is projection onto the kernel of $D$.




How does one obtain continuity at $s=0$ - why is the resulting map as described?




This corresponds to the integer $dim(ker D cap H_+) - dim (ker D cap H_-)$.




How does one make this computation?










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$
















    3












    $begingroup$


    I am having trouble understanding the following statement:




    3.20 Proposition, pg44: Let $D$ be a symmetric, odd graded elliptic operator on a graded vector bundle $S$ over a compact manifold. The element $[phi_D] in K(Bbb C) cong Bbb Z$ is the Fredholm index of the operator $D$.





    What exactly are used in making sense of this statement:



    1. Def 2.10, page 19. A Graded $*$-homomoprhism $phi_D:mathcalS rightarrow mathcalK(H)$ from spectral theorem.


    2. Prop 3.17. There is an isomoprhism $$Phi:K(A) rightarrow [mathcalS, A otimes mathcalK(H)]$$


    What the above two means is explain in my other post.




    The proof goes as follows:




    We have a homotopy of $*$-homomoprhisms $phi_s^-1D(f) = f(s^-1D)$. At $s=1$ we have $phi_D$ at $s=0$ we have the homomorphism of $f mapsto f(0)P$ where $P$ is projection onto the kernel of $D$.




    How does one obtain continuity at $s=0$ - why is the resulting map as described?




    This corresponds to the integer $dim(ker D cap H_+) - dim (ker D cap H_-)$.




    How does one make this computation?










    share|cite|improve this question









    $endgroup$














      3












      3








      3


      1



      $begingroup$


      I am having trouble understanding the following statement:




      3.20 Proposition, pg44: Let $D$ be a symmetric, odd graded elliptic operator on a graded vector bundle $S$ over a compact manifold. The element $[phi_D] in K(Bbb C) cong Bbb Z$ is the Fredholm index of the operator $D$.





      What exactly are used in making sense of this statement:



      1. Def 2.10, page 19. A Graded $*$-homomoprhism $phi_D:mathcalS rightarrow mathcalK(H)$ from spectral theorem.


      2. Prop 3.17. There is an isomoprhism $$Phi:K(A) rightarrow [mathcalS, A otimes mathcalK(H)]$$


      What the above two means is explain in my other post.




      The proof goes as follows:




      We have a homotopy of $*$-homomoprhisms $phi_s^-1D(f) = f(s^-1D)$. At $s=1$ we have $phi_D$ at $s=0$ we have the homomorphism of $f mapsto f(0)P$ where $P$ is projection onto the kernel of $D$.




      How does one obtain continuity at $s=0$ - why is the resulting map as described?




      This corresponds to the integer $dim(ker D cap H_+) - dim (ker D cap H_-)$.




      How does one make this computation?










      share|cite|improve this question









      $endgroup$




      I am having trouble understanding the following statement:




      3.20 Proposition, pg44: Let $D$ be a symmetric, odd graded elliptic operator on a graded vector bundle $S$ over a compact manifold. The element $[phi_D] in K(Bbb C) cong Bbb Z$ is the Fredholm index of the operator $D$.





      What exactly are used in making sense of this statement:



      1. Def 2.10, page 19. A Graded $*$-homomoprhism $phi_D:mathcalS rightarrow mathcalK(H)$ from spectral theorem.


      2. Prop 3.17. There is an isomoprhism $$Phi:K(A) rightarrow [mathcalS, A otimes mathcalK(H)]$$


      What the above two means is explain in my other post.




      The proof goes as follows:




      We have a homotopy of $*$-homomoprhisms $phi_s^-1D(f) = f(s^-1D)$. At $s=1$ we have $phi_D$ at $s=0$ we have the homomorphism of $f mapsto f(0)P$ where $P$ is projection onto the kernel of $D$.




      How does one obtain continuity at $s=0$ - why is the resulting map as described?




      This corresponds to the integer $dim(ker D cap H_+) - dim (ker D cap H_-)$.




      How does one make this computation?







      operator-algebras k-theory topological-k-theory






      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question











      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question










      asked Mar 18 at 17:55









      CL.CL.

      2,3333925




      2,3333925




















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          1












          $begingroup$

          The operator $D$ here is special: If $D$ is elliptic on a compact manifold, it will have compact resolvant by Rellich's lemma: $(1+D^2)^-frac12$ is compact. Therefore the spectrum of $D$ are eigenvalues, they have no limit point except $lambda=+infty$. If $f(x)$ is a continuous function of spectrum of $D$, $f(D)$ is well-defined. This will contain something like $delta_0(x)$ who is 1 when $x=0$ and is 0 elsewhere. This is not continuous on $mathbbR$, but is continuous on the spectrum of $D$!



          If $f$ vanishes at the infinity, $f(D)$ is bounded. The continuity of the operators $f(s^-1D)$ are considered under the norm topology. Since
          $$lim_sto 0 f(s^-1x)to delta_0(x)f(0)$$
          As continuous functions over the spectrum of $D$. Also $delta_0(D)$ is the projection $P$ to the eigenspace for $lambda=0$. We have the first limit of your question (1).



          Also by the result of compact resolvant, the dimension of the eigenspaces are finite dimensional, Let $P_+ ,P_-$ be the projection on $ker Dcap H_+$, $ker Dcap H_-$ respectivly. They will be trace-class operators(as operators on $L^2(M)$. We have
          $$ dim(ker Dcap H_+)=Tr(P_+),quad dim(ker Dcap H_-)=Tr(P_-)$$



          We define a "supertrace" $Str(P):=Tr(P_+)-Tr(P_-)$.



          We have $Index(D)=Str(P)$






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$













            Your Answer





            StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
            return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
            StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
            StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
            );
            );
            , "mathjax-editing");

            StackExchange.ready(function()
            var channelOptions =
            tags: "".split(" "),
            id: "69"
            ;
            initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
            // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
            if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
            createEditor();
            );

            else
            createEditor();

            );

            function createEditor()
            StackExchange.prepareEditor(
            heartbeatType: 'answer',
            autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
            convertImagesToLinks: true,
            noModals: true,
            showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
            reputationToPostImages: 10,
            bindNavPrevention: true,
            postfix: "",
            imageUploader:
            brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
            contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
            allowUrls: true
            ,
            noCode: true, onDemand: true,
            discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
            ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
            );



            );













            draft saved

            draft discarded


















            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3153097%2fk-theory-of-operators-i-higson-notes%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown

























            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes








            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes









            active

            oldest

            votes






            active

            oldest

            votes









            1












            $begingroup$

            The operator $D$ here is special: If $D$ is elliptic on a compact manifold, it will have compact resolvant by Rellich's lemma: $(1+D^2)^-frac12$ is compact. Therefore the spectrum of $D$ are eigenvalues, they have no limit point except $lambda=+infty$. If $f(x)$ is a continuous function of spectrum of $D$, $f(D)$ is well-defined. This will contain something like $delta_0(x)$ who is 1 when $x=0$ and is 0 elsewhere. This is not continuous on $mathbbR$, but is continuous on the spectrum of $D$!



            If $f$ vanishes at the infinity, $f(D)$ is bounded. The continuity of the operators $f(s^-1D)$ are considered under the norm topology. Since
            $$lim_sto 0 f(s^-1x)to delta_0(x)f(0)$$
            As continuous functions over the spectrum of $D$. Also $delta_0(D)$ is the projection $P$ to the eigenspace for $lambda=0$. We have the first limit of your question (1).



            Also by the result of compact resolvant, the dimension of the eigenspaces are finite dimensional, Let $P_+ ,P_-$ be the projection on $ker Dcap H_+$, $ker Dcap H_-$ respectivly. They will be trace-class operators(as operators on $L^2(M)$. We have
            $$ dim(ker Dcap H_+)=Tr(P_+),quad dim(ker Dcap H_-)=Tr(P_-)$$



            We define a "supertrace" $Str(P):=Tr(P_+)-Tr(P_-)$.



            We have $Index(D)=Str(P)$






            share|cite|improve this answer









            $endgroup$

















              1












              $begingroup$

              The operator $D$ here is special: If $D$ is elliptic on a compact manifold, it will have compact resolvant by Rellich's lemma: $(1+D^2)^-frac12$ is compact. Therefore the spectrum of $D$ are eigenvalues, they have no limit point except $lambda=+infty$. If $f(x)$ is a continuous function of spectrum of $D$, $f(D)$ is well-defined. This will contain something like $delta_0(x)$ who is 1 when $x=0$ and is 0 elsewhere. This is not continuous on $mathbbR$, but is continuous on the spectrum of $D$!



              If $f$ vanishes at the infinity, $f(D)$ is bounded. The continuity of the operators $f(s^-1D)$ are considered under the norm topology. Since
              $$lim_sto 0 f(s^-1x)to delta_0(x)f(0)$$
              As continuous functions over the spectrum of $D$. Also $delta_0(D)$ is the projection $P$ to the eigenspace for $lambda=0$. We have the first limit of your question (1).



              Also by the result of compact resolvant, the dimension of the eigenspaces are finite dimensional, Let $P_+ ,P_-$ be the projection on $ker Dcap H_+$, $ker Dcap H_-$ respectivly. They will be trace-class operators(as operators on $L^2(M)$. We have
              $$ dim(ker Dcap H_+)=Tr(P_+),quad dim(ker Dcap H_-)=Tr(P_-)$$



              We define a "supertrace" $Str(P):=Tr(P_+)-Tr(P_-)$.



              We have $Index(D)=Str(P)$






              share|cite|improve this answer









              $endgroup$















                1












                1








                1





                $begingroup$

                The operator $D$ here is special: If $D$ is elliptic on a compact manifold, it will have compact resolvant by Rellich's lemma: $(1+D^2)^-frac12$ is compact. Therefore the spectrum of $D$ are eigenvalues, they have no limit point except $lambda=+infty$. If $f(x)$ is a continuous function of spectrum of $D$, $f(D)$ is well-defined. This will contain something like $delta_0(x)$ who is 1 when $x=0$ and is 0 elsewhere. This is not continuous on $mathbbR$, but is continuous on the spectrum of $D$!



                If $f$ vanishes at the infinity, $f(D)$ is bounded. The continuity of the operators $f(s^-1D)$ are considered under the norm topology. Since
                $$lim_sto 0 f(s^-1x)to delta_0(x)f(0)$$
                As continuous functions over the spectrum of $D$. Also $delta_0(D)$ is the projection $P$ to the eigenspace for $lambda=0$. We have the first limit of your question (1).



                Also by the result of compact resolvant, the dimension of the eigenspaces are finite dimensional, Let $P_+ ,P_-$ be the projection on $ker Dcap H_+$, $ker Dcap H_-$ respectivly. They will be trace-class operators(as operators on $L^2(M)$. We have
                $$ dim(ker Dcap H_+)=Tr(P_+),quad dim(ker Dcap H_-)=Tr(P_-)$$



                We define a "supertrace" $Str(P):=Tr(P_+)-Tr(P_-)$.



                We have $Index(D)=Str(P)$






                share|cite|improve this answer









                $endgroup$



                The operator $D$ here is special: If $D$ is elliptic on a compact manifold, it will have compact resolvant by Rellich's lemma: $(1+D^2)^-frac12$ is compact. Therefore the spectrum of $D$ are eigenvalues, they have no limit point except $lambda=+infty$. If $f(x)$ is a continuous function of spectrum of $D$, $f(D)$ is well-defined. This will contain something like $delta_0(x)$ who is 1 when $x=0$ and is 0 elsewhere. This is not continuous on $mathbbR$, but is continuous on the spectrum of $D$!



                If $f$ vanishes at the infinity, $f(D)$ is bounded. The continuity of the operators $f(s^-1D)$ are considered under the norm topology. Since
                $$lim_sto 0 f(s^-1x)to delta_0(x)f(0)$$
                As continuous functions over the spectrum of $D$. Also $delta_0(D)$ is the projection $P$ to the eigenspace for $lambda=0$. We have the first limit of your question (1).



                Also by the result of compact resolvant, the dimension of the eigenspaces are finite dimensional, Let $P_+ ,P_-$ be the projection on $ker Dcap H_+$, $ker Dcap H_-$ respectivly. They will be trace-class operators(as operators on $L^2(M)$. We have
                $$ dim(ker Dcap H_+)=Tr(P_+),quad dim(ker Dcap H_-)=Tr(P_-)$$



                We define a "supertrace" $Str(P):=Tr(P_+)-Tr(P_-)$.



                We have $Index(D)=Str(P)$







                share|cite|improve this answer












                share|cite|improve this answer



                share|cite|improve this answer










                answered Apr 8 at 0:55









                RuiRui

                261




                261



























                    draft saved

                    draft discarded
















































                    Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


                    • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                    But avoid


                    • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                    • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

                    Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                    To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                    draft saved


                    draft discarded














                    StackExchange.ready(
                    function ()
                    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3153097%2fk-theory-of-operators-i-higson-notes%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                    );

                    Post as a guest















                    Required, but never shown





















































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown

































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown







                    Popular posts from this blog

                    Bosc Connection Yimello Approaching Angry The produce zaps the market. 구성 기록되다 변경...

                    WordPress Information needed

                    Hidroelektrana Sadržaj Povijest | Podjela hidroelektrana | Snaga dobivena u hidroelektranama | Dijelovi hidroelektrane | Uloga hidroelektrana u suvremenom svijetu | Prednosti hidroelektrana | Nedostaci hidroelektrana | Države s najvećom proizvodnjom hidro-električne energije | Deset najvećih hidroelektrana u svijetu | Hidroelektrane u Hrvatskoj | Izvori | Poveznice | Vanjske poveznice | Navigacijski izbornikTechnical Report, Version 2Zajedničkom poslužiteljuHidroelektranaHEP Proizvodnja d.o.o. - Hidroelektrane u Hrvatskoj