Confusion in sign convention of magnification? The 2019 Stack Overflow Developer Survey Results Are In Unicorn Meta Zoo #1: Why another podcast? Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar ManaraPoint me the primordial and intuitive concepts about this operations on physicsLorentz Transformation confusionshifting integration variable and taking derivative seemingly giving problemSolving for $theta$: $fracF - maw = Mcostheta + sintheta$Lens design using the matrix method (three lenses)Velocity-Time graph confusionFeynman Vertex Rule, Correlator, 2 diff coupling constants, why no-cross termsRay transfer matrixCan the same problem be done without calculus?Linear correlation between Distance and an Acceleration statistic

What does Linus Torvalds mean when he says that Git "never ever" tracks a file?

How do I design a circuit to convert a 100 mV and 50 Hz sine wave to a square wave?

Presidential Pardon

Would an alien lifeform be able to achieve space travel if lacking in vision?

Match Roman Numerals

ELI5: Why do they say that Israel would have been the fourth country to land a spacecraft on the Moon and why do they call it low cost?

Store Dynamic-accessible hidden metadata in a cell

Is it ethical to upload a automatically generated paper to a non peer-reviewed site as part of a larger research?

how can a perfect fourth interval be considered either consonant or dissonant?

Why don't hard Brexiteers insist on a hard border to prevent illegal immigration after Brexit?

Identify 80s or 90s comics with ripped creatures (not dwarves)

Can the Right Ascension and Argument of Perigee of a spacecraft's orbit keep varying by themselves with time?

Mortgage adviser recommends a longer term than necessary combined with overpayments

How to politely respond to generic emails requesting a PhD/job in my lab? Without wasting too much time

What can I do to 'burn' a journal?

Is there a way to generate uniformly distributed points on a sphere from a fixed amount of random real numbers per point?

Why can't wing-mounted spoilers be used to steepen approaches?

Button changing its text & action. Good or terrible?

Is there a writing software that you can sort scenes like slides in PowerPoint?

Is 'stolen' appropriate word?

Do warforged have souls?

Do I have Disadvantage attacking with an off-hand weapon?

How did the crowd guess the pentatonic scale in Bobby McFerrin's presentation?

60's-70's movie: home appliances revolting against the owners



Confusion in sign convention of magnification?



The 2019 Stack Overflow Developer Survey Results Are In
Unicorn Meta Zoo #1: Why another podcast?
Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar ManaraPoint me the primordial and intuitive concepts about this operations on physicsLorentz Transformation confusionshifting integration variable and taking derivative seemingly giving problemSolving for $theta$: $fracF - maw = Mcostheta + sintheta$Lens design using the matrix method (three lenses)Velocity-Time graph confusionFeynman Vertex Rule, Correlator, 2 diff coupling constants, why no-cross termsRay transfer matrixCan the same problem be done without calculus?Linear correlation between Distance and an Acceleration statistic










0












$begingroup$



A concave mirror forms a real image three times larger than the object on a screen. Object and screen are moved until the image becomes twice the size of object. If the shift of object is 6 cm. Find the focal length and initial position of object?




My attempt :-



1st way

As per question
$$m_i=3$$
$$Longrightarrow frac-f-f+u=3$$
$$Longrightarrow 2f=3u. ...(1)$$
For second case , On a similar way we get
$$ frac-f-f+(u+6)=3$$
$$ Longrightarrow f=2u+12. ....(2)$$
On solving equation 1 and 2 we get
$$f=-36 , u=-24$$



2nd way

Since the image is inverted the magnification must be negative.

So $$m_i =-3$$
$$Longrightarrow fracff-u=-3$$
For second case
$$fracff-(u+6)=-2$$
On solving we get
$$f=-36, u=-48$$



My question:- why I get two different answer, if use the sign. Convention in the formula of magnification I get different results when I use the sign. Convention in the value of magnification. Why this this happen and which is right process ?










share|cite|improve this question







New contributor




Abhishek Kumar is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.







$endgroup$
















    0












    $begingroup$



    A concave mirror forms a real image three times larger than the object on a screen. Object and screen are moved until the image becomes twice the size of object. If the shift of object is 6 cm. Find the focal length and initial position of object?




    My attempt :-



    1st way

    As per question
    $$m_i=3$$
    $$Longrightarrow frac-f-f+u=3$$
    $$Longrightarrow 2f=3u. ...(1)$$
    For second case , On a similar way we get
    $$ frac-f-f+(u+6)=3$$
    $$ Longrightarrow f=2u+12. ....(2)$$
    On solving equation 1 and 2 we get
    $$f=-36 , u=-24$$



    2nd way

    Since the image is inverted the magnification must be negative.

    So $$m_i =-3$$
    $$Longrightarrow fracff-u=-3$$
    For second case
    $$fracff-(u+6)=-2$$
    On solving we get
    $$f=-36, u=-48$$



    My question:- why I get two different answer, if use the sign. Convention in the formula of magnification I get different results when I use the sign. Convention in the value of magnification. Why this this happen and which is right process ?










    share|cite|improve this question







    New contributor




    Abhishek Kumar is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
    Check out our Code of Conduct.







    $endgroup$














      0












      0








      0





      $begingroup$



      A concave mirror forms a real image three times larger than the object on a screen. Object and screen are moved until the image becomes twice the size of object. If the shift of object is 6 cm. Find the focal length and initial position of object?




      My attempt :-



      1st way

      As per question
      $$m_i=3$$
      $$Longrightarrow frac-f-f+u=3$$
      $$Longrightarrow 2f=3u. ...(1)$$
      For second case , On a similar way we get
      $$ frac-f-f+(u+6)=3$$
      $$ Longrightarrow f=2u+12. ....(2)$$
      On solving equation 1 and 2 we get
      $$f=-36 , u=-24$$



      2nd way

      Since the image is inverted the magnification must be negative.

      So $$m_i =-3$$
      $$Longrightarrow fracff-u=-3$$
      For second case
      $$fracff-(u+6)=-2$$
      On solving we get
      $$f=-36, u=-48$$



      My question:- why I get two different answer, if use the sign. Convention in the formula of magnification I get different results when I use the sign. Convention in the value of magnification. Why this this happen and which is right process ?










      share|cite|improve this question







      New contributor




      Abhishek Kumar is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.







      $endgroup$





      A concave mirror forms a real image three times larger than the object on a screen. Object and screen are moved until the image becomes twice the size of object. If the shift of object is 6 cm. Find the focal length and initial position of object?




      My attempt :-



      1st way

      As per question
      $$m_i=3$$
      $$Longrightarrow frac-f-f+u=3$$
      $$Longrightarrow 2f=3u. ...(1)$$
      For second case , On a similar way we get
      $$ frac-f-f+(u+6)=3$$
      $$ Longrightarrow f=2u+12. ....(2)$$
      On solving equation 1 and 2 we get
      $$f=-36 , u=-24$$



      2nd way

      Since the image is inverted the magnification must be negative.

      So $$m_i =-3$$
      $$Longrightarrow fracff-u=-3$$
      For second case
      $$fracff-(u+6)=-2$$
      On solving we get
      $$f=-36, u=-48$$



      My question:- why I get two different answer, if use the sign. Convention in the formula of magnification I get different results when I use the sign. Convention in the value of magnification. Why this this happen and which is right process ?







      physics






      share|cite|improve this question







      New contributor




      Abhishek Kumar is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.











      share|cite|improve this question







      New contributor




      Abhishek Kumar is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.









      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question






      New contributor




      Abhishek Kumar is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.









      asked Apr 8 at 6:43









      Abhishek KumarAbhishek Kumar

      685




      685




      New contributor




      Abhishek Kumar is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.





      New contributor





      Abhishek Kumar is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.






      Abhishek Kumar is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.




















          0






          active

          oldest

          votes












          Your Answer








          StackExchange.ready(function()
          var channelOptions =
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "69"
          ;
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
          createEditor();
          );

          else
          createEditor();

          );

          function createEditor()
          StackExchange.prepareEditor(
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: true,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: 10,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader:
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          ,
          noCode: true, onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          );



          );






          Abhishek Kumar is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.









          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3179264%2fconfusion-in-sign-convention-of-magnification%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          0






          active

          oldest

          votes








          0






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes








          Abhishek Kumar is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.









          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          Abhishek Kumar is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.












          Abhishek Kumar is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.











          Abhishek Kumar is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.














          Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid


          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

          Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3179264%2fconfusion-in-sign-convention-of-magnification%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          Reflective Organisation Design Cloistered Grant Integrate Beans Dog 상황 수입 유교 Nation Needless...

          What is the multidegree of a curve $C subset mathbbP^n times mathbbP^m$? The 2019 Stack Overflow Developer Survey Results Are In Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Planned maintenance scheduled April 17/18, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern)$mathcalL$ is very ample, $mathcalU$ is generated by global sections $Rightarrow$ $mathcalL otimes mathcalU$ is very ampleHilbert polynomial and Chern classesComputing $H^k(mathbbCP^n times mathbbCP^m, mathcalO^*(mathbbCP^n times mathbbCP^m))$.Proof of $mathcalO_mathbbP^1 times mathbbP^1(a,b)$ is ample $iff$ $a,b >0$.Smooth curve of genus $1$ in $mathbbP_mathbbC^1times mathbbP_mathbbC^1$.When is the canonical sheaf of a curve very ample?Line bundle on projective $A$-scheme is the difference between two very ample line bundlesCanonical Divisor of Product of Smooth Curves is AmpleHilbert polynomial of $mathcalL$ when $StomathbbP^2$ finiteTensor product of very ample line bundle with globally generated line bundle is very ample

          A recreational problem The 2019 Stack Overflow Developer Survey Results Are In Unicorn Meta Zoo #1: Why another podcast? Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manaraprime factors of numbers formed by primorialsAll the small primes close together yet againSimple quadratic, crazy question part 2Can every odd prime $pne 11$ be the smallest prime factor of a carmichael-number with $3$ prime factors?Is the product of consecutive primes in $(a, b)[n]$ $=$ $1$ $pmod ab$?Pythagorean triples that “survive” Euler's totient functionA question about a certain type of primesPrimes of the form $p^2+p+41$