Weird behaviour when using querySelector The 2019 Stack Overflow Developer Survey Results Are In Unicorn Meta Zoo #1: Why another podcast? Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara The Ask Question Wizard is Live! Data science time! April 2019 and salary with experienceWhen are you supposed to use escape instead of encodeURI / encodeURIComponent?When to use double or single quotes in JavaScript?How to execute a JavaScript function when I have its name as a stringChange the selected value of a drop-down list with jQueryWhat is the purpose of the var keyword and when should I use it (or omit it)?How to decide when to use Node.js?What is the explanation for these bizarre JavaScript behaviours mentioned in the 'Wat' talk for CodeMash 2012?Get current applied style with JSRunning JavaScript function to gives “Uncaught SyntaxError: Unexpected token }”Accessing elements from HTML in JavaScript
What happens to a Warlock's expended Spell Slots when they gain a Level?
1960s short story making fun of James Bond-style spy fiction
Why are PDP-7-style microprogrammed instructions out of vogue?
What do I do when my TA workload is more than expected?
should truth entail possible truth
How to type a long/em dash `—`
Does Parliament hold absolute power in the UK?
Can I visit the Trinity College (Cambridge) library and see some of their rare books
What information about me do stores get via my credit card?
How did the audience guess the pentatonic scale in Bobby McFerrin's presentation?
My body leaves; my core can stay
how can a perfect fourth interval be considered either consonant or dissonant?
US Healthcare consultation for visitors
Is an up-to-date browser secure on an out-of-date OS?
Do I have Disadvantage attacking with an off-hand weapon?
The following signatures were invalid: EXPKEYSIG 1397BC53640DB551
Are there continuous functions who are the same in an interval but differ in at least one other point?
Didn't get enough time to take a Coding Test - what to do now?
Make it rain characters
For what reasons would an animal species NOT cross a *horizontal* land bridge?
"... to apply for a visa" or "... and applied for a visa"?
Do working physicists consider Newtonian mechanics to be "falsified"?
"is" operation returns false even though two objects have same id
Python - Fishing Simulator
Weird behaviour when using querySelector
The 2019 Stack Overflow Developer Survey Results Are In
Unicorn Meta Zoo #1: Why another podcast?
Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara
The Ask Question Wizard is Live!
Data science time! April 2019 and salary with experienceWhen are you supposed to use escape instead of encodeURI / encodeURIComponent?When to use double or single quotes in JavaScript?How to execute a JavaScript function when I have its name as a stringChange the selected value of a drop-down list with jQueryWhat is the purpose of the var keyword and when should I use it (or omit it)?How to decide when to use Node.js?What is the explanation for these bizarre JavaScript behaviours mentioned in the 'Wat' talk for CodeMash 2012?Get current applied style with JSRunning JavaScript function to gives “Uncaught SyntaxError: Unexpected token }”Accessing elements from HTML in JavaScript
.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty height:90px;width:728px;box-sizing:border-box;
As my understanding, when using element.querySelector()
, the query should be start on particular element.
However, when I run using code below, it keep selected the first DIV
tag in particular element.
const rootDiv = document.getElementById('test');
console.log(rootDiv.querySelector('div').innerHTML);
console.log(rootDiv.querySelector('div > div').innerHTML);
console.log(rootDiv.querySelector('div > div > div').innerHTML);
console.log(rootDiv.querySelector('div > div > div > div').innerHTML);
console.log(rootDiv.querySelector('div > div > div > div > div').innerHTML);
<div>
<div>
<div id="test">
<div>
<div>
This is content
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
As you can see, the first few results is the same.
This this a bug? Or it will query from start of the document?
javascript
add a comment |
As my understanding, when using element.querySelector()
, the query should be start on particular element.
However, when I run using code below, it keep selected the first DIV
tag in particular element.
const rootDiv = document.getElementById('test');
console.log(rootDiv.querySelector('div').innerHTML);
console.log(rootDiv.querySelector('div > div').innerHTML);
console.log(rootDiv.querySelector('div > div > div').innerHTML);
console.log(rootDiv.querySelector('div > div > div > div').innerHTML);
console.log(rootDiv.querySelector('div > div > div > div > div').innerHTML);
<div>
<div>
<div id="test">
<div>
<div>
This is content
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
As you can see, the first few results is the same.
This this a bug? Or it will query from start of the document?
javascript
add a comment |
As my understanding, when using element.querySelector()
, the query should be start on particular element.
However, when I run using code below, it keep selected the first DIV
tag in particular element.
const rootDiv = document.getElementById('test');
console.log(rootDiv.querySelector('div').innerHTML);
console.log(rootDiv.querySelector('div > div').innerHTML);
console.log(rootDiv.querySelector('div > div > div').innerHTML);
console.log(rootDiv.querySelector('div > div > div > div').innerHTML);
console.log(rootDiv.querySelector('div > div > div > div > div').innerHTML);
<div>
<div>
<div id="test">
<div>
<div>
This is content
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
As you can see, the first few results is the same.
This this a bug? Or it will query from start of the document?
javascript
As my understanding, when using element.querySelector()
, the query should be start on particular element.
However, when I run using code below, it keep selected the first DIV
tag in particular element.
const rootDiv = document.getElementById('test');
console.log(rootDiv.querySelector('div').innerHTML);
console.log(rootDiv.querySelector('div > div').innerHTML);
console.log(rootDiv.querySelector('div > div > div').innerHTML);
console.log(rootDiv.querySelector('div > div > div > div').innerHTML);
console.log(rootDiv.querySelector('div > div > div > div > div').innerHTML);
<div>
<div>
<div id="test">
<div>
<div>
This is content
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
As you can see, the first few results is the same.
This this a bug? Or it will query from start of the document?
const rootDiv = document.getElementById('test');
console.log(rootDiv.querySelector('div').innerHTML);
console.log(rootDiv.querySelector('div > div').innerHTML);
console.log(rootDiv.querySelector('div > div > div').innerHTML);
console.log(rootDiv.querySelector('div > div > div > div').innerHTML);
console.log(rootDiv.querySelector('div > div > div > div > div').innerHTML);
<div>
<div>
<div id="test">
<div>
<div>
This is content
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
const rootDiv = document.getElementById('test');
console.log(rootDiv.querySelector('div').innerHTML);
console.log(rootDiv.querySelector('div > div').innerHTML);
console.log(rootDiv.querySelector('div > div > div').innerHTML);
console.log(rootDiv.querySelector('div > div > div > div').innerHTML);
console.log(rootDiv.querySelector('div > div > div > div > div').innerHTML);
<div>
<div>
<div id="test">
<div>
<div>
This is content
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
javascript
javascript
edited Apr 8 at 9:00
Abana Clara
1,7351020
1,7351020
asked Apr 8 at 7:27
Joey ChongJoey Chong
1,0571116
1,0571116
add a comment |
add a comment |
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
What querySelector
does is it finds an element somewhere in the document that matches the CSS selector passed, and then checks that the found element is a descendant of the element you called querySelector
on. It doesn't start at the element it was called on and search downwards - rather, it always starts at the document level, looks for elements that match the selector, and checks that the element is also a descendant of the calling context element. It's a bit unintuitive.
So:
someElement.querySelector(selectorStr)
is like
[...document.querySelectorAll(selectorStr)]
.find(elm => someElement.contains(elm));
A possible solution is to use :scope
to indicate that you want the selection to start at the rootDiv
, rather than at document
:
const rootDiv = document.getElementById('test');
console.log(rootDiv.querySelector(':scope > div').innerHTML);
console.log(rootDiv.querySelector(':scope > div > div').innerHTML);
console.log(rootDiv.querySelector(':scope > div > div > div').innerHTML);
<div>
<div>
<div id="test">
<div>
<div>
This is content
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
:scope
is supported in all modern browsers but Edge.
Neat trick! Thanks!
– Tico
Apr 8 at 7:35
:scope
is not supported by all but most of the major browsers. Anyways, thank for explanation and this should be the answer. Thanks.
– Joey Chong
Apr 8 at 7:44
:scope
doesn't work with IE and Edge, I think it's important to point this out
– Cristian Traìna
Apr 8 at 7:47
Here is the browser compatibility table - we have to resist just few months more since Edge is implementing Chromium engine :P
– Cristian Traìna
Apr 8 at 7:47
Do you have any sources for the browser engine actually working this way ? - The query would have the same result, if the engine would start with the first div and check if it matches the query selector...
– Falco
Apr 8 at 11:17
add a comment |
The currently accepted answer somehow provides a valid logical explanation as to what happens, but they are factually wrong.
Element.querySelector
triggers the match a selector against tree algorithm, which goes from the root element and checks if its descendants do match the selector.
The selector itself is absolute, it doesn't have any knowledge of a Document and doesn't even require that your Element be appended to any. And apart from the :scope
attribute, it doesn't either care with which root you called the querySelector
method.
If we wanted to rewrite it ourselves, it would be more like
const walker = document.createTreeWalker(element,
NodeFilter.SHOW_ELEMENT,
acceptNode: (node) => return node.matches(selector) && NodeFilter.FILTER_ACCEPT
);
return walker.nextNode();
const rootDiv = document.getElementById('test');
console.log(querySelector(rootDiv, 'div>div').innerHTML);
function querySelector(element, selector)
const walker = document.createTreeWalker(element,
NodeFilter.SHOW_ELEMENT,
acceptNode: (node) => node.matches(selector) && NodeFilter.FILTER_ACCEPT
);
return walker.nextNode();
;
<div>
<div>
<div id="test">
<div>
<div>
This is content
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
With the big difference that this implementation doesn't support the special :scope
selector.
You may think it's the same going from the document or going from the root element, but not only will it make a difference in terms of performances, it will also allow for using this method while the element is not appended to any document.
const div = document.createElement('div');
div.insertAdjacentHTML('beforeend', '<div id="test"><div class="bar"></div></div>')
console.log(div.querySelector('div>.bar')); // found
console.log(document.querySelector('div>.bar')); // null
In the same way, matching elements in the Shadow-DOM would not be possible if we only had Document.querySelector.
Goood explanaition - especially the bit about Nodes not part of the document. This represents more clearly what the browser engine actually does.
– Falco
Apr 8 at 13:46
add a comment |
The query selector div > div > div
only means:
Find a div which has a parent and a granparent which are both also a div.
And if you start with the first child of test and check the selector, it is true. And this is the reason why only your last query selects the innermost div, since it has the first predicate (find a div with a great-great-grandparent-div) which is not fulfilled by the first child of test.
The query-selector will only test descendants, but it will evaluate the expression in scope of the whole document. Just imagine a selector like checking properties of an element - even if you only view the child element, it is still the child of its parent.
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function ()
StackExchange.using("snippets", function ()
StackExchange.snippets.init();
);
);
, "code-snippets");
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "1"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f55568211%2fweird-behaviour-when-using-queryselector%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
What querySelector
does is it finds an element somewhere in the document that matches the CSS selector passed, and then checks that the found element is a descendant of the element you called querySelector
on. It doesn't start at the element it was called on and search downwards - rather, it always starts at the document level, looks for elements that match the selector, and checks that the element is also a descendant of the calling context element. It's a bit unintuitive.
So:
someElement.querySelector(selectorStr)
is like
[...document.querySelectorAll(selectorStr)]
.find(elm => someElement.contains(elm));
A possible solution is to use :scope
to indicate that you want the selection to start at the rootDiv
, rather than at document
:
const rootDiv = document.getElementById('test');
console.log(rootDiv.querySelector(':scope > div').innerHTML);
console.log(rootDiv.querySelector(':scope > div > div').innerHTML);
console.log(rootDiv.querySelector(':scope > div > div > div').innerHTML);
<div>
<div>
<div id="test">
<div>
<div>
This is content
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
:scope
is supported in all modern browsers but Edge.
Neat trick! Thanks!
– Tico
Apr 8 at 7:35
:scope
is not supported by all but most of the major browsers. Anyways, thank for explanation and this should be the answer. Thanks.
– Joey Chong
Apr 8 at 7:44
:scope
doesn't work with IE and Edge, I think it's important to point this out
– Cristian Traìna
Apr 8 at 7:47
Here is the browser compatibility table - we have to resist just few months more since Edge is implementing Chromium engine :P
– Cristian Traìna
Apr 8 at 7:47
Do you have any sources for the browser engine actually working this way ? - The query would have the same result, if the engine would start with the first div and check if it matches the query selector...
– Falco
Apr 8 at 11:17
add a comment |
What querySelector
does is it finds an element somewhere in the document that matches the CSS selector passed, and then checks that the found element is a descendant of the element you called querySelector
on. It doesn't start at the element it was called on and search downwards - rather, it always starts at the document level, looks for elements that match the selector, and checks that the element is also a descendant of the calling context element. It's a bit unintuitive.
So:
someElement.querySelector(selectorStr)
is like
[...document.querySelectorAll(selectorStr)]
.find(elm => someElement.contains(elm));
A possible solution is to use :scope
to indicate that you want the selection to start at the rootDiv
, rather than at document
:
const rootDiv = document.getElementById('test');
console.log(rootDiv.querySelector(':scope > div').innerHTML);
console.log(rootDiv.querySelector(':scope > div > div').innerHTML);
console.log(rootDiv.querySelector(':scope > div > div > div').innerHTML);
<div>
<div>
<div id="test">
<div>
<div>
This is content
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
:scope
is supported in all modern browsers but Edge.
Neat trick! Thanks!
– Tico
Apr 8 at 7:35
:scope
is not supported by all but most of the major browsers. Anyways, thank for explanation and this should be the answer. Thanks.
– Joey Chong
Apr 8 at 7:44
:scope
doesn't work with IE and Edge, I think it's important to point this out
– Cristian Traìna
Apr 8 at 7:47
Here is the browser compatibility table - we have to resist just few months more since Edge is implementing Chromium engine :P
– Cristian Traìna
Apr 8 at 7:47
Do you have any sources for the browser engine actually working this way ? - The query would have the same result, if the engine would start with the first div and check if it matches the query selector...
– Falco
Apr 8 at 11:17
add a comment |
What querySelector
does is it finds an element somewhere in the document that matches the CSS selector passed, and then checks that the found element is a descendant of the element you called querySelector
on. It doesn't start at the element it was called on and search downwards - rather, it always starts at the document level, looks for elements that match the selector, and checks that the element is also a descendant of the calling context element. It's a bit unintuitive.
So:
someElement.querySelector(selectorStr)
is like
[...document.querySelectorAll(selectorStr)]
.find(elm => someElement.contains(elm));
A possible solution is to use :scope
to indicate that you want the selection to start at the rootDiv
, rather than at document
:
const rootDiv = document.getElementById('test');
console.log(rootDiv.querySelector(':scope > div').innerHTML);
console.log(rootDiv.querySelector(':scope > div > div').innerHTML);
console.log(rootDiv.querySelector(':scope > div > div > div').innerHTML);
<div>
<div>
<div id="test">
<div>
<div>
This is content
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
:scope
is supported in all modern browsers but Edge.
What querySelector
does is it finds an element somewhere in the document that matches the CSS selector passed, and then checks that the found element is a descendant of the element you called querySelector
on. It doesn't start at the element it was called on and search downwards - rather, it always starts at the document level, looks for elements that match the selector, and checks that the element is also a descendant of the calling context element. It's a bit unintuitive.
So:
someElement.querySelector(selectorStr)
is like
[...document.querySelectorAll(selectorStr)]
.find(elm => someElement.contains(elm));
A possible solution is to use :scope
to indicate that you want the selection to start at the rootDiv
, rather than at document
:
const rootDiv = document.getElementById('test');
console.log(rootDiv.querySelector(':scope > div').innerHTML);
console.log(rootDiv.querySelector(':scope > div > div').innerHTML);
console.log(rootDiv.querySelector(':scope > div > div > div').innerHTML);
<div>
<div>
<div id="test">
<div>
<div>
This is content
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
:scope
is supported in all modern browsers but Edge.
const rootDiv = document.getElementById('test');
console.log(rootDiv.querySelector(':scope > div').innerHTML);
console.log(rootDiv.querySelector(':scope > div > div').innerHTML);
console.log(rootDiv.querySelector(':scope > div > div > div').innerHTML);
<div>
<div>
<div id="test">
<div>
<div>
This is content
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
const rootDiv = document.getElementById('test');
console.log(rootDiv.querySelector(':scope > div').innerHTML);
console.log(rootDiv.querySelector(':scope > div > div').innerHTML);
console.log(rootDiv.querySelector(':scope > div > div > div').innerHTML);
<div>
<div>
<div id="test">
<div>
<div>
This is content
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
edited yesterday
Nisarg
11.2k52341
11.2k52341
answered Apr 8 at 7:31
CertainPerformanceCertainPerformance
99k166089
99k166089
Neat trick! Thanks!
– Tico
Apr 8 at 7:35
:scope
is not supported by all but most of the major browsers. Anyways, thank for explanation and this should be the answer. Thanks.
– Joey Chong
Apr 8 at 7:44
:scope
doesn't work with IE and Edge, I think it's important to point this out
– Cristian Traìna
Apr 8 at 7:47
Here is the browser compatibility table - we have to resist just few months more since Edge is implementing Chromium engine :P
– Cristian Traìna
Apr 8 at 7:47
Do you have any sources for the browser engine actually working this way ? - The query would have the same result, if the engine would start with the first div and check if it matches the query selector...
– Falco
Apr 8 at 11:17
add a comment |
Neat trick! Thanks!
– Tico
Apr 8 at 7:35
:scope
is not supported by all but most of the major browsers. Anyways, thank for explanation and this should be the answer. Thanks.
– Joey Chong
Apr 8 at 7:44
:scope
doesn't work with IE and Edge, I think it's important to point this out
– Cristian Traìna
Apr 8 at 7:47
Here is the browser compatibility table - we have to resist just few months more since Edge is implementing Chromium engine :P
– Cristian Traìna
Apr 8 at 7:47
Do you have any sources for the browser engine actually working this way ? - The query would have the same result, if the engine would start with the first div and check if it matches the query selector...
– Falco
Apr 8 at 11:17
Neat trick! Thanks!
– Tico
Apr 8 at 7:35
Neat trick! Thanks!
– Tico
Apr 8 at 7:35
:scope
is not supported by all but most of the major browsers. Anyways, thank for explanation and this should be the answer. Thanks.– Joey Chong
Apr 8 at 7:44
:scope
is not supported by all but most of the major browsers. Anyways, thank for explanation and this should be the answer. Thanks.– Joey Chong
Apr 8 at 7:44
:scope
doesn't work with IE and Edge, I think it's important to point this out– Cristian Traìna
Apr 8 at 7:47
:scope
doesn't work with IE and Edge, I think it's important to point this out– Cristian Traìna
Apr 8 at 7:47
Here is the browser compatibility table - we have to resist just few months more since Edge is implementing Chromium engine :P
– Cristian Traìna
Apr 8 at 7:47
Here is the browser compatibility table - we have to resist just few months more since Edge is implementing Chromium engine :P
– Cristian Traìna
Apr 8 at 7:47
Do you have any sources for the browser engine actually working this way ? - The query would have the same result, if the engine would start with the first div and check if it matches the query selector...
– Falco
Apr 8 at 11:17
Do you have any sources for the browser engine actually working this way ? - The query would have the same result, if the engine would start with the first div and check if it matches the query selector...
– Falco
Apr 8 at 11:17
add a comment |
The currently accepted answer somehow provides a valid logical explanation as to what happens, but they are factually wrong.
Element.querySelector
triggers the match a selector against tree algorithm, which goes from the root element and checks if its descendants do match the selector.
The selector itself is absolute, it doesn't have any knowledge of a Document and doesn't even require that your Element be appended to any. And apart from the :scope
attribute, it doesn't either care with which root you called the querySelector
method.
If we wanted to rewrite it ourselves, it would be more like
const walker = document.createTreeWalker(element,
NodeFilter.SHOW_ELEMENT,
acceptNode: (node) => return node.matches(selector) && NodeFilter.FILTER_ACCEPT
);
return walker.nextNode();
const rootDiv = document.getElementById('test');
console.log(querySelector(rootDiv, 'div>div').innerHTML);
function querySelector(element, selector)
const walker = document.createTreeWalker(element,
NodeFilter.SHOW_ELEMENT,
acceptNode: (node) => node.matches(selector) && NodeFilter.FILTER_ACCEPT
);
return walker.nextNode();
;
<div>
<div>
<div id="test">
<div>
<div>
This is content
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
With the big difference that this implementation doesn't support the special :scope
selector.
You may think it's the same going from the document or going from the root element, but not only will it make a difference in terms of performances, it will also allow for using this method while the element is not appended to any document.
const div = document.createElement('div');
div.insertAdjacentHTML('beforeend', '<div id="test"><div class="bar"></div></div>')
console.log(div.querySelector('div>.bar')); // found
console.log(document.querySelector('div>.bar')); // null
In the same way, matching elements in the Shadow-DOM would not be possible if we only had Document.querySelector.
Goood explanaition - especially the bit about Nodes not part of the document. This represents more clearly what the browser engine actually does.
– Falco
Apr 8 at 13:46
add a comment |
The currently accepted answer somehow provides a valid logical explanation as to what happens, but they are factually wrong.
Element.querySelector
triggers the match a selector against tree algorithm, which goes from the root element and checks if its descendants do match the selector.
The selector itself is absolute, it doesn't have any knowledge of a Document and doesn't even require that your Element be appended to any. And apart from the :scope
attribute, it doesn't either care with which root you called the querySelector
method.
If we wanted to rewrite it ourselves, it would be more like
const walker = document.createTreeWalker(element,
NodeFilter.SHOW_ELEMENT,
acceptNode: (node) => return node.matches(selector) && NodeFilter.FILTER_ACCEPT
);
return walker.nextNode();
const rootDiv = document.getElementById('test');
console.log(querySelector(rootDiv, 'div>div').innerHTML);
function querySelector(element, selector)
const walker = document.createTreeWalker(element,
NodeFilter.SHOW_ELEMENT,
acceptNode: (node) => node.matches(selector) && NodeFilter.FILTER_ACCEPT
);
return walker.nextNode();
;
<div>
<div>
<div id="test">
<div>
<div>
This is content
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
With the big difference that this implementation doesn't support the special :scope
selector.
You may think it's the same going from the document or going from the root element, but not only will it make a difference in terms of performances, it will also allow for using this method while the element is not appended to any document.
const div = document.createElement('div');
div.insertAdjacentHTML('beforeend', '<div id="test"><div class="bar"></div></div>')
console.log(div.querySelector('div>.bar')); // found
console.log(document.querySelector('div>.bar')); // null
In the same way, matching elements in the Shadow-DOM would not be possible if we only had Document.querySelector.
Goood explanaition - especially the bit about Nodes not part of the document. This represents more clearly what the browser engine actually does.
– Falco
Apr 8 at 13:46
add a comment |
The currently accepted answer somehow provides a valid logical explanation as to what happens, but they are factually wrong.
Element.querySelector
triggers the match a selector against tree algorithm, which goes from the root element and checks if its descendants do match the selector.
The selector itself is absolute, it doesn't have any knowledge of a Document and doesn't even require that your Element be appended to any. And apart from the :scope
attribute, it doesn't either care with which root you called the querySelector
method.
If we wanted to rewrite it ourselves, it would be more like
const walker = document.createTreeWalker(element,
NodeFilter.SHOW_ELEMENT,
acceptNode: (node) => return node.matches(selector) && NodeFilter.FILTER_ACCEPT
);
return walker.nextNode();
const rootDiv = document.getElementById('test');
console.log(querySelector(rootDiv, 'div>div').innerHTML);
function querySelector(element, selector)
const walker = document.createTreeWalker(element,
NodeFilter.SHOW_ELEMENT,
acceptNode: (node) => node.matches(selector) && NodeFilter.FILTER_ACCEPT
);
return walker.nextNode();
;
<div>
<div>
<div id="test">
<div>
<div>
This is content
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
With the big difference that this implementation doesn't support the special :scope
selector.
You may think it's the same going from the document or going from the root element, but not only will it make a difference in terms of performances, it will also allow for using this method while the element is not appended to any document.
const div = document.createElement('div');
div.insertAdjacentHTML('beforeend', '<div id="test"><div class="bar"></div></div>')
console.log(div.querySelector('div>.bar')); // found
console.log(document.querySelector('div>.bar')); // null
In the same way, matching elements in the Shadow-DOM would not be possible if we only had Document.querySelector.
The currently accepted answer somehow provides a valid logical explanation as to what happens, but they are factually wrong.
Element.querySelector
triggers the match a selector against tree algorithm, which goes from the root element and checks if its descendants do match the selector.
The selector itself is absolute, it doesn't have any knowledge of a Document and doesn't even require that your Element be appended to any. And apart from the :scope
attribute, it doesn't either care with which root you called the querySelector
method.
If we wanted to rewrite it ourselves, it would be more like
const walker = document.createTreeWalker(element,
NodeFilter.SHOW_ELEMENT,
acceptNode: (node) => return node.matches(selector) && NodeFilter.FILTER_ACCEPT
);
return walker.nextNode();
const rootDiv = document.getElementById('test');
console.log(querySelector(rootDiv, 'div>div').innerHTML);
function querySelector(element, selector)
const walker = document.createTreeWalker(element,
NodeFilter.SHOW_ELEMENT,
acceptNode: (node) => node.matches(selector) && NodeFilter.FILTER_ACCEPT
);
return walker.nextNode();
;
<div>
<div>
<div id="test">
<div>
<div>
This is content
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
With the big difference that this implementation doesn't support the special :scope
selector.
You may think it's the same going from the document or going from the root element, but not only will it make a difference in terms of performances, it will also allow for using this method while the element is not appended to any document.
const div = document.createElement('div');
div.insertAdjacentHTML('beforeend', '<div id="test"><div class="bar"></div></div>')
console.log(div.querySelector('div>.bar')); // found
console.log(document.querySelector('div>.bar')); // null
In the same way, matching elements in the Shadow-DOM would not be possible if we only had Document.querySelector.
const rootDiv = document.getElementById('test');
console.log(querySelector(rootDiv, 'div>div').innerHTML);
function querySelector(element, selector)
const walker = document.createTreeWalker(element,
NodeFilter.SHOW_ELEMENT,
acceptNode: (node) => node.matches(selector) && NodeFilter.FILTER_ACCEPT
);
return walker.nextNode();
;
<div>
<div>
<div id="test">
<div>
<div>
This is content
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
const rootDiv = document.getElementById('test');
console.log(querySelector(rootDiv, 'div>div').innerHTML);
function querySelector(element, selector)
const walker = document.createTreeWalker(element,
NodeFilter.SHOW_ELEMENT,
acceptNode: (node) => node.matches(selector) && NodeFilter.FILTER_ACCEPT
);
return walker.nextNode();
;
<div>
<div>
<div id="test">
<div>
<div>
This is content
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
const div = document.createElement('div');
div.insertAdjacentHTML('beforeend', '<div id="test"><div class="bar"></div></div>')
console.log(div.querySelector('div>.bar')); // found
console.log(document.querySelector('div>.bar')); // null
const div = document.createElement('div');
div.insertAdjacentHTML('beforeend', '<div id="test"><div class="bar"></div></div>')
console.log(div.querySelector('div>.bar')); // found
console.log(document.querySelector('div>.bar')); // null
answered Apr 8 at 12:42
KaiidoKaiido
45.9k467108
45.9k467108
Goood explanaition - especially the bit about Nodes not part of the document. This represents more clearly what the browser engine actually does.
– Falco
Apr 8 at 13:46
add a comment |
Goood explanaition - especially the bit about Nodes not part of the document. This represents more clearly what the browser engine actually does.
– Falco
Apr 8 at 13:46
Goood explanaition - especially the bit about Nodes not part of the document. This represents more clearly what the browser engine actually does.
– Falco
Apr 8 at 13:46
Goood explanaition - especially the bit about Nodes not part of the document. This represents more clearly what the browser engine actually does.
– Falco
Apr 8 at 13:46
add a comment |
The query selector div > div > div
only means:
Find a div which has a parent and a granparent which are both also a div.
And if you start with the first child of test and check the selector, it is true. And this is the reason why only your last query selects the innermost div, since it has the first predicate (find a div with a great-great-grandparent-div) which is not fulfilled by the first child of test.
The query-selector will only test descendants, but it will evaluate the expression in scope of the whole document. Just imagine a selector like checking properties of an element - even if you only view the child element, it is still the child of its parent.
add a comment |
The query selector div > div > div
only means:
Find a div which has a parent and a granparent which are both also a div.
And if you start with the first child of test and check the selector, it is true. And this is the reason why only your last query selects the innermost div, since it has the first predicate (find a div with a great-great-grandparent-div) which is not fulfilled by the first child of test.
The query-selector will only test descendants, but it will evaluate the expression in scope of the whole document. Just imagine a selector like checking properties of an element - even if you only view the child element, it is still the child of its parent.
add a comment |
The query selector div > div > div
only means:
Find a div which has a parent and a granparent which are both also a div.
And if you start with the first child of test and check the selector, it is true. And this is the reason why only your last query selects the innermost div, since it has the first predicate (find a div with a great-great-grandparent-div) which is not fulfilled by the first child of test.
The query-selector will only test descendants, but it will evaluate the expression in scope of the whole document. Just imagine a selector like checking properties of an element - even if you only view the child element, it is still the child of its parent.
The query selector div > div > div
only means:
Find a div which has a parent and a granparent which are both also a div.
And if you start with the first child of test and check the selector, it is true. And this is the reason why only your last query selects the innermost div, since it has the first predicate (find a div with a great-great-grandparent-div) which is not fulfilled by the first child of test.
The query-selector will only test descendants, but it will evaluate the expression in scope of the whole document. Just imagine a selector like checking properties of an element - even if you only view the child element, it is still the child of its parent.
answered Apr 8 at 11:25
FalcoFalco
2,8501620
2,8501620
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f55568211%2fweird-behaviour-when-using-queryselector%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown