Moving Supremum inside conditional expectationConditions under which the Limit for “Measure $to 0$” is $0$ [more difficult]Conditional expectation is square-integrableProperty of conditional expectationDifferentiating inside a conditional expectationEquality of sets supremum and infimumConvergence of conditional meansExchanging supremum and conditional expectationProve or disprove the following inequality?Conditional expectation as a random variable newSupremum of integrable random variables and pointwise convergence
XeLaTeX and pdfLaTeX ignore hyphenation
I see my dog run
Why is an old chain unsafe?
New order #4: World
Why CLRS example on residual networks does not follows its formula?
How can the DM most effectively choose 1 out of an odd number of players to be targeted by an attack or effect?
Circuitry of TV splitters
Why do we use polarized capacitor?
How to type dʒ symbol (IPA) on Mac?
Can an x86 CPU running in real mode be considered to be basically an 8086 CPU?
declaring a variable twice in IIFE
Copycat chess is back
Schwarzchild Radius of the Universe
How do you conduct xenoanthropology after first contact?
Why is the design of haulage companies so “special”?
What are these boxed doors outside store fronts in New York?
I’m planning on buying a laser printer but concerned about the life cycle of toner in the machine
Is it possible to do 50 km distance without any previous training?
I probably found a bug with the sudo apt install function
Shell script can be run only with sh command
Simulate Bitwise Cyclic Tag
Calculus Optimization - Point on graph closest to given point
What would happen to a modern skyscraper if it rains micro blackholes?
Is it possible to make sharp wind that can cut stuff from afar?
Moving Supremum inside conditional expectation
Conditions under which the Limit for “Measure $to 0$” is $0$ [more difficult]Conditional expectation is square-integrableProperty of conditional expectationDifferentiating inside a conditional expectationEquality of sets supremum and infimumConvergence of conditional meansExchanging supremum and conditional expectationProve or disprove the following inequality?Conditional expectation as a random variable newSupremum of integrable random variables and pointwise convergence
$begingroup$
Let $Z_l_l in Lambda,X$ be square-integrable random-variables, and $f:mathbbR^2rightarrow mathbbR$ be a continuous function, such that
- $
sup_l in LambdamathbbE[f(Z_l,X)]<infty
.
$ - $operatornameesssup_l in LambdaZ_l<infty$
Under what conditions, is it true that
$$
sup_l in LambdamathbbEleft[
f(Z_l,X)
right]
=
mathbbEleft[
f(operatornameesssup_l in LambdaZ_l,X)
right]
$$
probability probability-theory measure-theory calculus-of-variations supremum-and-infimum
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Let $Z_l_l in Lambda,X$ be square-integrable random-variables, and $f:mathbbR^2rightarrow mathbbR$ be a continuous function, such that
- $
sup_l in LambdamathbbE[f(Z_l,X)]<infty
.
$ - $operatornameesssup_l in LambdaZ_l<infty$
Under what conditions, is it true that
$$
sup_l in LambdamathbbEleft[
f(Z_l,X)
right]
=
mathbbEleft[
f(operatornameesssup_l in LambdaZ_l,X)
right]
$$
probability probability-theory measure-theory calculus-of-variations supremum-and-infimum
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
I think you are talking about the normal expected value, since conditional expectation is a random variable itself. At first glance, you need monotony in $f$ for $Z_l$, i.e. $Z_ileq Z_k$ implies $mathbbE[f(Z_i,X)] leq mathbbE[f(Z_k,X)]$. The bounds guarantee you that such a $sup$ exists almost surely (inside as well as outside of the expected value), so you are fine taking a surpremum over a bounded sequence. This is just a quick guess, maybe someone else is able to provide you with a more detailed answer with more relaxed conditions.
$endgroup$
– F. Conrad
Apr 1 at 22:03
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Let $Z_l_l in Lambda,X$ be square-integrable random-variables, and $f:mathbbR^2rightarrow mathbbR$ be a continuous function, such that
- $
sup_l in LambdamathbbE[f(Z_l,X)]<infty
.
$ - $operatornameesssup_l in LambdaZ_l<infty$
Under what conditions, is it true that
$$
sup_l in LambdamathbbEleft[
f(Z_l,X)
right]
=
mathbbEleft[
f(operatornameesssup_l in LambdaZ_l,X)
right]
$$
probability probability-theory measure-theory calculus-of-variations supremum-and-infimum
$endgroup$
Let $Z_l_l in Lambda,X$ be square-integrable random-variables, and $f:mathbbR^2rightarrow mathbbR$ be a continuous function, such that
- $
sup_l in LambdamathbbE[f(Z_l,X)]<infty
.
$ - $operatornameesssup_l in LambdaZ_l<infty$
Under what conditions, is it true that
$$
sup_l in LambdamathbbEleft[
f(Z_l,X)
right]
=
mathbbEleft[
f(operatornameesssup_l in LambdaZ_l,X)
right]
$$
probability probability-theory measure-theory calculus-of-variations supremum-and-infimum
probability probability-theory measure-theory calculus-of-variations supremum-and-infimum
asked Apr 1 at 15:56
AIM_BLBAIM_BLB
2,5392820
2,5392820
$begingroup$
I think you are talking about the normal expected value, since conditional expectation is a random variable itself. At first glance, you need monotony in $f$ for $Z_l$, i.e. $Z_ileq Z_k$ implies $mathbbE[f(Z_i,X)] leq mathbbE[f(Z_k,X)]$. The bounds guarantee you that such a $sup$ exists almost surely (inside as well as outside of the expected value), so you are fine taking a surpremum over a bounded sequence. This is just a quick guess, maybe someone else is able to provide you with a more detailed answer with more relaxed conditions.
$endgroup$
– F. Conrad
Apr 1 at 22:03
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I think you are talking about the normal expected value, since conditional expectation is a random variable itself. At first glance, you need monotony in $f$ for $Z_l$, i.e. $Z_ileq Z_k$ implies $mathbbE[f(Z_i,X)] leq mathbbE[f(Z_k,X)]$. The bounds guarantee you that such a $sup$ exists almost surely (inside as well as outside of the expected value), so you are fine taking a surpremum over a bounded sequence. This is just a quick guess, maybe someone else is able to provide you with a more detailed answer with more relaxed conditions.
$endgroup$
– F. Conrad
Apr 1 at 22:03
$begingroup$
I think you are talking about the normal expected value, since conditional expectation is a random variable itself. At first glance, you need monotony in $f$ for $Z_l$, i.e. $Z_ileq Z_k$ implies $mathbbE[f(Z_i,X)] leq mathbbE[f(Z_k,X)]$. The bounds guarantee you that such a $sup$ exists almost surely (inside as well as outside of the expected value), so you are fine taking a surpremum over a bounded sequence. This is just a quick guess, maybe someone else is able to provide you with a more detailed answer with more relaxed conditions.
$endgroup$
– F. Conrad
Apr 1 at 22:03
$begingroup$
I think you are talking about the normal expected value, since conditional expectation is a random variable itself. At first glance, you need monotony in $f$ for $Z_l$, i.e. $Z_ileq Z_k$ implies $mathbbE[f(Z_i,X)] leq mathbbE[f(Z_k,X)]$. The bounds guarantee you that such a $sup$ exists almost surely (inside as well as outside of the expected value), so you are fine taking a surpremum over a bounded sequence. This is just a quick guess, maybe someone else is able to provide you with a more detailed answer with more relaxed conditions.
$endgroup$
– F. Conrad
Apr 1 at 22:03
add a comment |
0
active
oldest
votes
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
);
);
, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3170783%2fmoving-supremum-inside-conditional-expectation%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
0
active
oldest
votes
0
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3170783%2fmoving-supremum-inside-conditional-expectation%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
$begingroup$
I think you are talking about the normal expected value, since conditional expectation is a random variable itself. At first glance, you need monotony in $f$ for $Z_l$, i.e. $Z_ileq Z_k$ implies $mathbbE[f(Z_i,X)] leq mathbbE[f(Z_k,X)]$. The bounds guarantee you that such a $sup$ exists almost surely (inside as well as outside of the expected value), so you are fine taking a surpremum over a bounded sequence. This is just a quick guess, maybe someone else is able to provide you with a more detailed answer with more relaxed conditions.
$endgroup$
– F. Conrad
Apr 1 at 22:03