Definition of divisor associated to a meromorphic function The 2019 Stack Overflow Developer Survey Results Are Inlet $f$ be any meromorphic function then $operatornameord_p(f)=0$Rational/meromorphic functions on a schemeIs the divisor of a meromorphic function “actually” a “divisor-valued potential”?How to write a divisor: Exercise n 20 pag 285 from Geometry of algebraic curves by Arbarello, Cornalba, Griffiths, HarrisLine bundles with no meromorphic/holomorphic sectionsOrder of a meromorphic function at $infty$What is the morphism associated to a divisor?Finite dimensionality of space of meromorphic sections with prescrbes polesmeromorphic sections of invertible sheaves and divisors on a Riemann surfaceA confusion regarding the concept of principal divisor
JSON.serialize: is it possible to suppress null values of a map?
How are circuits which use complex ICs normally simulated?
What could be the right powersource for 15 seconds lifespan disposable giant chainsaw?
Deadlock Graph and Interpretation, solution to avoid
The difference between dialogue marks
Dual Citizen. Exited the US on Italian passport recently
Is bread bad for ducks?
Why can Shazam do this?
Inversion Puzzle
Does light intensity oscillate really fast since it is a wave?
What is the use of option -o in the useradd command?
Patience, young "Padovan"
Access elements in std::string where positon of string is greater than its size
Why is my p-value correlated to difference between means in two sample tests?
Is it possible for the two major parties in the UK to form a coalition with each other instead of a much smaller party?
What does "rabbited" mean/imply in this sentence?
Limit the amount of RAM Mathematica may access?
Realistic Alternatives to Dust: What Else Could Feed a Plankton Bloom?
How to reverse every other sublist of a list?
Why Did Howard Stark Use All The Vibranium They Had On A Prototype Shield?
Landlord wants to switch my lease to a "Land contract" to "get back at the city"
Can distinct morphisms between curves induce the same morphism on singular cohomology?
Time travel alters history but people keep saying nothing's changed
Spanish for "widget"
Definition of divisor associated to a meromorphic function
The 2019 Stack Overflow Developer Survey Results Are Inlet $f$ be any meromorphic function then $operatornameord_p(f)=0$Rational/meromorphic functions on a schemeIs the divisor of a meromorphic function “actually” a “divisor-valued potential”?How to write a divisor: Exercise n 20 pag 285 from Geometry of algebraic curves by Arbarello, Cornalba, Griffiths, HarrisLine bundles with no meromorphic/holomorphic sectionsOrder of a meromorphic function at $infty$What is the morphism associated to a divisor?Finite dimensionality of space of meromorphic sections with prescrbes polesmeromorphic sections of invertible sheaves and divisors on a Riemann surfaceA confusion regarding the concept of principal divisor
$begingroup$
Let $X$ be a complex manifold and let $f$ be a meromorphic function defined on it. Let $Div(X)$ be the group of locally finite sum of analytic irreducible hypersurfaxces of $X$.
One would like to define a divisor associated to $f$ as $$sum_i in I ord(f)|_V_iV_i$$ but I really can't see why this sum should be locally finite.
complex-analysis algebraic-geometry complex-geometry several-complex-variables
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Let $X$ be a complex manifold and let $f$ be a meromorphic function defined on it. Let $Div(X)$ be the group of locally finite sum of analytic irreducible hypersurfaxces of $X$.
One would like to define a divisor associated to $f$ as $$sum_i in I ord(f)|_V_iV_i$$ but I really can't see why this sum should be locally finite.
complex-analysis algebraic-geometry complex-geometry several-complex-variables
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Are you asking for a counterexample or else a proof?
$endgroup$
– Somos
Apr 5 at 18:23
$begingroup$
I was not clear: i would like to see a proof
$endgroup$
– Tommaso Scognamiglio
Apr 5 at 19:49
$begingroup$
any comment ? the global divisor I defined are built from locally analytic hypersurfaces, it remains to find if the gluing operation ensure they are globally analytic hypersurfaces (see $x^2-y= (x-y^1/2)(x+y^1/2)$), but it doesn't matter for the locally finite part. There is also the question of the $v(phi_j)=1$ and what happens to it in the local to global part.
$endgroup$
– reuns
yesterday
$begingroup$
Thank you. My problem was that I was going backward:trying to show which global hypersurface appears locally, while one should glue things from local data.
$endgroup$
– Tommaso Scognamiglio
19 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Let $X$ be a complex manifold and let $f$ be a meromorphic function defined on it. Let $Div(X)$ be the group of locally finite sum of analytic irreducible hypersurfaxces of $X$.
One would like to define a divisor associated to $f$ as $$sum_i in I ord(f)|_V_iV_i$$ but I really can't see why this sum should be locally finite.
complex-analysis algebraic-geometry complex-geometry several-complex-variables
$endgroup$
Let $X$ be a complex manifold and let $f$ be a meromorphic function defined on it. Let $Div(X)$ be the group of locally finite sum of analytic irreducible hypersurfaxces of $X$.
One would like to define a divisor associated to $f$ as $$sum_i in I ord(f)|_V_iV_i$$ but I really can't see why this sum should be locally finite.
complex-analysis algebraic-geometry complex-geometry several-complex-variables
complex-analysis algebraic-geometry complex-geometry several-complex-variables
asked Apr 5 at 15:28
Tommaso ScognamiglioTommaso Scognamiglio
581412
581412
$begingroup$
Are you asking for a counterexample or else a proof?
$endgroup$
– Somos
Apr 5 at 18:23
$begingroup$
I was not clear: i would like to see a proof
$endgroup$
– Tommaso Scognamiglio
Apr 5 at 19:49
$begingroup$
any comment ? the global divisor I defined are built from locally analytic hypersurfaces, it remains to find if the gluing operation ensure they are globally analytic hypersurfaces (see $x^2-y= (x-y^1/2)(x+y^1/2)$), but it doesn't matter for the locally finite part. There is also the question of the $v(phi_j)=1$ and what happens to it in the local to global part.
$endgroup$
– reuns
yesterday
$begingroup$
Thank you. My problem was that I was going backward:trying to show which global hypersurface appears locally, while one should glue things from local data.
$endgroup$
– Tommaso Scognamiglio
19 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Are you asking for a counterexample or else a proof?
$endgroup$
– Somos
Apr 5 at 18:23
$begingroup$
I was not clear: i would like to see a proof
$endgroup$
– Tommaso Scognamiglio
Apr 5 at 19:49
$begingroup$
any comment ? the global divisor I defined are built from locally analytic hypersurfaces, it remains to find if the gluing operation ensure they are globally analytic hypersurfaces (see $x^2-y= (x-y^1/2)(x+y^1/2)$), but it doesn't matter for the locally finite part. There is also the question of the $v(phi_j)=1$ and what happens to it in the local to global part.
$endgroup$
– reuns
yesterday
$begingroup$
Thank you. My problem was that I was going backward:trying to show which global hypersurface appears locally, while one should glue things from local data.
$endgroup$
– Tommaso Scognamiglio
19 hours ago
$begingroup$
Are you asking for a counterexample or else a proof?
$endgroup$
– Somos
Apr 5 at 18:23
$begingroup$
Are you asking for a counterexample or else a proof?
$endgroup$
– Somos
Apr 5 at 18:23
$begingroup$
I was not clear: i would like to see a proof
$endgroup$
– Tommaso Scognamiglio
Apr 5 at 19:49
$begingroup$
I was not clear: i would like to see a proof
$endgroup$
– Tommaso Scognamiglio
Apr 5 at 19:49
$begingroup$
any comment ? the global divisor I defined are built from locally analytic hypersurfaces, it remains to find if the gluing operation ensure they are globally analytic hypersurfaces (see $x^2-y= (x-y^1/2)(x+y^1/2)$), but it doesn't matter for the locally finite part. There is also the question of the $v(phi_j)=1$ and what happens to it in the local to global part.
$endgroup$
– reuns
yesterday
$begingroup$
any comment ? the global divisor I defined are built from locally analytic hypersurfaces, it remains to find if the gluing operation ensure they are globally analytic hypersurfaces (see $x^2-y= (x-y^1/2)(x+y^1/2)$), but it doesn't matter for the locally finite part. There is also the question of the $v(phi_j)=1$ and what happens to it in the local to global part.
$endgroup$
– reuns
yesterday
$begingroup$
Thank you. My problem was that I was going backward:trying to show which global hypersurface appears locally, while one should glue things from local data.
$endgroup$
– Tommaso Scognamiglio
19 hours ago
$begingroup$
Thank you. My problem was that I was going backward:trying to show which global hypersurface appears locally, while one should glue things from local data.
$endgroup$
– Tommaso Scognamiglio
19 hours ago
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Let $h$ be analytic and non identically zero on a small disk $U = z$ and $Hol(U)$ the ring of meromorphic functions on $U$ that are analytic on some neighborhood of $0$.
Look at the set of principal ideals $S = (alpha) , alpha in Hol(U), alpha(0) = 0 $ partially ordered by inclusion. Let $v(alpha)$ be the degree of the first non-zero term in $alpha$'s power series. $v(alpha beta) = v(alpha)v(beta)$.
If $(alpha) supsetneq (beta)$ then $ beta =alphagamma$ with $gamma(0) = 0$ so $v(gamma) ge 1$ and $v(beta) ge v(alpha)+1$.
Thus the maximal elements of $S$ are well-defined : $ M = (phi) in S, not exists (varphi) in S, (varphi) supsetneq (phi)$.
From there let $h_0 = h$, while $h_j(0) = 0$, pick some $ (phi_j+1) in M$ such that $(h_j) subset (phi_j+1)$ and let $h_j+1 = frach_jphi_j+1$. Since $v(h)$ is finite the process terminates obtaining the factorization $$forall z in U, qquad h(z) = h_J(z)prod_j=1^J phi_j(z)$$ where $J le v(h)$ and $h_J(0) ne 0$.
Todo : show $v(phi_j) = 1$ so $J = v(h)$.
Find an even smaller disk $V$ where $h_J$ is non-zero and the $phi_J$ are holomorphic. The local divisor is defined as $Div(h|_V) = sum_j=1^J Z(phi_j|_V)$ where $Z(phi|_V) = z in V, phi(z)=0$.
If $f$ is meromorphic then $f = frachg$ with $g,h$ holomorphic and $Div(f|_V) = Div(h|_V)-Div(g|_V)$.
The global divisor is obtained by gluing those local divisors.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
There is an open set $U$ on which your meromorphic function doesn’t have any zeros or poles, so the only nonzero coefficients come from prime divisors on the complement of $U$ in $X$. This complement is a closed set $Z$. Now for the local finiteness: Take the intersection of $Z$ with a quasicompact open set of $X$, which is Noetherian as a topological space because $X$ is locally Noetherian, as it is a complex manifold and the ring of analytic functions in finitely many variables is Noetherian. (I learned this last fact from Huybrechts’s book Complex Geometry). Every subspace of a Noetherian topological space is Noetherian, so in particular this intersection can have only finitely many irreducible components. This gives you local finiteness.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
I was aking for a proof with complex manifold not algebraic varieties
$endgroup$
– Tommaso Scognamiglio
Apr 6 at 19:38
$begingroup$
This is a proof for complex manifolds.
$endgroup$
– Samir Canning
Apr 6 at 20:35
$begingroup$
Your answer doesn't contain the word analytic. Why do you try hiding it in some topological properties ? The ring of analytic functions is noetherian, it seems quite equivalent to OP's problem, and this is what you need to prove.
$endgroup$
– reuns
Apr 6 at 20:43
$begingroup$
This is just the way I learned it.
$endgroup$
– Samir Canning
Apr 6 at 21:22
$begingroup$
I’ll add in that I assume the fact from several complex variables that the ring of analytic functions is Noetherian. And I’ll give a reference.
$endgroup$
– Samir Canning
Apr 6 at 21:28
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
);
);
, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3176055%2fdefinition-of-divisor-associated-to-a-meromorphic-function%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Let $h$ be analytic and non identically zero on a small disk $U = z$ and $Hol(U)$ the ring of meromorphic functions on $U$ that are analytic on some neighborhood of $0$.
Look at the set of principal ideals $S = (alpha) , alpha in Hol(U), alpha(0) = 0 $ partially ordered by inclusion. Let $v(alpha)$ be the degree of the first non-zero term in $alpha$'s power series. $v(alpha beta) = v(alpha)v(beta)$.
If $(alpha) supsetneq (beta)$ then $ beta =alphagamma$ with $gamma(0) = 0$ so $v(gamma) ge 1$ and $v(beta) ge v(alpha)+1$.
Thus the maximal elements of $S$ are well-defined : $ M = (phi) in S, not exists (varphi) in S, (varphi) supsetneq (phi)$.
From there let $h_0 = h$, while $h_j(0) = 0$, pick some $ (phi_j+1) in M$ such that $(h_j) subset (phi_j+1)$ and let $h_j+1 = frach_jphi_j+1$. Since $v(h)$ is finite the process terminates obtaining the factorization $$forall z in U, qquad h(z) = h_J(z)prod_j=1^J phi_j(z)$$ where $J le v(h)$ and $h_J(0) ne 0$.
Todo : show $v(phi_j) = 1$ so $J = v(h)$.
Find an even smaller disk $V$ where $h_J$ is non-zero and the $phi_J$ are holomorphic. The local divisor is defined as $Div(h|_V) = sum_j=1^J Z(phi_j|_V)$ where $Z(phi|_V) = z in V, phi(z)=0$.
If $f$ is meromorphic then $f = frachg$ with $g,h$ holomorphic and $Div(f|_V) = Div(h|_V)-Div(g|_V)$.
The global divisor is obtained by gluing those local divisors.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Let $h$ be analytic and non identically zero on a small disk $U = z$ and $Hol(U)$ the ring of meromorphic functions on $U$ that are analytic on some neighborhood of $0$.
Look at the set of principal ideals $S = (alpha) , alpha in Hol(U), alpha(0) = 0 $ partially ordered by inclusion. Let $v(alpha)$ be the degree of the first non-zero term in $alpha$'s power series. $v(alpha beta) = v(alpha)v(beta)$.
If $(alpha) supsetneq (beta)$ then $ beta =alphagamma$ with $gamma(0) = 0$ so $v(gamma) ge 1$ and $v(beta) ge v(alpha)+1$.
Thus the maximal elements of $S$ are well-defined : $ M = (phi) in S, not exists (varphi) in S, (varphi) supsetneq (phi)$.
From there let $h_0 = h$, while $h_j(0) = 0$, pick some $ (phi_j+1) in M$ such that $(h_j) subset (phi_j+1)$ and let $h_j+1 = frach_jphi_j+1$. Since $v(h)$ is finite the process terminates obtaining the factorization $$forall z in U, qquad h(z) = h_J(z)prod_j=1^J phi_j(z)$$ where $J le v(h)$ and $h_J(0) ne 0$.
Todo : show $v(phi_j) = 1$ so $J = v(h)$.
Find an even smaller disk $V$ where $h_J$ is non-zero and the $phi_J$ are holomorphic. The local divisor is defined as $Div(h|_V) = sum_j=1^J Z(phi_j|_V)$ where $Z(phi|_V) = z in V, phi(z)=0$.
If $f$ is meromorphic then $f = frachg$ with $g,h$ holomorphic and $Div(f|_V) = Div(h|_V)-Div(g|_V)$.
The global divisor is obtained by gluing those local divisors.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Let $h$ be analytic and non identically zero on a small disk $U = z$ and $Hol(U)$ the ring of meromorphic functions on $U$ that are analytic on some neighborhood of $0$.
Look at the set of principal ideals $S = (alpha) , alpha in Hol(U), alpha(0) = 0 $ partially ordered by inclusion. Let $v(alpha)$ be the degree of the first non-zero term in $alpha$'s power series. $v(alpha beta) = v(alpha)v(beta)$.
If $(alpha) supsetneq (beta)$ then $ beta =alphagamma$ with $gamma(0) = 0$ so $v(gamma) ge 1$ and $v(beta) ge v(alpha)+1$.
Thus the maximal elements of $S$ are well-defined : $ M = (phi) in S, not exists (varphi) in S, (varphi) supsetneq (phi)$.
From there let $h_0 = h$, while $h_j(0) = 0$, pick some $ (phi_j+1) in M$ such that $(h_j) subset (phi_j+1)$ and let $h_j+1 = frach_jphi_j+1$. Since $v(h)$ is finite the process terminates obtaining the factorization $$forall z in U, qquad h(z) = h_J(z)prod_j=1^J phi_j(z)$$ where $J le v(h)$ and $h_J(0) ne 0$.
Todo : show $v(phi_j) = 1$ so $J = v(h)$.
Find an even smaller disk $V$ where $h_J$ is non-zero and the $phi_J$ are holomorphic. The local divisor is defined as $Div(h|_V) = sum_j=1^J Z(phi_j|_V)$ where $Z(phi|_V) = z in V, phi(z)=0$.
If $f$ is meromorphic then $f = frachg$ with $g,h$ holomorphic and $Div(f|_V) = Div(h|_V)-Div(g|_V)$.
The global divisor is obtained by gluing those local divisors.
$endgroup$
Let $h$ be analytic and non identically zero on a small disk $U = z$ and $Hol(U)$ the ring of meromorphic functions on $U$ that are analytic on some neighborhood of $0$.
Look at the set of principal ideals $S = (alpha) , alpha in Hol(U), alpha(0) = 0 $ partially ordered by inclusion. Let $v(alpha)$ be the degree of the first non-zero term in $alpha$'s power series. $v(alpha beta) = v(alpha)v(beta)$.
If $(alpha) supsetneq (beta)$ then $ beta =alphagamma$ with $gamma(0) = 0$ so $v(gamma) ge 1$ and $v(beta) ge v(alpha)+1$.
Thus the maximal elements of $S$ are well-defined : $ M = (phi) in S, not exists (varphi) in S, (varphi) supsetneq (phi)$.
From there let $h_0 = h$, while $h_j(0) = 0$, pick some $ (phi_j+1) in M$ such that $(h_j) subset (phi_j+1)$ and let $h_j+1 = frach_jphi_j+1$. Since $v(h)$ is finite the process terminates obtaining the factorization $$forall z in U, qquad h(z) = h_J(z)prod_j=1^J phi_j(z)$$ where $J le v(h)$ and $h_J(0) ne 0$.
Todo : show $v(phi_j) = 1$ so $J = v(h)$.
Find an even smaller disk $V$ where $h_J$ is non-zero and the $phi_J$ are holomorphic. The local divisor is defined as $Div(h|_V) = sum_j=1^J Z(phi_j|_V)$ where $Z(phi|_V) = z in V, phi(z)=0$.
If $f$ is meromorphic then $f = frachg$ with $g,h$ holomorphic and $Div(f|_V) = Div(h|_V)-Div(g|_V)$.
The global divisor is obtained by gluing those local divisors.
edited Apr 6 at 21:45
answered Apr 6 at 21:36
reunsreuns
20.7k21353
20.7k21353
add a comment |
add a comment |
$begingroup$
There is an open set $U$ on which your meromorphic function doesn’t have any zeros or poles, so the only nonzero coefficients come from prime divisors on the complement of $U$ in $X$. This complement is a closed set $Z$. Now for the local finiteness: Take the intersection of $Z$ with a quasicompact open set of $X$, which is Noetherian as a topological space because $X$ is locally Noetherian, as it is a complex manifold and the ring of analytic functions in finitely many variables is Noetherian. (I learned this last fact from Huybrechts’s book Complex Geometry). Every subspace of a Noetherian topological space is Noetherian, so in particular this intersection can have only finitely many irreducible components. This gives you local finiteness.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
I was aking for a proof with complex manifold not algebraic varieties
$endgroup$
– Tommaso Scognamiglio
Apr 6 at 19:38
$begingroup$
This is a proof for complex manifolds.
$endgroup$
– Samir Canning
Apr 6 at 20:35
$begingroup$
Your answer doesn't contain the word analytic. Why do you try hiding it in some topological properties ? The ring of analytic functions is noetherian, it seems quite equivalent to OP's problem, and this is what you need to prove.
$endgroup$
– reuns
Apr 6 at 20:43
$begingroup$
This is just the way I learned it.
$endgroup$
– Samir Canning
Apr 6 at 21:22
$begingroup$
I’ll add in that I assume the fact from several complex variables that the ring of analytic functions is Noetherian. And I’ll give a reference.
$endgroup$
– Samir Canning
Apr 6 at 21:28
add a comment |
$begingroup$
There is an open set $U$ on which your meromorphic function doesn’t have any zeros or poles, so the only nonzero coefficients come from prime divisors on the complement of $U$ in $X$. This complement is a closed set $Z$. Now for the local finiteness: Take the intersection of $Z$ with a quasicompact open set of $X$, which is Noetherian as a topological space because $X$ is locally Noetherian, as it is a complex manifold and the ring of analytic functions in finitely many variables is Noetherian. (I learned this last fact from Huybrechts’s book Complex Geometry). Every subspace of a Noetherian topological space is Noetherian, so in particular this intersection can have only finitely many irreducible components. This gives you local finiteness.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
I was aking for a proof with complex manifold not algebraic varieties
$endgroup$
– Tommaso Scognamiglio
Apr 6 at 19:38
$begingroup$
This is a proof for complex manifolds.
$endgroup$
– Samir Canning
Apr 6 at 20:35
$begingroup$
Your answer doesn't contain the word analytic. Why do you try hiding it in some topological properties ? The ring of analytic functions is noetherian, it seems quite equivalent to OP's problem, and this is what you need to prove.
$endgroup$
– reuns
Apr 6 at 20:43
$begingroup$
This is just the way I learned it.
$endgroup$
– Samir Canning
Apr 6 at 21:22
$begingroup$
I’ll add in that I assume the fact from several complex variables that the ring of analytic functions is Noetherian. And I’ll give a reference.
$endgroup$
– Samir Canning
Apr 6 at 21:28
add a comment |
$begingroup$
There is an open set $U$ on which your meromorphic function doesn’t have any zeros or poles, so the only nonzero coefficients come from prime divisors on the complement of $U$ in $X$. This complement is a closed set $Z$. Now for the local finiteness: Take the intersection of $Z$ with a quasicompact open set of $X$, which is Noetherian as a topological space because $X$ is locally Noetherian, as it is a complex manifold and the ring of analytic functions in finitely many variables is Noetherian. (I learned this last fact from Huybrechts’s book Complex Geometry). Every subspace of a Noetherian topological space is Noetherian, so in particular this intersection can have only finitely many irreducible components. This gives you local finiteness.
$endgroup$
There is an open set $U$ on which your meromorphic function doesn’t have any zeros or poles, so the only nonzero coefficients come from prime divisors on the complement of $U$ in $X$. This complement is a closed set $Z$. Now for the local finiteness: Take the intersection of $Z$ with a quasicompact open set of $X$, which is Noetherian as a topological space because $X$ is locally Noetherian, as it is a complex manifold and the ring of analytic functions in finitely many variables is Noetherian. (I learned this last fact from Huybrechts’s book Complex Geometry). Every subspace of a Noetherian topological space is Noetherian, so in particular this intersection can have only finitely many irreducible components. This gives you local finiteness.
edited Apr 6 at 21:29
answered Apr 6 at 17:45
Samir CanningSamir Canning
50839
50839
$begingroup$
I was aking for a proof with complex manifold not algebraic varieties
$endgroup$
– Tommaso Scognamiglio
Apr 6 at 19:38
$begingroup$
This is a proof for complex manifolds.
$endgroup$
– Samir Canning
Apr 6 at 20:35
$begingroup$
Your answer doesn't contain the word analytic. Why do you try hiding it in some topological properties ? The ring of analytic functions is noetherian, it seems quite equivalent to OP's problem, and this is what you need to prove.
$endgroup$
– reuns
Apr 6 at 20:43
$begingroup$
This is just the way I learned it.
$endgroup$
– Samir Canning
Apr 6 at 21:22
$begingroup$
I’ll add in that I assume the fact from several complex variables that the ring of analytic functions is Noetherian. And I’ll give a reference.
$endgroup$
– Samir Canning
Apr 6 at 21:28
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I was aking for a proof with complex manifold not algebraic varieties
$endgroup$
– Tommaso Scognamiglio
Apr 6 at 19:38
$begingroup$
This is a proof for complex manifolds.
$endgroup$
– Samir Canning
Apr 6 at 20:35
$begingroup$
Your answer doesn't contain the word analytic. Why do you try hiding it in some topological properties ? The ring of analytic functions is noetherian, it seems quite equivalent to OP's problem, and this is what you need to prove.
$endgroup$
– reuns
Apr 6 at 20:43
$begingroup$
This is just the way I learned it.
$endgroup$
– Samir Canning
Apr 6 at 21:22
$begingroup$
I’ll add in that I assume the fact from several complex variables that the ring of analytic functions is Noetherian. And I’ll give a reference.
$endgroup$
– Samir Canning
Apr 6 at 21:28
$begingroup$
I was aking for a proof with complex manifold not algebraic varieties
$endgroup$
– Tommaso Scognamiglio
Apr 6 at 19:38
$begingroup$
I was aking for a proof with complex manifold not algebraic varieties
$endgroup$
– Tommaso Scognamiglio
Apr 6 at 19:38
$begingroup$
This is a proof for complex manifolds.
$endgroup$
– Samir Canning
Apr 6 at 20:35
$begingroup$
This is a proof for complex manifolds.
$endgroup$
– Samir Canning
Apr 6 at 20:35
$begingroup$
Your answer doesn't contain the word analytic. Why do you try hiding it in some topological properties ? The ring of analytic functions is noetherian, it seems quite equivalent to OP's problem, and this is what you need to prove.
$endgroup$
– reuns
Apr 6 at 20:43
$begingroup$
Your answer doesn't contain the word analytic. Why do you try hiding it in some topological properties ? The ring of analytic functions is noetherian, it seems quite equivalent to OP's problem, and this is what you need to prove.
$endgroup$
– reuns
Apr 6 at 20:43
$begingroup$
This is just the way I learned it.
$endgroup$
– Samir Canning
Apr 6 at 21:22
$begingroup$
This is just the way I learned it.
$endgroup$
– Samir Canning
Apr 6 at 21:22
$begingroup$
I’ll add in that I assume the fact from several complex variables that the ring of analytic functions is Noetherian. And I’ll give a reference.
$endgroup$
– Samir Canning
Apr 6 at 21:28
$begingroup$
I’ll add in that I assume the fact from several complex variables that the ring of analytic functions is Noetherian. And I’ll give a reference.
$endgroup$
– Samir Canning
Apr 6 at 21:28
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3176055%2fdefinition-of-divisor-associated-to-a-meromorphic-function%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
$begingroup$
Are you asking for a counterexample or else a proof?
$endgroup$
– Somos
Apr 5 at 18:23
$begingroup$
I was not clear: i would like to see a proof
$endgroup$
– Tommaso Scognamiglio
Apr 5 at 19:49
$begingroup$
any comment ? the global divisor I defined are built from locally analytic hypersurfaces, it remains to find if the gluing operation ensure they are globally analytic hypersurfaces (see $x^2-y= (x-y^1/2)(x+y^1/2)$), but it doesn't matter for the locally finite part. There is also the question of the $v(phi_j)=1$ and what happens to it in the local to global part.
$endgroup$
– reuns
yesterday
$begingroup$
Thank you. My problem was that I was going backward:trying to show which global hypersurface appears locally, while one should glue things from local data.
$endgroup$
– Tommaso Scognamiglio
19 hours ago