Exponential decay of convolution with gradient of heat kernel in the half-space The 2019 Stack Overflow Developer Survey Results Are InFinding an upper bound on the gradient of the solution to the heat equationIntegral Inequality for Bound on Gradient of Solution to Heat EquationConvolution with the heat kernelProperties of the heat kernelHelp with integral from Boltzmann equationDetail of a proof “Sobolev inequality $Rightarrow$ Isoperimetric inequality”.Extension of Poincaré inequality: $|u|_L^2(Omega)leq C|nabla u|_L^2(Omega)$ when $u$ vanishes in $GammasubseteqpartialOmega$.How to deal integral at infinity?Evaluating an Integral by converting into polar coordinates.Inequality for the Laplace operator
What is the steepest angle that a canal can be traversable without locks?
Why Did Howard Stark Use All The Vibranium They Had On A Prototype Shield?
Dual Citizen. Exited the US on Italian passport recently
Are USB sockets on wall outlets live all the time, even when the switch is off?
If the Wish spell is used to duplicate the effect of Simulacrum, are existing duplicates destroyed?
How long do I have to send payment?
JSON.serialize: is it possible to suppress null values of a map?
How to change the limits of integration
Falsification in Math vs Science
Patience, young "Padovan"
Can't find the latex code for the ⍎ (down tack jot) symbol
What is the best strategy for white in this position?
Realistic Alternatives to Dust: What Else Could Feed a Plankton Bloom?
Understanding the implication of what "well-defined" means for the operation in quotient group
Why is it "Tumoren" and not "Tumore"?
How to create dashed lines/arrows in Illustrator
Why isn't airport relocation done gradually?
Is flight data recorder erased after every flight?
Is three citations per paragraph excessive for undergraduate research paper?
What does Linus Torvalds mean when he says that Git "never ever" tracks a file?
The difference between dialogue marks
Time travel alters history but people keep saying nothing's changed
"Riffle" two strings
Why could you hear an Amstrad CPC working?
Exponential decay of convolution with gradient of heat kernel in the half-space
The 2019 Stack Overflow Developer Survey Results Are InFinding an upper bound on the gradient of the solution to the heat equationIntegral Inequality for Bound on Gradient of Solution to Heat EquationConvolution with the heat kernelProperties of the heat kernelHelp with integral from Boltzmann equationDetail of a proof “Sobolev inequality $Rightarrow$ Isoperimetric inequality”.Extension of Poincaré inequality: $|u|_L^2(Omega)leq C|nabla u|_L^2(Omega)$ when $u$ vanishes in $GammasubseteqpartialOmega$.How to deal integral at infinity?Evaluating an Integral by converting into polar coordinates.Inequality for the Laplace operator
$begingroup$
I am wrestling with the decay of this integral:
$$I := int_mathbbR^3_+ nabla_x^k Gamma(x-y,frac12)(xi(y)f(y))dy,$$
where $f:mathbbR^3_+ rightarrow mathbbR^3$ is a smooth vector field that vanishes on the boundary of the half-space $mathbbR^3_+$, satisfying a decay condition $|f(y)|leqfrac1y$ for all $y$. Here $xi(y) in C_c^infty(mathbbR^3)$ is chosen to be a cut-off function with $xi(y)=1$ on the unit disk centered at the origin.
More importantly, the heat kernel $Gamma$ is defined by
$$ Gamma(z,t)=frac1(4pi t)^3/2e^-frac^24t$$
for all $(z,t)inmathbbR^3 times (0,infty)$.
I am expecting that the quantity $I$ can be controlled by $$C frac1)^2,$$
or possibly, more precisely by $$Ce^-x^2/4$$ for some constant $C$ which is independent of $x$. But I am struggling to prove it rigorously. It's frustrating!!
Could you help me out with this problem, please?
My strategy has worked only to a small extent as follows:
Divide the domain of integral into two cases $|x-y|geq frac12|x|$ and $|x-y|<frac12|x|$ so that $I$ can be decomposed into the sum $I = I_1 + I_2$. Then, for the first case, we have
$$ I_1 leq C e^-fracx4 int_K fracy-xy dy leq C (|x|+1)e^-fracx4,$$
where $K$ is the compact support of $xi$. This seems not optimal but I can take that temporarily because it is enough to obtain polynomial decay.
The second case geometrically implies that $|y|>frac12|x|$, which yields $$ I_2 leq C |x|frac1xint_K e^-frac^22dy leq C int_K e^-fracx4dy leq C e^-fracx4,$$
as desired.
Please, suggest a better idea to investigate the decay or allow me to improve my previous bound for the first case!!
Note: $x$ is an arbitrarily given point in $mathbbR^3_+$.
multivariable-calculus pde vector-analysis convolution heat-equation
New contributor
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I am wrestling with the decay of this integral:
$$I := int_mathbbR^3_+ nabla_x^k Gamma(x-y,frac12)(xi(y)f(y))dy,$$
where $f:mathbbR^3_+ rightarrow mathbbR^3$ is a smooth vector field that vanishes on the boundary of the half-space $mathbbR^3_+$, satisfying a decay condition $|f(y)|leqfrac1y$ for all $y$. Here $xi(y) in C_c^infty(mathbbR^3)$ is chosen to be a cut-off function with $xi(y)=1$ on the unit disk centered at the origin.
More importantly, the heat kernel $Gamma$ is defined by
$$ Gamma(z,t)=frac1(4pi t)^3/2e^-frac^24t$$
for all $(z,t)inmathbbR^3 times (0,infty)$.
I am expecting that the quantity $I$ can be controlled by $$C frac1)^2,$$
or possibly, more precisely by $$Ce^-x^2/4$$ for some constant $C$ which is independent of $x$. But I am struggling to prove it rigorously. It's frustrating!!
Could you help me out with this problem, please?
My strategy has worked only to a small extent as follows:
Divide the domain of integral into two cases $|x-y|geq frac12|x|$ and $|x-y|<frac12|x|$ so that $I$ can be decomposed into the sum $I = I_1 + I_2$. Then, for the first case, we have
$$ I_1 leq C e^-fracx4 int_K fracy-xy dy leq C (|x|+1)e^-fracx4,$$
where $K$ is the compact support of $xi$. This seems not optimal but I can take that temporarily because it is enough to obtain polynomial decay.
The second case geometrically implies that $|y|>frac12|x|$, which yields $$ I_2 leq C |x|frac1xint_K e^-frac^22dy leq C int_K e^-fracx4dy leq C e^-fracx4,$$
as desired.
Please, suggest a better idea to investigate the decay or allow me to improve my previous bound for the first case!!
Note: $x$ is an arbitrarily given point in $mathbbR^3_+$.
multivariable-calculus pde vector-analysis convolution heat-equation
New contributor
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I am wrestling with the decay of this integral:
$$I := int_mathbbR^3_+ nabla_x^k Gamma(x-y,frac12)(xi(y)f(y))dy,$$
where $f:mathbbR^3_+ rightarrow mathbbR^3$ is a smooth vector field that vanishes on the boundary of the half-space $mathbbR^3_+$, satisfying a decay condition $|f(y)|leqfrac1y$ for all $y$. Here $xi(y) in C_c^infty(mathbbR^3)$ is chosen to be a cut-off function with $xi(y)=1$ on the unit disk centered at the origin.
More importantly, the heat kernel $Gamma$ is defined by
$$ Gamma(z,t)=frac1(4pi t)^3/2e^-frac^24t$$
for all $(z,t)inmathbbR^3 times (0,infty)$.
I am expecting that the quantity $I$ can be controlled by $$C frac1)^2,$$
or possibly, more precisely by $$Ce^-x^2/4$$ for some constant $C$ which is independent of $x$. But I am struggling to prove it rigorously. It's frustrating!!
Could you help me out with this problem, please?
My strategy has worked only to a small extent as follows:
Divide the domain of integral into two cases $|x-y|geq frac12|x|$ and $|x-y|<frac12|x|$ so that $I$ can be decomposed into the sum $I = I_1 + I_2$. Then, for the first case, we have
$$ I_1 leq C e^-fracx4 int_K fracy-xy dy leq C (|x|+1)e^-fracx4,$$
where $K$ is the compact support of $xi$. This seems not optimal but I can take that temporarily because it is enough to obtain polynomial decay.
The second case geometrically implies that $|y|>frac12|x|$, which yields $$ I_2 leq C |x|frac1xint_K e^-frac^22dy leq C int_K e^-fracx4dy leq C e^-fracx4,$$
as desired.
Please, suggest a better idea to investigate the decay or allow me to improve my previous bound for the first case!!
Note: $x$ is an arbitrarily given point in $mathbbR^3_+$.
multivariable-calculus pde vector-analysis convolution heat-equation
New contributor
$endgroup$
I am wrestling with the decay of this integral:
$$I := int_mathbbR^3_+ nabla_x^k Gamma(x-y,frac12)(xi(y)f(y))dy,$$
where $f:mathbbR^3_+ rightarrow mathbbR^3$ is a smooth vector field that vanishes on the boundary of the half-space $mathbbR^3_+$, satisfying a decay condition $|f(y)|leqfrac1y$ for all $y$. Here $xi(y) in C_c^infty(mathbbR^3)$ is chosen to be a cut-off function with $xi(y)=1$ on the unit disk centered at the origin.
More importantly, the heat kernel $Gamma$ is defined by
$$ Gamma(z,t)=frac1(4pi t)^3/2e^-frac^24t$$
for all $(z,t)inmathbbR^3 times (0,infty)$.
I am expecting that the quantity $I$ can be controlled by $$C frac1)^2,$$
or possibly, more precisely by $$Ce^-x^2/4$$ for some constant $C$ which is independent of $x$. But I am struggling to prove it rigorously. It's frustrating!!
Could you help me out with this problem, please?
My strategy has worked only to a small extent as follows:
Divide the domain of integral into two cases $|x-y|geq frac12|x|$ and $|x-y|<frac12|x|$ so that $I$ can be decomposed into the sum $I = I_1 + I_2$. Then, for the first case, we have
$$ I_1 leq C e^-fracx4 int_K fracy-xy dy leq C (|x|+1)e^-fracx4,$$
where $K$ is the compact support of $xi$. This seems not optimal but I can take that temporarily because it is enough to obtain polynomial decay.
The second case geometrically implies that $|y|>frac12|x|$, which yields $$ I_2 leq C |x|frac1xint_K e^-frac^22dy leq C int_K e^-fracx4dy leq C e^-fracx4,$$
as desired.
Please, suggest a better idea to investigate the decay or allow me to improve my previous bound for the first case!!
Note: $x$ is an arbitrarily given point in $mathbbR^3_+$.
multivariable-calculus pde vector-analysis convolution heat-equation
multivariable-calculus pde vector-analysis convolution heat-equation
New contributor
New contributor
New contributor
asked Apr 6 at 17:41
fluideqnsfluideqns
1
1
New contributor
New contributor
add a comment |
add a comment |
0
active
oldest
votes
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
);
);
, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
fluideqns is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3177266%2fexponential-decay-of-convolution-with-gradient-of-heat-kernel-in-the-half-space%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
0
active
oldest
votes
0
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
fluideqns is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
fluideqns is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
fluideqns is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
fluideqns is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3177266%2fexponential-decay-of-convolution-with-gradient-of-heat-kernel-in-the-half-space%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown