Twin primes whose sum is a cube [on hold]$84537841287167$ and $84537841287169$ a particular pair of twin primes!Conjecture on twin primesAbout a paper by Gold & Tucker (characterizing twin primes)Twin Primes Problem: Need HelpNumber Theory : Primes not in Twin PrimesIs there more than one occurrence of a power of two between twin primes?Twin Primes, their Arithmetic Means and some properties.Twin Primes and Complete Residue SystemsWhat is wrong with this reasoning regarding twin primes?A sieve for twin primes; does it imply there are infinite many twin primes?A twin prime theorem, and a reformulation of the twin prime conjecture
What do you call something that goes against the spirit of the law, but is legal when interpreting the law to the letter?
extract characters between two commas?
Why is my log file so massive? 22gb. I am running log backups
Why was the "bread communication" in the arena of Catching Fire left out in the movie?
Shall I use personal or official e-mail account when registering to external websites for work purpose?
Crop image to path created in TikZ?
Is it legal to have the "// (c) 2019 John Smith" header in all files when there are hundreds of contributors?
Is there a way to make member function NOT callable from constructor?
A poker game description that does not feel gimmicky
"listening to me about as much as you're listening to this pole here"
What is the command to reset a PC without deleting any files
How would photo IDs work for shapeshifters?
Does the average primeness of natural numbers tend to zero?
aging parents with no investments
New order #4: World
Is Social Media Science Fiction?
Why airport relocation isn't done gradually?
"My colleague's body is amazing"
Are objects structures and/or vice versa?
LWC and complex parameters
Does a dangling wire really electrocute me if I'm standing in water?
Add an angle to a sphere
Why doesn't a const reference extend the life of a temporary object passed via a function?
Landlord wants to switch my lease to a "Land contract" to "get back at the city"
Twin primes whose sum is a cube [on hold]
$84537841287167$ and $84537841287169$ a particular pair of twin primes!Conjecture on twin primesAbout a paper by Gold & Tucker (characterizing twin primes)Twin Primes Problem: Need HelpNumber Theory : Primes not in Twin PrimesIs there more than one occurrence of a power of two between twin primes?Twin Primes, their Arithmetic Means and some properties.Twin Primes and Complete Residue SystemsWhat is wrong with this reasoning regarding twin primes?A sieve for twin primes; does it imply there are infinite many twin primes?A twin prime theorem, and a reformulation of the twin prime conjecture
$begingroup$
$84537841287167$ and $84537841287169$ are a pair of twin primes.
The sum of $84537841287167+84537841287169$ is a cube.
Are there other examples of twin pairs $p$, $p+2$ whose sum is a cube?
Have they to have a particular form?
elementary-number-theory
New contributor
$endgroup$
put on hold as off-topic by user21820, Adrian Keister, Saad, José Carlos Santos, YiFan Apr 5 at 23:39
This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:
- "This question is missing context or other details: Please provide additional context, which ideally explains why the question is relevant to you and our community. Some forms of context include: background and motivation, relevant definitions, source, possible strategies, your current progress, why the question is interesting or important, etc." – user21820, Adrian Keister, Saad, José Carlos Santos, YiFan
|
show 3 more comments
$begingroup$
$84537841287167$ and $84537841287169$ are a pair of twin primes.
The sum of $84537841287167+84537841287169$ is a cube.
Are there other examples of twin pairs $p$, $p+2$ whose sum is a cube?
Have they to have a particular form?
elementary-number-theory
New contributor
$endgroup$
put on hold as off-topic by user21820, Adrian Keister, Saad, José Carlos Santos, YiFan Apr 5 at 23:39
This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:
- "This question is missing context or other details: Please provide additional context, which ideally explains why the question is relevant to you and our community. Some forms of context include: background and motivation, relevant definitions, source, possible strategies, your current progress, why the question is interesting or important, etc." – user21820, Adrian Keister, Saad, José Carlos Santos, YiFan
2
$begingroup$
What do you want to do with other examples?
$endgroup$
– Dietrich Burde
Apr 4 at 9:50
6
$begingroup$
For $k le 10000$, there are $185$ values of $k$ where $p = 108k^3-1$ and $p+2$ are twin primes that sum to a cube. Following are some examples.. $107,2634011,29659499,57395627,104792291,271669247,485149499,cdots\ 83797007573051, colorred84537841287167, 88875400155587,89731703685707,89846291353499,cdots$
$endgroup$
– achille hui
Apr 4 at 10:23
1
$begingroup$
@taritgoswami it is a single line command using the CAS maximafor k : 1 thru 10000 do if (primep(108*k^3-1) and primep(108*k^3+1)) then print(k," ",108*k^3-1);
$endgroup$
– achille hui
Apr 4 at 12:10
3
$begingroup$
oeis.org/A061308 is worth a look.
$endgroup$
– Barry Cipra
Apr 4 at 12:15
2
$begingroup$
similarly oeis.org/A240169
$endgroup$
– KBusc
Apr 4 at 16:00
|
show 3 more comments
$begingroup$
$84537841287167$ and $84537841287169$ are a pair of twin primes.
The sum of $84537841287167+84537841287169$ is a cube.
Are there other examples of twin pairs $p$, $p+2$ whose sum is a cube?
Have they to have a particular form?
elementary-number-theory
New contributor
$endgroup$
$84537841287167$ and $84537841287169$ are a pair of twin primes.
The sum of $84537841287167+84537841287169$ is a cube.
Are there other examples of twin pairs $p$, $p+2$ whose sum is a cube?
Have they to have a particular form?
elementary-number-theory
elementary-number-theory
New contributor
New contributor
edited Apr 4 at 10:11
tarit goswami
2,1181422
2,1181422
New contributor
asked Apr 4 at 9:29
pantareispantareis
527
527
New contributor
New contributor
put on hold as off-topic by user21820, Adrian Keister, Saad, José Carlos Santos, YiFan Apr 5 at 23:39
This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:
- "This question is missing context or other details: Please provide additional context, which ideally explains why the question is relevant to you and our community. Some forms of context include: background and motivation, relevant definitions, source, possible strategies, your current progress, why the question is interesting or important, etc." – user21820, Adrian Keister, Saad, José Carlos Santos, YiFan
put on hold as off-topic by user21820, Adrian Keister, Saad, José Carlos Santos, YiFan Apr 5 at 23:39
This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:
- "This question is missing context or other details: Please provide additional context, which ideally explains why the question is relevant to you and our community. Some forms of context include: background and motivation, relevant definitions, source, possible strategies, your current progress, why the question is interesting or important, etc." – user21820, Adrian Keister, Saad, José Carlos Santos, YiFan
2
$begingroup$
What do you want to do with other examples?
$endgroup$
– Dietrich Burde
Apr 4 at 9:50
6
$begingroup$
For $k le 10000$, there are $185$ values of $k$ where $p = 108k^3-1$ and $p+2$ are twin primes that sum to a cube. Following are some examples.. $107,2634011,29659499,57395627,104792291,271669247,485149499,cdots\ 83797007573051, colorred84537841287167, 88875400155587,89731703685707,89846291353499,cdots$
$endgroup$
– achille hui
Apr 4 at 10:23
1
$begingroup$
@taritgoswami it is a single line command using the CAS maximafor k : 1 thru 10000 do if (primep(108*k^3-1) and primep(108*k^3+1)) then print(k," ",108*k^3-1);
$endgroup$
– achille hui
Apr 4 at 12:10
3
$begingroup$
oeis.org/A061308 is worth a look.
$endgroup$
– Barry Cipra
Apr 4 at 12:15
2
$begingroup$
similarly oeis.org/A240169
$endgroup$
– KBusc
Apr 4 at 16:00
|
show 3 more comments
2
$begingroup$
What do you want to do with other examples?
$endgroup$
– Dietrich Burde
Apr 4 at 9:50
6
$begingroup$
For $k le 10000$, there are $185$ values of $k$ where $p = 108k^3-1$ and $p+2$ are twin primes that sum to a cube. Following are some examples.. $107,2634011,29659499,57395627,104792291,271669247,485149499,cdots\ 83797007573051, colorred84537841287167, 88875400155587,89731703685707,89846291353499,cdots$
$endgroup$
– achille hui
Apr 4 at 10:23
1
$begingroup$
@taritgoswami it is a single line command using the CAS maximafor k : 1 thru 10000 do if (primep(108*k^3-1) and primep(108*k^3+1)) then print(k," ",108*k^3-1);
$endgroup$
– achille hui
Apr 4 at 12:10
3
$begingroup$
oeis.org/A061308 is worth a look.
$endgroup$
– Barry Cipra
Apr 4 at 12:15
2
$begingroup$
similarly oeis.org/A240169
$endgroup$
– KBusc
Apr 4 at 16:00
2
2
$begingroup$
What do you want to do with other examples?
$endgroup$
– Dietrich Burde
Apr 4 at 9:50
$begingroup$
What do you want to do with other examples?
$endgroup$
– Dietrich Burde
Apr 4 at 9:50
6
6
$begingroup$
For $k le 10000$, there are $185$ values of $k$ where $p = 108k^3-1$ and $p+2$ are twin primes that sum to a cube. Following are some examples.. $107,2634011,29659499,57395627,104792291,271669247,485149499,cdots\ 83797007573051, colorred84537841287167, 88875400155587,89731703685707,89846291353499,cdots$
$endgroup$
– achille hui
Apr 4 at 10:23
$begingroup$
For $k le 10000$, there are $185$ values of $k$ where $p = 108k^3-1$ and $p+2$ are twin primes that sum to a cube. Following are some examples.. $107,2634011,29659499,57395627,104792291,271669247,485149499,cdots\ 83797007573051, colorred84537841287167, 88875400155587,89731703685707,89846291353499,cdots$
$endgroup$
– achille hui
Apr 4 at 10:23
1
1
$begingroup$
@taritgoswami it is a single line command using the CAS maxima
for k : 1 thru 10000 do if (primep(108*k^3-1) and primep(108*k^3+1)) then print(k," ",108*k^3-1);
$endgroup$
– achille hui
Apr 4 at 12:10
$begingroup$
@taritgoswami it is a single line command using the CAS maxima
for k : 1 thru 10000 do if (primep(108*k^3-1) and primep(108*k^3+1)) then print(k," ",108*k^3-1);
$endgroup$
– achille hui
Apr 4 at 12:10
3
3
$begingroup$
oeis.org/A061308 is worth a look.
$endgroup$
– Barry Cipra
Apr 4 at 12:15
$begingroup$
oeis.org/A061308 is worth a look.
$endgroup$
– Barry Cipra
Apr 4 at 12:15
2
2
$begingroup$
similarly oeis.org/A240169
$endgroup$
– KBusc
Apr 4 at 16:00
$begingroup$
similarly oeis.org/A240169
$endgroup$
– KBusc
Apr 4 at 16:00
|
show 3 more comments
5 Answers
5
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
List of Some Twin Primes Greater than $bf3$ whose Sum is a Cube
The sum of twin primes $6k-1$ and $6k+1$ is $12k$ and $12k=j^3implies6mid j$. So to look for such twin primes, look for twin primes of the form
$$
(108n^3-1,108n^3+1)
$$
We can skip $nequiv2pmod5$ since
$$
beginalign
108cdot n^3+1
&equiv3cdot2^3+1&pmod5\
&equiv0&pmod5
endalign
$$
and we can skip $nequiv3pmod5$ since
$$
beginalign
108cdot n^3-1
&equiv3cdot3^3-1&pmod5\
&equiv0&pmod5
endalign
$$
Checking $nequiv0,1,4pmod5$, we get
$$
beginarrayl
n&108n^3-1&108n^3+1\hline
1&107&109\
29&2634011&2634013\
65&29659499&29659501\
81&57395627&57395629\
99&104792291&104792293\
136&271669247&271669249\
165&485149499&485149501\
174&568946591&568946593\
176&588791807&588791809\
191&752530067&752530069\
200&863999999&864000001\
266&2032678367&2032678369\
295&2772616499&2772616501\
301&2945257307&2945257309\
319&3505869971&3505869973\
346&4473547487&4473547489\
351&4670303507&4670303509\
370&5470523999&5470524001\
400&6911999999&6912000001\
411&7498065347&7498065349\
431&8646803027&8646803029\
434&8828622431&8828622433\
436&8951240447&8951240449\
456&10240432127&10240432129\
491&12784043267&12784043269\
494&13019808671&13019808673\
526&15717410207&15717410209\
541&17100765467&17100765469\
599&23211554291&23211554293\
651&29796600707&29796600709\
676&33362903807&33362903809\
714&39311389151&39311389153\
746&44837381087&44837381089\
790&53248211999&53248212001\
924&85200014591&85200014593\
956&94362064127&94362064129\
991&105110165267&105110165269\
endarray
$$
Note that the sum of the primes is $(6n)^3$.
This list does not include $3+5=2^3$ because $(3,5)$ is the only twin prime that is not of the form $(6k-1,6k+1)$; that is, all primes greater than $3$ must be relatively prime to $6$.
Mathematica Code
Module[s = "", m,
For[n = 1, n < 1000, ++n,
If[MemberQ[0, 1, 4, Mod[n, 5]] && PrimeQ[(m = 108 n^3) - 1] &&
PrimeQ[m + 1],
s = StringJoin[s,
ToString[n] <> "&" <> ToString[m - 1] <> "&" <> ToString[m + 1] <>
"\n"]]]; s]
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
"We can immediately skip $nequiv2,3pmod5$ since $5mid108cdot2^3+1$ and $5mid108cdot3^3-1$" I don't understand this line, could you explain this a little further?
$endgroup$
– spyr03
Apr 4 at 15:46
3
$begingroup$
As $5$ divides $108cdot 2^3+1$, for any $k$ of the form $5t+2$ we have $108cdot (5t+2)^3+ 1$. Now using binomial expansion you can see that it will left $5cdot m+108cdot 2^3$, which is divisible by $5$. Hence it can't be prime. So we are not checking for that $n$. Same argument goes for $nequiv 3pmod5$.
$endgroup$
– OppoInfinity
Apr 4 at 15:54
$begingroup$
@spyr03: I have expanded the section about the values skipped
$endgroup$
– robjohn♦
Apr 4 at 17:27
add a comment |
$begingroup$
$3$ and $5$ add to $2^3$, and $107 + 109 = 6^3$. So yes, there are other examples.
Clearly the sum has to be even, so if you want to systematically look for examples, then you could look through numbers of the form
$$
frac(2n)^32pm 1
$$
and check whether they are twin primes. That's how I found the $6^3$ one, at least. I'm sure there are clever ways to cut down the search space further. Or maybe it's better to look through all twin primes and see whether they add to cubes. I have no idea which would actually be faster.
Edit Apart from $3+5$, the primes cannot be divisible by $3$ (obviously), and since neither $p$ nor $p+2$ are divisible by $3$, that means their sum is divisible by $3$. So instead of just $frac(2n)^32pm1$, you can narrow it to $frac(6n)^32pm 1$.
Once can do a similar analysis on the basis of, say, $5$, and find that $nnotequiv 2, 3pmod 5$, meaning the numerator must be on one of the forms $(30n)^3, (30n + 6)^3$ or $(30n + 24)^3$.
New edit:
I used my above idea to search with the following Python program:
import math
def is_prime(n):
if(n%2==0):
return False
for i in range(3,int(math.sqrt(n))+1,2):
if(n%i==0):
return False
return True
for i in range(1,300):
for k in [30*i, 30*i + 6, 30*i + 24]:
if is_prime(k**3/2 - 1) & is_prime(k**3/2 + 1):
print "%d & %d & %d\\" % (k**3/2 - 1, k**3/2 + 1, k)
(The speed of the program starts to go down at about 300.)
It found the following list:
$$
beginarraycc
hline
p&p+2&sqrt[3]textsum\
hline
2634011 & 2634013 & 174\
29659499 & 29659501 & 390\
57395627 & 57395629 & 486\
104792291 & 104792293 & 594\
271669247 & 271669249 & 816\
485149499 & 485149501 & 990\
568946591 & 568946593 & 1044\
588791807 & 588791809 & 1056\
752530067 & 752530069 & 1146\
863999999 & 864000001 & 1200\
2032678367 & 2032678369 & 1596\
2772616499 & 2772616501 & 1770\
2945257307 & 2945257309 & 1806\
3505869971 & 3505869973 & 1914\
4473547487 & 4473547489 & 2076\
4670303507 & 4670303509 & 2106\
5470523999 & 5470524001 & 2220\
6911999999 & 6912000001 & 2400\
7498065347 & 7498065349 & 2466\
8646803027 & 8646803029 & 2586\
8828622431 & 8828622433 & 2604\
8951240447 & 8951240449 & 2616\
10240432127 & 10240432129 & 2736\
12784043267 & 12784043269 & 2946\
13019808671 & 13019808673 & 2964\
15717410207 & 15717410209 & 3156\
17100765467 & 17100765469 & 3246\
23211554291 & 23211554293 & 3594\
29796600707 & 29796600709 & 3906\
33362903807 & 33362903809 & 4056\
39311389151 & 39311389153 & 4284\
44837381087 & 44837381089 & 4476\
53248211999 & 53248212001 & 4740\
85200014591 & 85200014593 & 5544\
94362064127 & 94362064129 & 5736\
105110165267 & 105110165269 & 5946\
111603347747 & 111603347749 & 6066\
156246957827 & 156246957829 & 6786\
169013118347 & 169013118349 & 6966\
183838613471 & 183838613473 & 7164\
215526633731 & 215526633733 & 7554\
223322272991 & 223322272993 & 7644\
226492415999 & 226492416001 & 7680\
239472986111 & 239472986113 & 7824\
280145695391 & 280145695393 & 8244\
hline
endarray
$$
This skips $2^3 = 3+5$ and $6^3 = 107+109$, and $24^3 = 6911 + 6913$ (although $6913 = 31cdot 223$, so that's irrelevant), because of some hiccup with the range
in the primality test that I didn't bother fixing. Thanks to @taritgoswami for the prime test I copy-pasted from him and trimmed down a little. It still thinks $2$ is non-prime, but that's OK in this case. In fact, I could theoretically have taken away the whole parity check there, since I know I'm only feeding it odd numbers.
The print statement is formatted like that so that I could copy-paste it directly from the Python output into a MathJaX array
without having to manually type all the formatting necessary.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
some bigger one
$endgroup$
– pantareis
Apr 4 at 9:32
$begingroup$
@DietrichBurde It's a cube, see the question body.
$endgroup$
– Arthur
Apr 4 at 9:34
$begingroup$
@DietrichBurde I'm sure we can. $17+19 = 6^2$, so $6$ is really prolific here.
$endgroup$
– Arthur
Apr 4 at 9:37
1
$begingroup$
with Maple can you find other examples?
$endgroup$
– pantareis
Apr 4 at 9:41
$begingroup$
@pantareis I'm sure I could. If I knew how to use Maple. Or you could do it: I've already told you one possible algorithm.
$endgroup$
– Arthur
Apr 4 at 9:42
|
show 4 more comments
$begingroup$
To demonstrate that there are also huge solutions :
Define $$k=10^100+303593$$ $$s=4k^3-1$$ $$t=4k^3+1$$ then $(s,t)$ is a twin prime pair of the desired form which can be searched with this PARI/GP - routine
? z=prod(j=1,3*10^4,prime(j));k=10^100-1;gef=0;while(gef==0,k=k+1;s=4*k^3-1;t=4*
k^3+1;if(gcd(s*t,z)==1,if(ispseudoprime(s)==1,print(k-10^100);if(ispseudoprime(t)
==1,gef=1))))
$ s $and $ t $ are proven primes with $ 301 $ digits. Assuming the generalized bunyakovsky conjecture, there are infinite many pairs of the desired form.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
$(3,5),(107,109)$ and $(2634011,2634013)$ are only such twin prime pairs below $10^7$. You can check for more by increasing the range using this small Python code below. I just run it upto $10^8$, $(29659499,29659501)$ and $(57395627,57395629)$ are only such pairs with $10^7<p<10^8$.
Edit:
For optimization purpose, I will use the fact that all primes more than $3$ can be represented in the form $6kpm 1$.
First let check manually for $p=2,3$. For $p=2$ it's clearly not possible. For $p=3$, we have $3+5=8=2^3$, so, $(3,5)$ is such pair.
Suppose, $p=6k-1$, with $p>5$, then we have $12k=n^3$. That means, $12|n^3$. But, as $n^3$ is a perfect cube, and we have $12=3cdot 2^2$, at least $3^3cdot 2^3=216$ will divide $n^3$. So, the pair $(108m^3-1,108m^3+1)$ will be such pair if both of them are prime.
While dealing with cubes, usually prefer to work in $mathbbZ_7$, as any cube is either of $0,1,6$ in this field,i.e; $n^3equiv 0,1,6pmod7$ . So, we can have $2p+2equiv 0pmod7$, which gives $pequiv 6pmod7$, or, $2p+2equiv 1pmod7$ which implies $pequiv 3pmod7$ or $2p+2equiv 6pmod7$ which implies $pequiv 2pmod7$. Hence, only $3$ pssibilities. Here is the updated program:
import math
import time
start_time=time.time()
def is_prime(n):
flag=0
if(n==2):
return True
if(n%2==0):
return False
else:
for i in range(3,int(math.sqrt(n))+1,2):
if(n%i==0):
flag=1
break
if(flag==0):
return True
return False
for i in range(1,1000):#change the number inside this braket to check for larger numbers
c=(6*i)**3
p=c//2-1
if(p%7==2 or p%7==4 or p%7==6):
if(is_prime(p) & is_prime(p+2)):
print(p, "is such twin prime with sum",c)
print(time.time()-start_time)
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
I am not the downvoter, but my guess is that it is because your script, the substance of your answer, is quite inefficient compared to some others that were posted.
$endgroup$
– Mees de Vries
Apr 4 at 14:32
$begingroup$
@MeesdeVries Updated it, please have a look.
$endgroup$
– tarit goswami
Apr 4 at 19:20
add a comment |
$begingroup$
$p + (p + 2) = 2p + 2 = 2(p + 1)$
For the sum to be a cube, $p + 1$ must be divisible by 4, so that the sum becomes $2 times 4m^3$ for some integer $m$. So $p + 1$ is of the form $4m^3$.
$endgroup$
2
$begingroup$
Also, with the exception of the twin prime pair 3,5, every pair of twin primes must be of the form 6n-1,6n+1. Using your notation, you can further refine based on this to $p+1=108k^3$
$endgroup$
– Moko19
Apr 4 at 9:52
add a comment |
5 Answers
5
active
oldest
votes
5 Answers
5
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
List of Some Twin Primes Greater than $bf3$ whose Sum is a Cube
The sum of twin primes $6k-1$ and $6k+1$ is $12k$ and $12k=j^3implies6mid j$. So to look for such twin primes, look for twin primes of the form
$$
(108n^3-1,108n^3+1)
$$
We can skip $nequiv2pmod5$ since
$$
beginalign
108cdot n^3+1
&equiv3cdot2^3+1&pmod5\
&equiv0&pmod5
endalign
$$
and we can skip $nequiv3pmod5$ since
$$
beginalign
108cdot n^3-1
&equiv3cdot3^3-1&pmod5\
&equiv0&pmod5
endalign
$$
Checking $nequiv0,1,4pmod5$, we get
$$
beginarrayl
n&108n^3-1&108n^3+1\hline
1&107&109\
29&2634011&2634013\
65&29659499&29659501\
81&57395627&57395629\
99&104792291&104792293\
136&271669247&271669249\
165&485149499&485149501\
174&568946591&568946593\
176&588791807&588791809\
191&752530067&752530069\
200&863999999&864000001\
266&2032678367&2032678369\
295&2772616499&2772616501\
301&2945257307&2945257309\
319&3505869971&3505869973\
346&4473547487&4473547489\
351&4670303507&4670303509\
370&5470523999&5470524001\
400&6911999999&6912000001\
411&7498065347&7498065349\
431&8646803027&8646803029\
434&8828622431&8828622433\
436&8951240447&8951240449\
456&10240432127&10240432129\
491&12784043267&12784043269\
494&13019808671&13019808673\
526&15717410207&15717410209\
541&17100765467&17100765469\
599&23211554291&23211554293\
651&29796600707&29796600709\
676&33362903807&33362903809\
714&39311389151&39311389153\
746&44837381087&44837381089\
790&53248211999&53248212001\
924&85200014591&85200014593\
956&94362064127&94362064129\
991&105110165267&105110165269\
endarray
$$
Note that the sum of the primes is $(6n)^3$.
This list does not include $3+5=2^3$ because $(3,5)$ is the only twin prime that is not of the form $(6k-1,6k+1)$; that is, all primes greater than $3$ must be relatively prime to $6$.
Mathematica Code
Module[s = "", m,
For[n = 1, n < 1000, ++n,
If[MemberQ[0, 1, 4, Mod[n, 5]] && PrimeQ[(m = 108 n^3) - 1] &&
PrimeQ[m + 1],
s = StringJoin[s,
ToString[n] <> "&" <> ToString[m - 1] <> "&" <> ToString[m + 1] <>
"\n"]]]; s]
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
"We can immediately skip $nequiv2,3pmod5$ since $5mid108cdot2^3+1$ and $5mid108cdot3^3-1$" I don't understand this line, could you explain this a little further?
$endgroup$
– spyr03
Apr 4 at 15:46
3
$begingroup$
As $5$ divides $108cdot 2^3+1$, for any $k$ of the form $5t+2$ we have $108cdot (5t+2)^3+ 1$. Now using binomial expansion you can see that it will left $5cdot m+108cdot 2^3$, which is divisible by $5$. Hence it can't be prime. So we are not checking for that $n$. Same argument goes for $nequiv 3pmod5$.
$endgroup$
– OppoInfinity
Apr 4 at 15:54
$begingroup$
@spyr03: I have expanded the section about the values skipped
$endgroup$
– robjohn♦
Apr 4 at 17:27
add a comment |
$begingroup$
List of Some Twin Primes Greater than $bf3$ whose Sum is a Cube
The sum of twin primes $6k-1$ and $6k+1$ is $12k$ and $12k=j^3implies6mid j$. So to look for such twin primes, look for twin primes of the form
$$
(108n^3-1,108n^3+1)
$$
We can skip $nequiv2pmod5$ since
$$
beginalign
108cdot n^3+1
&equiv3cdot2^3+1&pmod5\
&equiv0&pmod5
endalign
$$
and we can skip $nequiv3pmod5$ since
$$
beginalign
108cdot n^3-1
&equiv3cdot3^3-1&pmod5\
&equiv0&pmod5
endalign
$$
Checking $nequiv0,1,4pmod5$, we get
$$
beginarrayl
n&108n^3-1&108n^3+1\hline
1&107&109\
29&2634011&2634013\
65&29659499&29659501\
81&57395627&57395629\
99&104792291&104792293\
136&271669247&271669249\
165&485149499&485149501\
174&568946591&568946593\
176&588791807&588791809\
191&752530067&752530069\
200&863999999&864000001\
266&2032678367&2032678369\
295&2772616499&2772616501\
301&2945257307&2945257309\
319&3505869971&3505869973\
346&4473547487&4473547489\
351&4670303507&4670303509\
370&5470523999&5470524001\
400&6911999999&6912000001\
411&7498065347&7498065349\
431&8646803027&8646803029\
434&8828622431&8828622433\
436&8951240447&8951240449\
456&10240432127&10240432129\
491&12784043267&12784043269\
494&13019808671&13019808673\
526&15717410207&15717410209\
541&17100765467&17100765469\
599&23211554291&23211554293\
651&29796600707&29796600709\
676&33362903807&33362903809\
714&39311389151&39311389153\
746&44837381087&44837381089\
790&53248211999&53248212001\
924&85200014591&85200014593\
956&94362064127&94362064129\
991&105110165267&105110165269\
endarray
$$
Note that the sum of the primes is $(6n)^3$.
This list does not include $3+5=2^3$ because $(3,5)$ is the only twin prime that is not of the form $(6k-1,6k+1)$; that is, all primes greater than $3$ must be relatively prime to $6$.
Mathematica Code
Module[s = "", m,
For[n = 1, n < 1000, ++n,
If[MemberQ[0, 1, 4, Mod[n, 5]] && PrimeQ[(m = 108 n^3) - 1] &&
PrimeQ[m + 1],
s = StringJoin[s,
ToString[n] <> "&" <> ToString[m - 1] <> "&" <> ToString[m + 1] <>
"\n"]]]; s]
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
"We can immediately skip $nequiv2,3pmod5$ since $5mid108cdot2^3+1$ and $5mid108cdot3^3-1$" I don't understand this line, could you explain this a little further?
$endgroup$
– spyr03
Apr 4 at 15:46
3
$begingroup$
As $5$ divides $108cdot 2^3+1$, for any $k$ of the form $5t+2$ we have $108cdot (5t+2)^3+ 1$. Now using binomial expansion you can see that it will left $5cdot m+108cdot 2^3$, which is divisible by $5$. Hence it can't be prime. So we are not checking for that $n$. Same argument goes for $nequiv 3pmod5$.
$endgroup$
– OppoInfinity
Apr 4 at 15:54
$begingroup$
@spyr03: I have expanded the section about the values skipped
$endgroup$
– robjohn♦
Apr 4 at 17:27
add a comment |
$begingroup$
List of Some Twin Primes Greater than $bf3$ whose Sum is a Cube
The sum of twin primes $6k-1$ and $6k+1$ is $12k$ and $12k=j^3implies6mid j$. So to look for such twin primes, look for twin primes of the form
$$
(108n^3-1,108n^3+1)
$$
We can skip $nequiv2pmod5$ since
$$
beginalign
108cdot n^3+1
&equiv3cdot2^3+1&pmod5\
&equiv0&pmod5
endalign
$$
and we can skip $nequiv3pmod5$ since
$$
beginalign
108cdot n^3-1
&equiv3cdot3^3-1&pmod5\
&equiv0&pmod5
endalign
$$
Checking $nequiv0,1,4pmod5$, we get
$$
beginarrayl
n&108n^3-1&108n^3+1\hline
1&107&109\
29&2634011&2634013\
65&29659499&29659501\
81&57395627&57395629\
99&104792291&104792293\
136&271669247&271669249\
165&485149499&485149501\
174&568946591&568946593\
176&588791807&588791809\
191&752530067&752530069\
200&863999999&864000001\
266&2032678367&2032678369\
295&2772616499&2772616501\
301&2945257307&2945257309\
319&3505869971&3505869973\
346&4473547487&4473547489\
351&4670303507&4670303509\
370&5470523999&5470524001\
400&6911999999&6912000001\
411&7498065347&7498065349\
431&8646803027&8646803029\
434&8828622431&8828622433\
436&8951240447&8951240449\
456&10240432127&10240432129\
491&12784043267&12784043269\
494&13019808671&13019808673\
526&15717410207&15717410209\
541&17100765467&17100765469\
599&23211554291&23211554293\
651&29796600707&29796600709\
676&33362903807&33362903809\
714&39311389151&39311389153\
746&44837381087&44837381089\
790&53248211999&53248212001\
924&85200014591&85200014593\
956&94362064127&94362064129\
991&105110165267&105110165269\
endarray
$$
Note that the sum of the primes is $(6n)^3$.
This list does not include $3+5=2^3$ because $(3,5)$ is the only twin prime that is not of the form $(6k-1,6k+1)$; that is, all primes greater than $3$ must be relatively prime to $6$.
Mathematica Code
Module[s = "", m,
For[n = 1, n < 1000, ++n,
If[MemberQ[0, 1, 4, Mod[n, 5]] && PrimeQ[(m = 108 n^3) - 1] &&
PrimeQ[m + 1],
s = StringJoin[s,
ToString[n] <> "&" <> ToString[m - 1] <> "&" <> ToString[m + 1] <>
"\n"]]]; s]
$endgroup$
List of Some Twin Primes Greater than $bf3$ whose Sum is a Cube
The sum of twin primes $6k-1$ and $6k+1$ is $12k$ and $12k=j^3implies6mid j$. So to look for such twin primes, look for twin primes of the form
$$
(108n^3-1,108n^3+1)
$$
We can skip $nequiv2pmod5$ since
$$
beginalign
108cdot n^3+1
&equiv3cdot2^3+1&pmod5\
&equiv0&pmod5
endalign
$$
and we can skip $nequiv3pmod5$ since
$$
beginalign
108cdot n^3-1
&equiv3cdot3^3-1&pmod5\
&equiv0&pmod5
endalign
$$
Checking $nequiv0,1,4pmod5$, we get
$$
beginarrayl
n&108n^3-1&108n^3+1\hline
1&107&109\
29&2634011&2634013\
65&29659499&29659501\
81&57395627&57395629\
99&104792291&104792293\
136&271669247&271669249\
165&485149499&485149501\
174&568946591&568946593\
176&588791807&588791809\
191&752530067&752530069\
200&863999999&864000001\
266&2032678367&2032678369\
295&2772616499&2772616501\
301&2945257307&2945257309\
319&3505869971&3505869973\
346&4473547487&4473547489\
351&4670303507&4670303509\
370&5470523999&5470524001\
400&6911999999&6912000001\
411&7498065347&7498065349\
431&8646803027&8646803029\
434&8828622431&8828622433\
436&8951240447&8951240449\
456&10240432127&10240432129\
491&12784043267&12784043269\
494&13019808671&13019808673\
526&15717410207&15717410209\
541&17100765467&17100765469\
599&23211554291&23211554293\
651&29796600707&29796600709\
676&33362903807&33362903809\
714&39311389151&39311389153\
746&44837381087&44837381089\
790&53248211999&53248212001\
924&85200014591&85200014593\
956&94362064127&94362064129\
991&105110165267&105110165269\
endarray
$$
Note that the sum of the primes is $(6n)^3$.
This list does not include $3+5=2^3$ because $(3,5)$ is the only twin prime that is not of the form $(6k-1,6k+1)$; that is, all primes greater than $3$ must be relatively prime to $6$.
Mathematica Code
Module[s = "", m,
For[n = 1, n < 1000, ++n,
If[MemberQ[0, 1, 4, Mod[n, 5]] && PrimeQ[(m = 108 n^3) - 1] &&
PrimeQ[m + 1],
s = StringJoin[s,
ToString[n] <> "&" <> ToString[m - 1] <> "&" <> ToString[m + 1] <>
"\n"]]]; s]
edited Apr 5 at 9:45
Community♦
1
1
answered Apr 4 at 12:20
robjohn♦robjohn
270k27313642
270k27313642
1
$begingroup$
"We can immediately skip $nequiv2,3pmod5$ since $5mid108cdot2^3+1$ and $5mid108cdot3^3-1$" I don't understand this line, could you explain this a little further?
$endgroup$
– spyr03
Apr 4 at 15:46
3
$begingroup$
As $5$ divides $108cdot 2^3+1$, for any $k$ of the form $5t+2$ we have $108cdot (5t+2)^3+ 1$. Now using binomial expansion you can see that it will left $5cdot m+108cdot 2^3$, which is divisible by $5$. Hence it can't be prime. So we are not checking for that $n$. Same argument goes for $nequiv 3pmod5$.
$endgroup$
– OppoInfinity
Apr 4 at 15:54
$begingroup$
@spyr03: I have expanded the section about the values skipped
$endgroup$
– robjohn♦
Apr 4 at 17:27
add a comment |
1
$begingroup$
"We can immediately skip $nequiv2,3pmod5$ since $5mid108cdot2^3+1$ and $5mid108cdot3^3-1$" I don't understand this line, could you explain this a little further?
$endgroup$
– spyr03
Apr 4 at 15:46
3
$begingroup$
As $5$ divides $108cdot 2^3+1$, for any $k$ of the form $5t+2$ we have $108cdot (5t+2)^3+ 1$. Now using binomial expansion you can see that it will left $5cdot m+108cdot 2^3$, which is divisible by $5$. Hence it can't be prime. So we are not checking for that $n$. Same argument goes for $nequiv 3pmod5$.
$endgroup$
– OppoInfinity
Apr 4 at 15:54
$begingroup$
@spyr03: I have expanded the section about the values skipped
$endgroup$
– robjohn♦
Apr 4 at 17:27
1
1
$begingroup$
"We can immediately skip $nequiv2,3pmod5$ since $5mid108cdot2^3+1$ and $5mid108cdot3^3-1$" I don't understand this line, could you explain this a little further?
$endgroup$
– spyr03
Apr 4 at 15:46
$begingroup$
"We can immediately skip $nequiv2,3pmod5$ since $5mid108cdot2^3+1$ and $5mid108cdot3^3-1$" I don't understand this line, could you explain this a little further?
$endgroup$
– spyr03
Apr 4 at 15:46
3
3
$begingroup$
As $5$ divides $108cdot 2^3+1$, for any $k$ of the form $5t+2$ we have $108cdot (5t+2)^3+ 1$. Now using binomial expansion you can see that it will left $5cdot m+108cdot 2^3$, which is divisible by $5$. Hence it can't be prime. So we are not checking for that $n$. Same argument goes for $nequiv 3pmod5$.
$endgroup$
– OppoInfinity
Apr 4 at 15:54
$begingroup$
As $5$ divides $108cdot 2^3+1$, for any $k$ of the form $5t+2$ we have $108cdot (5t+2)^3+ 1$. Now using binomial expansion you can see that it will left $5cdot m+108cdot 2^3$, which is divisible by $5$. Hence it can't be prime. So we are not checking for that $n$. Same argument goes for $nequiv 3pmod5$.
$endgroup$
– OppoInfinity
Apr 4 at 15:54
$begingroup$
@spyr03: I have expanded the section about the values skipped
$endgroup$
– robjohn♦
Apr 4 at 17:27
$begingroup$
@spyr03: I have expanded the section about the values skipped
$endgroup$
– robjohn♦
Apr 4 at 17:27
add a comment |
$begingroup$
$3$ and $5$ add to $2^3$, and $107 + 109 = 6^3$. So yes, there are other examples.
Clearly the sum has to be even, so if you want to systematically look for examples, then you could look through numbers of the form
$$
frac(2n)^32pm 1
$$
and check whether they are twin primes. That's how I found the $6^3$ one, at least. I'm sure there are clever ways to cut down the search space further. Or maybe it's better to look through all twin primes and see whether they add to cubes. I have no idea which would actually be faster.
Edit Apart from $3+5$, the primes cannot be divisible by $3$ (obviously), and since neither $p$ nor $p+2$ are divisible by $3$, that means their sum is divisible by $3$. So instead of just $frac(2n)^32pm1$, you can narrow it to $frac(6n)^32pm 1$.
Once can do a similar analysis on the basis of, say, $5$, and find that $nnotequiv 2, 3pmod 5$, meaning the numerator must be on one of the forms $(30n)^3, (30n + 6)^3$ or $(30n + 24)^3$.
New edit:
I used my above idea to search with the following Python program:
import math
def is_prime(n):
if(n%2==0):
return False
for i in range(3,int(math.sqrt(n))+1,2):
if(n%i==0):
return False
return True
for i in range(1,300):
for k in [30*i, 30*i + 6, 30*i + 24]:
if is_prime(k**3/2 - 1) & is_prime(k**3/2 + 1):
print "%d & %d & %d\\" % (k**3/2 - 1, k**3/2 + 1, k)
(The speed of the program starts to go down at about 300.)
It found the following list:
$$
beginarraycc
hline
p&p+2&sqrt[3]textsum\
hline
2634011 & 2634013 & 174\
29659499 & 29659501 & 390\
57395627 & 57395629 & 486\
104792291 & 104792293 & 594\
271669247 & 271669249 & 816\
485149499 & 485149501 & 990\
568946591 & 568946593 & 1044\
588791807 & 588791809 & 1056\
752530067 & 752530069 & 1146\
863999999 & 864000001 & 1200\
2032678367 & 2032678369 & 1596\
2772616499 & 2772616501 & 1770\
2945257307 & 2945257309 & 1806\
3505869971 & 3505869973 & 1914\
4473547487 & 4473547489 & 2076\
4670303507 & 4670303509 & 2106\
5470523999 & 5470524001 & 2220\
6911999999 & 6912000001 & 2400\
7498065347 & 7498065349 & 2466\
8646803027 & 8646803029 & 2586\
8828622431 & 8828622433 & 2604\
8951240447 & 8951240449 & 2616\
10240432127 & 10240432129 & 2736\
12784043267 & 12784043269 & 2946\
13019808671 & 13019808673 & 2964\
15717410207 & 15717410209 & 3156\
17100765467 & 17100765469 & 3246\
23211554291 & 23211554293 & 3594\
29796600707 & 29796600709 & 3906\
33362903807 & 33362903809 & 4056\
39311389151 & 39311389153 & 4284\
44837381087 & 44837381089 & 4476\
53248211999 & 53248212001 & 4740\
85200014591 & 85200014593 & 5544\
94362064127 & 94362064129 & 5736\
105110165267 & 105110165269 & 5946\
111603347747 & 111603347749 & 6066\
156246957827 & 156246957829 & 6786\
169013118347 & 169013118349 & 6966\
183838613471 & 183838613473 & 7164\
215526633731 & 215526633733 & 7554\
223322272991 & 223322272993 & 7644\
226492415999 & 226492416001 & 7680\
239472986111 & 239472986113 & 7824\
280145695391 & 280145695393 & 8244\
hline
endarray
$$
This skips $2^3 = 3+5$ and $6^3 = 107+109$, and $24^3 = 6911 + 6913$ (although $6913 = 31cdot 223$, so that's irrelevant), because of some hiccup with the range
in the primality test that I didn't bother fixing. Thanks to @taritgoswami for the prime test I copy-pasted from him and trimmed down a little. It still thinks $2$ is non-prime, but that's OK in this case. In fact, I could theoretically have taken away the whole parity check there, since I know I'm only feeding it odd numbers.
The print statement is formatted like that so that I could copy-paste it directly from the Python output into a MathJaX array
without having to manually type all the formatting necessary.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
some bigger one
$endgroup$
– pantareis
Apr 4 at 9:32
$begingroup$
@DietrichBurde It's a cube, see the question body.
$endgroup$
– Arthur
Apr 4 at 9:34
$begingroup$
@DietrichBurde I'm sure we can. $17+19 = 6^2$, so $6$ is really prolific here.
$endgroup$
– Arthur
Apr 4 at 9:37
1
$begingroup$
with Maple can you find other examples?
$endgroup$
– pantareis
Apr 4 at 9:41
$begingroup$
@pantareis I'm sure I could. If I knew how to use Maple. Or you could do it: I've already told you one possible algorithm.
$endgroup$
– Arthur
Apr 4 at 9:42
|
show 4 more comments
$begingroup$
$3$ and $5$ add to $2^3$, and $107 + 109 = 6^3$. So yes, there are other examples.
Clearly the sum has to be even, so if you want to systematically look for examples, then you could look through numbers of the form
$$
frac(2n)^32pm 1
$$
and check whether they are twin primes. That's how I found the $6^3$ one, at least. I'm sure there are clever ways to cut down the search space further. Or maybe it's better to look through all twin primes and see whether they add to cubes. I have no idea which would actually be faster.
Edit Apart from $3+5$, the primes cannot be divisible by $3$ (obviously), and since neither $p$ nor $p+2$ are divisible by $3$, that means their sum is divisible by $3$. So instead of just $frac(2n)^32pm1$, you can narrow it to $frac(6n)^32pm 1$.
Once can do a similar analysis on the basis of, say, $5$, and find that $nnotequiv 2, 3pmod 5$, meaning the numerator must be on one of the forms $(30n)^3, (30n + 6)^3$ or $(30n + 24)^3$.
New edit:
I used my above idea to search with the following Python program:
import math
def is_prime(n):
if(n%2==0):
return False
for i in range(3,int(math.sqrt(n))+1,2):
if(n%i==0):
return False
return True
for i in range(1,300):
for k in [30*i, 30*i + 6, 30*i + 24]:
if is_prime(k**3/2 - 1) & is_prime(k**3/2 + 1):
print "%d & %d & %d\\" % (k**3/2 - 1, k**3/2 + 1, k)
(The speed of the program starts to go down at about 300.)
It found the following list:
$$
beginarraycc
hline
p&p+2&sqrt[3]textsum\
hline
2634011 & 2634013 & 174\
29659499 & 29659501 & 390\
57395627 & 57395629 & 486\
104792291 & 104792293 & 594\
271669247 & 271669249 & 816\
485149499 & 485149501 & 990\
568946591 & 568946593 & 1044\
588791807 & 588791809 & 1056\
752530067 & 752530069 & 1146\
863999999 & 864000001 & 1200\
2032678367 & 2032678369 & 1596\
2772616499 & 2772616501 & 1770\
2945257307 & 2945257309 & 1806\
3505869971 & 3505869973 & 1914\
4473547487 & 4473547489 & 2076\
4670303507 & 4670303509 & 2106\
5470523999 & 5470524001 & 2220\
6911999999 & 6912000001 & 2400\
7498065347 & 7498065349 & 2466\
8646803027 & 8646803029 & 2586\
8828622431 & 8828622433 & 2604\
8951240447 & 8951240449 & 2616\
10240432127 & 10240432129 & 2736\
12784043267 & 12784043269 & 2946\
13019808671 & 13019808673 & 2964\
15717410207 & 15717410209 & 3156\
17100765467 & 17100765469 & 3246\
23211554291 & 23211554293 & 3594\
29796600707 & 29796600709 & 3906\
33362903807 & 33362903809 & 4056\
39311389151 & 39311389153 & 4284\
44837381087 & 44837381089 & 4476\
53248211999 & 53248212001 & 4740\
85200014591 & 85200014593 & 5544\
94362064127 & 94362064129 & 5736\
105110165267 & 105110165269 & 5946\
111603347747 & 111603347749 & 6066\
156246957827 & 156246957829 & 6786\
169013118347 & 169013118349 & 6966\
183838613471 & 183838613473 & 7164\
215526633731 & 215526633733 & 7554\
223322272991 & 223322272993 & 7644\
226492415999 & 226492416001 & 7680\
239472986111 & 239472986113 & 7824\
280145695391 & 280145695393 & 8244\
hline
endarray
$$
This skips $2^3 = 3+5$ and $6^3 = 107+109$, and $24^3 = 6911 + 6913$ (although $6913 = 31cdot 223$, so that's irrelevant), because of some hiccup with the range
in the primality test that I didn't bother fixing. Thanks to @taritgoswami for the prime test I copy-pasted from him and trimmed down a little. It still thinks $2$ is non-prime, but that's OK in this case. In fact, I could theoretically have taken away the whole parity check there, since I know I'm only feeding it odd numbers.
The print statement is formatted like that so that I could copy-paste it directly from the Python output into a MathJaX array
without having to manually type all the formatting necessary.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
some bigger one
$endgroup$
– pantareis
Apr 4 at 9:32
$begingroup$
@DietrichBurde It's a cube, see the question body.
$endgroup$
– Arthur
Apr 4 at 9:34
$begingroup$
@DietrichBurde I'm sure we can. $17+19 = 6^2$, so $6$ is really prolific here.
$endgroup$
– Arthur
Apr 4 at 9:37
1
$begingroup$
with Maple can you find other examples?
$endgroup$
– pantareis
Apr 4 at 9:41
$begingroup$
@pantareis I'm sure I could. If I knew how to use Maple. Or you could do it: I've already told you one possible algorithm.
$endgroup$
– Arthur
Apr 4 at 9:42
|
show 4 more comments
$begingroup$
$3$ and $5$ add to $2^3$, and $107 + 109 = 6^3$. So yes, there are other examples.
Clearly the sum has to be even, so if you want to systematically look for examples, then you could look through numbers of the form
$$
frac(2n)^32pm 1
$$
and check whether they are twin primes. That's how I found the $6^3$ one, at least. I'm sure there are clever ways to cut down the search space further. Or maybe it's better to look through all twin primes and see whether they add to cubes. I have no idea which would actually be faster.
Edit Apart from $3+5$, the primes cannot be divisible by $3$ (obviously), and since neither $p$ nor $p+2$ are divisible by $3$, that means their sum is divisible by $3$. So instead of just $frac(2n)^32pm1$, you can narrow it to $frac(6n)^32pm 1$.
Once can do a similar analysis on the basis of, say, $5$, and find that $nnotequiv 2, 3pmod 5$, meaning the numerator must be on one of the forms $(30n)^3, (30n + 6)^3$ or $(30n + 24)^3$.
New edit:
I used my above idea to search with the following Python program:
import math
def is_prime(n):
if(n%2==0):
return False
for i in range(3,int(math.sqrt(n))+1,2):
if(n%i==0):
return False
return True
for i in range(1,300):
for k in [30*i, 30*i + 6, 30*i + 24]:
if is_prime(k**3/2 - 1) & is_prime(k**3/2 + 1):
print "%d & %d & %d\\" % (k**3/2 - 1, k**3/2 + 1, k)
(The speed of the program starts to go down at about 300.)
It found the following list:
$$
beginarraycc
hline
p&p+2&sqrt[3]textsum\
hline
2634011 & 2634013 & 174\
29659499 & 29659501 & 390\
57395627 & 57395629 & 486\
104792291 & 104792293 & 594\
271669247 & 271669249 & 816\
485149499 & 485149501 & 990\
568946591 & 568946593 & 1044\
588791807 & 588791809 & 1056\
752530067 & 752530069 & 1146\
863999999 & 864000001 & 1200\
2032678367 & 2032678369 & 1596\
2772616499 & 2772616501 & 1770\
2945257307 & 2945257309 & 1806\
3505869971 & 3505869973 & 1914\
4473547487 & 4473547489 & 2076\
4670303507 & 4670303509 & 2106\
5470523999 & 5470524001 & 2220\
6911999999 & 6912000001 & 2400\
7498065347 & 7498065349 & 2466\
8646803027 & 8646803029 & 2586\
8828622431 & 8828622433 & 2604\
8951240447 & 8951240449 & 2616\
10240432127 & 10240432129 & 2736\
12784043267 & 12784043269 & 2946\
13019808671 & 13019808673 & 2964\
15717410207 & 15717410209 & 3156\
17100765467 & 17100765469 & 3246\
23211554291 & 23211554293 & 3594\
29796600707 & 29796600709 & 3906\
33362903807 & 33362903809 & 4056\
39311389151 & 39311389153 & 4284\
44837381087 & 44837381089 & 4476\
53248211999 & 53248212001 & 4740\
85200014591 & 85200014593 & 5544\
94362064127 & 94362064129 & 5736\
105110165267 & 105110165269 & 5946\
111603347747 & 111603347749 & 6066\
156246957827 & 156246957829 & 6786\
169013118347 & 169013118349 & 6966\
183838613471 & 183838613473 & 7164\
215526633731 & 215526633733 & 7554\
223322272991 & 223322272993 & 7644\
226492415999 & 226492416001 & 7680\
239472986111 & 239472986113 & 7824\
280145695391 & 280145695393 & 8244\
hline
endarray
$$
This skips $2^3 = 3+5$ and $6^3 = 107+109$, and $24^3 = 6911 + 6913$ (although $6913 = 31cdot 223$, so that's irrelevant), because of some hiccup with the range
in the primality test that I didn't bother fixing. Thanks to @taritgoswami for the prime test I copy-pasted from him and trimmed down a little. It still thinks $2$ is non-prime, but that's OK in this case. In fact, I could theoretically have taken away the whole parity check there, since I know I'm only feeding it odd numbers.
The print statement is formatted like that so that I could copy-paste it directly from the Python output into a MathJaX array
without having to manually type all the formatting necessary.
$endgroup$
$3$ and $5$ add to $2^3$, and $107 + 109 = 6^3$. So yes, there are other examples.
Clearly the sum has to be even, so if you want to systematically look for examples, then you could look through numbers of the form
$$
frac(2n)^32pm 1
$$
and check whether they are twin primes. That's how I found the $6^3$ one, at least. I'm sure there are clever ways to cut down the search space further. Or maybe it's better to look through all twin primes and see whether they add to cubes. I have no idea which would actually be faster.
Edit Apart from $3+5$, the primes cannot be divisible by $3$ (obviously), and since neither $p$ nor $p+2$ are divisible by $3$, that means their sum is divisible by $3$. So instead of just $frac(2n)^32pm1$, you can narrow it to $frac(6n)^32pm 1$.
Once can do a similar analysis on the basis of, say, $5$, and find that $nnotequiv 2, 3pmod 5$, meaning the numerator must be on one of the forms $(30n)^3, (30n + 6)^3$ or $(30n + 24)^3$.
New edit:
I used my above idea to search with the following Python program:
import math
def is_prime(n):
if(n%2==0):
return False
for i in range(3,int(math.sqrt(n))+1,2):
if(n%i==0):
return False
return True
for i in range(1,300):
for k in [30*i, 30*i + 6, 30*i + 24]:
if is_prime(k**3/2 - 1) & is_prime(k**3/2 + 1):
print "%d & %d & %d\\" % (k**3/2 - 1, k**3/2 + 1, k)
(The speed of the program starts to go down at about 300.)
It found the following list:
$$
beginarraycc
hline
p&p+2&sqrt[3]textsum\
hline
2634011 & 2634013 & 174\
29659499 & 29659501 & 390\
57395627 & 57395629 & 486\
104792291 & 104792293 & 594\
271669247 & 271669249 & 816\
485149499 & 485149501 & 990\
568946591 & 568946593 & 1044\
588791807 & 588791809 & 1056\
752530067 & 752530069 & 1146\
863999999 & 864000001 & 1200\
2032678367 & 2032678369 & 1596\
2772616499 & 2772616501 & 1770\
2945257307 & 2945257309 & 1806\
3505869971 & 3505869973 & 1914\
4473547487 & 4473547489 & 2076\
4670303507 & 4670303509 & 2106\
5470523999 & 5470524001 & 2220\
6911999999 & 6912000001 & 2400\
7498065347 & 7498065349 & 2466\
8646803027 & 8646803029 & 2586\
8828622431 & 8828622433 & 2604\
8951240447 & 8951240449 & 2616\
10240432127 & 10240432129 & 2736\
12784043267 & 12784043269 & 2946\
13019808671 & 13019808673 & 2964\
15717410207 & 15717410209 & 3156\
17100765467 & 17100765469 & 3246\
23211554291 & 23211554293 & 3594\
29796600707 & 29796600709 & 3906\
33362903807 & 33362903809 & 4056\
39311389151 & 39311389153 & 4284\
44837381087 & 44837381089 & 4476\
53248211999 & 53248212001 & 4740\
85200014591 & 85200014593 & 5544\
94362064127 & 94362064129 & 5736\
105110165267 & 105110165269 & 5946\
111603347747 & 111603347749 & 6066\
156246957827 & 156246957829 & 6786\
169013118347 & 169013118349 & 6966\
183838613471 & 183838613473 & 7164\
215526633731 & 215526633733 & 7554\
223322272991 & 223322272993 & 7644\
226492415999 & 226492416001 & 7680\
239472986111 & 239472986113 & 7824\
280145695391 & 280145695393 & 8244\
hline
endarray
$$
This skips $2^3 = 3+5$ and $6^3 = 107+109$, and $24^3 = 6911 + 6913$ (although $6913 = 31cdot 223$, so that's irrelevant), because of some hiccup with the range
in the primality test that I didn't bother fixing. Thanks to @taritgoswami for the prime test I copy-pasted from him and trimmed down a little. It still thinks $2$ is non-prime, but that's OK in this case. In fact, I could theoretically have taken away the whole parity check there, since I know I'm only feeding it odd numbers.
The print statement is formatted like that so that I could copy-paste it directly from the Python output into a MathJaX array
without having to manually type all the formatting necessary.
edited Apr 4 at 11:12
answered Apr 4 at 9:31
ArthurArthur
122k7122211
122k7122211
$begingroup$
some bigger one
$endgroup$
– pantareis
Apr 4 at 9:32
$begingroup$
@DietrichBurde It's a cube, see the question body.
$endgroup$
– Arthur
Apr 4 at 9:34
$begingroup$
@DietrichBurde I'm sure we can. $17+19 = 6^2$, so $6$ is really prolific here.
$endgroup$
– Arthur
Apr 4 at 9:37
1
$begingroup$
with Maple can you find other examples?
$endgroup$
– pantareis
Apr 4 at 9:41
$begingroup$
@pantareis I'm sure I could. If I knew how to use Maple. Or you could do it: I've already told you one possible algorithm.
$endgroup$
– Arthur
Apr 4 at 9:42
|
show 4 more comments
$begingroup$
some bigger one
$endgroup$
– pantareis
Apr 4 at 9:32
$begingroup$
@DietrichBurde It's a cube, see the question body.
$endgroup$
– Arthur
Apr 4 at 9:34
$begingroup$
@DietrichBurde I'm sure we can. $17+19 = 6^2$, so $6$ is really prolific here.
$endgroup$
– Arthur
Apr 4 at 9:37
1
$begingroup$
with Maple can you find other examples?
$endgroup$
– pantareis
Apr 4 at 9:41
$begingroup$
@pantareis I'm sure I could. If I knew how to use Maple. Or you could do it: I've already told you one possible algorithm.
$endgroup$
– Arthur
Apr 4 at 9:42
$begingroup$
some bigger one
$endgroup$
– pantareis
Apr 4 at 9:32
$begingroup$
some bigger one
$endgroup$
– pantareis
Apr 4 at 9:32
$begingroup$
@DietrichBurde It's a cube, see the question body.
$endgroup$
– Arthur
Apr 4 at 9:34
$begingroup$
@DietrichBurde It's a cube, see the question body.
$endgroup$
– Arthur
Apr 4 at 9:34
$begingroup$
@DietrichBurde I'm sure we can. $17+19 = 6^2$, so $6$ is really prolific here.
$endgroup$
– Arthur
Apr 4 at 9:37
$begingroup$
@DietrichBurde I'm sure we can. $17+19 = 6^2$, so $6$ is really prolific here.
$endgroup$
– Arthur
Apr 4 at 9:37
1
1
$begingroup$
with Maple can you find other examples?
$endgroup$
– pantareis
Apr 4 at 9:41
$begingroup$
with Maple can you find other examples?
$endgroup$
– pantareis
Apr 4 at 9:41
$begingroup$
@pantareis I'm sure I could. If I knew how to use Maple. Or you could do it: I've already told you one possible algorithm.
$endgroup$
– Arthur
Apr 4 at 9:42
$begingroup$
@pantareis I'm sure I could. If I knew how to use Maple. Or you could do it: I've already told you one possible algorithm.
$endgroup$
– Arthur
Apr 4 at 9:42
|
show 4 more comments
$begingroup$
To demonstrate that there are also huge solutions :
Define $$k=10^100+303593$$ $$s=4k^3-1$$ $$t=4k^3+1$$ then $(s,t)$ is a twin prime pair of the desired form which can be searched with this PARI/GP - routine
? z=prod(j=1,3*10^4,prime(j));k=10^100-1;gef=0;while(gef==0,k=k+1;s=4*k^3-1;t=4*
k^3+1;if(gcd(s*t,z)==1,if(ispseudoprime(s)==1,print(k-10^100);if(ispseudoprime(t)
==1,gef=1))))
$ s $and $ t $ are proven primes with $ 301 $ digits. Assuming the generalized bunyakovsky conjecture, there are infinite many pairs of the desired form.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
To demonstrate that there are also huge solutions :
Define $$k=10^100+303593$$ $$s=4k^3-1$$ $$t=4k^3+1$$ then $(s,t)$ is a twin prime pair of the desired form which can be searched with this PARI/GP - routine
? z=prod(j=1,3*10^4,prime(j));k=10^100-1;gef=0;while(gef==0,k=k+1;s=4*k^3-1;t=4*
k^3+1;if(gcd(s*t,z)==1,if(ispseudoprime(s)==1,print(k-10^100);if(ispseudoprime(t)
==1,gef=1))))
$ s $and $ t $ are proven primes with $ 301 $ digits. Assuming the generalized bunyakovsky conjecture, there are infinite many pairs of the desired form.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
To demonstrate that there are also huge solutions :
Define $$k=10^100+303593$$ $$s=4k^3-1$$ $$t=4k^3+1$$ then $(s,t)$ is a twin prime pair of the desired form which can be searched with this PARI/GP - routine
? z=prod(j=1,3*10^4,prime(j));k=10^100-1;gef=0;while(gef==0,k=k+1;s=4*k^3-1;t=4*
k^3+1;if(gcd(s*t,z)==1,if(ispseudoprime(s)==1,print(k-10^100);if(ispseudoprime(t)
==1,gef=1))))
$ s $and $ t $ are proven primes with $ 301 $ digits. Assuming the generalized bunyakovsky conjecture, there are infinite many pairs of the desired form.
$endgroup$
To demonstrate that there are also huge solutions :
Define $$k=10^100+303593$$ $$s=4k^3-1$$ $$t=4k^3+1$$ then $(s,t)$ is a twin prime pair of the desired form which can be searched with this PARI/GP - routine
? z=prod(j=1,3*10^4,prime(j));k=10^100-1;gef=0;while(gef==0,k=k+1;s=4*k^3-1;t=4*
k^3+1;if(gcd(s*t,z)==1,if(ispseudoprime(s)==1,print(k-10^100);if(ispseudoprime(t)
==1,gef=1))))
$ s $and $ t $ are proven primes with $ 301 $ digits. Assuming the generalized bunyakovsky conjecture, there are infinite many pairs of the desired form.
answered Apr 4 at 11:34
PeterPeter
49.2k1240138
49.2k1240138
add a comment |
add a comment |
$begingroup$
$(3,5),(107,109)$ and $(2634011,2634013)$ are only such twin prime pairs below $10^7$. You can check for more by increasing the range using this small Python code below. I just run it upto $10^8$, $(29659499,29659501)$ and $(57395627,57395629)$ are only such pairs with $10^7<p<10^8$.
Edit:
For optimization purpose, I will use the fact that all primes more than $3$ can be represented in the form $6kpm 1$.
First let check manually for $p=2,3$. For $p=2$ it's clearly not possible. For $p=3$, we have $3+5=8=2^3$, so, $(3,5)$ is such pair.
Suppose, $p=6k-1$, with $p>5$, then we have $12k=n^3$. That means, $12|n^3$. But, as $n^3$ is a perfect cube, and we have $12=3cdot 2^2$, at least $3^3cdot 2^3=216$ will divide $n^3$. So, the pair $(108m^3-1,108m^3+1)$ will be such pair if both of them are prime.
While dealing with cubes, usually prefer to work in $mathbbZ_7$, as any cube is either of $0,1,6$ in this field,i.e; $n^3equiv 0,1,6pmod7$ . So, we can have $2p+2equiv 0pmod7$, which gives $pequiv 6pmod7$, or, $2p+2equiv 1pmod7$ which implies $pequiv 3pmod7$ or $2p+2equiv 6pmod7$ which implies $pequiv 2pmod7$. Hence, only $3$ pssibilities. Here is the updated program:
import math
import time
start_time=time.time()
def is_prime(n):
flag=0
if(n==2):
return True
if(n%2==0):
return False
else:
for i in range(3,int(math.sqrt(n))+1,2):
if(n%i==0):
flag=1
break
if(flag==0):
return True
return False
for i in range(1,1000):#change the number inside this braket to check for larger numbers
c=(6*i)**3
p=c//2-1
if(p%7==2 or p%7==4 or p%7==6):
if(is_prime(p) & is_prime(p+2)):
print(p, "is such twin prime with sum",c)
print(time.time()-start_time)
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
I am not the downvoter, but my guess is that it is because your script, the substance of your answer, is quite inefficient compared to some others that were posted.
$endgroup$
– Mees de Vries
Apr 4 at 14:32
$begingroup$
@MeesdeVries Updated it, please have a look.
$endgroup$
– tarit goswami
Apr 4 at 19:20
add a comment |
$begingroup$
$(3,5),(107,109)$ and $(2634011,2634013)$ are only such twin prime pairs below $10^7$. You can check for more by increasing the range using this small Python code below. I just run it upto $10^8$, $(29659499,29659501)$ and $(57395627,57395629)$ are only such pairs with $10^7<p<10^8$.
Edit:
For optimization purpose, I will use the fact that all primes more than $3$ can be represented in the form $6kpm 1$.
First let check manually for $p=2,3$. For $p=2$ it's clearly not possible. For $p=3$, we have $3+5=8=2^3$, so, $(3,5)$ is such pair.
Suppose, $p=6k-1$, with $p>5$, then we have $12k=n^3$. That means, $12|n^3$. But, as $n^3$ is a perfect cube, and we have $12=3cdot 2^2$, at least $3^3cdot 2^3=216$ will divide $n^3$. So, the pair $(108m^3-1,108m^3+1)$ will be such pair if both of them are prime.
While dealing with cubes, usually prefer to work in $mathbbZ_7$, as any cube is either of $0,1,6$ in this field,i.e; $n^3equiv 0,1,6pmod7$ . So, we can have $2p+2equiv 0pmod7$, which gives $pequiv 6pmod7$, or, $2p+2equiv 1pmod7$ which implies $pequiv 3pmod7$ or $2p+2equiv 6pmod7$ which implies $pequiv 2pmod7$. Hence, only $3$ pssibilities. Here is the updated program:
import math
import time
start_time=time.time()
def is_prime(n):
flag=0
if(n==2):
return True
if(n%2==0):
return False
else:
for i in range(3,int(math.sqrt(n))+1,2):
if(n%i==0):
flag=1
break
if(flag==0):
return True
return False
for i in range(1,1000):#change the number inside this braket to check for larger numbers
c=(6*i)**3
p=c//2-1
if(p%7==2 or p%7==4 or p%7==6):
if(is_prime(p) & is_prime(p+2)):
print(p, "is such twin prime with sum",c)
print(time.time()-start_time)
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
I am not the downvoter, but my guess is that it is because your script, the substance of your answer, is quite inefficient compared to some others that were posted.
$endgroup$
– Mees de Vries
Apr 4 at 14:32
$begingroup$
@MeesdeVries Updated it, please have a look.
$endgroup$
– tarit goswami
Apr 4 at 19:20
add a comment |
$begingroup$
$(3,5),(107,109)$ and $(2634011,2634013)$ are only such twin prime pairs below $10^7$. You can check for more by increasing the range using this small Python code below. I just run it upto $10^8$, $(29659499,29659501)$ and $(57395627,57395629)$ are only such pairs with $10^7<p<10^8$.
Edit:
For optimization purpose, I will use the fact that all primes more than $3$ can be represented in the form $6kpm 1$.
First let check manually for $p=2,3$. For $p=2$ it's clearly not possible. For $p=3$, we have $3+5=8=2^3$, so, $(3,5)$ is such pair.
Suppose, $p=6k-1$, with $p>5$, then we have $12k=n^3$. That means, $12|n^3$. But, as $n^3$ is a perfect cube, and we have $12=3cdot 2^2$, at least $3^3cdot 2^3=216$ will divide $n^3$. So, the pair $(108m^3-1,108m^3+1)$ will be such pair if both of them are prime.
While dealing with cubes, usually prefer to work in $mathbbZ_7$, as any cube is either of $0,1,6$ in this field,i.e; $n^3equiv 0,1,6pmod7$ . So, we can have $2p+2equiv 0pmod7$, which gives $pequiv 6pmod7$, or, $2p+2equiv 1pmod7$ which implies $pequiv 3pmod7$ or $2p+2equiv 6pmod7$ which implies $pequiv 2pmod7$. Hence, only $3$ pssibilities. Here is the updated program:
import math
import time
start_time=time.time()
def is_prime(n):
flag=0
if(n==2):
return True
if(n%2==0):
return False
else:
for i in range(3,int(math.sqrt(n))+1,2):
if(n%i==0):
flag=1
break
if(flag==0):
return True
return False
for i in range(1,1000):#change the number inside this braket to check for larger numbers
c=(6*i)**3
p=c//2-1
if(p%7==2 or p%7==4 or p%7==6):
if(is_prime(p) & is_prime(p+2)):
print(p, "is such twin prime with sum",c)
print(time.time()-start_time)
$endgroup$
$(3,5),(107,109)$ and $(2634011,2634013)$ are only such twin prime pairs below $10^7$. You can check for more by increasing the range using this small Python code below. I just run it upto $10^8$, $(29659499,29659501)$ and $(57395627,57395629)$ are only such pairs with $10^7<p<10^8$.
Edit:
For optimization purpose, I will use the fact that all primes more than $3$ can be represented in the form $6kpm 1$.
First let check manually for $p=2,3$. For $p=2$ it's clearly not possible. For $p=3$, we have $3+5=8=2^3$, so, $(3,5)$ is such pair.
Suppose, $p=6k-1$, with $p>5$, then we have $12k=n^3$. That means, $12|n^3$. But, as $n^3$ is a perfect cube, and we have $12=3cdot 2^2$, at least $3^3cdot 2^3=216$ will divide $n^3$. So, the pair $(108m^3-1,108m^3+1)$ will be such pair if both of them are prime.
While dealing with cubes, usually prefer to work in $mathbbZ_7$, as any cube is either of $0,1,6$ in this field,i.e; $n^3equiv 0,1,6pmod7$ . So, we can have $2p+2equiv 0pmod7$, which gives $pequiv 6pmod7$, or, $2p+2equiv 1pmod7$ which implies $pequiv 3pmod7$ or $2p+2equiv 6pmod7$ which implies $pequiv 2pmod7$. Hence, only $3$ pssibilities. Here is the updated program:
import math
import time
start_time=time.time()
def is_prime(n):
flag=0
if(n==2):
return True
if(n%2==0):
return False
else:
for i in range(3,int(math.sqrt(n))+1,2):
if(n%i==0):
flag=1
break
if(flag==0):
return True
return False
for i in range(1,1000):#change the number inside this braket to check for larger numbers
c=(6*i)**3
p=c//2-1
if(p%7==2 or p%7==4 or p%7==6):
if(is_prime(p) & is_prime(p+2)):
print(p, "is such twin prime with sum",c)
print(time.time()-start_time)
edited Apr 5 at 9:06
answered Apr 4 at 10:02
tarit goswamitarit goswami
2,1181422
2,1181422
$begingroup$
I am not the downvoter, but my guess is that it is because your script, the substance of your answer, is quite inefficient compared to some others that were posted.
$endgroup$
– Mees de Vries
Apr 4 at 14:32
$begingroup$
@MeesdeVries Updated it, please have a look.
$endgroup$
– tarit goswami
Apr 4 at 19:20
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I am not the downvoter, but my guess is that it is because your script, the substance of your answer, is quite inefficient compared to some others that were posted.
$endgroup$
– Mees de Vries
Apr 4 at 14:32
$begingroup$
@MeesdeVries Updated it, please have a look.
$endgroup$
– tarit goswami
Apr 4 at 19:20
$begingroup$
I am not the downvoter, but my guess is that it is because your script, the substance of your answer, is quite inefficient compared to some others that were posted.
$endgroup$
– Mees de Vries
Apr 4 at 14:32
$begingroup$
I am not the downvoter, but my guess is that it is because your script, the substance of your answer, is quite inefficient compared to some others that were posted.
$endgroup$
– Mees de Vries
Apr 4 at 14:32
$begingroup$
@MeesdeVries Updated it, please have a look.
$endgroup$
– tarit goswami
Apr 4 at 19:20
$begingroup$
@MeesdeVries Updated it, please have a look.
$endgroup$
– tarit goswami
Apr 4 at 19:20
add a comment |
$begingroup$
$p + (p + 2) = 2p + 2 = 2(p + 1)$
For the sum to be a cube, $p + 1$ must be divisible by 4, so that the sum becomes $2 times 4m^3$ for some integer $m$. So $p + 1$ is of the form $4m^3$.
$endgroup$
2
$begingroup$
Also, with the exception of the twin prime pair 3,5, every pair of twin primes must be of the form 6n-1,6n+1. Using your notation, you can further refine based on this to $p+1=108k^3$
$endgroup$
– Moko19
Apr 4 at 9:52
add a comment |
$begingroup$
$p + (p + 2) = 2p + 2 = 2(p + 1)$
For the sum to be a cube, $p + 1$ must be divisible by 4, so that the sum becomes $2 times 4m^3$ for some integer $m$. So $p + 1$ is of the form $4m^3$.
$endgroup$
2
$begingroup$
Also, with the exception of the twin prime pair 3,5, every pair of twin primes must be of the form 6n-1,6n+1. Using your notation, you can further refine based on this to $p+1=108k^3$
$endgroup$
– Moko19
Apr 4 at 9:52
add a comment |
$begingroup$
$p + (p + 2) = 2p + 2 = 2(p + 1)$
For the sum to be a cube, $p + 1$ must be divisible by 4, so that the sum becomes $2 times 4m^3$ for some integer $m$. So $p + 1$ is of the form $4m^3$.
$endgroup$
$p + (p + 2) = 2p + 2 = 2(p + 1)$
For the sum to be a cube, $p + 1$ must be divisible by 4, so that the sum becomes $2 times 4m^3$ for some integer $m$. So $p + 1$ is of the form $4m^3$.
answered Apr 4 at 9:36
11235813211123581321
352210
352210
2
$begingroup$
Also, with the exception of the twin prime pair 3,5, every pair of twin primes must be of the form 6n-1,6n+1. Using your notation, you can further refine based on this to $p+1=108k^3$
$endgroup$
– Moko19
Apr 4 at 9:52
add a comment |
2
$begingroup$
Also, with the exception of the twin prime pair 3,5, every pair of twin primes must be of the form 6n-1,6n+1. Using your notation, you can further refine based on this to $p+1=108k^3$
$endgroup$
– Moko19
Apr 4 at 9:52
2
2
$begingroup$
Also, with the exception of the twin prime pair 3,5, every pair of twin primes must be of the form 6n-1,6n+1. Using your notation, you can further refine based on this to $p+1=108k^3$
$endgroup$
– Moko19
Apr 4 at 9:52
$begingroup$
Also, with the exception of the twin prime pair 3,5, every pair of twin primes must be of the form 6n-1,6n+1. Using your notation, you can further refine based on this to $p+1=108k^3$
$endgroup$
– Moko19
Apr 4 at 9:52
add a comment |
2
$begingroup$
What do you want to do with other examples?
$endgroup$
– Dietrich Burde
Apr 4 at 9:50
6
$begingroup$
For $k le 10000$, there are $185$ values of $k$ where $p = 108k^3-1$ and $p+2$ are twin primes that sum to a cube. Following are some examples.. $107,2634011,29659499,57395627,104792291,271669247,485149499,cdots\ 83797007573051, colorred84537841287167, 88875400155587,89731703685707,89846291353499,cdots$
$endgroup$
– achille hui
Apr 4 at 10:23
1
$begingroup$
@taritgoswami it is a single line command using the CAS maxima
for k : 1 thru 10000 do if (primep(108*k^3-1) and primep(108*k^3+1)) then print(k," ",108*k^3-1);
$endgroup$
– achille hui
Apr 4 at 12:10
3
$begingroup$
oeis.org/A061308 is worth a look.
$endgroup$
– Barry Cipra
Apr 4 at 12:15
2
$begingroup$
similarly oeis.org/A240169
$endgroup$
– KBusc
Apr 4 at 16:00